Hwang Gy

Emerging erythromycin resistance among group B streptococci in Korea.

Abstractu2002In order to determine possible trends in the susceptibility and distribution of group B streptococci (GBS) serotypes in a Korean population and to elucidate any relationship between the serotypes and the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns found, 185 clinical isolates of GBS were investigated between 1990 and 1998. The rate of erythromycin resistance increased from 0% during the period 1990–1995 to 26% in 1996 and 40% in 1998. The overall rates of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin were 20% and 22.2%, respectively. GBS serotype V was not detected until 1995, but it was isolated in 1996 and ranked third in frequency (18.8%) in 1997. Among the 37 erythromycin-resistant strains detected, 54.1% and 29.7% were of serotype III and V, respectively. The emerging erythromycin resistance detected among these GBS isolates was mainly due to a sudden increase in the incidence of GBS serotypes with multidrug-resistant phenotypes.

Distributions of Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B Resistance Phenotypes in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococi

Background: Increased resistance rates to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics among clinical isolates of staphylococci are considered as a consequence of an expanded use of these antibiotics in the treatment of Gram-positive infections. The proportion of MLSB resistance phenotypes of staphylococci is quite different by geographical variations and study periods. The aim of the present study was to determine the distribution of MLSB resistance phenotypes among clinical isolates of staphylococci in a university hospital. Methods: The MLSB resistance phenotypes of clinical isolates of staphylococci were investigated by the double-disk diffusion test using erythromycin and clindamycin disks. Results: Of 7,916 isolates, 55.7% exhibited a constitutive resistance phenotype (cMLSB) whereas 8.1% expressed an inducible resistance phenotype (iMLSB). Among 3,419 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 32.6% and 10.0% exhibited cMLSB and iMLSB resistance phenotypes, respectively. Of 4,497 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 73.1% and 6.8% were cMLSB and iMLSB resistance phenotypes, respectively. cMLSB was detected among 90.2% of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 46.5% of methicillin-resistant CNS (MRCNS), 3.2% of methicillin-susceptible CNS (MSCNS), and 2.2% of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). iMLSB was detected among 16.5% of MSSA, 11.5% of MRCNS, 6.7% of MSCNS, and 4.4% of MRSA. Conclusion: MLSB resistance was more prevalent among S. aureus isolates than CNS strains. Although cMLSB was the most frequently detected resistance phenotype among the total staphylococcal isolates, methicillin-susceptible strains exhibited somewhat higher iMLSB resistance rates compared with methicillin-resistant strains. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2008; 11:78-83)

Frequency and Clinical Characteristics of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Staphylococcus saprophyticus

Background: Staphylococcus saprophyticus is the second most common cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in young women. As little is known about the incidence of UTIs caused by this organism in Korea, we examined its frequency and clinical characteristics. Methods: We analyzed the frequency of S. saprophyticus among organisms isolated from urine specimens in Wonju Christian Hospital from July 1996 to June 2008 and reviewed clinical characteristics retrospectively. Results: Of 24,277 strains isolated from urine specimens during the past 12 years, 21 (0.09%) were S. saprophyticus. Outpatients were more common in the S. saprophyticus group than in all patients group (12 of 21, 57% vs 5,098 of 24,277, 21%). The incidence of S. saprophyticus in women was the highest in the group of 15 to 34 years of age. Monthly distributions of isolates were almost constant in all patient groups, while 16 of 21 (76%) cases of the S. saprophyticus group occurred in summer and fall (June to November). Conclusion: The fequencies of S. saprophyticus among organisms isolated from urine specimens in all patient groups and women were 0.09% and 0.17%, respectively, and are much lower than those in other countries. However, we need further studies to examine the prevalence of S. saprophyticus UTIs in other regions of this country. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2009;12:62-66)

Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of RAPIDEC CARBA NP Test for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Background: Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)producing Enterobacteriaceae are resistant to most β-lactam antibiotics except carbapenems. In recent years, infrequently isolated Enterobacteriaceae that produce carbapenemase pose a serious threat in the selection of appropriate therapeutic antibiotics. The rapid detection method of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is necessary to prevent the spread of CPE into healthcare facilities. Methods: One hundred clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates (Klebsiella pneumoniae 40, Escherichia coli 40, others 20) showing susceptibility to carbapenems and positivity in the CLSI ESBL phenotypic test from November 2015 to March 2016 and 59 stocked Enterobacteriaceae isolates harboring resistance genes producing carbapenemase (K. pneumoniae 56, Enterobacter cloacae 2, E. coli 1; types of CPE: KPC 36, GES 12, NDM 6, VIM 2, OXA 2, IMP 1) were subjected to the RAPIDEC CARBA NP test (bioMerieux, France) and CPE phenotypic test using the modified Hodge test (MHT) and carbapenemase inhibition test. Results: All of the 100 Enterobacteriaceae isolates with carbapenem susceptibility and ESBL positivity were negative on the RAPIDEC CARBA NP test and CPE phenotypic test. Of 59 stock CPE isolates, 53 and 42 showed positive results to the RAPIDEC CARBA NP test and MHT, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the RAPIDEC CARBA NP test for detecting CPE were 89.8% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The RAPIDEC CARBA NP test is simple and produces a result within 3 hr. In conclusion, the test is a useful screen for detecting CPE because it shows high sensitivity and specificity for CPE detection. (Ann Clin Microbiol 2016;19:59-64)