Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hs Gill is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hs Gill.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2013

Ten-year RSA-measured migration of the Exeter femoral stem

D W Murray; A. Gulati; Hs Gill

The Exeter femoral stem is a double-tapered highly polished collarless cemented implant with good long-term clinical results. In order to determine why the stem functions well we have undertaken a long-term radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study. A total of 20 patients undergoing primary Exeter total hip replacement for osteoarthritis using the Hardinge approach were recruited and followed with RSA for ten years. The stems progressively subsided and internally rotated with posterior head migration. The mean subsidence was 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 0.9) at two years and 1.3 mm (95% CI 1.0 to 1.6) at ten years. The mean posterior migration of the head was 0.7 mm (95% CI 0.5 to 0.9) at two years and 1.2 mm (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4) at ten years. There was no significant cement restrictor migration. The Exeter stem continues to subside slowly into the cement mantle in the long term. This appears to compress the cement and the cement bone interface, contributing to secure fixation in the long term.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2015

Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis

B. J. L. Kendrick; Bart L. Kaptein; Edward R. Valstar; Hs Gill; W. F. M. Jackson; C. A. F. Dodd; A J Price; D W Murray

The most common reasons for revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are loosening and pain. Cementless components may reduce the revision rate. The aim of this study was to compare the fixation and clinical outcome of cementless and cemented Oxford UKAs. A total of 43 patients were randomised to receive either a cemented or a cementless Oxford UKA and were followed for two years with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), radiographs aligned with the bone-implant interfaces and clinical scores. The femoral components migrated significantly during the first year (mean 0.2 mm) but not during the second. There was no significant difference in the extent of migration between cemented and cementless femoral components in either the first or the second year. In the first year the cementless tibial components subsided significantly more than the cemented components (mean 0.28 mm (sd 0.17) vs. 0.09 mm (sd 0.19 mm)). In the second year, although there was a small amount of subsidence (mean 0.05 mm) there was no significant difference (p = 0.92) between cemented and cementless tibial components. There were no femoral radiolucencies. Tibial radiolucencies were narrow (< 1 mm) and were significantly (p = 0.02) less common with cementless (6 of 21) than cemented (13 of 21) components at two years. There were no complete radiolucencies with cementless components, whereas five of 21 (24%) cemented components had complete radiolucencies. The clinical scores at two years were not significantly different (p = 0.20). As second-year migration is predictive of subsequent loosening, and as radiolucency is suggestive of reduced implant-bone contact, these data suggest that fixation of the cementless components is at least as good as, if not better than, that of cemented devices.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2015

Cemented versus cementlessOxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometricanalysis

B. J. L. Kendrick; Bart L. Kaptein; Edward R. Valstar; Hs Gill; W. F. M. Jackson; Christopher Dodd; A J Price; David W. Murray

The most common reasons for revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are loosening and pain. Cementless components may reduce the revision rate. The aim of this study was to compare the fixation and clinical outcome of cementless and cemented Oxford UKAs. A total of 43 patients were randomised to receive either a cemented or a cementless Oxford UKA and were followed for two years with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), radiographs aligned with the bone-implant interfaces and clinical scores. The femoral components migrated significantly during the first year (mean 0.2 mm) but not during the second. There was no significant difference in the extent of migration between cemented and cementless femoral components in either the first or the second year. In the first year the cementless tibial components subsided significantly more than the cemented components (mean 0.28 mm (sd 0.17) vs. 0.09 mm (sd 0.19 mm)). In the second year, although there was a small amount of subsidence (mean 0.05 mm) there was no significant difference (p = 0.92) between cemented and cementless tibial components. There were no femoral radiolucencies. Tibial radiolucencies were narrow (< 1 mm) and were significantly (p = 0.02) less common with cementless (6 of 21) than cemented (13 of 21) components at two years. There were no complete radiolucencies with cementless components, whereas five of 21 (24%) cemented components had complete radiolucencies. The clinical scores at two years were not significantly different (p = 0.20). As second-year migration is predictive of subsequent loosening, and as radiolucency is suggestive of reduced implant-bone contact, these data suggest that fixation of the cementless components is at least as good as, if not better than, that of cemented devices.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2015

Cemented versus cementlessOxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometricanalysis: A randomised controlled trial

B. J. L. Kendrick; Bart L. Kaptein; Edward R. Valstar; Hs Gill; W. F. M. Jackson; Christopher Dodd; A J Price; David W. Murray

The most common reasons for revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are loosening and pain. Cementless components may reduce the revision rate. The aim of this study was to compare the fixation and clinical outcome of cementless and cemented Oxford UKAs. A total of 43 patients were randomised to receive either a cemented or a cementless Oxford UKA and were followed for two years with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), radiographs aligned with the bone-implant interfaces and clinical scores. The femoral components migrated significantly during the first year (mean 0.2 mm) but not during the second. There was no significant difference in the extent of migration between cemented and cementless femoral components in either the first or the second year. In the first year the cementless tibial components subsided significantly more than the cemented components (mean 0.28 mm (sd 0.17) vs. 0.09 mm (sd 0.19 mm)). In the second year, although there was a small amount of subsidence (mean 0.05 mm) there was no significant difference (p = 0.92) between cemented and cementless tibial components. There were no femoral radiolucencies. Tibial radiolucencies were narrow (< 1 mm) and were significantly (p = 0.02) less common with cementless (6 of 21) than cemented (13 of 21) components at two years. There were no complete radiolucencies with cementless components, whereas five of 21 (24%) cemented components had complete radiolucencies. The clinical scores at two years were not significantly different (p = 0.20). As second-year migration is predictive of subsequent loosening, and as radiolucency is suggestive of reduced implant-bone contact, these data suggest that fixation of the cementless components is at least as good as, if not better than, that of cemented devices.


Orthopaedic Proceedings | 2012

CEMENTLESS FIXATION OF UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT DECREASES RADIOLUCENCY AT TWO YEARS

Bjl Kendrick; Hemant Pandit; C Jenkins; D Beard; Hs Gill; Aj Price; Caf Dodd; D W Murray


Orthopaedic Proceedings | 2009

A NEW DOMED TIBIAL LATERAL COMPONENT PROVIDES IMPROVED RANGE OF MOVEMENT & RETAINS NORMAL KINEMATICS FOR THE OXFORD UKR

B.H. van Duren; J. Gallagher; Hemant Pandit; D Beard; C. A. F. Dodd; Hs Gill; D W Murray


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2013

Cemented versus cementless fixation in Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at five years: a randomised controlled trial

Ad Liddle; H Pandit; C Jenkins; Aj Price; Hs Gill; C. A. F. Dodd; D W Murray


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2013

Recurrence of pseudotumour after revision surgery following metal on metal hip replacements

S Mehmood; Hemant Pandit; George Grammatopoulos; N. A. Athanasou; Simon Ostlere; Hs Gill; D W Murray; Sion Glyn-Jones


Orthopaedic Proceedings | 2012

HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE “GUIDED MOTION” OF MODERN TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS?

Bh van Duren; Hemant Pandit; S Tilley; M Price; Hs Gill; D W Murray; Neil P. Thomas


Orthopaedic Proceedings | 2012

AN IN-VIVO STUDY OF LINEAR PENETRATION IN THE OXFORD UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY AT TWENTY YEARS

Bjl Kendrick; Dj Simpson; Nj Bottomley; Bl Kaptein; Eh Garling; Hs Gill; Caf Dodd; D W Murray; Aj Price

Collaboration


Dive into the Hs Gill's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D W Murray

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. A. F. Dodd

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bart L. Kaptein

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward R. Valstar

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge