Iain Findlay

Effect of captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in patients with angina pectoris and heart failure.

The effects of captopril and placebo were compared in 18 patients with chronic heart failure and angina pectoris with use of a double-blind crossover trial design. Symptoms were assessed by patient treatment preference, visual analogue scores and nitroglycerin consumption. Exercise performance was assessed using two different treadmill protocols of different work intensity with simultaneous measurement of oxygen consumption and by supine bicycle exercise and simultaneous radionuclide ventriculography. Arrhythmias were assessed by 48 h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Patients generally preferred placebo to captopril, and this appeared to be due to an increase in symptoms of angina with captopril. Treadmill exercise time on a high intensity protocol was shorter with captopril than with placebo; on a low intensity protocol, angina became a more frequent limiting symptom even though overall exercise performance was not changed. The heart rate-blood pressure product was reduced, but largely because of a reduction in blood pressure rather than in heart rate. During supine bicycle exercise, no differences in symptoms, exercise performance, ejection fraction or changes in blood pressure were noted and ventricular arrhythmias were reduced. Captopril does not appear to be clinically useful in alleviating angina pectoris in patients with heart failure, and this effect may be related to a decrease in coronary perfusion pressure. Nonetheless, desirable metabolic effects, a reduction in arrhythmias and potential effects on survival require further study of captopril in patients with both angina and heart failure.

Combination of verapamil and beta blockers in systemic hypertension

The efficacy and safety of verapamil and propranolol were examined in 14 hypertensive patients (mean age 51.2, range 30 to 65) in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study of verapamil, 360 mg, propranolol, 240 mg, these 2 formulations in combination and placebo, each given for 4 weeks. Supine blood pressure, heart rate, atrioventricular conduction (PR interval) and left ventricular function were measured. All treatments reduced diastolic blood pressure (mean +/- standard deviation) (p less than 0.001): placebo to 106.6 +/- 8.1 mm Hg; propranolol to 93.8 +/- 7.7; verapamil to 89.8 +/- 7.8; the combination to 84.1 +/- 6.1, but the effect of the combination was significantly greater than that of either drug alone (p less than 0.05). Heart rate at rest (placebo, 80.2 +/- 12.2 beats/min) was reduced by propranolol (63.3 +/- 9.4, p less than 0.001), but not by verapamil (79.0 +/- 8.9). However, the addition of verapamil to propranolol led to a further reduction in heart rate (56.9 +/- 8.4, p less than 0.005). PR interval was prolonged significantly by the combination (185.5 +/- 35.3 ms) when compared with placebo (154.0 +/- 22.7); propranolol (159.1 +/- 21.2) and verapamil (165.5 +/- 32.4) (p less than 0.005 for each). The active drugs increased end-diastolic dimension and end-systolic dimension. For each variable, the effect of the combination was statistically significant (p less than 0.01). Fractional shortening was not altered significantly by any of the treatments. Thus verapamil plus propranolol is a very effective antihypertensive combination but heart rate, atrioventricular conduction and left ventricular function may be affected adversely, necessitating careful monitoring of therapy.

Twenty-Four-Hour β-Blockade in Stable Angina Pectoris: A Study of Atenolol and Betaxolol

Summary We examined the importance of a long plasma half-life (t 1/2) on the antianginal effects of β-blockade by comparing equivalent doses of once-daily atenolol 100 mg (t 1/2 6–8 h) and betaxolol 20 mg (t 1/2 20–22 h) in a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study of 20 patients with stable angina pectoris. At 20 h postdose, heart rate (HR) was lower with betaxolol than with atenolol whereas blood pressure (BP) was equally reduced by both drugs. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory HR recording demonstrated that this difference existed for the last 6 h of the dosage cycle. During treadmill exercise, HR remained lower with betaxolol than with atenolol and exercise time was significantly prolonged only by betaxolol. With placebo, radionuclide ventriculography demonstrated that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased during exercise. Betaxolol, but not atenolol, significantly attenuated the exercise-induced decrease in EF. Thus, the long plasma t1/2 of betaxolol is associated with a reduction in exercise-induced ischemia when tested toward the end of the 24-h dosage cycle. Plasma t 1/2 therefore is of clinical relevance to the antianginal, but not antihypertensive, actions of β-blockers.

Atenolol and celiprolol for stable angina pectoris

Once-daily atenolol and celiprolol were compared in a placebo-controlled crossover study of 16 patients with stable angina pectoris. Atenolol and celiprolol equally and significantly reduced frequency of angina and electrocardiographic evidence of cardiac ischemia. Celiprolol, however, produced less suppression of the double product at 1 mm of ST-segment depression than atenolol, suggesting that actions other than reduction of heart rate may contribute to its antianginal efficacy.

Effects of Calcium Antagonism and Beta-Blockade on Haemodynamic Responses to Stress

The influences of verapamil, propranolol and their combination on blood pressure and heart rate during cold pressor testing and isometric exercise were examined in 13 patients with essential hypertension. Verapamil modified the peak pressor responses to each stimulus while the major action of propranolol was on heart rate. Together the drugs attenuated both haemodynamic responses. Combined calcium antagonism and beta-blockade may modify favourably surges in blood pressure and heart rate in ambulant hypertensives.