I. Harper

Switching to Sirolimus-Based Immune Suppression After Liver Transplantation Is Safe and Effective: A Single-Center Experience

Background. Sirolimus is unlicensed for use in liver transplantation because of concerns over safety, particularly in regard to hepatic artery thrombosis and excess mortality. However, sirolimus offers potential advantages over calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression, relating to its renal sparing and antiproliferative properties. Methods. A review was undertaken of 148 liver transplant patients converted to sirolimus over 10 years at a single center. Results. The main indications for sirolimus were renal impairment and hepatitis C virus fibrosis. One hundred eleven (75%) patients remained on sirolimus after median follow-up of 1006 days. Mean (±standard deviation) glomerular filtration rate improved significantly from 59±29 mL/min preconversion to 72±39 mL/min at censor point (P<0.05). Improvement in glomerular filtration rate was most marked in patients converted for renal impairment. Liver function tests remained stable or improved, particularly in patients transplanted for hepatitis C virus. Side effects attributed to sirolimus occurred in 101 (68%) patients requiring withdrawal in 20 patients (14%). Moderate increases in serum lipids were observed and controlled effectively with statins. The incidence of proteinuria increased postconversion but had no deleterious impact on renal function. No episodes of hepatic artery thrombosis were observed. Conclusions. Sirolimus was safe and may improve outcome in selected patients after liver transplantation.

Regulation of Allograft Survival by Inhibitory FcγRIIb Signaling

Fcγ receptors (FcγR) provide important immunoregulation. Targeting inhibitory FcγRIIb may therefore prolong allograft survival, but its role in transplantation has not been addressed. FcγRIIb signaling was examined in murine models of acute or chronic cardiac allograft rejection by transplanting recipients that either lacked FcγRIIb expression (FcγRIIb−/−) or overexpressed FcγRIIb on B cells (B cell transgenic [BTG]). Acute heart allograft rejection occurred at the same tempo in FcγRIIb−/− C57BL/6 (B6) recipients as wild type recipients, with similar IgG alloantibody responses. In contrast, chronic rejection of MHC class II–mismatched bm12 cardiac allografts was accelerated in FcγRIIb−/− mice, with development of more severe transplant arteriopathy and markedly augmented effector autoantibody production. Autoantibody production was inhibited and rejection was delayed in BTG recipients. Similarly, whereas MHC class I–mismatched B6.Kd hearts survived indefinitely and remained disease free in B6 mice, much stronger alloantibody responses and progressive graft arteriopathy developed in FcγRIIb−/− recipients. Notably, FcγRIIb-mediated inhibition of B6.Kd heart graft rejection was abrogated by increasing T cell help through transfer of additional H2.Kd-specific CD4 T cells. Thus, inhibitory FcγRIIb signaling regulates chronic but not acute rejection, most likely because the supra-optimal helper CD4 T cell response in acute rejection overcomes FcγRIIb-mediated inhibition of the effector B cell population. Immunomodulation of FcγRIIb in clinical transplantation may hold potential for inhibiting progression of transplant arteriopathy and prolonging transplant survival.

Augmentation of Recipient Adaptive Alloimmunity by Donor Passenger Lymphocytes within the Transplant

Summary Chronic rejection of solid organ allografts remains the major cause of transplant failure. Donor-derived tissue-resident lymphocytes are transferred to the recipient during transplantation, but their impact on alloimmunity is unknown. Using mouse cardiac transplant models, we show that graft-versus-host recognition by passenger donor CD4 T cells markedly augments recipient cellular and humoral alloimmunity, resulting in more severe allograft vasculopathy and early graft failure. This augmentation is enhanced when donors were pre-sensitized to the recipient, is dependent upon avoidance of host NK cell recognition, and is partly due to provision of cognate help for allo-specific B cells from donor CD4 T cells recognizing B cell MHC class II in a peptide-degenerate manner. Passenger donor lymphocytes may therefore influence recipient alloimmune responses and represent a therapeutic target in solid organ transplantation.

CD8 T-cell recognition of acquired alloantigen promotes acute allograft rejection

Significance Cytotoxic CD8 T-cell responses against mismatched MHC class I alloantigen are the principal arm of the cellular response against a transplanted organ. How CD4 T cells deliver essential help for development of these cytotoxic responses remains unclear. Here we show that recipient dendritic cells present acquired MHC alloantigen both as intact protein, for recognition by cytotoxic CD8 T cells, and as processed allopeptide, for recognition by helper CD4 T cells. Our findings suggest a mechanism by which help is provided for generating effector cytotoxic CD8 T-cell alloresponses at late time points after transplantation and solve a long-standing conundrum as to why host lymphoid tissue is required for CD8 T-cell allorecognition of graft parenchymal cells. Adaptive CD8 T-cell immunity is the principal arm of the cellular alloimmune response, but its development requires help. This can be provided by CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen “indirectly,” as self-restricted allopeptide, but this process remains unexplained, because the target epitopes for CD4 and CD8 T-cell recognition are “unlinked” on different cells (recipient and donor antigen presenting cells (APCs), respectively). Here, we test the hypothesis that the presentation of intact and processed MHC class I alloantigen by recipient dendritic cells (DCs) (the “semidirect” pathway) allows linked help to be delivered by indirect-pathway CD4 T cells for generating destructive cytotoxic CD8 T-cell alloresponses. We show that CD8 T-cell–mediated rejection of murine heart allografts that lack hematopoietic APCs requires host secondary lymphoid tissue (SLT). SLT is necessary because within it, recipient dendritic cells can acquire MHC from graft parenchymal cells and simultaneously present it as intact protein to alloreactive CD8 T cells and as processed peptide alloantigen for recognition by indirect-pathway CD4 T cells. This enables delivery of essential help for generating cytotoxic CD8 T-cell responses that cause rapid allograft rejection. In demonstrating the functional relevance of the semidirect pathway to transplant rejection, our findings provide a solution to a long-standing conundrum as to why SLT is required for CD8 T-cell allorecognition of graft parenchymal cells and suggest a mechanism by which indirect-pathway CD4 T cells provide help for generating effector cytotoxic CD8 T-cell alloresponses at late time points after transplantation.

Diversity of the CD4 T cell alloresponse: the short and the long of it

Summary MHC alloantigen is recognized by two pathways: “directly,” intact on donor cells, or “indirectly,” as self-restricted allopeptide. The duration of each pathway, and its relative contribution to allograft vasculopathy, remain unclear. Using a murine model of chronic allograft rejection, we report that direct-pathway CD4 T cell alloresponses, as well as indirect-pathway responses against MHC class II alloantigen, are curtailed by rapid elimination of donor hematopoietic antigen-presenting cells. In contrast, persistent presentation of epitope resulted in continual division and less-profound contraction of the class I allopeptide-specific CD4 T cell population, with approximately 10,000-fold more cells persisting than following acute allograft rejection. This expanded population nevertheless displayed sub-optimal anamnestic responses and was unable to provide co-stimulation-independent help for generating alloantibody. Indirect-pathway CD4 T cell responses are heterogeneous. Appreciation that responses against particular alloantigens dominate at late time points will likely inform development of strategies aimed at improving transplant outcomes.

Unlinked Memory Helper Responses Promote Long-Lasting Humoral Alloimmunity

Essential help for long-lived alloantibody responses is theoretically provided only by CD4 T cells that recognize target alloantigen, processed and presented by the allospecific B cell. We demonstrate that in an alloresponse to multiple MHC disparities, cognate help for class-switched alloantibody may also be provided by CD4 T cells specific for a second “helper” alloantigen. This response was much shorter-lived than when help was provided conventionally, by Th cell recognition of target alloantigen. Nevertheless, long-lasting humoral alloimmunity developed when T cell memory against the helper alloantigen was first generated. Costimulatory blockade abrogated alloantibody produced through naive Th cell recognition of target alloantigen but, crucially, blockade was ineffective when help was provided by memory responses to the accessory helper alloantigen. These results suggest that memory Th cell responses against previously encountered graft alloantigen may be the dominant mechanism for providing help to generate new specificities of alloantibody in transplant patients receiving immunosuppression.

Recipient natural killer cell allorecognition of passenger donor lymphocytes and its effect on adaptive alloimmunity after transplantation

BACKGROUND Memory T cells are known to reside in peripheral non-lymphoid tissue, but how their presence within solid organ allografts affects transplant outcomes is not known. We have previously described how graft-versus-host (GVH) allorecognition by passenger CD4 T cells within MHC class II-mismatched bm12 heart grafts provokes antinuclear humoral autoimmunity in C57BL/6 recipient mice. Here we aimed to examine how such GVH recognition affects the alloresponse to allografts with greater mismatching. METHODS A MHC class I and II mismatched murine model of cardiac transplantation was developed (bm12.Kd.IE to C57BL/6). After transplantation, cellular and humoral responses against mismatched antigens were measured with ELISPOT and ELISA, and the effect of GVH recognition assessed by depletion of donor CD4 T cells before graft procurement. Antinuclear autoantibody development was assessedwith HeP-2 indirect immunofluorescence. The role of recipient natural killer (NK) cells was examined by depletion with anti-NK1.1 antibody. FINDINGS Bm12.Kd.IE heart grafts provoked strong germinal centre alloantibody and autoantibody responses in C57BL/6 recipients and developed allograft vasculopathy. By contrast, heart grafts from CD4 T-cell-depleted donors developed only minimal vasculopathy, and the alloantibody responses were weaker, without observable autoantibody. Bm12.Kd.IE CD4 T cells survived long term when transferred to RAG hosts suggesting that avoidance of killing by host NK cells might be essential for autoantibody development. In support, in a model of alloantibody-mediated vasculopathy, depletion of NK cells from a C57BL/6 recipient of a BALB/c heart graft resulted in the development of autoantibody, amplification of the alloantibody response, and rapid allograft rejection. This amplification was abrogated by depletion of donor CD4 T cells. INTERPRETATION Although host adaptive immunity is expected to bring about destruction of passenger lymphocytes within heart allografts, this process occurs too slowly to prevent GVH-mediated augmentation of the alloresponse to the graft. Rather, rapid killing of donor lymphocytes by host alloreactive NK cells is essential. Passenger CD4 lymphocytes might therefore contribute to chronic rejection in recipients receiving an allograft that does not prompt innate NK cell recognition. FUNDING Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Training Fellowship.

THE INHIBITORY RECEPTOR FCGAMMARIIB DELAYS CHRONIC BUT NOT ACUTE ALLOGRAFT REJECTION: 788

C.J. Callaghan1, T.S. Win1, I. Harper1, T. Conlon2, R. Motallebzadeh2, S. Sivaganesh3, M. Goddard4, E.M. Bolton2, J.A. Bradley2, R. Brownlie5, K. Smith5, G.J. Pettigrew2 1Department Of Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge/UNITED KINGDOM, 2Department Of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge/UNITED KINGDOM, 3Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge/UNITED KINGDOM, 4Department Of Pathology, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge/UNITED KINGDOM, 5Department Of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge/UNITED KINGDOM