Hwan S. Joo

Nontechnical Skills in Anesthesia Crisis Management with Repeated Exposure to Simulation-based Education

Background:Critical incident reporting and observational studies have identified nontechnical skills that are vital to successful anesthesia crisis management. Examples of such skills include task management, team working, situation awareness, and decision making. These skills are not necessarily acquired through clinical experience and may need to be specifically taught. This study uses a high-fidelity patient simulator to assess the effect of repeated exposure to simulated anesthesia crises on the nontechnical skills of anesthesia residents. Methods:After institutional research board approval and informed consent, 20 anesthesia residents were recruited. Each resident was randomized to participate as the primary anesthesiologist in the management of three different simulated anesthesia crises using a high-fidelity patient simulator. After each session, videotaped footage was used to facilitate debriefing of their nontechnical skills. The videotapes were later reviewed by two expert blinded independent assessors who rated each residents nontechnical skills by using a previously validated and reliable marking system. Results:A significant improvement in the nontechnical skills of residents was demonstrated from their first to second session and from their first to third session (both P < 0.005). However from their second to third session, no significant improvement was observed. Interrater reliability between assessors was modest (single rater intraclass correlation = 0.53). Conclusion:A single exposure to anesthesia crises using a high-fidelity patient simulator can improve the nontechnical skills of anesthesia residents. However, an additional simulation session may confer little or no additional benefit.

Sevoflurane versus propofol for anesthetic induction: a meta-analysis.

We performed this meta-analysis to compare the characteristics of sevoflurane and propofol for the induction of routine anesthesia and for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. The variables assessed were 1) time to loss of consciousness, 2) incidence of apnea during induction, 3) induction complic

The intubating laryngeal mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways

We performed the current study to compare tracheal intubation (TI) using awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) and TI using the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) in patients with difficult airway. Our hypothesis was that patients with difficult airways could be safely intubated after induction of anesthesia using the ILMA. After ethics approval and informed consent, 38 patients who were identified to have difficult airways were randomly assigned to AFOI or TI using the ILMA. Patients in the AFOI group had the usual sedation and airway topicalization. Patients in the ILMA group were induced with propofol for ILMA insertion and succinylcholine for TI. The first TI attempt was done blindly via the ILMA and all subsequent attempts were performed with fiberoptic guidance. All patients in the ILMA group were successfully ventilated. Successful TI was achieved in all patients in both groups. However, in 10% of the patients in the ILMA group, TI was achieved by a second anesthesiologist who was more experienced with the use of the ILMA. In a postoperative questionnaire, patients in the ILMA group were more satisfied with their method of TI (P < 0.01). The ILMA is a useful device in the management of patients with difficult airways and may be a valuable alternative to AFOI when AFOI is contraindicated or in the patient with the unanticipated difficult airway.

The value of screening preoperative chest x-rays: a systematic review

PurposeChestx-ray (CXR) is the most frequently ordered radiological test in Canada. Despite published guidelines, variable policies exist amongst different hospitals for ordering of preoperative CXRs. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the value of screening CXRs and establish evidence to support guidelines for the use of preoperative screening CXRs.SourceMedline and Embase were searched under set terms for all English language articles published during 1966–2004. All eligible studies were reviewed and data were extracted individually by two authors. Of the 513 articles identified, 14 studies met both inclusion and exclusion criteria.Principal findingsThe quality of published evidence was modest as only six of the studies were rated as fair and eight as poor. Of the reported studies, diagnostic yield increased with age. However, most of the abnormalities consisted of chronic disorders such as cardiomegaly and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (up to 65%). The rate of subsequent investigations was highly variable (4–47%). When further investigations were performed, the proportion of patients who had a change in management was low (10% of investigated patients). Postoperative pulmonary complications were also similar between patients who had preoperative CXRs (12.8%) and patients who did not (16%).ConclusionAn association between preoperative screening CXRs and decrease in morbidity or mortality could not be established. As the prevalence of CXR abnormalities is low in patients under the age of 70, there is fair evidence that routine CXRs should not be performed for patients in this age group without risk factors. For patients over 70, there is insufficient evidence for or against performance of routine CXRs. The current recommendation from the Guidelines Association Committee that routine CXRs should not be performed for patients over 70 without risk factors is supported by this study.RésuméObjectifLa radiographie pulmonaire (RXP) est le test radiologique le plus demandé au Canada. Malgré les directives publiées, différentes politiques de demande de RXP préopératoires existent dans les hôpitaux. Nous voulions faire une revue systématique des documents sur la valeur des RXP de dépistage préopératoire et établir une preuve appuyant les directives sur leur usage.SourceNous avons passé en revue les bases Medline et Embase sous des termes déterminés pour tous les articles en anglais publiés de 1966 à 2004. Toutes les études admissibles ont été revues et les données extraites isolément par deux auteurs. Des 513 articles retenus, 14 études répondaient aux critères d’inclusion et d’exclusion.Constatations principalesLa qualité de la preuve publiée était modeste, car seulement six études ont été cotées acceptables et huit pauvres. Dans ces études, le rendement diagnostique augmentait avec l’âge. Cependant, la majorité des anomalies étaient des troubles chroniques comme la cardiomégalie et la maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique (jusqu’à 65 %). Le taux d’examens subséquents était très variable (4–47 %). Quand d’autres tests étaient effectués, une faible proportion (10 % des patients testés) de patients voyaient leur traitement modifié. Les complications pulmonaires postopératoires étaient aussi similaires chez les patients qui avaient eu (12,8 %) ou non (16 %) des RXP préopératoires.ConclusionUne association entre les RXP de dépistage préopératoire et une baisse de la morbidité ou de la mortalité n’a pas pu être établie. Comme la prévalence des anomalies détectées lors des RXP était faible chez les patients de moins de 70 ans, il semble évident que des RXP de routine ne devraient pas être réalisés pour les patients de ce groupe d’âge sans facteurs de risque. Pour les patients de plus de 70 ans, la preuve est insuffisante pour décider s’il y a lieu de procéder à des RXP de routine. La recommandation actuelle du Comité des directives de l’Association voulant que les RXP de routine ne soient pas réalisés pour les patients de plus de 70 ans sans facteurs de risque est soutenue par notre étude.

Fiberoptic Oral Intubation : The Effect of Model Fidelity on Training for Transfer to Patient Care

Background:Previous studies have indicated that fiberoptic orotracheal intubation (FOI) skills can be learned outside the operating room. The purpose of this study was to determine which of two educational interventions allows learners to gain greater capacity for performing the procedure. Methods:Respiratory therapists were randomly assigned to a low-fidelity or high-fidelity training model group. The low-fidelity group was guided by experts, on a nonanatomic model designed to refine fiberoptic manipulation skills. The high-fidelity group practiced their skills on a computerized virtual reality bronchoscopy simulator. After training, subjects performed two consecutive FOIs on healthy, anesthetized patients with predicted “easy” intubations. Each subjects FOI was evaluated by blinded examiners, using a validated global rating scale and checklist. Success and time were also measured. Results:Data were analyzed using a two-way mixed design analysis of variance. There was no significant difference between the low-fidelity (n = 14) and high-fidelity (n = 14) model groups when compared with the global rating scale, checklist, time, and success at achieving tracheal intubation (all P = not significant). Second attempts in both groups were significantly better than first attempts (P < 0.001), and there was no interaction between “fidelity of training model” and “first versus second attempt” scores. Conclusions:There was no added benefit from training on a costly virtual reality model with respect to transfer of FOI skills to intraoperative patient care. Second attempts in both groups were significantly better than first attempts. Low-fidelity models for FOI training outside the operating room are an alternative for programs with budgetary constraints.

Evaluation of patient simulator performance as an adjunct to the oral examination for senior anesthesia residents

Background: Patient simulators possess features for performance assessment. However, the concurrent validity and the “added value” of simulator-based examinations over traditional examinations have not been adequately addressed. The current study compared a simulator-based examination with an oral examination for assessing the management skills of senior anesthesia residents. Methods: Twenty senior anesthesia residents were assessed sequentially in resuscitation and trauma scenarios using two assessment modalities: an oral examination, followed by a simulator-based examination. Two independent examiners scored the performances with a previously validated global rating scale developed by the Anesthesia Oral Examination Board of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Different examiners were used to rate the oral and simulation performances. Results: Interrater reliability was good to excellent across scenarios and modalities: intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.77 to 0.87. The within-scenario between-modality score correlations (concurrent validity) were moderate: r = 0.52 (resuscitation) and r = 0.53 (trauma) (P < 0.05). Forty percent of the average score variance was accounted for by the participants, and 30% was accounted for by the participant-by-modality interaction. Conclusions: Variance in participant scores suggests that the examination is able to perform as expected in terms of discriminating among test takers. The rather large participant-by-modality interaction, along with the pattern of correlations, suggests that an examinees performance varies based on the testing modality and a trainee who “knows how” in an oral examination may not necessarily be able to “show how” in a simulation laboratory. Simulation may therefore be considered a useful adjunct to the oral examination.

Personalized Oral Debriefing Versus Standardized Multimedia Instruction After Patient Crisis Simulation

BACKGROUND: Simulation experience alone without debriefing is insufficient for learning. Standardized multimedia instruction has been shown to be useful in teaching surgical skills but has not been evaluated for use as an adjunct in crisis management training. Our primary purpose in this study was to determine whether standardized computer-based multimedia instruction is effective for learning, and whether the learning is retained 5 wk later. Our secondary purpose was to compare multimedia instruction to personalized video-assisted oral debriefing with an expert. METHODS: Thirty anesthesia residents were recruited to manage three different simulated resuscitation scenarios using a high-fidelity patient simulator. After the first scenario, subjects were randomized to either a computer-based multimedia tutorial or a personal debriefing of their performance with an expert and videotape review. After their respective teaching, subjects managed a similar posttest resuscitation scenario and a third retention test scenario 5 wk later. Performances were independently rated by two blinded expert assessors using a previously validated assessment system. RESULTS: Posttest (12.22 ± 2.19, P = 0.009) and retention (12.80 ± 1.77, P < 0.001) performances of nontechnical skills were significantly improved in the standardized multimedia instruction group compared with pretest (10.27 ± 2.10). There were no significant differences in improvement between the two methods of instruction. CONCLUSION: Computer-based multimedia instruction is an effective method of teaching nontechnical skills in simulated crisis scenarios and may be as effective as personalized oral debriefing. Multimedia may be a valuable adjunct to centers when debriefing expertise is not available.

A Comparison of Patient-controlled Sedation Using Either Remifentanil or Remifentanil-propofol for Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) has been used for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) because it allows for rapid individualized titration of anesthetics. Because of its sedating effects, the addition of propofol to remifentanil may improve patient tolerance of SWL with PCS. One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil 10 &mgr;g or remifentanil 10 &mgr;g plus propofol 5 mg for PCS with zero-lockout interval. Nine patients in the Remifentanil group and three patients in the Remifentanil-Propofol group required additional sedatives to complete their SWL (P = 0.128). Compared with the Remifentanil group, the Remifentanil-Propofol group required less remifentanil, had a decreased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and had a better overall satisfaction level. However, they had an increased incidence of transient apnea and oxygen desaturation. The incidence of apnea was 15% in the Remifentanil group and 52% in the Remifentanil-Propofol group (P < 0.001). All patients were able to move themselves to the stretcher at the end of SWL, and median time to home discharge was <70 min in both groups. Both remifentanil and remifentanil-propofol were useful for PCS during SWL.

Cognitive aid for neonatal resuscitation: a prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND Retention of skills and knowledge after neonatal resuscitation courses (NRP) is known to be problematic. The use of cognitive aids is mandatory in industries such as aviation, to avoid dependence on memory when decision-making in critical situations. We aimed to prospectively investigate the effect of a cognitive aid on the performance of simulated neonatal resuscitation. METHODS Thirty-two anaesthesia residents were recruited. The intervention group had a poster detailing the NRP algorithm and the control group did not. Video recordings of each of the performances were analysed using a previously validated checklist by a peer, an expert anaesthetist, and an expert neonatologist. RESULTS The median (IQR) checklist score in the control group [18.2 (15.0-20.5)] was not significantly different from that in the intervention group [20.3 (18.3-21.3)] (P=0.08). When evaluated by the neonatologist, none of the subjects correctly performed all life-saving interventions necessary to pass the checklist. A minority of the intervention group used the cognitive aid frequently. CONCLUSIONS Retention of skills after NRP training is poor. The infrequent use of the cognitive aid may be the reason that it did not improve performance. Further research is required to investigate whether cognitive aids can be useful if their use is incorporated into the NRP training.

High-fidelity simulation demonstrates the influence of anesthesiologists' age and years from residency on emergency cricothyroidotomy skills.

BACKGROUND:Age-related deterioration in both cognitive function and the capacity to control fine motor movements has been demonstrated in numerous studies. However, this decline has not been described with respect to complex clinical anesthesia skills. Cricothyroidotomy is an example of a complex, lifesaving procedure that requires competency in the domains of both cognitive processing and fine motor control. Proficiency in this skill is vital to minimize time to reestablish oxygenation during a “cannot intubate, cannot ventilate” scenario. In this prospective, controlled, single-blinded study, we tested the hypothesis that age affects the learning and performance of emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy in a high-fidelity simulated cannot intubate/cannot ventilate scenario. METHODS:Thirty-six staff anesthesiologists (19 aged younger than 45 years and 17 older than 45 years) managed a high-fidelity cannot intubate/cannot ventilate scenario in a high-fidelity simulator before and after a 1-hour standardized training session. The group division cutoff age of 45 years was based on the median age of our sample subject population before enrollment. The scenarios required the insertion of an emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy. We compared cricothyroidotomy skills in the older group with those in the younger group using procedural time, 5-point task-specific checklist score, and global rating scale score. Correlation based on age, years from residency, weekly clinical hours worked, previous continuing medical education in airway management, and previous simulation experience was also performed. RESULTS:In both prestandardization and poststandardization, age and years from residency correlated with procedural time, checklist scores, and global rating scores. Baseline, prestandardization variables were all better for the younger group, with a mean age of 37 years, compared with the older group, with a mean age of 58 years. Procedural time was 100 (72–128) seconds versus 152 (120–261) seconds. Checklist scores were 7.0 (6.1–8.0) versus 6.0 (4.8–8.0). Global rating scale scores were 22.0 (17.8–29.8) versus 17.5 (10.4–20.6). After the 1-hour standardized training session, the younger group continued to perform better than the older group with procedural time of 75 (66–91) seconds versus 87 (78–123) seconds, checklist scores of 10.0 (9.1–10.0) versus 9.0 (8.0–10.0), and global rating scale scores of 35.0 (32.1–35.0) versus 32.0 (29.0–33.8). Regression analysis was performed on the poststandardization data. Both age and years from residency independently affected procedural time, checklist scores, and global rating scale scores (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Baseline proficiency with simulated emergency cricothyroidotomy is associated with age and years from residency. Despite standardized training, operator age and years from residency were associated with decreased proficiency. Further research should explore the potential of using age and years from residency as factors for implementing periodic continuing medical education.