Ian R. Sharp

Linked sequence stratigraphic and structural evolution of propagating normal faults

Two distinct phases in the structural evolution of normal faults can be identified in the Miocene Gulf of Suez rift: (1) an initial growth fold stage when the fault is a buried structure and (2) a subsequent surface faulting stage. During the growth fold stage, strata thin and become truncated toward the fault zone and are rotated and diverge away from the buried fault into growth synclines. In contrast, once the fault breaks surface, strata form a divergent wedge, which is rotated and thickens into the fault. The two tectono-stratigraphic styles also occur contemporaneously along the length of a single fault segment. Growth folding characterizes deformation around the ends of fault segments where the fault is blind, whereas the center of fault segments are characterized by surface faulting. These observations suggest that marked along-strike variation in stratal surfaces and facies stacking patterns will occur in depositional sequences in areas of normal faulting.

Fault-propagation folding in extensional settings: Examples of structural style and synrift sedimentary response from the Suez rift, Sinai, Egypt

Field data from the Oligocene–Miocene Gulf of Suez rift demonstrate that coeval growth faults, folds, and transfer zones exerted a major control on synrift stratigraphic sequence development. Growth folds in the Suez rift are related to steeply dipping normal faults that propagated upward, resulting in broad, upward-widening monoclines in overlying strata. Folding during fault propagation was accommodated by layer-parallel slip and detachment along mudstone horizons as well as by normal and rare reverse secondary faults that propagated away from the master fault. The eventual propagation of the master fault through to the surface left the steep limb of the monocline and most of the secondary faults in the hanging wall. This evolving structural style exerted a marked control on the geometry and stacking patterns of coeval synrift sediments. Synrift sediments display onlap and intraformational unconformities toward the growth monoclines and buried faults, whereas they diverge into broadly synclinal expanded sections away from the growth monocline. Continued movement across buried faults resulted in the progressive rotation of the monoclinal limb and associated synrift sediments, each successively younger sequence dipping basinward at a shallower angle than the previous one. The resulting synrift geometries differ significantly from stratal geometries normally anticipated adjacent to normal faults. Along-strike variations in facies stacking patterns are also commonly associated with decreasing displacement across faults and associated folds toward low-relief transfer zones. Data from other rift basins indicate that fault-propagation folds are not unique to the Gulf of Suez.

Late Cretaceous–Paleocene formation of the proto–Zagros foreland basin, Lurestan Province, SW Iran

Late Cretaceous emplacement of ophiolitic-radiolaritic thrust sheets over the Arabian passive margin was the first manifestation of the protracted closure of the Neotethys Ocean, which ended with the continental collision between Arabia and central Iran and the formation of the present Zagros fold belt. This tectonic stacking produced a flexural basin (the Amiran Basin: 400 × 200 km in size) in the northwest Zagros that was filled with a 1225-m-thick shallowing-upward detrital succession made up of the Amiran, Taleh Zang, and Kashkan Formations. This succession sits unconformably above the Late Cretaceous Gurpi Formation and is overlain by the Oligocene-Miocene Shahbazan-Asmari carbonate succession. Dating of the Amiran-Kashkan succession is based on detailed biostratigraphy using large foraminifera and calcareous nannoplankton. The Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary is located within the uppermost 25-45 m of the Gurpi Formation. The overlying Amiran and Taleh Zang Formations have been dated as Paleocene in age. However, the base of the Paleocene within the Gurpi Formation lacks NP1 and NP2 zones, implying a hiatus of ∼2 m.y. at ca. 65.5 Ma, which is inferred to correspond to an early folding phase near the Cretaceous-Paleocene boundary. The upper part of the Kashkan Formation is dated to the earliest Eocene by palynostratigraphy. A large hiatus (or very slow deposition) lasting about 15 m.y. occurs between the Kashkan and Shahbazan Formations in the studied region. The base of the prograding Shahbazan platform deposits is dated by 87Sr/86Sr stratigraphy at ca. 33.9 Ma. The upper part of the Asmari Formation is dated as early-middle Miocene using foraminifera associations. Reconstruction of the Amiran-Taleh Zang-Kashkan succession of the Amiran Basin indicates a thickening of the basin fill from the southern pinch-out along the SE flank of the Kabir Kuh anticline to SW of the Khorramabad anticline, where the flexure is at least 900 m. In contrast, the NE part of the basin underwent coeval contraction and uplift of ∼1300 m. Superimposed smaller undulations onto the large-scale flexure are interpreted as Late Cretaceous-Paleocene folds. Regional comparisons (SE Zagros, Oman, and Turkey) indicate that Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary deformation affected the entire NE margin of Arabia but that compression was not synchronous, being younger in Lurestan than in the NW Persian Gulf where inversion tectonics occurred from Turonian to mid-Campanian times. The long sedimentary hiatus spanning most of the middle and late Eocene must have been related to deep lithospheric processes linked to the initial events of the protracted closure of the Neotethys Ocean between Arabia and central Iran. The tectono-sedimentary history recorded in the Zagros Basin may help to understand early foreland basin growth in other orogens in which subsequent continental collision has obliterated these early events.

Growth and linkage of the East Tanka fault zone, Suez rift: structural style and syn-rift stratigraphic response

Abstract: An integrated tectono-stratigraphic analysis of the East Tanka fault zone, Suez rift, indicates fault growth by linkage of initially isolated fault segments that is consistent with fault growth models based on displacement–length (D-L) scaling laws. During the initial 2.4 Ma of rifting, the East Tanka fault zone was composed of two en-echelon fault segments c.1–1.5 km long, separated by a hanging-wall intrabasin high that controlled the geometry of depocentres filled with continental deposits. Alluvial fan conglomerates were fed through the region between the two fault segments, and form a discrete coarse-grained body, preserved in the immediate hanging wall of the fault zone. Subsequent stratigraphic patterns indicate that the two faults hard-linked to form a single fault zone c.3.5 km long. Hard linkage of the segments resulted in migration of the zone of maximum displacement and subsidence into the zone of linkage. Uplift due to the migration of activity caused modification of drainage in the footwall of the fault zone that terminated the growth of the alluvial fan. This study demonstrates the need to integrate structural and stratigraphic data when attempting to reconstruct the temporal and spatial evolution of normal fault zones. Additionally, the fault dynamics illustrated have implications for tectono-stratigraphic models of rift basins, and syn-rift stratigraphic evolution.

Stratigraphic architecture and fracture-controlled dolomitization of the Cretaceous Khami and Bangestan groups: an outcrop case study, Zagros Mountains, Iran

Abstract The Barremian–Aptian upper Khami Group and Albian–Campanian Bangestan Group have been studied at outcrop in Lurestan, SW Iran. The upper Khami Group comprises a thin deltaic wedge (Gadvan Fm) transgressively overlain by shelfal carbonates (Dariyan Fm). The Dariyan Fm can be divided into lower and upper units separated by a major intra-Aptian fracture-controlled karst. The top of the Daryian Fm is capped by the Arabian plate-wide Aptian–Albian unconformity. The overlying Bangestan Group includes the Kazhdumi, Sarvak, Surgah and Ilam formations. The Kazhdumi Fm represents a mixed carbonate-clastic intrashelf basin succession, and passes laterally (towards the NE) into a low-angle Orbitolina-dominated muddy carbonate ramp/shoal (Mauddud Mbr). The Mauddud Mbr is capped by an angular unconformity and karst of latest Albian–earliest Cenomanian age. The overlying Sarvak Fm comprises both low-angle ramp and steeper dipping (5–10°) carbonate shelf/platform systems. Three regionally extensive karst surfaces are developed in the latest Cenomanian–Turonian interval of the Sarvak Fm, and are interpreted to be related to flexure of the Arabian plate margin due to the initiation of intra-oceanic deformation. The Surgah and Ilam Fm represent clastic and muddy carbonate ramp depositional systems respectively. Both The Khami and Bangestan groups have been affected by spectacularly exposed fracture-controlled dolomitization. Dolomite bodies are 100 m to several km in width, have plume-like geometry, with both fracture (fault/joint) and gradational diagenetic contacts with undolomitized country rock. Sheets of dolomite extend away from dolomite bodies along steeply dipping fault/joint zones, and as strata-bound bodies preferentially following specific depositional/diagenetic facies or stratal surfaces. There is a close link between primary depositional architecture/facies and secondary dolomitization. Vertical barriers to dolomitization are low permeability mudstones, below which dolomitizing fluids moved laterally. Where these barriers are cut by faults and fracture corridors, dolomitization can be observed to have advanced upwards, indicating that faults and joints were fluid migration conduits. Comparisons to Jurassic–Cenozoic dolomites elsewhere in Iran, Palaeozoic dolomites of North America and Neogene dolomites of the Gulf of Suez indicate striking textural, paragenetic and outcrop-scale similarities. These data imply a common fracture-controlled dolomitization process is applicable regardless of tectonic setting (compressional, transtensional and extensional).

Basin architecture and growth folding of the NW Zagros early foreland basin during the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary

Abstract: We present and use the chronostratigraphy of 13 field logs and detailed mapping to constrain the evolution of the early Zagros foreland basin, in NW Iran. Large foraminifera, calcareous nannofossil, palynological and 87Sr/86Sr analysis supplied ages indicating a Campanian–early Eocene age of the basin infill, which is characterizd by a diachronous, southwestward migrating, shallowing upwards, mixed clastic–carbonate succession. Growth synclines and local palaeoslope variations indicate syndepositional folding from Maastrichtian to Eocene time and suggest forelandward migration of the deformation front. We also illustrate the basin architecture with a synthetic stratigraphic transect. From internal to external areas, time lines cross the formation boundaries from continental Kashkan red beds to Taleh Zang mixed clastic–carbonate platforms, Amiran slope deposits and basinal Gurpi–Pabdeh shales and marls. The foreland basin depocentres show a progressive migration from the Campanian to Eocene (c. 83–52.7 Ma), with rates of c. 2.4 mm a−1 during the early–middle Palaeocene (c. 65.5–58.7 Ma) increasing to c. 6 mm a−1 during the late Palaeocene–earliest Eocene (c. 58.7–52.8 Ma). Coeval subsidence remained at c. 0.27 mm a−1 during the first 12.7 Ma and decreased to c. 0.16 mm a−1 during the last 4.2 Ma of basin filling. Finally, we integrate our results with published large-scale maps and discuss their implications in the context of the Zagros orogeny. Supplementary material: Tables with dating results are available at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18439.

Structure of the Mountain Front Flexure along the Anaran anticline in the Pusht-e Kuh Arc (NW Zagros, Iran): insights from sand box models

Abstract The Mountain Frontal Flexure shows a single step along the front of the Pusht-e Kuh Arc with about 3 km of structural relief. This front has been interpreted as being formed by a basement monocline above a blind crustal-scale and low-angle thrust with a ramp–flat geometry (the ramp dips 12–15° towards the inner part of the orogen and cuts the entire crust). The Anaran anticline on top of the Mountain Frontal Flexure shows an irregular geometry in map view and consists of four segments with diverse directions of which the SE Anaran, the Central Anaran and the NW Dome are culminations. The North–South Anaran segment may form a linking zone developed during the rise and amplification of single culminations, the NW Dome and the Central Anaran, above the Mountain Frontal Flexure. The asymmetric Anaran anticline is characterized by the existence of multiple normal faults, some of them with significant dip-slip displacements of up to 1000 m. These faults limit grabens located along the crests of the anticline segments. Cross-cutting relationships show that the normal faults along the Central Anaran are older than along the North–South Anaran, reinforcing the temporal constraints on the later growth of this segment of the anticline. The geometry of the Anaran anticline is asymmetric with the subvertical forelimb very little exposed. This forelimb is cut above and below by a thrust system that seems to develop along the fold hinges. The lower thrust, with a ramp–flat geometry, carries the entire anticline towards the foreland on top of slightly deformed rocks in the footwall. The thrust flattens in the Gachsaran evaporitic level forming a typical triangular zone filled with evaporites, which produce a strong fold disharmony between the overburden (Passive Group) and the underlying rocks (Competent Group). The growth of the Anaran anticline lasted for about 6 Ma and was the consequence of detachment folding that was subsequently thrust, rotated and uplifted above the Mountain Frontal Flexure with coeval reactivation of earlier crestal layer-parallel extension normal faults to accommodate the large increase of structural relief between the foreland and the tectonic arc. Three main results from analogue modelling have been combined with field data to resolve the geometry of the Anaran anticline as well as its evolution: (1) a thickening of intermediate evaporites (Gachsaran Formation) is produced above the flat segment of the thrust carrying the anticline on top of foreland strata; (2) growth strata deposited in the adjacent syncline modify the geometry of the anticline by increasing the dip and the length of its forelimb; (3) coeval erosion to anticline growth, as well as thick growth strata deposition, increases fold amplification rather than foreland propagation of deformation. The proposed fold model may be applied to other anticlines on top of this major basement-related thrust, such as the Siah Kuh and Khaviz anticlines in the Pusht-e Kuh Arc and Dezful Embayment domains.

Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy of Early SYN-RIFT Tidal Sediments: The Nukhul Formation, Suez Rift, Egypt

ABSTRACT Facies and tectono-stratigraphic models for the tidally influenced Miocene Nukhul Formation are presented, based on outcrop data from Hammam Faraun fault block, Suez Rift, Egypt. Deposits of the Nukhul Formation are attributed to two linked depositional settings, offshore to shoreface and estuary settings, and were deposited during initial stages of rifting in hanging-wall depocenters of early-formed propagating fault segments. The offshore to shoreface deposits consist of variably bioturbated mudstones that pass gradationally upward to bioturbated bioclastic sandstones. The more landward estuary deposits can be separated into a tripartite division of estuary mouth, estuary funnel with bayhead delta, and upper estuary channel deposits. Estuarine processes generated a complex intercalation of lithologies, with both gradational and sharp facies transitions. In the estuary deposits, tidal ravinement surfaces are typically characterized by mudstones of the estuary-funnel association below, passing abruptly up to erosionally based estuary mouth sandstones. Maximum flooding surfaces are expressed by an abrupt erosional contact separating estuary-mouth sandstones below and estuary-funnel mudstones above. Stratigraphic development was strongly influenced by the evolving early-rift structure. Depocenters were narrow (2-5 km wide) and elongate (< 10 km long) parallel to the strike of normal-fault segments. The shoreface shoal prevented wave energy in the estuary and increased the relative influence of tidal currents. The elongate, fault-controlled geometry of the depocenters confined the bayhead delta and further enhanced tidal influence. Stratal geometry reflects deformation associated with low-relief growth folds and surface-breaking faults that, together, formed part of an evolving fault array. This basin configuration and associated Nukhul stratigraphy is markedly different to tectono-stratigraphic models for crustal-scale tilted fault blocks that are applicable from late stages of rifting.

Rift-initiation development of normal fault blocks: insights from the Hammam Faraun fault block, Suez Rift, Egypt

An integrated structural and stratigraphic study of the Hammam Faraun fault block, Suez Rift, Egypt, provides insights into the rift-initiation tectonostratigraphic evolution of the crustal-scale normal fault blocks. The shallow marine to offshore Tayiba Formation (Lower Oligocene) represents the youngest preserved pre-rift unit, and key stratal surface development indicates that relative sea-level variations exerted a marked control on its stratigraphic evolution. A major sea-level fall, which may have been a regional (i.e. eustatic) event, occurred during the mid-Oligocene and was synchronous with the onset of rifting. A major erosional unconformity (the base synrift unconformity) formed in response to the sea-level fall and defines a series of NNE–SSW- to NE–SW-trending palaeovalleys up to 40 m deep by 500 m wide, which are infilled by continental deposits and volcanic rocks of the Abu Zenima Formation (Upper Oligocene–Lower Miocene). During the rift initiation, palaeovalleys controlled depositional patterns and the evolving fault-controlled topography was insufficient to modify drainage patterns. Through time, however, surface-breaking faults began to exert a marked control on deposition. This study indicates the complexity that can occur during the rift-initiation phase caused by extrabasinal factors such as eustatic sea-level variations and antecedent drainage.

Tectonic-sedimentary evolution of the western margin of the Mesozoic Vardar Ocean: evidence from the Pelagonian and Almopias zones, northern Greece

Abstract The Vardar Zone documents the Mesozoic-Early Cenozoic evolution of several small oceanic basins and a complex history of terrane assembly. Following a Hercynian phase of deformation and granitic intrusion within the Pelagonian Zone to the west, the Vardar Zone rifted in Permian-Triassic time, with the creation of an oceanic basin (Almopias Ocean) during the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic. During the Mid-Jurassic, this ocean subducted northeastwards beneath the Paikon Zone and the Serbo-Macedonian Zone, giving rise to arc volcanism and back-arc rifting. A second ocean basin, the Pindos Ocean, opened to the west of a Pelagonian microcontinent, also during Late Triassic-Early Jurassic time. During the Mid-Late Jurassic, ophiolites were emplaced northeastwards (in present co-ordinates) from the Pindos Ocean onto the Pelagonian microcontinent, forming the Pelagonian ophiolitic mélange within a flexural foredeep. This emplacement is dated at pre-Late Oxfordian-Early Kimmeridgian from the evidence of corals within neritic carbonates that depositionally overlie the emplaced ophiolitic rocks in several areas. Related greenschist- or amphibolite-facies metamorphism is attributed to deep burial following trench-margin collision and the attempted subduction of the Pelagonian continent. An inferred phase of NNW-SSE displacement, also of pre-latest Jurassic age, imparted a regionally persistent stretching lineation and related ductile fabric, apparently related to post-collisional strike-slip. The Pelagonian Zone and its emplaced ophiolitic rocks then underwent extensional exhumation during Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous time. The western margin of the Vardar Zone experienced extensional (or transtensional) faulting, neritic carbonate and terrigenous clastic deposition, and intermediate-silicic magmatism during Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous time. Oceanic crust (Meglenitsa Ophiolite) formed further east in the Vardar Zone during Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous time, possibly above a subduction zone. A near-margin setting is suggested by the presence of a deep-water terrigenous cover, probably derived from the Paikon continental unit to the east. The Vardar Zone as a whole finally closed related to eastward subduction beneath Eurasia, culminating in collision with the Pelagonian microcontinent during latest Cretaceous-Eocene time, as recorded in foreland basin development, HP-LT metamorphism, ophiolite emplacement and large-scale westward thrusting. In contrast to models that suggest closure of the Vardar Ocean in the Mid-Late Jurassic, followed by reopening of a Cretaceous ocean, we believe that the Vardar Ocean remained partly open from Triassic to Late Cretaceous-Early Cenozoic time.