Ian B. Lee
University of Toronto
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ian B. Lee.
The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence | 2008
Ian B. Lee
In a classic paper, Amartya Sen proposed that human reasons for action be conceptualized in terms of three distinct forms of motivation: self-interest, sympathy and commitment. This article explores the implications of the concept of commitment for the economic understanding of the corporation. It argues that commitment can help to explain the deliberative features of corporate governance - features that the traditional economic approach inadequately explains or passes over entirely.
Archive | 2006
Ian B. Lee
This chapter explores the implications of ethical investing—the making of investment decisions at least partly on the basis of considerations other than profit or self-interest—for the debate about corporate social responsibility and for certain related questions of corporate law. In particular, I address three topics. First, I argue that, contrary to popular belief, corporate law does not mandate “shareholder primacy,” by which I mean that it does not obligate managers to disregard the interests of nonshareholders or to treat them as merely instrumental considerations in the service of shareholder wealth maximization. My argument highlights the importance of ethical investing for scholars interested in corporate social responsibility, since it turns out to be the preferences and behaviour of stockholders, to a greater extent than corporate law, that constrain managers’ freedom to exercise their powers responsibly. The second topic I address concerns the conflict between the concept of ethical investing and the behavioural assumptions that underlie the standard line of argument in defense of shareholder primacy. Many corporate law theorists who endorse shareholder primacy respond to this conflict by characterizing ethical investing as either irrational and aberrant, or else rational and potentially pernicious. I argue that both of these responses are misguided.
Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance | 2005
Ian B. Lee
American Business Law Journal | 2005
Ian B. Lee
Archive | 2005
Ian B. Lee
Archive | 1999
Ian B. Lee
Law and Social Inquiry-journal of The American Bar Foundation | 2009
Ian B. Lee
Archive | 2006
Ian B. Lee
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies | 2011
Ian B. Lee
Archive | 2011
Ian B. Lee