Huang Lh

Cost-effectiveness analysis of neonatal hearing screening program in china: should universal screening be prioritized?

BackgroundNeonatal hearing screening (NHS) has been routinely offered as a vital component of early childhood care in developed countries, whereas such a screening program is still at the pilot or preliminary stage as regards its nationwide implementation in developing countries. To provide significant evidence for health policy making in China, this study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of NHS program implementation in case of eight provinces of China.MethodsA cost-effectiveness model was conducted and all neonates annually born from 2007 to 2009 in eight provinces of China were simulated in this model. The model parameters were estimated from the established databases in the general hospitals or maternal and child health hospitals of these eight provinces, supplemented from the published literature. The model estimated changes in program implementation costs, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for universal screening compared to targeted screening in eight provinces.Results and discussionA multivariate sensitivity analysis was performed to determine uncertainty in health effect estimates and cost-effectiveness ratios using a probabilistic modeling technique. Targeted strategy trended to be cost-effective in Guangxi, Jiangxi, Henan, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Hebei, Shandong, and Beijing from the level of 9%, 9%, 8%, 4%, 3%, 7%, 5%, and 2%, respectively; while universal strategy trended to be cost-effective in those provinces from the level of 70%, 70%, 48%, 10%, 8%, 28%, 15%, 4%, respectively. This study showed although there was a huge disparity in the implementation of the NHS program in the surveyed provinces, both universal strategy and targeted strategy showed cost-effectiveness in those relatively developed provinces, while neither of the screening strategy showed cost-effectiveness in those relatively developing provinces. This study also showed that both strategies especially universal strategy achieve a good economic effect in the long term costs.ConclusionsUniversal screening might be considered as the prioritized implementation goal especially in those relatively developed provinces of China as it provides the best health and economic effects, while targeted screening might be temporarily more realistic than universal screening in those relatively developing provinces of China.

Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing

BackgroundAlthough migrant workers account for the majority of newborns in Beijing, their children are less likely to undergo appropriate universal newborn hearing screening/rescreening (UNHS) than newborns of local non-migrant residents. We hypothesised that this was at least in part due to the inadequacy of the UNHS protocol currently employed for newborn babies, and therefore aimed to modify the protocol to specifically reflect the needs of the migrant population.MethodsA total of 10,983 healthy babies born to migrant mothers between January 2007 and December 2009 at a Beijing public hospital were investigated for hearing abnormalities according to a modified UNHS protocol. This incorporated two additional/optional otoacoustic emissions (OAE) tests at 24–48 hours and 2 months after birth. Infants not passing a screening test were referred to the next test, until any hearing loss was confirmed by the auditory brainstem response (ABR) test.ResultsA total of 98.91% (10983/11104) of all newborn children underwent the initial OAE test, of which 27.22% (2990/10983) failed the test. 1712 of the failed babies underwent the second inpatient OAE test, with739 failing again; thus significantly decreasing the overall positive rate for abnormal hearing from 27.22% to 18.36% ([2990–973 /10983)]; p = 0). Overall, 1147(56.87%) babies underwent the outpatient OAE test again after1-month, of whom 228 failed and were referred for the second outpatient OAE test (i.e. 2.08% (228/10983) referral rate at 1month of age). 141 of these infants underwent the referral test, of whom 103 (73.05%) tested positive again and were referred for a final ABR test for hearing loss (i.e. final referral rate of 1.73% ([228-38/10983] at 2 months of age). Only 54 infants attended the ABR test and 35 (0.32% of the original cohort tested) were diagnosed with abnormal hearing.ConclusionsOur study shows that it is feasible and practical to achieve high coverage rates for screening hearing loss and decrease the referral rates in newborn babies of migrant workers, using a modification of the currently employed UNHS protocol.

Characterization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in full-term newborns

OBJECTIVE To analyze the characteristics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) in full-term newborns. METHODS A total of 236 ears from 147 randomly selected full-term Chinese neonates (82 females and 65 males), who had passed the initial newborn hearing screening, were assessed for SOAEs using the Capella OAE equipment (Madsen, Denmark). The test was performed in a sound booth. RESULTS (1) The overall prevalence of SOAE was 56.77% of the ears. The prevalence of SOAEs was significantly higher in females (69.23%) than in males (41.51%, p<0.01), as well as in the right ears (64.17%) than in the left ears (49.14%, p<0.05). (2) The overall mean level of SOAE was 11.78±8.36dB SPL, with no significant differences between males (11.73±8.25dB SPL) and females (11.81±8.43dB SPL) or between the left (11.97±8.56dB SPL) and the right ears (11.65±8.22dB SPL). (3) The 25th and 75th percentiles of SOAE frequencies were 2.31 and 4.36kHz in females and 1.93 and 3.94kHz in males, which were statistically significantly different (p<0.01). In contrast, the SOAE frequency was not significantly different between ears (2.22-4.18kHz in the left ears and 2.17-4.14kHz in right ears). (4) The overall mean number of SOAEs was 3.70±2.75, with no significant differences in females (3.62±2.70) and males (3.86±2.87) or in right (3.70±2.55) and left ears (3.70±3.02). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence rate of SOAE is significantly higher in females than in males and in the right ears than in the left ears in Chinese newborns. The frequencies of the SOAEs in newborns appeared to be higher than those reported in normal-hearing adults in the literature.