Howard N. Winfield

Relationship of Symptoms of Prostatism to Commonly Used Physiological and Anatomical Measures of the Severity of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

In previous studies the severity of symptoms of prostatism in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia have not correlated well with prostate size, degree of bladder trabeculation, uroflowmetry or post-void residual volume. As part of a prospective cohort study of benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment effectiveness in 4 university-based urology practices, we correlated symptom severity and these commonly used measures of disease severity. Symptom severity was quantified using the American Urological Association symptom index. Analyses were based on 198 outpatients completing a standardized evaluation (84 of these men have completed 6 months of followup after treatment with prostatectomy, balloon dilation, terazosin or watchful waiting). At baseline, symptom severity was not correlated with uroflowmetry, post-void residual, prostate size and degree of bladder trabeculation. However, symptom severity was much more strongly related to overall health status than the other measures. Reduction in symptoms with treatment did correlate with improvements in uroflowmetry. This poor baseline correlation with symptoms may reflect unreliability in measurement of the physiological/anatomical variables. Alternatively, these parameters may be measuring different pathophysiological phenomena.

Lower Extremity Neuropathies After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy on a Split-Leg Table

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Lower extremity neuropathies from prolonged lithotomy positioning have been well documented. When we initiated our robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) program in December 2002, we chose to use the split-leg table that allows patient support in a more anatomic position, hypothesizing that this would reduce risk of neurologic compression injuries. We report our incidence of lower extremity neuropathies associated with RALP using split-leg positioning and review patient and surgical variables associated with this complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed records of 377 patients who underwent RALP using a split-leg table. Patient data including height, weight, body mass index, age, and smoking status; surgical variables such as surgeon operative experience and intraoperative times were also assessed. Intraoperative time was defined as anesthesia induction to anesthesia emergence to more accurately measure total time patients spent in the split-leg position. RESULTS Of 377 patients, lower extremity neuropathies developed in 5 (1.3%) in the immediate postoperative period. Of all variables examined, only increased intraoperative time was identified as a potential risk factor for the development of this complication (496.2 ± 34.8 min vs 366.3 ± 96.1 min, P<0.001). Overall mean operative time for all patients was 368.0 ± 96.6 minutes. Three of the five patients had symptoms suggestive of a femoral mononeuropathy. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative time as defined in our study is a significant risk factor for development of postoperative neuropathy. We also found that split-leg positioning appears to put the femoral nerve at risk for injury, instead of the common peroneal nerve as has been previously reported from prolonged lithotomy positioning.

Lessons Learned from a Case of Calf Compartment Syndrome After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is rapidly gaining favor as a minimally invasive method to surgically address prostate cancer. The sophisticated equipment and unique positioning requirements of this technology require exceptional preparation and attention to detail to minimize the chance of surgical complications. We present the case of a 57-year-old man who developed left calf compartment syndrome after (robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy) requiring fasciotomies. We use this example to highlight specific areas of risk unique to the da Vinci Surgical System® using intraoperative photos to show danger areas as well as review basic positioning requirements common to all prolonged pelvic surgeries performed in Trendelenburg position.

Complications of Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed in the first 372 patients undergoing laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection at 8 medical centers. In 16 patients laparoscopic node dissection could not be completed due to patient body habitus or technical difficulties. Of these aborted procedures 14 occurred during the initial 8 dissections at each institution. A total of 55 complications (15%) occurred: 14 were noted in the intraoperative and 41 in the postoperative period. Of these patients 13 required open surgical intervention for the treatment of a complication. Complications included vascular injury (11 patients), viscus injury (8), genitourinary problems (10), functional/mechanical bowel obstruction (7), lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (5), infection/wound problem (5), lymphedema (5), anesthetic complications (2) and obturator nerve palsy (2). Based on our experience, there is a significant learning curve associated with performing laparoscopic pelvic node dissection. However, with experience and adherence to laparoscopic surgical principles, the risk of complications may be minimized.

Laparoscopic Varix Ligation

Varicocele, dilated veins in the pampiniform plexus, is frequently a contributing factor in male infertility. We performed outpatient laparoscopic varix ligation in 14 patients (5 bilaterally) with clinically evident varices and persistent oligospermia and/or asthenospermia. The spermatic artery was identified and preserved in all but 1 varix ligation. Mean interval to resumption of preoperative activity levels was 3.4 days. On average, patients consumed 8.4 tablets of acetaminophen (325 mg.) with codeine (30 mg.) during the recovery period. The procedure is effective and decreases postoperative morbidity.

Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons.

PURPOSE With the exponential growth of robotic urological surgery, particularly with robot assisted radical prostatectomy, guidelines for safe initiation of this technology are a necessity. Currently no standardized credentialing system exists to our knowledge to evaluate surgeon competency and safety with robotic urological surgery performance. Although proctoring is a modality by which such competency can be evaluated, other training tools and guidelines are needed to ensure that the requisite knowledge and technical skills to perform this procedure have been acquired. We evaluated the current status of proctoring and credentialing in other surgical specialties to discuss and recommend its application and implementation specifically for robot assisted radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the literature on safety and medicolegal implications of proctoring and the safe introduction of surgical procedures to develop recommendations for robot assisted radical prostatectomy proctoring and credentialing. RESULTS Proctoring is an essential mechanism for robot assisted radical prostatectomy institutional credentialing and should be a prerequisite for granting unrestricted privileges on the robot. This should be differentiated from preceptoring, wherein the expert is directly involved in hands-on training. Advanced technology has opened new avenues for long-distance observation through teleproctoring. Although the medicolegal implications of an active surgical intervention by a proctor are not clearly defined, the role as an observer should grant immunity from malpractice liability. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of guidelines and proctoring recommendations is necessary to protect surgeons, proctors, institutions and, above all, the patients who are associated with the institutional introduction of a robot assisted radical prostatectomy program. With no current guidelines we anticipate this article will serve as a catalyst of interorganizational discussion to initiate regulatory oversight of surgeon certification and proctorship.

Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy : An international perspective

OBJECTIVES To assess technical preferences and current practice trends of retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy. METHODS A questionnaire survey of 36 selected urologic laparoscopic centers worldwide was performed. RESULTS Twenty-four centers (67%) responded. Overall, 3988 laparoscopic procedures were reported: transperitoneal approach (n = 2945) and retroperitoneal/extraperitoneal approach (n = 1043). Retroperitoneoscopic/extraperitoneoscopic procedures included adrenalectomy (n = 74), nephrectomy (n = 299), ureteral procedures (n = 166), pelvic lymph node dissection (n = 197), bladder neck suspension (n = 210), varix ligation (n = 91), and lumbar sympathectomy (n = 6). Mean number of total laparoscopic procedures performed in 1995 per center was 41 (range 5 to 86). Major complications occurred in 49 (4.7%) patients and included visceral complications in 26 (2.5%) patients and vascular complications in 23 (2.2%). Open conversion was performed in 69 (6.6%) patients, electively in 41 and emergently in 28 (visceral injuries, n = 16; vascular injuries, n = 1 2). Retroperitoneoscopy/extraperitoneoscopy is gaining in acceptance worldwide: in 1993, the mean estimated ratio of transperitoneal laparoscopic cases versus retroperitoneoscopic/ extraperitoneoscopic cases per center was 74:26; however, in 1996 the ratio was 49:51. CONCLUSIONS Retroperitoneoscopy and pelvic extraperitoneoscopy are important adjuncts to the laparoscopic armamentarium in urologic surgery. The overall major complication rate associated with retroperitoneoscopy/extraperitoneoscopy was 4.7%.

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Initial Experience and Comparison to the Open Surgical Approach

During an 18-month period, 6 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies were attempted, 4 of which were successful. The surgical technique was modified and improved between cases aided by new laparoscopic instrumentation, such as the argon beam coagulator and the 7.5 MHz. ultrasonic sector scanning system. In a retrospective comparison between laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy, estimated blood loss was 525 ml. for the former versus 708 ml. for the latter procedure. However, operating time was more than 2 hours longer with the laparoscopic approach. The major advantages of the laparoscopic procedure appear to be a more rapid return to full diet, less postoperative pain and less requirement for parenteral narcotics. Despite the small size of this series and limited followup data, convalescence may be shortened by 4 weeks after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Patients with benign diseases of the kidney, especially with a duplicated collecting system, who require partial nephrectomy may be considered candidates for the laparoscopic approach. The advantages to the patient, however, may be offset by the technical demands on the surgeon.

Survey of neuromuscular injuries to the patient and surgeon during urologic laparoscopic surgery

OBJECTIVES Laparoscopy may be complicated by neuromuscular injuries, both to the patient and to the surgeon. We used a survey to estimate the incidence of these injuries during urologic laparoscopic surgery, to assess risk factors for these injuries, and to determine preventive measures. METHODS A survey of neuromuscular injuries associated with laparoscopy submitted to 18 institutions in the United States was completed by 18 attending urologists from 15 institutions. RESULTS From among a total of 1651 procedures, there were 46 neuromuscular injuries in 45 patients (2.7%), including abdominal wall neuralgia (14), extremity sensory deficit (12), extremity motor deficit (8), clinical rhabdomyolysis (6), shoulder contusion (4), and back spasm (2). Neuromuscular injuries were twice as common with upper retroperitoneal as with pelvic laparoscopy (3. 1% versus 1.5%). Among patients with neuromuscular injuries, those with rhabdomyolysis were heavier (means 91 versus 80 kg) and underwent longer procedures (means 379 versus 300 minutes), and those with motor deficits were older (means 51 versus 42 years of age). Of the surgeons, 28% and 17% reported frequent neck and shoulder pain, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although not common, neuromuscular injuries during laparoscopy do contribute to morbidity. Abdominal wall neuralgias, injuries to peripheral nerves, and joint or back injuries likely occur no more frequently than during open surgery, but risk of rhabdomyolysis may be increased. Positioning in a partial rather than full flank position may reduce the incidence of some injuries. Measures to reduce neuromuscular strain on the surgeon during laparoscopy should be considered.

Practice patterns in the treatment of large renal stones.

PURPOSE To determine the current practice patterns of a large group of urologists in the treatment of large renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS A survey was sent to all actively practicing members of the North Central Section of the American Urological Association. The questions pertained to age, time in practice, type of practice, time devoted to treating stones, residency training, case scenarios with treatment options, and whether they or a radiologist performed percutaneous access. The data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS The response rate was 51% (564/1102 surveys returned). Three quarters (73%) of the urologists were comfortable performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and 35% gave reasons they do not perform PCNL. Only 11% of those performing PCNL routinely obtained the percutaneous access themselves. Trends in the analysis included: (1) those trained to perform PCNL during residency were more often comfortable with this procedure; (2) younger urologists were more comfortable performing PCNL, even if they had been in practice for only a short time; (3) urologists in private practice were nearly as comfortable performing PCNL as were academic urologists; (4) urologists not comfortable with PCNL more often recommended SWL over PCNL as a primary treatment for moderate/large renal stones; and (5) few urologists routinely obtained percutaneous access themselves. CONCLUSIONS Many urologists trained in recent years are comfortable performing PCNL. The type of training received influences treatment recommendations, and percutaneous access is most often obtained by/in conjunction with radiologists. This information may be useful in guiding residency training programs in the preparation of residents for the treatment of large renal stones.