Howard M. Druce

Rhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care

Background There is a need for more research on all forms of rhinosinusitis. Progress in this area has been hampered by a lack of consensus definitions and the limited number of published clinical trials. Objectives To develop consensus definitions for rhinosinusitis and outline strategies useful in clinical trials. Methods Five national societies, The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; The American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy; The American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; The American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; and the American Rhinologic Society formed an expert panel from multiple disciplines. Over two days, the panel developed definitions for rhinosinusitis and outlined strategies for design of clinical trials. Results Committee members agreed to adopt the term “rhinosinusitis” and reached consensus on definitions and strategies for clinical research on acute presumed bacterial rhinosinusitis, chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis, and classic allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Symptom and objective criteria, measures for monitoring research progress, and use of symptom scoring tools, quality-of-life instruments, radiologic studies, and rhinoscopic assessment were outlined for each condition. Conclusion The recommendations from this conference should improve accuracy of clinical diagnosis and serve as a starting point for design of rhinosinusitis clinical trials.

A clinical trial of ipratropium bromide nasal spray in patients with perennial nonallergic rhinitis

Intranasal ipratropium bromide has been shown to significantly reduce rhinorrhea. Use of a freon-propelled intranasal preparation has resulted in side effects associated with the drying properties of the propellant. The purpose of the present trial was to study the safety and efficacy of a new isotonic aqueous ipratropium bromide nasal spray pump, specifically in patients with perennial nonallergic rhinitis. Two hundred thirty-three patients participated in an 8-week double-blind parallel comparison of ipratropium bromide nasal spray with its vehicle, a saline solution. Treatment with the ipratropium spray resulted in a 30% reduction in rhinorrhea; this reduction was significantly greater than that seen with the saline vehicle. There was a modest reduction in postnasal drip, sneezing, and congestion with both treatments, which may be attributable to the salutary effects of the saline solution. Patients also perceived a significant reduction in the degree to which rhinorrhea interfered with their daily activities and moods. Treatment was well tolerated, with no drug-related systemic adverse events and no evidence of nasal rebound on discontinuation of treatment. Minor, infrequent episodes of nasal dryness and epistaxis were the only significant adverse events reported; these did not limit treatment.

Efficacy and safety of single and multiple doses of pseudoephedrine in the treatment of nasal congestion associated with common cold

Background Pseudoephedrine (60 mg) is widely used as an oral decongestant taken in tablet or syrup formulations every 4–6 hours for the treatment of nasal congestion associated with common cold and allergy. However, there are relatively few studies in the literature that have used objective measures of nasal airway resistance (NAR) to assess the efficacy of pseudoephedrine, and most studies use only a single dose of medication. The present study has the aims of studying the safety and efficacy of a new pseudoephedrine formulation after single and multiple doses in patients with URTI. Methods The study was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted over three study days at a single center. Patients suffering from nasal congestion associated with common cold were recruited and total NAR was measured by the technique of posterior rhinomanometry. NAR and subjective scores of nasal congestion were measured at baseline and after dosing with study medication, every hour over a four-hour period on day 1 after a single dose, and on day 3 after multiple doses of medication. Subjective scores of congestion/stuffiness were also made as a summary score at the end of each day of treatment. Results Two hundred and thirty-eight patients with nasal congestion associated with acute upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), mean age 20 years, were recruited to the study and received treatment. After a single dose on day 1 the pseudoephedrine group had a statistically significant lower area under the NAR curve than placebo (p = 0.006) for the primary efficacy variable area under the NAR curve from 0–3 hours (NAR AUC 0–3h), and similarly for the secondary efficacy variable NAR AUC 0–4h (p = 0.001). On day three after multiple doses, the pseudoephedrine group had a statistically significant lower NAR AUC 0–3h and AUC 0–4h than placebo (p < 0.001), On day 1, the pseudoephedrine group had significantly lower subjective scores for congestion than placebo visual analog scale (VAS) AUC 0–3h (p = 0.029) and similarly for VAS AUC 0–4h (p = 0.021). On day 3, the differences in subjective scores were not significantly different. The mean decrease from baseline of the summary score for congestion/stuffiness over the duration of the study was greater in the pseudoephedrine group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.016). On average, heart rate was between two and four beats per minute greater in the pseudoephedrine group compared to placebo. Five adverse events were reported in both treatment groups and these were deemed to be unrelated to treatment. Conclusion The results demonstrate that pseudoephedrine is a safe and effective treatment for nasal congestion associated with URTI. The results from the laboratory study on day 1 demonstrate by both objective and subjective measures of nasal congestion that a single dose of 60 mg pseudoephedrine is superior to placebo treatment. Support for the decongestant efficacy of multiple doses of pseudoephedrine is provided by objective measures on day 3 and subjective measures made over three days, but not by the VAS scores on day 3.

Efficacy of brompheniramine maleate for the treatment of rhinovirus colds

We tested the efficacy of brompheniramine maleate in a large randomized, controlled trial of volunteers with experimental rhinovirus colds. Brompheniramine (12 mg) or placebo was administered at 8:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. for < or = 4 days after the onset of symptoms (24, 36, or 48 hours after virus challenge). During the first 3 days of treatment (the first 4 days after virus challenge), nasal secretion weights were lower for infected evaluable subjects receiving brompheniramine (n = 113) than for controls (day 1: 4.3 g vs. 6.8 g; day 2: 4.8 g vs. 7.7 g; and day 3: 3.3 g vs. 5.3 g) (P < or = .03), as were rhinorrhea scores (day 1: 0.6 vs. 0.8; day 2: 0.5 vs. 0.8; and day 3: 0.3 vs. 0.5) (P < .03), sneeze counts (day 1: 1.8 vs. 3.6; day 2: 2.1 vs. 5.1; and day 3: 1.3 vs. 3.3) (P < or = .001), and sneeze severity scores (day 1: 0.3 vs. 0.6; day 2: 0.25 vs. 0.7; and day 3: 0.2 vs. 0.4) (P < .001) (n = 112). Cough counts were lower after day 1 of treatment for the brompheniramine group than for controls (4.7 vs. 7.9) (P = .05) (day 2 after virus challenge), and other symptoms were modestly reduced or were unaffected in the brompheniramine group. Total symptom scores were also lower for the brompheniramine group than for controls on treatment days 1 (4.8 vs. 6.0) (P = .03) and 2 (4.1 vs. 5.6) (days 2 and 3 after virus challenge) (P = .003). Treatment with brompheniramine was associated with the adverse effects of somnolence (n = 3) and confusion (n = 1). Brompheniramine was efficacious treatment for the sneezing, rhinorrhea, and cough associated with rhinovirus colds.

Adjuncts to Medical Management of Sinusitis

The basic principles of sinusitis therapy are to treat any Infection present, facilitate drainage, and promote drainage both during and after treatment to prevent recurrence. Adjunctive measures promoting ciliary function and drainage through the sinus ostia include the following nonpharmacologic measures: Steam, astringents, inhalations, saline, and hot, dry air. Pharmacologic measures include decongestants, topical corticosteroids for chronic sinusitis, mucoevacuants, and analgesics. Antihistamines are indicated for acute sinusitis only when a patient with concomitant allergies is symptomatic during the allergy season or after infection has been ruled out as the primary cause of sinusitis. Sinusitis may be associated with asthma, and some patients do not respond optimally to asthma therapy until their sinusitis is diagnosed and treated.

Use of ipratropium bromide nasal spray in chronic treatment of nonallergic perennial rhinitis, alone and in combination with other perennial rhinitis medications

To study the long-term safety and effectiveness of ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% in the treatment of nonallergic perennial rhinitis, we administered this medication for 1 year in an open-label trial involving 285 patients. Our intention was to maintain the highest protocol dose possible to gain a clearer picture of the long-term side effect profile of the compound. Ipratropium bromide was well tolerated with no serious side effects in this patient population. It provided a significant improvement in rhinorrhea throughout the year-long trial; only 17 of 285 patients (6%) were considered treatment failures. There was an improvement in patient quality of life, as well as a substantial reduction in the need for other medications (antihistamines, decongestants, and nasal steroids) used to treat perennial rhinitis symptoms.

The effects of an H1-receptor antagonist, terfenadine, on histamine-induced microcirculatory changes and vasopermeability in nasal mucosa

We used a nonsedating, selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist, terfenadine, to investigate the effects of antihistamines on the microcirculatory changes and vascular permeability induced by topical histamine provocation challenge. We assessed the former by the laser-Doppler measurement of blood flow, volume, and red blood cell speed, and the latter by analysis of albumin/total protein ratios in nasal lavages. Terfenadine reduced the mean symptom score and permeability changes (p less than 0.05) induced by histamine in a dose-related manner. Terfenadine had no effect on blood flow or other microcirculatory parameters. We propose that vascular effects of histamine in the nasal mucosa are not mediated uniquely through the H1 receptor.

In vivo detection of a novel macrophage-derived protein involved in the regulation of nasal mucus-like glycoconjugate secretion

BACKGROUND We recently described a novel 68 kd mucus secretagogue (MMS-68) derived from human monocytes, pulmonary macrophages, and a macrophage hybridoma, clone 63. We detected MMS-68 in monocyte culture supernatants from patients with steroid-dependent asthma and in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with chronic bronchitis by antigen capture ELISA and in normal lung tissue by immunohistochemistry. METHODS To determine a role for MMS-68 in the regulation of nasal mucus, we labeled human nasal turbinates with tritiated glucosamine and assayed for the ability of the previously purified MMS-68 (stock solution) to induce mucus-like glycoconjugate release (MLGC). We also performed immunohistochemistry stains with an anti-MMS-68 antibody (1-D-10) on frozen sections (n = 5) of nasal turbinates from patients with allergic and nonallergic rhinitis who were undergoing rhinoplasty and measured MMS-68 levels in nasal lavages from patients who were undergoing topical nasal histamine or methacholine challenge. RESULTS MMS-68 is a potent nasal MLGC secretagogue causing a dose-dependent increase in MLGC release in vitro. Staining revealed a subepithelial distribution for MMS-68. Antigen capture ELISA of nasal lavages demonstrated mean MMS-68 levels from saline control challenge of 0.9 +/- 0.5 micrograms MMS-68 per milligram of protein (n = 5), 8.6 +/- 1.4 micrograms MMS-68 per milligram of protein from histamine challenge and 20.7 +/- 2.3 micrograms MMS-68 per milligram of protein (n = 5) after methacholine challenge. CONCLUSION Taken together these data suggest that MMS-68 may play a role in the normal regulation of mucus secretion.

Anticholinergic properties of brompheniramine, chlorpheniramine, and atropine in human nasal mucosa in vitro

Brompheniramine and chlorpheniramine have anticholinergic activities, but the relative potency of these effects has not been well defined. The anticholinergic properties of brompheniramine, chlorpheniramine, and atropine were assessed in an in vitro model of human nasal mucosal glandular secretion. Methacholine was used as a cholinergic agonist to stimulate glandular secretion of 7F10-mucin. These drugs (0.01–1000 μM) or vehicle (saline) were added to explant cultures with and without 100 μM methacholine. 7F10-mucin concentrations were measured in culture supernatants after 2-hour incubations. The effective dose reducing methacholine-induced secretion (ED50) was determined. ED50 was 0.25 μM for atropine, 4.10 μM for brompheniramine, and 4.63 μM for chlorpheniramine. None of the anticholinergic drugs changed spontaneous glandular exocytosis. Brompheniramine and chlorpheniramine are equipotent anticholinergic agents in human nasal mucosa in vitro. Atropine was 16 to 19 times more potent.

Chronic Sinusitis and Rhinitis

In a 6-month period, 186 new patients with chronic nasal symptoms were evaluated. In addition to history and physical examination, all received sinus radiographs. A subset received epicutaneous skin tests to environmental aeroallergens. Patients were divided into five diagnostic categories to determine if history or physical findings could predict abnormal sinus radiographs. No symptom or group of symptoms proved diagnostic; however, no patient with allergic rhinitis had purulent nasal secretions. Positive skin tests occurred in the absence of typical allergy symptoms. Many patients had received inappropriate prior therapy with either surgery or antibiotics. We conclude that sinus radiographs should be obtained in all patients with chronic nasal symptoms not improved by routine therapy.