Hugo R. Rosen

A bioartificial liver to treat severe acute liver failure.

ObjectiveTo test the safety and efficacy of a bioartificial liver support system in patients with severe acute liver failure. Summary Background DataSummary Background Data authors developed a bioartificial liver using porcine hepatocytes. The system was tested in vitro and shown to have differentiated liver functions (cytochrome P450 activity, synthesis of liver-specific proteins, bilirubin synthesis, and conjugation). When tested in vivo in experimental animals with liver failure, it gave substantial metabolic and hemodynamic support. MethodsSeven patients with severe acute liver failure received a double lumen catheter in the saphenous vein; blood was removed, plasma was separated and perfused through a cartridge containing 4 to 6 X 109 porcine hepatocytes, and plasma and blood cells were reconstituted and reinfused. Each treatment lasted 6 to 7 hours. ResultsResults patients tolerated the procedure(s) well, with neurologic improvement, decreased intracranial pressure (23.0 ± 2.3 to 7.8 ± 1.7 mm Hg; p < 0.005) associated with an increase in cerebral perfusion pressure, decreased plasma ammonia (163.3 ± 21.3 to 112.2 ± 9.8 μMoles/L; p < 0.01), and increased encephalopathy index (0.60 ± 0.17 to 1.24 ± 0.22; p < 0.03). All patients survived, had a liver transplant, and were discharged from the hospital. ConclusionsConclusions bioartificial liver is safe and serves as an effective “bridge” to liver transplant in some patients.

Orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C : Outcome, effect of immunosuppression, and causes of retransplantation during an 8-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVE To determine the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA HCV has become the leading cause of cirrhosis and hepatic failure leading to OLT. Recurrent HCV after OLT is associated with significant complications and may lead to graft loss that requires retransplantation (re-OLT). The authors studied the outcome of transplantation for HCV, the effect of primary immunotherapy, and causes of retransplantation. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of their experience during an 8-year period (1990-1997), during which 374 patients underwent transplants for HCV (298 [79.6%] received one OLT; 76 [20.4%] required re-OLT). Median follow-up was 2 years (range 0 to 8.3). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine in 190 patients and tacrolimus in 132 patients. In a third group of patients, therapy was switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus or from tacrolimus to cyclosporine (cyclosporine/tacrolimus group). RESULTS Overall, 1-, 2-, and 5-year actuarial patient survival rates were 86%, 82%, and 76%, respectively. The 2-year patient survival rate was 81 % in the cyclosporine group, 85% in the tacrolimus group, and 82% in the cyclosporine/tacrolimus group. In patients receiving one OLT, overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 85%, 81%, and 75%, respectively. The 2-year patient survival rate was 79% in the cyclosporine group, 84% in the tacrolimus group, and 80% in the cyclosporine/tacrolimus group. The overall graft survival rates were 70%, 65%, and 60% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. The graft survival rate at 2 years was similar under cyclosporine (68.5%), tacrolimus (64%), or cyclosporine/tacrolimus (60%) therapy. Re-OLT was required in 42 (11.2%) patients for graft dysfunction in the initial 30 days after OLT. Other causes for re-OLT included hepatic artery thrombosis in 10 (2.6%), chronic rejection in 8 (2.1%), and recurrent HCV in 13 (3.4%) patients. The overall survival rates after re-OLT were 63% and 58% at 1 and 2 years. The 1-year survival rate after re-OLT was 61 % for graft dysfunction, 50% for chronic rejection, 60% for hepatic artery thrombosis, and 60% for recurrent HCV. At re-OLT, 85.3% of the patients were critically ill (United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS] status 1); only 14.7% of the patients were UNOS status 2 and 3. In re-OLT for chronic rejection and recurrent HCV, the 1-year survival rate of UNOS 1 patients was 38.4%, compared with 87.5% for UNOS 2 and 3 patients. In patients requiring re-OLT, there was no difference in the 1-year patient survival rate after re-OLT when cyclosporine (60%), tacrolimus (63%), or cyclosporine/tacrolimus (56%) was used for primary therapy. With cyclosporine, three patients (1.5%) required re-OLT for chronic rejection versus one patient (0.7%) with tacrolimus. Re-OLT for recurrent HCV was required in four (3%) and seven (3.6%) patients with tacrolimus and cyclosporine therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Orthotopic liver transplantation for HCV is performed with excellent results. There are no distinct advantages to the use of cyclosporine versus tacrolimus immunosuppression when patient and graft survival are considered. Re-OLT is an important option in the treatment of recurrent HCV and should be performed early in the course of recurrent disease. Survival after re-OLT is not distinctively affected by cyclosporine or tacrolimus primary immunotherapy. The incidence of re-OLT for recurrent HCV or chronic rejection is low after either tacrolimus or cyclosporine therapy.

Graft loss following liver transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Liver disease due to hepatitis C (HCV) is an increasingly frequent indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of the current study was to analyze the causes of graft loss following OLT for chronic hepatitis C and the longterm outcome following retransplantation in a large university program. Between January 1990 and December 1995, 1183 patients underwent primary OLT at our center. In 304 patients, HCV was diagnosed by seropositivity and/or polymerase chain reaction. Fifty-six (18.4%) of these patients underwent retransplantation. The 36 patients retransplanted for primary non-function were excluded from further analysis. The other indications for regrafting (>30 days following primary transplant) included hepatic artery thrombosis (5), chronic rejection (4), severe HCV recurrence (5), and other etiologies (6). The cumulative survival rates for the 248 patients who received 1 OLT (group 1) were 84% after one year and 75% after three years. The corresponding rates for the 20 non-PNF patients who were retransplanted (group 2) were 60% and 43%, respectively (P<.0001). Moreover, logistic regression analysis confirmed that patients in group 2 were more than 4 times likely to die than patients in group 1 (P<.0034; risk ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval 1.61 to 11.37). Patients undergoing retransplantation had a high incidence of serious infectious complications leading to mortality. Two additional patients with severe recurrent HCV died awaiting liver retransplantation. Eight of the 304 total patients (2.6%) transplanted for chronic HCV developed graft failure secondary to HCV recurrence and 6 of the 8 were retransplanted; 3 of the 6 patients retransplanted are alive without evidence of histologic recurrence (mean follow-up less than 1 year). In summary, despite the high frequency of recurrent histologic evidence of HCV following primary OLT (70% at 3 years), graft loss attributable solely to HCV is an infrequent finding. Retransplantation per se is a risk factor for a fatal outcome, and the indication for reOLT does not appear to impact ultimate outcome. Serious infectious complications were the leading cause of mortality in patients retransplanted. Furthermore, given the indolent natural history of HCV, longer follow-up is necessary to determine the ultimate rate of graft loss due to HCV recurrence.

Hepatitis C and the Renal Transplant Patient

Our understanding of HCV is evolving rapidly. The question of the risk of transmission within HD units is still unsettled, and definitive recommendations about isolating HCV‐infected patients are not possible. Although RT does not appear to be deleterious in many HCV‐infected patients, histologic and clinical evidence of severe liver disease should be a contraindication to RT (Fig. 2). To assess the ultimate effect of RT in patients with HCV, longer‐term studies are required. The role of different viral genotypes in the outcome of HCV infection in RT recipients requires further investigation. Pending more conclusive results, use of organs from anti‐HCV‐positive donors, even when transplanted into anti‐HCV‐positive recipients, is best avoided. The role of antiviral agents in RT recipients also remains to be defined, but preliminary results with alpha‐interferon have been disappointing, showing limited efficacy and possibly inducing allograft dysfunction. Clearly, the distinction between viral and host factors in the evolution and severity of HCV infection remains the most fundamental issue in understanding the pathobiology of this disease and developing appropriate guidelines for management in the renal transplant patient.

Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management

Patients with peptic ulcer disease who do not have Helicobacter pylori infection or a history of NSAID use may have the syndrome. Acid secretion can be controlled medically, and tumor resection may be curative in selected patients.