I. Aidonidis

Ranolazine enhances the antiarrhythmic activity of amiodarone by accelerating conversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.

Ranolazine is a relatively novel antiischemic/antianginal compound with antiarrhythmic properties. We investigated its ability to shorten the time to conversion of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) when added to amiodarone after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. In this prospective, randomized, allocation-concealed, single-blind, single-site clinical trial, we enrolled consecutive eligible patients who developed POAF after elective on-pump CABG surgery. Participants were randomized to receive either ranolazine 375 mg twice daily orally plus intravenous amiodarone (active group) or intravenous amiodarone alone (control group). We enrolled 41 patients; 20 in the active and 21 in the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, procedural duration, extracorporeal circulation time, and aortic cross-clamp time. Mean time of conversion was significantly shorter in the active group (19.9 ± 3.2 vs 37.2 ± 3.9 hours, P < .001), suggesting that compared to amiodarone alone, the ranolazine–amiodarone combination had a superior antiarrhythmic effect against POAF.

Ranolazine-induced postrepolarization refractoriness suppresses induction of atrial flutter and fibrillation in anesthetized rabbits.

Ranolazine (Ran) is a novel anti-ischemic agent with electrophysiologic properties mainly attributed to the inhibition of late Na+ current and atrial-selective early Na+ current. However, there are only limited data regarding its efficacy and mechanism of action against atrial flutter (Afl) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in intact animals. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the electrophysiologic mechanism of Ran in a rabbit model of inducible atrial tachyarrhythmias elicited by acetylcholine (ACh). Arrhythmias were produced in 19 rabbits by rapid atrial burst pacing during control, after intravenous ACh and after Ran + ACh administration. Recording of right atrial monophasic action potentials (MAPs) and programmed stimulation were utilized to determine the duration of atrial repolarization at various cycle lengths and voltage levels of action potential, including 75% of total MAP duration (MAPD75), effective refractory period (ERP), and postrepolarization refractoriness (PRR = ERP − MAPD75) prior to and after Ran. Control stimulation yielded no arrhythmias or maximal nonsustained runs of Afl/AF. Upon ACh, 17 of 19 rabbits exhibited sustained Afl and AF as well as mixed forms of Afl/AF, while 2 animals revealed none or short runs of nonsustained arrhythmias and were excluded from the study. High-frequency burst pacing during the first 30 minutes after Ran + ACh failed to induce any arrhythmia in 13 of 17 rabbits (76%), while 2 animals displayed sustained Afl/AF and 2 other animals nonsustained Afl/AF. At basic stimulation cycle length of 250 milliseconds, Ran prolonged baseline atrial ERP (80 ± 8 vs 120 ± 9 milliseconds, P < .001) much more than MAPD75 (65 ± 7 vs 85 ± 7 milliseconds, P < .001), leading to atrial PRR which was more pronounced after Ran compared with control measurements (35 ± 11 vs 15 ± 10 milliseconds, P < .001). This in vivo study demonstrates that Ran exerts antiarrhythmic activity by suppressing inducibility of ACh-mediated Afl/AF in intact rabbits. Its action may predominantly be related to a significant increase in atrial PRR, resulting in depressed electrical excitability and impediment of arrhythmia initiation.

Electropharmacology of the bradycardic agents alinidine and zatebradine (UL-FS 49) in a conscious canine ventricular arrhythmia model of permanent coronary artery occlusion

SummaryMyocardial infarction was produced in 27 anesthetized dogs by ligating the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery proximal to the septal branch. Nineteen of these animals survived the operation and were studied by programmed stimulation in a random sequence between the third and seventh days after the infarct. Complete electrophysiologic testing was implemented in each animal prior to and after single doses of either alinidine (1 mg/kg IV) or zatebradine (0.5 mg/kg IV). Alinidine prevented reinduction of sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT) in only 2 of 9 dogs and zatebradine in 1 of 8 dogs. The SVT cycle length was not significantly changed in all cases in which it was still inducible despite drug administration (p>0.05). Alinidine lengthened the effective refractory period (ERP) in the AV node (p<0.01), whereas zatebradine did not induce a statistically significant prolongation. Conversely, zatebradine increased the left ventricular ERP, while alinidine left it almost unchanged. The rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) did not significantly differ from control values after the administration of either agents. Also, the duration and the ERP of infarctzone potentials, defined as late potentials, remained unaltered. The results indicate that the bradycardic agents alinidine and zatebradine do not exert antiarrhythmic efficacy against SVT induced during subacute myocardial infarction in conscious dogs. None of these drugs substantially changed ventricular electrophysiology or showed a drug-specific proarrhythmic effect.