I. Monnet

Multicentre phase II study of cisplatin–etoposide chemotherapy for advanced large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma: the GFPC 0302 study

BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung remains unclear. Here, our primary objective was to assess the efficacy of cisplatin-etoposide doublet chemotherapy in advanced LCNEC. Accuracy of the pathological diagnosis and treatment toxicity were assessed as secondary objectives. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospective, multicentre, single-arm, phase II study with a centralised review of treatment-response and pathological data. Patients had untreated performance status (PS) 0/1 stage IV/IIIB LCNEC and received cisplatin (80 mg/m22 d1) and etoposide (100 mg/m22 d1-3) every 21 days. RESULTS Eighteen centres included 42 patients (mean age, 59 ± 9 years; 69% men; median of four cycles/patient). At least one grade-3/4 toxicity occurred in 59% of patients (neutropaenia, thrombocytopaenia, and anaemia in 32%, 17%, and 12%, respectively). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.2 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 3.1-6.6) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-9.6), respectively. The centralised pathologist review reclassified 11 of 40 (27.5%) patients: 9 as small-cell lung cancer, 1 as undifferentiated non-small-cell lung cancer, and 1 as atypical carcinoid. Survival data were not significantly changed by excluding the reclassified patients. CONCLUSIONS The pathological diagnosis of LCNEC is difficult. The outcomes of advanced LCNEC treated with cisplatin-etoposide doublets are poor, similar to those of patients with advanced small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).

Intracerebral efficacy and tolerance of nivolumab in non–small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

OBJECTIVES Although nivolumab has shown efficacy against non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), patients with active brain metastases (BMs) were excluded from pivotal clinical trials. Hence, data regarding nivolumab intracerebral activity and safety in NSCLC patients with BMs are scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on NSCLC patients with BMs treated with nivolumab. The primary endpoint was intracerebral objective response rate (IORR), according to RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints included intracerebral control rate, intracerebral and general progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and tolerance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Forty-three patients were included. BMs were locally pretreated in 34 (79%) patients and active in 16 (37%) patients. Median follow-up was 5.7 (95% CI: 2.7-8.4) months. IORR and extracerebral response rate were, respectively, 9% (95% CI: 3-23%) and 11% (95% CI: 4-26%). Intracerebral control rate was 51% (95% CI: 37-66%). Median intracerebral and general PFS lasted 3.9 (95% CI: 2.8-11.1) and 2.8 (95% CI: 1.8-4.6) months, respectively. Median OS was 7.5 (95% CI: 5.6-not reached) months. Five neurological adverse events occurred, including 1 grade-4 transient ischemic attack of uncertain imputability and 1 grade-3 neurological deficit; neither required nivolumab discontinuation. Nivolumab intracerebral activity was similar to its reported extracerebral efficacy, with an acceptable safety profile. Prospective and controlled data are needed to determine nivolumabs place in treatment of NSCLC patients with BMs.

Randomized open-label non-comparative multicenter phase II trial of sequential erlotinib and docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy: GFPC 10.02 study.

BACKGROUND Concomitant administration of erlotinib with standard chemotherapy does not appear to improve survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but preliminary studies suggest that sequential administration might be effective. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and tolerability of second-line sequential administration of erlotinib and docetaxel in advanced NSCLC. METHODS In an open-label phase II trial, patients with advanced NSCLC, EGFR wild-type or unknown, PS 0-2, in whom initial cisplatin-based chemotherapy had failed were randomized to sequential erlotinib 150 mg/d (day 2-16)+docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) d1) (arm ED) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) d1) alone (arm D) (21-day cycle). The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival rate at 15 weeks (PFS 15). Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), the overall response rate (ORR) and tolerability. Based on a Simon optimal two-stage design, the ED strategy was rejected if the primary endpoint was below 33/66 patients at the end of the two Simon stages. RESULTS 147 patients were randomized (median age: 60±8 years, PS 0/1/2: 44/83/20 patients; males: 78%). The ED strategy was rejected, with only 18 of 73 patients achieving PFS15 in arm ED at the end of stage 2 and 17 of 74 patients in arm D. In arms ED and D, respectively, median PFS was 2.2 and 2.5 months and median OS was 6.5 and 8.3 months. CONCLUSION Sequential erlotinib and docetaxel was not more effective than docetaxel alone as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown EGFR status.

Determinants of malignant pleural mesothelioma survival and burden of disease in France: a national cohort analysis

This study was undertaken to determine the healthcare burden of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in France and to analyze its associations with socioeconomic deprivation, population density, and management outcomes. A national hospital database was used to extract incident MPM patients in years 2011 and 2012. Cox models were used to analyze 1‐ and 2‐year survival according to sex, age, co‐morbidities, management, population‐density index, and social deprivation index. The analysis included 1,890 patients (76% men; age: 73.6 ± 10.0 years; 84% with significant co‐morbidities; 57% living in urban zones; 53% in highly underprivileged areas). Only 1% underwent curative surgical procedure; 65% received at least one chemotherapy cycle, 72% of them with at least one pemetrexed and/or bevacizumab administration. One‐ and 2‐year survival rates were 64% and 48%, respectively. Median survival was 14.9 (95% CI: 13.7–15.7) months. The mean cost per patient was 27,624 ± 17,263 euros (31% representing pemetrexed and bevacizumab costs). Multivariate analyses retained men, age >70 years, chronic renal failure, chronic respiratory failure, and never receiving pemetrexed as factors of poor prognosis. After adjusting the analysis to age, sex, and co‐morbidities, living in rural/semi‐rural area was associated with better 2‐year survival (HR: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.73–0.94]; P < 0.01); social deprivation index was not significantly associated with survival. With approximately 1,000 new cases per year in France, MPMs represents a significant national health care burden. Co‐morbidities, sex, age, and living place appear to be significant factors of prognosis.