Huapyong Kang

Gemcitabine-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome in pancreatic cancer: A case report and review of the literature

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare thrombotic complication characterized by a triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure. HUS may be caused by several different conditions, including infection, malignancy, and chemotherapeutic agents, such as mitomycin, cisplatin, and most recently, gemcitabine. The outcome of gemcitabine-induced HUS is poor, and the disease has a high mortality rate. This study reports a case of gemcitabine-induced HUS in a patient with pancreatic cancer in Korea.

The optimal serum pepsinogen cut-off value for predicting histologically confirmed atrophic gastritis

BACKGROUND Although serum pepsinogen tests are useful for predicting the presence of atrophic gastritis, the optimal cut-off values have not been fully evaluated. AIM To determine the optimal serum pepsinogen cut-off value for predicting atrophic gastritis. METHODS Patients scheduled for upper endoscopy at Severance Hospital, Korea, between August 2012 and October 2013, were recruited prospectively. Endoscopic biopsies for atrophic gastritis were obtained and histologically graded, based on the updated Sydney system. RESULTS Ninety-five patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 57.7±12.1 years, and 44.2% of the patients were male. Serum pepsinogen I/II ratios were lower in patients with atrophic gastritis than in those without it (antrum, 4.2±1.7 vs. 5.2±2.1, P=0.040; corpus, 3.3±1.9 vs. 5.4±1.9, P<0.001). Serum pepsinogen I/II ratios were significantly correlated with histologic atrophic gastritis (antrum, P=0.030; corpus, P<0.001). Using a cut-off value of 4.9, the sensitivity and specificity of the serum pepsinogen I/II ratio for predicting atrophic gastritis in the antrum were 68.2% and 60.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION The optimal serum pepsinogen I/II ratio cut-off values for atrophic gastritis of the antrum and for the corpus were 4.9 and 3.5, respectively. Serum pepsinogen I/II ratios, with these cut-off values, are useful for screening patients for the presence of atrophic gastritis.

Full-Dose Gemcitabine Is a More Effective Chemotherapeutic Agent Than 5-Fluorouracil for Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of full-dose gemcitabine-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (FG-CCRT) and conventional 5-fluorouracil CCRT (5FU-CCRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: 109 LAPC cases treated with FG-CCRT (n = 89) or 5FU-CCRT (n = 20) were reviewed retrospectively. The FG-CCRT group was composed of a full-dose gemcitabine monotherapy (1,000 mg/m2) arm and a combination therapy with cisplatin (70 mg/m2) arm. The 5FU-CCRT group used a radiosensitizing dose of 5-FU (500 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (20 mg/m2). Concurrent radiotherapy was targeted at the tumor with a 5-mm margin without lymph node irradiation. Results: Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher in the FG-CCRT group (ORR: 32.6 vs. 5%, p = 0.013; DCR: 79.8 vs. 50.0%, p = 0.006). FG-CCRT showed remarkable superiority to 5FU-CCRT for suppressing distant metastasis (18.0 vs. 45.0%, p = 0.017). Neutropenia (34.8 vs. 10%, p = 0.032) and thrombocytopenia (21.3 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.021) were more frequent in the FG-CCRT group as originally expected. When dividing the FG-CCRT group to gemcitabine monotherapy (GEM) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin, toxicities of the GEM subgroup were not different than those of the 5FU-CCRT group. Conclusion: FG-CCRT, especially full-dose gemcitabine monotherapy-based CCRT was more effective for the initial control of LAPC than 5FU-CCRT, and also relatively safe.

Efficacy and treatment-related adverse events of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in Korean population: A single-center cohort study

Pancreatic cancer has poor prognosis because of its rapid progression and treatment resistance. Based on the results of the Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (MPACT), a combination regimen of gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel is currently used as standard therapy for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, because studies in Asian populations are lacking, we investigated the treatment efficacy and safety of this combination therapy in Korean population. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (n=81) treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (1,000 and 125 mg/m2, respectively) as the first-line chemotherapy from January 2016 were identified using the Severance Hospital Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Registry. Treatment efficacy and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 10.7 months (range, 1.5-23.3 months). Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rates were 12.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7-not estimable), 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.0-11.8), and 46.9%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 neurotoxicity and neutropenia were 18.5% and 46.9%, respectively. Febrile neutropenia and grade ≥3 gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 13 (16.0%) and 16 (19.8%) patients, respectively. Dose reductions because of AEs were required in 60.5% of patients. The combination of gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel is an effective anti-cancer regimen in Korean population of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, careful monitoring and management are required because of occurrence of treatment-related AEs.