Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hugo Obertop is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hugo Obertop.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2001

Transthoracic Versus Transhiatal Resection for Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Meta-Analysis

Jan B. F. Hulscher; Jan G.P. Tijssen; Hugo Obertop; J. Jan B. van Lanschot

There is much controversy about the surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma: should an extensive resection be done to optimize long-term survival or should the extent of the operation be limited to obtain lower perioperative morbidity and mortality rates? We systematically reviewed the English-language literature published during the past decade, with emphasis on the differences between transthoracic and transhiatal resections regarding early morbidity, in-hospital mortality rates, and 3- and 5-year survival. Although transthoracic resections had significantly higher early (pulmonary) morbidity and mortality rates, 5-year survival was approximately 20% after both transthoracic and transhiatal resections.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2000

The recurrence pattern of esophageal carcinoma after transhiatal resection

Jan B. F. Hulscher; Johanna W. van Sandick; Jan G.P. Tijssen; Hugo Obertop; J. Jan B. van Lanschot

BACKGROUND There is much controversy about the optimal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus. Little is known about the pattern of recurrence after transhiatal resection for esophageal carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 149 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the mid or distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction between June 1993 and June 1997. Recurrence was classified as locoregional or distant recurrence. Nine patients with macroscopically evident tumor left after resection and three patients (2.0%) who died in the hospital were excluded from the analysis. This left 137 patients; 105 men and 32 women with a median age 65 years (range 37 to 84 years). RESULTS There were 95 adenocarcinomas (69.3%) and 42 squamous cell carcinomas (30.7%). Overall the median followup was 24.0 months (range 1.4 to 69.2 months). For patients alive at the end offollowup without recurrence, the median followup was 36.5 months (range 23.6 to 69.2 months). Seven patients died of other causes. The median interval between operation and recurrence was 11 months (range 1.4 to 62.5 months) for patients who had recurrence, with no significant difference in interval between locoregional and systemic recurrence. Seventy-two of the 137 patients (52.6%) developed recurrent disease. Thirty-two patients (23.4%) developed locoregional recurrence only, 21 patients (15.3%) developed systemic recurrence only, and 19 patients (13.9%) had a combination of both. In only 8.0% of all patients was there recurrence in the cervical lymph nodes. The most frequent sites of distant recurrence were liver (37.5%), bone (25.0%), and lung (17.5%). Recurrence was related to postoperative lymph node status (p<0.001) and the radicality of the operation (p<0.001) in multivariate analysis. Recurrence was not associated with localization or histologic type of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS Recurrence after transhiatal resection is an early event. Almost 40% of patients developed locoregional recurrent disease. For this patient group a more extended procedure may be of benefit, especially in the patients (23.4%) with locoregional recurrence in whom this is the only site of recurrent disease. But the potential benefit of a more extended procedure has to be balanced against a possible increase in perioperative morbidity and mortality.


Annals of Surgery | 2003

The need for a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary cancer - A prospective randomized multicenter trial with special focus on assessment of quality of life

N. Tjarda van Heek; Steve M. M. de Castro; Casper H.J. van Eijck; Rutger C.I. van Geenen; Eric J. Hesselink; Paul J. Breslau; T.C. Khe Tran; Geert Kazemier; Mechteld R. M. Visser; Olivier R. Busch; Hugo Obertop; Dirk J. Gouma

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy on the development of gastric outlet obstruction and quality of life in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer found during explorative laparotomy. Summary Background Data: Several studies, including one randomized trial, propagate to perform a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy routinely in patients with periampullary cancer found to be unresectable during laparotomy. Others suggest an increase of postoperative complications. Controversy still exists in general surgical practice if a double bypass should be performed routinely in these patients. Methods: Between December 1998 and March 2002, patients with a periampullary carcinoma who were found to be unresectable during exploration were randomized to receive a double bypass (hepaticojejunostomy and a retrocolic gastrojejunostomy) or a single bypass (hepaticojejunostomy). Randomization was stratified for center and presence of metastases. Patients with gastrointestinal obstruction and patients treated endoscopically for more than 3 months were excluded. Primary endpoints were development of clinical gastric outlet obstruction and surgical intervention for gastric outlet obstruction. Secondary endpoints were mortality, morbidity, hospital stay, survival, and quality of life, measured prospectively by the EORTC-C30 and Pan26 questionnaires. It was decided to perform an interim analysis after inclusion of 50% of the patients (n = 70). Results: Five of the 70 patients randomized were lost to follow-up. From the remaining 65 patients, 36 patients underwent a double and 29 a single bypass. There were no differences in patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, and surgical findings between the groups. Clinical symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction were found in 2 of the 36 patients (5.5%) with a double bypass, and in 12 of the 29 patients (41.4%) with a single bypass (P = 0.001). In the double bypass group, one patient (2.8%) and in the single bypass group 6 patients (20.7%) required (re-)gastrojejunostomy during follow-up (P = 0.04). The absolute risk reduction for reoperation in the double bypass group was 18%, and the numbers needed to treat was 6. Postoperative morbidity rates, including delayed gastric emptying, were 31% in the double versus 28% in the single bypass group (P = 0.12). Median postoperative length of stay was 11 days (range 4–76 days) in the double versus 9 days (range 6–20 days) in the single bypass group (P = 0.06); median survival was 7.2 months in the double versus 8.4 months in the single bypass group (P = 0.15). No differences were found in the quality of life between both groups. After surgery most quality of life scores deteriorated temporarily and were restored to their baseline score (t = −1) within 4 months. Conclusions: Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy significantly decreases the incidence of gastric outlet obstruction without increasing complication rates. There were no differences in quality of life between the two groups. Together with the previous randomized trial from the Hopkins group, this study provides sufficient evidence to state that a double bypass consisting of a hepaticojejunostomy and a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy is preferable to a single bypass consisting of only a hepaticojejunostomy in patients undergoing surgical palliation for unresectable periampullary carcinoma. Therefore, the trial was stopped earlier than planned.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2008

Preoperative Prediction of the Occurrence and Severity of Complications After Esophagectomy for Cancer With Use of a Nomogram

Sjoerd M. Lagarde; Johannes B. Reitsma; Anna-Karin D. Maris; Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen; Olivier R. Busch; Hugo Obertop; Aelko H. Zwinderman; J. Jan B. van Lanschot

BACKGROUND Predicting the severity of complications after esophagectomy may supply important information for both patient and surgeon. The aim of the present study was to develop a nomogram based on preoperative risk factors to predict the severity of complications in patients who undergo esophagectomy for cancer. METHODS A consecutive series of 663 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 1993 and August 2005 was used to develop a prognostic model. The model was validated in a second group of patients who were operated between August 2005 and November 2006. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the severity of complications. Diverse simple and conventional preoperative risk factors were evaluated. A nomogram was developed to enhance clinical applicability. RESULTS Patients were divided into three complication categories: those who suffered from no complications (n = 197); minor complications (n = 354); and major complications (n = 112). The following predictors remained in the model after multivariate analysis: higher age (p = 0.014); cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack (CVA/TIA) (p = 0.009) or myocardial infarction in the medical history (p = 0.066); lower forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV(1)) (p = 0.030); presence of electrocardiogram-changes (p = 0.008); and more extensive surgery (p < 0.001). A nomogram based on these variables was constructed. Overall agreement between the predicted probabilities and the observed frequencies was good in the development and the validation set. CONCLUSIONS The nomogram predicts the severity of complications for individual patients and may help in informing the patient before undergoing esophagectomy for cancer and in choosing the optimal extent of surgery. When externally validated, the nomogram may play a role in risk-adjusted audit of morbidity after esophagectomy.


Annals of Surgery | 2003

Immune Responses and Prediction of Major Infection in Patients Undergoing Transhiatal or Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Cancer

Johanna W. van Sandick; Suzanne S. Gisbertz; Ineke J. M. ten Berge; Marja A. Boermeester; Tineke C. T. M. van der Pouw Kraan; Theo A. Out; Hugo Obertop; J. Jan B. van Lanschot

ObjectiveTo investigate alterations in immune responses after transhiatal versus transthoracic esophageal resection and to evaluate the role of preoperative immune functions in predicting postoperative infectious complications. Summary Background DataImpaired immune defense is associated with a decreased resistance to infection. Patients undergoing esophageal resection via a transhiatal or transthoracic approach are prone to develop infectious complications. There are no randomized data on immune responses after two major surgical interventions. MethodsThe study group consisted of 20 patients who were randomly allocated to a limited transhiatal or extended transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Blood samples were taken before the operation and at regular intervals thereafter from day 1 to day 10. Monocyte and T-helper type 1 (Th1) and type 2 (Th2) lymphocyte functions were assessed in stimulated whole blood cultures. ResultsBoth surgical groups had severely depressed in vitro production of interleukin (IL)-12, IL-10, interferon-&ggr;, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-13 on postoperative day 1. Depression of Th2-type cytokine production was more profound after transthoracic than after transhiatal esophagectomy (IL-4, P = .005; IL-13, P = .007). Postoperative reduction in Th1-type cytokine production was similar between the two groups (interferon-&ggr;, P = .40; IL-2, P = .06). Irrespective of the surgical approach, patients who developed major infectious complications after surgery presented with a diminished T-cell cytokine production before the operation compared to those who had a relatively uneventful recovery (IL-4, P = .045; interferon-&ggr;, P = .064). In regression analysis, the occurrence of postoperative major infection was best predicted by increased duration of anesthesia (P < .0001) and low preoperative interferon-&ggr; production (P = .006). ConclusionsBoth transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy induced severely depressed monocyte and T-lymphocyte cytokine production. The extent of the surgical procedure had a differential immunosuppressive impact on Th2-type but not on Th1-type cell activity, indicating that the two Th pathways were downregulated through distinct mechanisms. Preoperative interferon-&ggr; determination would be useful to anticipate the occurrence of postoperative major infectious complications.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2002

Indicators of prognosis after transhiatal esophageal resection without thoracotomy for cancer

Johanna W. van Sandick; J. Jan B. van Lanschot; Fiebo J. ten Kate; Jan G.P. Tijssen; Hugo Obertop

BACKGROUND Various techniques have been described for the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The transhiatal approach has been debated for its safety and oncologic results. STUDY DESIGN Between January 1993 and September 1996, 115 patients underwent a transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent for adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Procedure-related hazards, pathologic results, and prognostic factors for survival were evaluated. Median duration of postoperative followup was 27 months (range 1 to 74 months) for all patients and 45 months (range 30 to 74 months) for those alive at final followup. RESULTS No emergency thoracotomies were experienced. In-hospital mortality was 3.5%. Vocal cord dysfunction (24%) and pulmonary complications (23%) were the most frequent early postoperative complications. A microscopically radical resection was achieved in 73% of patients. Overall survival was 45% at 3 years. In univariate analysis, the most pronounced indicators of longterm survival (p < 0.0001) were radicality of the resection, lymph node involvement, lymph node ratio (ie, the ratio of invaded to removed lymph nodes), and pathologic tumor stage. Multivariate analysis identified the lymph node ratio (p < 0.0001) as the strongest independent predictor of long-term survival, followed by radicality of the resection (p = 0.0064) and duration of ICU stay (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy can be considered a safe procedure for resectable cancer of the midesophagus, distal esophagus, or esophagogastric junction. Radicality and survival results were in line with the data reported for traditional transthoracic approaches. A prognostic value of the lymph node ratio was observed. It emphasizes the need for controlled trials aimed at delineating the prognostic impact of an extended lymph node dissection.


The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2006

Extracapsular lymph node involvement in node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction

Sjoerd M. Lagarde; Fiebo J. ten Kate; Daan J de Boer; Olivier R. Busch; Hugo Obertop; J. Jan B. van Lanschot

In adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, little attention has been paid to the biologic significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI). In the present study, a consecutive series of 251 patients with lymph node dissemination were reviewed. All patients underwent esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma and were prospectively followed. A total of 1562 positive lymph nodes were reexamined. Extracapsular LNI was identified in 456 lymph nodes (29%) in 166 patients (66%). Extracapsular LNI was confined to one lymph node in 63 patients (38%). The occurrence of extracapsular LNI increased significantly with the depth of invasion, presence of positive resectable truncal nodes, number of resected nodes, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio. The median potential follow-up period was 58 months (range, 12-143 months). In this period, 178 patients died of recurrent disease. The pattern of recurrence was comparable between patients with and without extracapsular LNI (P = 0.938). The median survival in patients with extracapsular LNI was 15 months (95% confidence interval, 12-18 months) compared with 41 months (95% confidence interval, 19-64 months) in those without extracapsular LNI (P < 0.001). Median survival of patients with 2 or more lymph nodes was 12 months (95% confidence interval, 8-15 monhts). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that T-stage, extracapsular LNI, and lymph node ratio were independent prognostic factors. The presence of extracapsular LNI identifies a subgroup with a significantly worse long-term survival. Together with the T-stage and the lymph node ratio, extracapsular LNI reflects a particularly aggressive biologic behavior and has significant prognostic potential.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2001

Benign tracheo-neo-esophageal fistulas after subtotal esophagectomy

Christianne J. Buskens; Jan B. F. Hulscher; Paul Fockens; Hugo Obertop; J. Jan B. van Lanschot

BACKGROUND Benign tracheo-neo-esophageal fistulas after esophagectomy are rare and treatment can be challenging. They can result from perioperative tracheal injury or various postoperative complications. METHODS Charts of 6 patients with a benign tracheoneo-esophageal fistula after subtotal esophagectomy treated in this institution between July 1993 and August 1999 were analyzed. RESULTS Three men and 3 women (median age 61 years) developed a fistula after subtotal esophagectomy. Symptoms varied from mild swallowing difficulties to aspiration pneumonia and mediastinitis. Two patients with mild symptoms were treated conservatively. In 1 patient a long fistula was partly excised through the neck. In 3 patients the gastric tube was excluded or excised, with surgical closure of the tracheal defect. The alimentary tract was reconstructed by colonic interposition. There were no major complications. After a median follow-up of 1.6 years, all fistulas were closed. All patients were capable of sufficient oral intake. CONCLUSIONS A benign tracheo-neo-esophageal fistula after esophagectomy is a rare, but serious complication. Site and size of the fistula, together with the severity of symptoms, should dictate management.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 1998

The prognosis of esophageal carcinoma staged irresectable (T4) by endosonography.

Paul Fockens; Karolien Kisman; Maruschka P. Merkus; J. Jan B. van Lanschot; Hugo Obertop; Guido N. J. Tytgat

BACKGROUND Endosonography is an accurate preoperative staging technique for esophageal carcinoma. We retrospectively investigated a cohort of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus or gastric cardia that was endosonographically staged to be irresectable and studied whether their survival was influenced by the treatment received. STUDY DESIGN Between April 1992 and July 1995, 654 patients were referred for endosonographic staging. We retrospectively searched our database for patients staged T4 and collected followup. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards model were used to study the effect of treatment and various other factors on survival. RESULTS Fifty-one patients (median age, 62 years; range, 44-87; 37 male) were staged T4 by endosonography. Followup was collected of all patients. Explorative surgery was chosen in 24 patients (47%), and the tumor was resected in 13 patients. Median survival in the surgical group was 9.67 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.03, 13.31) and 7.06 months (95% CI: 5.68, 8.44) in the nonsurgical group (not significant). Patients with infiltration in the respiratory tract had a 2.5 times higher risk of death than patients without (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.30, 4.96). CONCLUSIONS Patients staged irresectable by endosonography (T4 stage) have a very poor prognosis, regardless of further therapy. Survival of this group of patients was not influenced by surgery.


Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2005

Incidence and management of biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy

Steve M. M. de Castro; Koert F. D. Kuhlmann; Olivier R. Busch; Otto M. van Delden; Johan S. Laméris; Thomas M. van Gulik; Hugo Obertop; Dirk J. Gouma

This study analyzes the change in the management of biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy. Between 1993 and 2003 all patients (n = 1033) were studied with a hepaticojejunostomy as part of a pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 486), proximal bile duct resection (without liver resection) (n = 35), and biliodigestive bypass for malignant (n = 302) and benign (n = 210) disease. Biliary leakage was defined as the presence of bile-stained fluid (>50 mL) in the abdominal drain more than 24 hours after surgery, proven radiologically or at relaparotomy. The studied patients were divided into two equal periods to analyze the change in management. Overall, 24 of 1033 patients (2.3%) had biliary leakage. In multivariate analysis, a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2 (P = .012), endoscopic biliary drainage (P = .044), and an anastomosis on the segmental bile ducts (P < .001) were independent predictors of leakage. Management in the first half of the study period (1993-1998) versus the second half (1999–2003) was maintenance of operatively placed drains (18% vs. 15%, respectively, P = 1.000), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (18% vs. 69%, respectively, P = .012), surgical drainage (55% vs. 8%, respectively, P = .023), and re-hepaticojejunostomy (9% vs. 8%, respectively, P = 1.000). There was no mortality in the patients with biliary leakage. Leakage after a hepaticojejunostomy is a relatively rare complication without mortality and can safely be managed with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.

Collaboration


Dive into the Hugo Obertop's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge