Hussein S. Zaki

Differential treatment responses of TMD patients as a function of psychological characteristics

&NA; A number of studies have reported that psychological factors play a significant role in TMD. Several studies have identified subgroups of patients based on their responses to psychological assessments; however, none of these studies have reported on the clinical utility of classifications of TMD patients on these various measures. In this study, the differential response of 133 TMD patients classified within 3 psychosocial‐behaviorally based subgroups to a conservative, standardized treatment was examined. The treatment consisted of the combination of an intra‐oral appliance, biofeedback, and stress management. Follow‐up assessments were conducted 6 months after treatment termination. The results demonstrated that overall as a group patients significantly improved and maintained improvements on physical, psychosocial, and behavioral measures (P < 0.0001). Comparisons across patient subgroups, however, revealed differential patterns of improvement on the outcome measures. Most notably, reliable change indices demonstrated that the patients classified into a subgroup characterized by the greatest degree of psychological distress (Dysfunctional) demonstrated significantly greater improvements on measures of pain intensity (P < 0.001), perceived impact of TMD symptoms on their lives (P < 0.001), depression (P < 0.01), and negative thoughts (P < 0.001), compared with groups characterized by greater interpersonal problems (Interpersonally Distressed) and those patients who appeared to be the least disabled by TMD (Adaptive Copers). These data provide support for the clinical utility of a psychosocial‐behavioral classification system and suggest that in future research individualizing treatments and outcome measures based on patient characteristics may improve treatment efficacy and outcome evaluation.

Effects of intraoral appliance and biofeedback/stress management alone and in combination in treating pain and depression in patients with temporomandibular disorders

To assess the differential efficacy of two commonly used treatments for temporomandibular disorders (TMD), intraoral appliances (IAs) and biofeedback (BF), separately and in combination, two studies were conducted. The first study directly compared IA treatment, a combination of biofeedback and stress management (BF/SM), and a waiting list control group in a sample of 80 TMD patients. Both treatments were determined to be equally credible to patients, ruling out this potential threat to the validity of the results obtained. The results demonstrated that the IA treatment was more effective than the BF/SM treatment in reducing pain after treatment, but at a 6-month follow-up the IA group significantly relapsed, especially in depression, whereas the BF/SM maintained improvements on both pain and depression and continued to improve. The second study examined the combination of IA and BF/SM in a sample of 30 TMD patients. The results of this study demonstrated that the combined treatment approach was more effective than either of the single treatments alone, particularly in pain reduction, at the 6-month follow-up. These results support the importance of using both dental and psychologic treatments to successfully treat TMD patients if treatment gains are to be maintained.

An empirical taxometric alternative to traditional classification of temporomandibular disorders

&NA; A number of investigators have suggested that the generic classification temporomandibular disorders (TMD) may consist of several subsets of patients. Two primary factors are suggested to be significant in discriminating subgroups, namely, presence or absence of TM joint abnormalities and psychological characteristics such as traits, maladaptive behavioral patterns, and gross psychopathology. Few attempts, however, have been made to integrate psychosocial and behavioral parameters in order to identify a taxonomy of TMD patients and, subsequently, to examine the differentiation of subgroups on oral dysfunction/structural abnormalities (OD/SA). The primary purpose of this paper was to develop and cross‐validate an empirically derived classification system of TMD patients. The first study identified three unique subgroups of TMD patients, labeled ‘dysfunctional,’ ‘interpersonally distressed,’ and ‘adaptive copers.’ A second study cross‐validated and confirmed the uniqueness and accuracy of the taxonomy. Subsequent analyses were performed that demonstrated that these groups were not distinguishable on the basis of any measures of OD/SA. The taxonomy identified is compared and contrasted with other reported subgroups of TMD patients and the implications of this classification system for treatment of TMD patients are discussed.

Dysfunctional patients with temporomandibular disorders: Evaluating the efficacy of a tailored treatment protocol.

Forty-eight dysfunctional patients (i.e., high levels of pain, interference, and affective distress and low levels of perceived control) with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) were randomly assigned either to a treatment consisting of an intraoral appliance (IA) and stress management with biofeedback (SM) plus nondirective, supportive counseling (SC) -- IA + SM + SC -- or to a customized treatment that included cognitive therapy (CT) with the IA and SM--IA + SM + CT. Both treatment groups reported statistically significant reductions on a set of physical, psychosocial, and behavioral measures posttreatment and at a 6-month follow-up. However, the intervention that included CT demonstrated significantly greater reductions in pain, depression, and medication use. Only the groups receiving the treatment that included the CT demonstrated continued improvements to the follow-up on pain associated with muscle palpation, self-reported pain severity, depression, and use of medications. These results support the efficacy of the tailored treatment for dysfunctional TMD.

ELONGATED STYLOID PROCESS IN A TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDER SAMPLE : PREVALENCE AND TREATMENT OUTCOME

An elongated styloid process is an anatomic anomaly present in 2% to 30% of adults; it is occasionally associated with pain. Its prevalence among patients with classic temporomandibular disorder pain symptoms is unknown. The effect of conservative treatment on patients who have symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and an elongated styloid process is also unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of the elongated styloid process in a sample of patients with temporomandibular disorders and to compare patients with and without the elongated styloid process on initial presenting signs and symptoms and treatment outcome. A total of 100 panoramic radiographs of patients with symptomatic temporomandibular disorders were examined to ascertain the presence or absence of an elongated styloid process. All patients participated in a conservative treatment program of biofeedback and stress management and a flat-plane intraoral appliance. Initial symptoms and treatment outcome of patients with and without an elongated styloid process were compared by use of multivariate analysis of variance on several oral-paraoral and psychosocial-behavioral methods. The prevalence of an elongated styloid process in this clinic sample of temporomandibular disorders was 27%. The patients with or without an elongated styloid process were not significantly different in pretreatment symptoms, and both groups exhibited substantial treatment gains. However, patients with an elongated styloid process showed significantly less improvement on unassisted mandibular opening without pain than did patients who did not have an elongated styloid process. This suggests that an elongated styloid process may place structural limitations on pain-free maximum mandibular opening. The results support conservative management of patients with symptoms of temporomandibular disorders when an elongated styloid process is present.

A comparison of the effect of different occlusal forms in mandibular implant overdentures

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Posterior tooth form selection for implant overdentures is made according to personal preference and experience using the concepts of conventional complete denture prosthodontics. PURPOSE This study (1) compared the masticatory efficiency of three occlusal forms, 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and lingual contact (lingualized occlusion), in subjects with mandibular implant overdentures, and (2) determined their effects on the implant supporting tissues. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eight patients who had four root form implants in the mandibular symphysis area connected with a Hader bar were selected. Maxillary and mandibular dentures were constructed for each patient with interchangeable posterior segments and the three occlusal forms were tested. The masticatory efficiency for each posterior tooth form was assessed with objective food tests and a subjective patient preference questionnaire. Periodic evaluation of implant-supporting tissues also was performed. RESULTS Reliability analysis showed that all R1 coefficients were > or =0.80 (<0.001), indicating high subject consistency between multiple chewing efficiency trials. MANOVA analysis indicated a significant difference in chewing efficiency among the three occlusal forms (p < 0.001). The 0 degree occlusal form was associated with a significantly higher number of chewing strokes compared with 30 degrees or lingualized occlusal forms. The different occlusal forms were not found to have a clinically detrimental effect on the peri-implant soft or hard tissues. CONCLUSION Chewing efficiency tests and patient preference ratings showed that 30 degree teeth and lingual contact provided better chewing efficiency than 0 degree teeth. None of the tested occlusal forms showed any clinical or radiographic detrimental effect on the implant-supporting tissues.

A new approach in construction of nasal septal obturators

Nasal septal obturators are used to mechanically close nasal septal defects. The use of an impression of the nasal septal defect in the construction of nasal septal obturators is mandatory. A heat-cured, highly polished acrylic resin button constructed from an accurate impression is less likely to induce crusting and bleeding, or to be dislodged, than a Silastic button.

The influence of mandibular movements on joint sounds in patients with temporomandibular disorders

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM There are discrepancies among researchers concerning the reliability and use of temporomandibular joint sounds. PURPOSE This study examined the reliability of mandibular movements and sounds and determined the correlation between movements and sounds. MATERIAL AND METHODS The mandibular movements of 35 subjects diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders were recorded with 2 CCD cameras, and sounds were recorded bilaterally with Panasonic electret condenser microphones in the ear canal. Subjects performed 3 movements, each repeated 5 times. RESULTS Reliability of maximum movements across the 5 trials was good to excellent, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) between 0.76 and 0.91 for all movements except protrusion. Temporomandibular sound event counts were reliable for most movements, including vertical opening, protrusion, and right and left laterotrusion (ICCs between 0.41 and 0.81). Most subjects produced sound events either in 100% or in none of the trials. Reliability for sound events was better during protrusion (ICCs between 0.56 and 0.81) than vertical opening (ICCs 0.41 to 0.64). Subjects with sound events during vertical opening (followed by closing) were significantly more likely to have sound events during protrusion (followed immediately by vertical opening and closing) (P <.01). CONCLUSION Temporomandibular sound events are generally reliable and warrant study regarding their use in classifying and diagnosing patients with temporomandibular disorders. Condylar translation, which occurs during both vertical opening and protrusion, appears to have a strong influence on the production of temporomandibular sound events.

Prosthetic management of large nasal septal defects

Large nasal septal defect is defined as a defect that exceeds in size a stretched nostril. Large nasal septal defects cannot be closed by hard acrylic resin nasal septal obturators because of access and path-of-insertion problems. However, obturation can be achieved by construction of a nasal stent that fits into one of the nasal cavities. This article describes a procedure used to manage a large nasal septal defect with an intranasal heat-processed acrylic resin stent. The medial wall of the stent indirectly allows for the partition of the two nasal cavities. The stent is rendered patent to allow for comfortable breathing. The impression making and construction of these stents is not difficult. These nasal stents indirectly separate the two nasal cavities and effective obturation of large nasal septal defects is achieved.

A procedure for constructing dentures with interchangeable teeth

Studies that compare different types of complete denture teeth have repeatedly emphasized the importance of standardizing all denture factors, except the type of teeth. Within-subject comparisons have also been recommended to avoid personal differences between patients. For optimum results, one denture should be constructed for each patient with interchangeable teeth. This article describes a simple and accurate procedure for constructing dentures with interchangeable posterior teeth.