Howard N. Bockbrader

A saturable transport mechanism in the intestinal absorption of gabapentin is the underlying cause of the lack of proportionality between increasing dose and drug levels in plasma.

Gabapentin (l-(aminomethyl)cyclohexaneacetic acid) is a neuroprotective agent with antiepileptic properties. The structure is small (molecular weight less than 200), is zwitterionic, and resembles an amino acid with the exception that it does not contain a chiral carbon and the amino group is not alpha to the carboxylate functionality. Gabapentin is not metabolized by humans, and thus, the amount of gabapentin excreted by the renal route represents the fraction of dose absorbed. Clinical trials have reported dose-dependent bioavailabilities ranging from 73.8 ± 18.3 to 35.7 ± 18.3% when the dose was increased from 100 to 1600 mg. The permeability of gabapentin in the rat intestinal perfusion system was consistent with carrier-mediated absorption, i.e., a 75 to 80% decrease in permeability when the drug concentration was increased from 0.01 to 50 mM (0.46 ± 0.05 to 0.12 ± 0.04). Excellent agreement was obtained between the actual clinical values and the predicted values from in situ results for the fraction of dose absorbed calculated using the theoretically derived correlation, Fabs = 1 - exp(−2Peff) by Ami-don et al. (Pharm. Res. 5:651–654, 1988). The permeability values obtained for gabapentin correspond to 67.4 and 30.2% of the dose absorbed at the low and high concentrations, respectively. In the everted rat intestinal ring system, gabapentin shared an inhibition profile similar to that of L-phenylalanine. Characteristics of gabapentin uptake included cross-inhibition with L-Phe, sensitivity to inhibition by L-Leu, stereoselectivity as evidenced by incomplete inhibition by D-Phe, and lack of effect by Gly. Our findings support absorption of gabapentin by a saturable pathway, system L, shared by the large hydrophobic amino acids, L-Phe and L-Leu. The saturable absorption pathway makes a major contribution to the lack of proportionality in plasma levels of drug with increasing dose ob-served in the clinic.

Inter- and intra-subject variability in gabapentin absorption and absolute bioavailability.

UNLABELLED Gabapentin (GBP) is a non-metabolized, non-plasma protein bound, renally excreted antiepileptic drug that is actively absorbed via the system L amino acid transporter. Previous studies have demonstrated that gabapentin displays dose-dependent absorption. OBJECTIVES These studies were conducted to determine inter- and intra-subject variability of gabapentin absorption. Two prospective clinical studies in healthy adult volunteers were conducted. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to express variability of gabapentin absorption. METHODS Study A: 400-mg single dose, randomized, cross-over study to assess bioavailability of four different gabapentin formulations (n=20, 9 males, 11 females; mean age and weight 41 years, 75.1 kg). Plasma was serially collected up to 48 h and bioavailability (F) calculated post-dose to determine concentration-time curves (AUC). All four formulations were bioequivalent, thus repeated measures analysis was performed to assess inter-and intra-subject variability. Study B: 600-mg single dose study (n=50, 15 males, 35 females; mean age and weight 31.1 years, 72.7 kg) was conducted to determine inter-subject variability in gabapentin F. Urine was collected over 48 h and bioavailability (F) calculated. Urine and plasma gabapentin concentrations were measured by HPLC-UV. RESULTS Study A: Overall mean (CV) of GBP AUC values was 34.1+/-24 ug/h per ml. Inter-subject CV for AUC was 22.5% and intra-subject CV was 12.1%. Study B: Overall mean (SD) GBP F was 49.3+/-13.6%. Inter-subject CV of F was 27.6%. DISCUSSION The inter-subject variability in gabapentin absorption is substantially less than that of the inter-subject variability. This indicates that one would expect a wide range in gabapentin absorption between subjects; however, a much smaller variability within a subject. The within subject variability of gabapentin is small enough that plasma drug monitoring may be used to assess gabapentin absorption for a given subject and the benefit of dose individualization.

Pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in subjects with various degrees of renal function

The pharmacokinetics of oral gabapentin (400 mg) was studied in normal subjects and in subjects with various degrees of renal function. Sixty subjects participated in this three‐center study. None of the subjects were receiving hemodialysis. Plasma and urine samples were collected for up to 264 hours after dosing, and concentrations of gabapentin were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Apparent oral plasma clearance (CL/F) and renal clearance (CLR) of gabapentin decreased and maximum plasma concentration, time to reach maximum concentration, and half‐life values increased as renal function diminished. Gabapentin CL/F and CLR were linearly correlated with creatinine clearance. Total urinary recovery of unchanged drug was comparable in all subjects, indicating that the extent of drug absorption was unaffected by renal function. There was no evidence of gabapentin metabolism even in subjects with severe renal impairment. In summary, impaired renal function results in higher plasma gabapentin concentrations, longer elimination half‐lives, and reduced CL/F and CLR values. Based on pharmacokinetic considerations, it appears that the dosing regimen of gabapentin in subjects with renal impairment may be adjusted on the basis of creatinine clearance.

Gabapentin bioavailability: effect of dose and frequency of administration in adult patients with epilepsy

UNLABELLED Gabapentin (GBP) is a non-metabolized antiepileptic drug that is eliminated by renal excretion and displays saturable, dose dependent absorption. The recommended dosing schedule for GBP is t.i.d. At large daily doses, oral bioavailability (F) may be improved by giving the daily dose more frequently. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether switching GBP dosage regimen from t.i.d. to q.i.d. results in increased oral bioavailability. METHODS This study consisted of two parts; a computer simulated pharmacokinetic model and a clinical pharmacokinetic study in nine adult epileptic patients receiving 3600 mg/day and 11 receiving 4800 mg/day. All patients were evaluated during both t.i.d. and q.i.d. regimens. F were determined by calculation of percent of dose excreted unchanged using steady-state 24-h urine collections and were compared using a paired t-test. RESULTS At 3600 mg/day, mean F following t.i.d. and q.i.d. dosing were 38.7+/-22.1% and 40.0+/-18.9%, respectively (P=0.738). At 4800 mg/day, mean F following t.i.d. and q.i.d. dosing were 29.2+/-16.2% and 35.6+/-17.6%, respectively (P=0.006). DISCUSSION Good agreement was observed between values from this study and predicted values based on the pharmacokinetic model. Improved GBP F at doses of 3600 mg/day was not achieved with more frequent drug administration, and thus is not warranted. At 4800 mg/day, a 22% increase in F was observed with more frequent drug dosing. CONCLUSION GBP F may be significantly increased by q.i.d. versus t.i.d. dosing, depending upon dose level. This increase in F however must be balanced against the inconvenience of more frequent dosing. Therapeutic drug level monitoring may aid in the evaluation of such pharmacokinetic maneuvers.

Disposition of Gabapentin in Anuric Subjects on Hemodialysis

Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant drug, which in man is cleared solely by renal excretion and is not bound to plasma proteins. Because the clearance of gabapentin is dependent on renal function, the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin were investigated in anuric subjects maintained on hemodialysis. Plasma samples were obtained over an 8‐day period after administration of single oral 400‐mg doses of gabapentin. Pre‐ and post‐dialyzer plasma samples and dialysate samples from quantitative collection of dialyzer effluent were obtained during hemodialysis sessions performed 2, 4, and 7 days after dosing. A mean (SD) maximum gabapentin plasma concentration of 6.0 (2.4) μg/mL was achieved at 4.7 (2.1) hours post‐dose. The elimination half‐life of gabapentin on non‐hemodialysis days averaged 132 hours. Approximately 35% of the gabapentin dose was recovered in dialysate, and mean hemodialysis clearance of gabapentin was 142 (26) mL/min; approximately 93% of the dialyzer creatinine clearance. Gabapentin elimination half‐life during hemodialysis was approximately 4 hours. Systemic plasma gabapentin concentrations increased approximately 30% during the first 2 hours after hemodialysis as a result of drug redistribution in the body. It is recommended that patients with end‐stage renal disease maintained on hemodialysis receive an initial 300‐mg to 400‐mg gabapentin loading dose. Plasma gabapentin concentrations can be maintained by giving 200 to 300 mg of gabapentin after every 4 hours of hemodialysis.

Effects of age and gender on single-dose pharmacokinetics of gabapentin.

Summary: Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of age, age‐related changes in renal function, and gender on the single‐dose pharmacokinetics of orally administered gabapentin (GBP).

Single-dose gabapentin pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy infants and children.

Gabapentin (Neurontin®) is a gamma‐aminobutyric acid analogue indicated in adults for adjunctive treatment of partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. Two studies were conducted to determine the single‐dose pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in healthy subjects age 1 month to 12 years and to guide dose selection in safety and efficacy trials in pediatric patients. Forty‐eight subjects were given single oral doses of gabapentin (10 mg/kg) while fasting. Enrollment was homogeneously distributed throughout the age range. Plasma samples were drawn predose and then serially for 24 hours postdose. Single doses of gabapentin were well tolerated by healthy pediatric subjects. Plots of pharmacokinetic parameters versus age suggested significant differences between younger (1 month to < 5 years) and older (∞5 to 12 years) subjects. Mean area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from zero to infinity (AUC (0‐∞)) was 25.6 μg•h/mL in younger subjects and 36.0 μg•h/mL in older subjects (p < 0.001). Corresponding mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 3.74 and 4.52 μg/ml (p < 0.05). Oral clearance (normalized for body weight) was 7.40 and 4.41 mL/min/kg in younger subjects and older subjects, respectively (p < 0.001). It was concluded that children between 1 month and < 5 years of age require approximately 30% higher daily doses of gabapentin than those ≥ 5 to 12 years of age.

Impact of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis.

BackgroundContinued scepticism about the benefits of population pharmacokinetics and/or population pharmacodynamics, here referred to collectively as the population approach, hampers its widespread application in drug development. At the same time the sources of this scepticism have not been clearly defined. In an attempt to capture and clearly define these concerns and to help communicate the value of the population approach in drug development at Parke-Davis we conducted a survey of customers within the company. The results of this survey are presented here.MethodsAll drug development programmes conducted over the past 10 years that included a population approach in data analysis and interpretation were identified. A brief description of the population analysis was prepared together with a brief description of how the resulting information was used in each drug development programme. These synopses were forwarded to relevant members of each drug development team together with a survey designed to solicit opinions as to the relevance and impact of these analyses.ResultsThe most frequent use of information derived from population-based analysis was in labelling. In all cases of drugs making to New Drug Application (NDA) submission the analyses resulted in information that was included in approved or proposed labelling. In almost half of the cases summarised here (5 of 12), population-based analysis was perceived to have resulted in information that influenced the direction of individual development programmes. In many of these cases the information was serendipitous. It is also noted that most of these analyses were not the result of clearly defined objectives and prospective analysis plans.ConclusionsUse of the population approach, even when applied retrospectively, may have value in complementing or supporting interpretation of other data collected during the course of a trial. Atypical systemic exposure is quickly and easily assessed for correlation with adverse events or exceptional efficacy in retrospective or ad hoc evaluation. Although we know of no direct evidence, it is possible that such use of population pharmacokinetic data has facilitated NDA review and approval by providing insight into the role of atypical systemic drug exposure in otherwise spurious events.

Transport of Pregabalin in Rat Intestine and Caco-2 Monolayers

AbstractPurpose. The purpose of this study was to determine if the intestinal transport of pregabalin (isobutyl -γ-aminobutyric acid, isobutyl GAB A), a new anticonvulsant drug, was mediated by amino acid carriers with affinity for large neutral amino acids (LNAA). Methods. Pregabalin transport was studied in rat intestine and Caco-2 monolayers. An in vitro Ussing/diffusion chamber model and an in situ single-pass perfusion model were used to study rat intestinal transport. An in vitro diffusion chamber model was used to evaluate Caco-2 transport. Results. In rat ileum, pregabalin transport was saturable and inhibited by substrates of intestinal LNAA carriers including neurontin (gabapentin), phenylalanine, and proline. Weak substrates of intestinal LNAA carriers (β-alanine, -γ-aminobutyric acid, and methyl aminoisobutyric acid) did not significantly change pregabalin transport. In Caco-2 mono-layers that showed a high capacity for phenylalanine transport, pregabalin transport was concentration- and direction-independent and equivalent in magnitude to the paracellular marker, mannitol. The in vitro and in situ rat ileal permeabilities of the LNAA carrier-mediated compounds neurontin, pregabalin, and phenylalanine correlated well with the corresponding in vivo human oral absorption. Conclusions. The transport of pregabalin was mediated by LNAA carriers in rat ileum but not in Caco-2 monolayers. Caco-2 was not an appropriate model for evaluating the in vivo human oral absorption of pregabalin and neurontin.

Safety and tolerability of CI-979 in patients with alzheimer's disease

CI-979 ((E)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxaldehyde, O-methyloxime monohydrochloride), a novel muscarinic agonist, is being investigated as a potential treatment for Alzheimers disease (AD). The objective of the present study was to determine the safety and tolerance of multiple, rising, oral doses of CI-979 in patients with AD. Ten male patients aged 59 to 74 years (mean 65 years) who met NINCDS criteria for AD were randomized to receive either CI-979 (eight patients) or placebo (two patients) according to a double-blind, parallel-group, rising-dose design. Doses were 0.5-mg q6h, 1-mg q12h, 1-mg q6h, 2-mg q12h, 2-mg q6h, 2.5-mg q6h, and 3-mg q6h. All doses were to be administered sequentially for 3 days each with the exception of the 2.5-mg q6h dose, which was to be administered for 1.5 days. Five patients receiving CI-979 discontinued study medication because of adverse events; two after receiving 2-mg q6h (10 doses), two after 2.5-mg q6h (5 doses), and one after 3-mg q6h (4 doses). The study was terminated following administration of the fourth 3-mg dose due to the nature and intensity of adverse events. Cholinergic symptoms including diaphoresis, hypersalivation, nausea, diarrhea, hypotension, chills, headache, flatulence, and urinary frequency and signs suggestive of parkinsonism (cogwheeling, tremor, pillrolling, posturing, and shuffling gait) were dose-limiting. The frequency and intensity of adverse events increased with increasing CI-979 dose. No other clinically significant CI-979-related changes occurred in physical examinations, clinical laboratory measurements, electrocardiograms, or ophthalmologic examinations. Steady-state trough plasma CI-979 concentrations increased in proportion to dose. In summary, CI-979 doses of 1-mg q6h were well tolerated by all patients; 2-mg q6h was tolerated by most patients, and 2.5-mg and 3-mg doses were poorly tolerated, Dose titration to a maximum of 2-mg q6h will therefore be used in initial efficacy trials of CI-979 in patients with AD.