Hubert Potočnik
University of Ljubljana
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Hubert Potočnik.
Science | 2014
Guillaume Chapron; Petra Kaczensky; John D. C. Linnell; Manuela von Arx; Djuro Huber; Henrik Andrén; José Vicente López-Bao; Michal Adamec; Francisco Álvares; Ole Anders; Linas Balčiauskas; Vaidas Balys; Péter Bedő; Ferdinand Bego; Juan Carlos Blanco; Urs Breitenmoser; Henrik Brøseth; Luděk Bufka; Raimonda Bunikyte; Paolo Ciucci; Alexander Dutsov; Thomas Engleder; Christian Fuxjäger; Claudio Groff; Katja Holmala; Bledi Hoxha; Yorgos Iliopoulos; Ovidiu Ionescu; Jasna Jeremić; Klemen Jerina
The conservation of large carnivores is a formidable challenge for biodiversity conservation. Using a data set on the past and current status of brown bears (Ursus arctos), Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), gray wolves (Canis lupus), and wolverines (Gulo gulo) in European countries, we show that roughly one-third of mainland Europe hosts at least one large carnivore species, with stable or increasing abundance in most cases in 21st-century records. The reasons for this overall conservation success include protective legislation, supportive public opinion, and a variety of practices making coexistence between large carnivores and people possible. The European situation reveals that large carnivores and people can share the same landscape. Many populations of brown bears, lynx, grey wolves, and wolverines persist successfully outside protected areas in Europe. Success for Europes large carnivores? Despite pessimistic forecasts, Europes large carnivores are making a comeback. Chapron et al. report that sustainable populations of brown bear, Eurasian lynx, gray wolf, and wolverine persist in one-third of mainland Europe. Moreover, many individuals and populations are surviving and increasing outside protected areas set aside for wildlife conservation. Coexistence alongside humans has become possible, argue the authors, because of improved public opinion and protective legislation. Science, this issue p. 1517
PLOS Biology | 2016
John D. C. Linnell; Arie Trouwborst; Luigi Boitani; Petra Kaczensky; Djuro Huber; Slaven Reljić; Josip Kusak; Aleksandra Majić; Tomaz Skrbinsek; Hubert Potočnik; Matt W. Hayward; E. J. Milner-Gulland; Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar; Kirk A. Olson; Lkhagvasuren Badamjav; Richard Bischof; Steffen Zuther; Urs Breitenmoser
The ongoing refugee crisis in Europe has seen many countries rush to construct border security fencing to divert or control the flow of people. This follows a trend of border fence construction across Eurasia during the post-9/11 era. This development has gone largely unnoticed by conservation biologists during an era in which, ironically, transboundary cooperation has emerged as a conservation paradigm. These fences represent a major threat to wildlife because they can cause mortality, obstruct access to seasonally important resources, and reduce effective population size. We summarise the extent of the issue and propose concrete mitigation measures.
Journal of Natural History | 2007
Cene Fišer; Rok Keber; Vesna Kereži; Ajda Moškrič; Anja Palandančić; Vesna Petkovska; Hubert Potočnik; Boris Sket
The co‐occurrence of amphipods Niphargus timavi and Gammarus fossarum was studied. A small brook in SW Slovenia was sampled monthly for one year. Below the primary spring the brook sinks, flows for about 150 m below the surface and springs again. Gammarus fossarum never reached the stretch above the sink. Both species were found at all sampling sites below the secondary spring throughout the year, but the abundance of the two varied along the stream spatially and temporarily. Differences in life cycles between G. fossarum and N. timavi were not informative; however, the estimated reproductive potential of G. fossarum was much higher than of N. timavi. A result of the higher reproductive potential may be the dominance of gammarids in permanent waters, while N. timavi may invade a surrounding fissure system where it survives gammarid competition and summer desiccations when the gammarid population becomes extinct.
European Journal of Wildlife Research | 2014
Miha Krofel; Klemen Jerina; Franc Kljun; Ivan Kos; Hubert Potočnik; Nina Ražen; Petra Zor; Anamarija Žagar
Human harvest is the most important mortality factor for wild ungulates in Europe and can affect several aspects of ungulate biology. There is a growing concern about possible negative side effects of human harvest. To better understand the differences between human and natural mortality, we compared the extent, age and sex structure, nutritional condition, spatial and temporal distribution of human harvest, and natural predation by the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx on the European roe deer Capreolus capreolus, the most abundant wild ungulate in Europe. Compared to the human harvest, lynx were less likely to kill fawns and yearlings than adults, and among adult deer, lynx were more likely to kill females. The proportion of roe deer with fat-depleted bone marrow was higher among lynx prey than among harvested animals. Average lynx kill rate was estimated to 47.8 roe deer per year, and lynx predation was considerably lower than the human harvest in the same area. While human harvest increased with higher roe deer density, lynx predation was similar across the gradient of roe deer densities. Comparison with other countries indicated that differences between human harvest and natural mortality of ungulates vary considerably in different parts of Europe. Variation in hunting practices and, even more importantly, carnivore predation may have an important role in buffering unwanted side effects of harvest of wild ungulates.
Acta Theriologica | 2002
Hubert Potočnik; Franc Kljun; Jozko Racnik; Tomaz Skrbinsek; Miha Adamič; Ivan Kos
WildcatsFelis silvestris Schreber, 1775 were captured for radio collaring as a part of a study of their spatial distribution and social organisation in southern Slovenia between 1999 and 2001. Double-door box traps, with a roof that bears easily break (bear permeable traps), have been used to capture individuals. The distances between traps were between 550 to 2200 m. They were set out on logging roads and narrow trails in the forest. Nine wildcats, one lynx Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) and one feral cat were caught as target species and 19 badgersMeles meles and one bear cubUrsus arctos as non-targets. The catching success was 1 wildcat/58 trap-days and seems to be in correlation with the lunar cycle. Overall, 7 males and 2 female wildcats were captured which might indicate sex biased trapping selection. Methodological improvements shortened the time of handling procedures. Improved field protocols as well as restraining and immobilisation procedures increased reliability and safety of drug administrations, decreased potential chances for injuries and reduced overall stress of captured animals.
European Journal of Wildlife Research | 2004
Jožko Račnik; Tomaž Skrbinšek; N. Tozon; A. Nemec; Hubert Potočnik; Franc Kljun; Ivan Kos; Andrej Bidovec
Hematological, serum biochemistry, and urinalysis values were determined for nine (two females and seven males) adult, free-living European wildcats (Felis silvestris) in the Kocevje Forests of the southern Slovenia. Samples were collected from August 1999 to March 2001. Cats were anesthetized with ketamine and medetomidine. Blood samples were taken by jugular venipuncture and urine samples by bladder puncture. A control group of domestic cats (F. silvestris catus) was assembled to determine if differences exist among blood and urine values between free-living European wildcats and domestic cats. Hematological, biochemical, and urine parameters were similar to those of the control group. Values of glucose, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, mean corpuscular value, basophile count, and alanine aminotransferase were significantly higher than values of the control group. All urine samples contained white blood cells and proteins, and seven of them contained red blood cells.
(December 2012) | 2012
Michal Adamec; Francisco Álvares; O. Anders; Henrik Andrén; L. Balciauskas; V. Balys; P. Bedo; Ferdinand Bego; Juan Carlos Blanco; Luigi Boitani; Urs Breitenmoser; Henrik Brøseth; Luděk Bufka; R. Bunikyte; Guillaume Chapron; Paolo Ciucci; Aleksandar Dutsov; T. Engleder; C. Fuxjäger; C. Groff; M. Heltai; K. Holmala; B. Hoxha; Djuro Huber; Yorgos Iliopoulos; O. Ionescu; G. Ivanov; J. Jeremić; Klemen Jerina; Petra Kaczensky
Biological Conservation | 2016
Víctor Sazatornil; Alejandro Rodríguez; Michael R. Klaczek; Mohsen Ahmadi; Francisco Álvares; Stephen M. Arthur; Juan Carlos Blanco; Bridget L. Borg; Dean Cluff; Yolanda Cortés; Emilio J. García; Eli Geffen; Bilal Habib; Yorgos Iliopoulos; Mohammad Kaboli; Miha Krofel; Luis Llaneza; Francesca Marucco; John K. Oakleaf; David K. Person; Hubert Potočnik; Nina Ražen; Helena Rio-Maior; Håkan Sand; David Unger; Petter Wabakken; José Vicente López-Bao
European Journal of Wildlife Research | 2016
Nina Ražen; Alessandro Brugnoli; Chiara Castagna; Claudio Groff; Petra Kaczensky; Franci Kljun; Felix Knauer; Ivan Kos; Miha Krofel; Roman Luštrik; Aleksandra Majić; Georg Rauer; Davide Righetti; Hubert Potočnik
Aquatic Conservation-marine and Freshwater Ecosystems | 2010
Cene Fišer; Marjeta Konec; Zala Kobe; Miha Osanič; Pina Gruden; Hubert Potočnik