Hsieh Mc

Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND The survival benefit and morbidity after nodal dissection for gastric cancer remains controversial. We aimed to do a single-institution randomised trial to compare D1 (ie, level 1) lymphadenectomy with that of D3 (ie, levels 1, 2, and 3) dissection for gastric cancer in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. METHODS From Oct 7, 1993, to Aug 12, 1999, 335 patients were registered. 221 patients were eligible, 110 of whom were randomly assigned D1 surgery and 111 of whom were randomly assigned D3 surgery, both with curative intent. Three participating surgeons had done at least 25 independent D3 dissections before the start of the trial, and every procedure was verified by pathological analyses. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival. We also analysed risk of recurrence. Main analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at the US National Institute of Health website . FINDINGS Median follow-up for the 110 (50%) survivors was 94.5 months (range 62.9-135.1). Overall 5-year survival was significantly higher in patients assigned D3 surgery than in those assigned D1 surgery (59.5% [95% CI 50.3-68.7] vs 53.6% [44.2-63.0]; difference beteween groups 5.9% [-7.3 to 19.1], log-rank p=0.041). 215 patients who had R0 resection (ie, no microscopic evidence of residual disease) had recurrence at 5 years of 50.6% [41.1-60.2] for D1 surgery and 40.3% [30.9-49.7] for D3 surgery (difference between groups 10.3% [-3.2 to 23.7], log-rank p=0.197). INTERPRETATION D3 nodal dissection, compared with that of D1, offers a survival benefit for patients with gastric cancer when done by well trained, experienced surgeons.

Randomized clinical trial of morbidity after D1 and D3 surgery for gastric cancer

A randomized comparison of D1 (level 1 lymphadenectomy) and D3 (levels 1, 2 and 3 lymphadenectomy) dissection was performed to evaluate morbidity and effects on survival from gastric cancer.

Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND--No nodal grouping category of gastric cancer has been universally accepted for the grading of the effectiveness of therapeutic regimens. AIMS--To establish an appropriate nodal grouping as a forecaster of distant disease and test its validity as a determinant in survival. PATIENTS--Five hundred and ten patients who underwent curative resections for gastric cancer were studied. METHODS--Retrospectively analyse the prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes. RESULTS--A total of 17 176 lymph nodes with an average of 34 per specimen were removed, of which 2811 (16%) showed metastases. Among the 510 patients, 287 (56%) had lymph node metastases, with an average of 9.8 per metastatic case. The survival of all patients was related to their nodal status, an abrupt decrease in survival was seen between 0 and 1 and 4 compared with 5 or more modes while little difference in survival existed among 1, 2, 3, and 4, and among 5, 6, 7, and 8 positive nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of positive nodes (1-4, 5-8 versus > or = 9; relative risk 2.2) and depth of cancer invasion (three levels; relative risk 1.9) were independently correlated with survival. The current nodal stage was not a prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS--Gastric cancer patients with 0, 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and > 9 positive nodes may represent four appropriate prognostic groups and should be adopted for classification of nodal stage in gastric cancer.

Quality of Life of Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma after Curative Gastrectomy

Abstract. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated in 162 patients having radical gastrectomy for cancer. The results showed that more than half of the patients had a good appetite; they consumed a normal diet and a normal volume of food. Approximately 60% of the patients had weight loss of more than 5 kg. Patients who underwent a total gastrectomy had poor tolerance of normal food and frequent eating and body weight loss versus those who had a subtotal gastrectomy. Patients who underwent Billroth II reconstruction after a distal subtotal gastrectomy lost more body weight than those with a Billroth I anastomosis. The extent of lymphadenectomy did not influence the QOL. Patients under 65 years of age had a better QOL. Nearly all patients had normal work and daily living activities. Some patients appeared to lack energy or had a period of anxiety or depression. These data indicate that radical gastrectomy can be performed with an acceptable QOL for a potentially curable gastric carcinoma.

Complications Following D3 Gastrectomy: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial

IntroductionA single institutional surgical trial for gastric cancer had demonstrated increased morbidity but not mortality. This report analyzes risk factors affecting morbidity.MethodsRisk factors for morbidity in 221 patients treated with curative intent were evaluated in a prospective randomized trial comparing D1 and D3 surgery for curable gastric cancer.ResultsThe surgeon’s experience after 25 nodal dissections had no influence on surgical or overall complications, nor did the patients’ co-morbidity (e.g., respiratory system disease, cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus). Distal pancreatectomy negatively affected surgical morbidity [relative risk (RR) 6.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.869–20.626] and overall morbidity (RR 5.50, 95% CI 1.671–18.082). All of the patients with a distal pancreatectomy underwent concomitant splenectomy. Multivariate analysis found splenectomy and nodal dissection to be the only two independent risk factors adversely affecting operative morbidity. The RR of splenectomy for surgical complications was 4.19 (95% CI 1.327–13.208), and for overall complications it was 3.88 (95% CI 1.259–11.973). The RR of nodal dissection for surgical complications was 2.51 (95% CI 1.336–4.730), and for overall complications it was 1.93 (95% CI 1.149–3.255).ConclusionsSplenectomy (with or without pancreatectomy) and nodal dissection are risk factors for operative morbidity but not mortality.