Hyo Euy Sohn

Heterogeneity of pseudohypoparathyroidism type I from the aspect of urinary excretion of calcium and serum levels of parathyroid hormone

SummaryUrinary excretion of calcium (Ca) was measured in 9 patients with pseudohypoparathyroidism (PHP) type I—3 with Albrights hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO): AHO(+) and 6 without AHO: AHO(−)—and in 13 with idiopathic hypoparathyroidism (IHP), treated with active vitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3 or 1αOHD3) to maintain serum Ca levels at 8.4–9.5 mg/dl. Fasting urinary excretion of Ca in PHP was significantly lower than that in IHP. Moreover, fasting urinary excretion of Ca in PHP AHO(+) was lower than that in PHP AHO(−). This difference was also seen in the urine after oral loading of Ca. Urinary excretion, of sodium (Na) was not different between PHP AHP(+) and PHP AHO(−). Serum levels of immunoreactive PTH in PHP AHO(+) were higher than those in PHP AHO(−). The difference in urinary excretion of Ca between PHP AHO(+) and PHP AHO(−) may come from the difference in the circulating levels of PTH.

Human PTH(1–34) infusion test in differential diagnosis of various types of hypoparathyroidism: an attempt to establish a standard clinical test

To introduce a simple procedure and reliable diagnostic criteria for parathyroid hormone (PTH) infusion test, 128 patients with either pseudo- (PsH) or idiopathic hypoparathyroidism (IdH) and 25 normocalcemic controls were studied. Incremental responses of urinary cyclic AMP and phosphate to 20 micrograms (67 U) or 30 micrograms (100 U) of human PTH(1-34) were assessed by using simple parameters of urinary excretion rates of the two substances. The results are summarized as follows. (1) PTH dose-cyclic AMP response relation suggests that 100 U of PTH is more appropriate than 67 U as a standard test dose for adults. (2) By presenting the magnitude of cyclic AMP response as either net increase or fold increase during 1 h after 100 U of PTH infusion, we can differentiate PsH type I from others without overlap. (3) Differentiation between PsH and IdH or normocalcemic subjects by phosphaturic response is less clearcut than that made by cyclic AMP response whatever indices and criteria are used. Thus it seems difficult to diagnose PsH type II merely based on the discrepancy between cyclic AMP and phosphaturic responses to exogenous PTH. (4) The test results are essentially similar in the examinations performed before and during vitamin D therapy. However, when the magnitude of phosphaturic response is expressed as net increase during 2 h after PTH, it tends to be enhanced after vitamin D therapy in patients with PsH compared to the response before therapy.

Suppressibility of Parathyroid Function in Primary Hyperparathyroidism as Estimated

The effects of calcium injection (3 mg/Kg/10 min) or oral calcium administration (calcium lactate 7.7 g) on plasma iPTH and Nephrogenous cyclic AMP (NcAMP) were studied in 6 normal controls and 13 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. In the control subjects, plasma iPTH determined by a predominantly carboxyl-terminal antiserum was less than 0.3 ng/ml before and after both calcium loads, whereas 41 approximately 98% (mean 67%) of NcAMP was rapidly and uniformly suppressed to a level lower than the normal value. In 2 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, iPTH was clearly reduced from 8.0 to 4.6 ng/ml and 1.6 to 0.96 ng/ml, respectively, by the calcium load. However, in the other 7 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who showed only a slight elevation of iPTH: less than 0.3 approximately 0.9 ng/ml, the reductions in iPTH were not detected after the calcium load: less than 0.3 approximately 0.7 ng/ml. In contrast, 30 approximately 54% (1.02 approximately 3.85 nmol/dl GF) of NcAMP, which was greater than the diurnal variation, was suppressed after calcium injection in 5 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (2 of 4 patients with urological, and 3 of 5 patients with chemical hyperparathyroidism). But NcAMP was not suppressed in all 4 patients with skeletal hyperparathyroidism including one with proximal renal tubular dysfunction whose basal iPTH was elevated markedly but reduced clearly by the calcium load. In general, suppression of NcAMP was followed by a decrease of phosphate excretion. On the other hand, even in a patient with primary hyperparathyroidism whose NcAMP was not suppressed at all after the calcium injection, calcium infusion (15 mg/Kg/3h) resulted in some (23%) decrease in NcAMP. Oral calcium administration resulted in responses which were almost the same as those produced by calcium injection. These results suggest that NcAMP provides a useful index in the parathyroid suppression test in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, especially those who display a rather mild elevation of iPTH. This is not the case, however, in a few patients who show a marked elevation of iPTH and/or proximal renal tubular dysfunction.