Ibrahim Khansa

Impact of Complications on Patient Satisfaction in Breast Reconstruction

Background: The development of a complication after surgery can be difficult for both patient and surgeon. With a growing body of literature evaluating patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction, few studies directly focus on the impact of surgical complications on satisfaction. This study analyzed the effect of complications on general and aesthetic satisfaction after breast reconstruction. Methods: All women at an academic institution undergoing breast reconstruction between 1999 and 2006 were identified. Patient demographics and history of complications were collected. A questionnaire adapted from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Survey was administered examining general and aesthetic satisfaction. Patients with complications were compared with patients with no complications. Results: Overall, 716 women underwent 932 reconstructions; 233 patients had a complication. Patient demographics and response rate were similar between the two groups (overall response rate 75.4 percent). Development of a complication correlated with increased odds of aesthetic dissatisfaction (odds ratio = 1.61, p = 0.047). Other predictors of dissatisfaction were older age, reconstruction with an implant, and a longer time interval between reconstruction and survey, while autologous reconstruction was a predictor of satisfaction. Among patients with a complication, implant reconstruction and mastectomy for prophylaxis were significant predictors of dissatisfaction. Conclusions: Aesthetic satisfaction after breast reconstruction is lower in patients developing a complication, older patients, and those receiving an implant reconstruction. Furthermore, patients with a prophylactic mastectomy are more likely than those with a therapeutic mastectomy to be dissatisfied when complications arise. These relationships are important, as measures to improve quality and decrease complications can directly improve patient satisfaction.

Fat necrosis in autologous abdomen-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review.

Background: Fat necrosis is a common and potentially exasperating complication of autologous breast reconstruction. The authors performed a systematic review of the English literature on autologous breast reconstruction to determine significant patient and surgical factors that are predictors of postoperative fat necrosis. Methods: A PubMed search using the terms “fat necrosis” and “breast reconstruction” was conducted. Articles were screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collected included patient characteristics, reconstructive techniques used, and the specific postoperative morbidity of interest. Patient cohorts were pooled, and the incidence of fat necrosis was calculated in the presence and absence of each risk factor. Chi-square analysis was applied, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 172 articles found, 70 met the inclusion criteria. The mean rate of fat necrosis was 11.3 percent. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps had the highest rate of fat necrosis (14.4 percent), followed by pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (12.3 percent), superficial inferior epigastric artery (8.1 percent), and free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (6.9 percent). Significant predictors of fat necrosis included obesity (p = 0.035), prereconstruction irradiation (p = 0.022), postreconstruction irradiation (p < 0.001), active smoking (p < 0.001), and abdominal scars (p = 0.05). Protective factors included supercharging (p < 0.001) and bilateral reconstruction (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Although there is little agreement in the literature regarding risk factors for fat necrosis, the authors were able to demonstrate several significant predictors by systematically analyzing 70 articles. Improved knowledge of the risk factors for fat necrosis can help surgeons provide improved preoperative counseling and take measures to minimize the risk of this complication.

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous lumpectomy and radiation therapy: analysis of complications and satisfaction.

Background:Lumpectomy and radiation therapy (breast conservation therapy [BCT]) are common treatments for early-stage breast cancer. However, many of these patients will require a subsequent salvage mastectomy and reconstruction after a locoregional recurrence. This study examines whether prior BCT leads to higher rates of complications and dissatisfaction with subsequent mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Methods:All women undergoing initial breast reconstruction at an academic institution were identified (1999–2006). Women who had undergone prior BCT were compared with women without prior BCT. A questionnaire adapted from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Survey was administered. Rates of complications, as well as general and aesthetic satisfaction, were compared between the 2 groups. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the effects of prior BCT, age, comorbidities, reconstruction type, and time between radiation and reconstruction. Results:Overall, 532 women underwent 802 reconstructions, of whom 113 women (137 reconstructions) had prior BCT. Prior BCT did not correlate with higher complication rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09, P = 0.690), or lower general or aesthetic satisfaction (OR = 0.84, P = 0.559; OR = 0.91, P = 0.723, respectively); however, there was an increased rate of mastectomy skin flap loss (12.4% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.024). Increasing age was the most significant risk factor for complications and dissatisfaction. Conclusion:Radiation in the setting of BCT did not increase overall rates of complications or dissatisfaction with subsequent breast reconstruction in our patient population. These patients, however, had a higher incidence of mastectomy skin flap loss. These findings are important for preoperative counseling and intraoperative planning in patients with prior lumpectomy and radiation.

Breast reconstruction with tissue expanders: implementation of a standardized best-practices protocol to reduce infection rates.

Background: Periprosthetic infection remains a frustrating and costly complication of breast reconstruction with tissue expanders. Although some specific steps have been previously shown to reduce periprosthetic infections, no comprehensive protocol addressing all aspects of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative patient management has been evaluated in the literature. The authors’ goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of their protocol at reducing periprosthetic infections. Methods: A comprehensive, best-practices protocol was introduced and implemented in November of 2010. All patients undergoing breast reconstruction using tissue expanders at the authors’ institution in the 5 years before the protocol, and in the 2 years after, were analyzed. Results: Three hundred five patients underwent 456 tissue expander reconstructions in the 5 years before the protocol, and 198 patients underwent 313 reconstructions in the 2 years after. Significantly fewer patients developed periprosthetic infection after protocol (11.6 percent versus 18.4 percent; p = 0.042), and the number of infected tissue expanders trended toward a decrease (9.3 percent versus 13.2 percent; p = 0.097). On multivariate analysis, the protocol significantly reduced the odds of periprosthetic infection (OR, 0.45; p = 0.022). Predictors of infection included obesity (OR, 2.01; p = 0.045) and preoperative breast size larger than C cup (OR, 2.83; p = 0.006). Conclusions: The authors’ comprehensive, best-practices protocol allowed them to reduce the odds of tissue expander infections by 55 percent (OR, 0.45; p = 0.022). The authors were able to identify several potential areas of improvement that may help them lower the rate of infection further in the future. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Evidence-Based Scar Management: How to Improve Results with Technique and Technology.

Background: Scars represent the visible sequelae of trauma, injury, burn, or surgery. They may induce distress in the patient because of their aesthetically unpleasant appearance, especially if they are excessively raised, depressed, wide, or erythematous. They may also cause the patient symptoms of pain, tightness, and pruritus. Numerous products are marketed for scar prevention or improvement, but their efficacy is unclear. Methods: A literature review of high-level studies analyzing methods to prevent or improve hypertrophic scars, keloids, and striae distensae was performed. The evidence from these articles was analyzed to generate recommendations. Each intervention’s effectiveness at preventing or reducing scars was rated as none, low, or high, depending on the strength of the evidence for that intervention. Results: For the prevention of hypertrophic scars, silicone, tension reduction, and wound edge eversion seem to have high efficacy, whereas onion extract, pulsed-dye laser, pressure garments, and scar massage have low efficacy. For the treatment of existing hypertrophic scars, silicone, pulsed-dye laser, CO2 laser, corticosteroids, 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, and scar massage have high efficacy, whereas onion extract and fat grafting seem to have low efficacy. For keloid scars, effective adjuncts to excision include corticosteroids, mitomycin C, bleomycin, and radiation therapy. No intervention seems to have significant efficacy in the prevention or treatment of striae distensae. Conclusion: Although scars can never be completely eliminated in an adult, this article presents the most commonly used, evidence-based methods to improve the quality and symptoms of hypertrophic scars, as well as keloid scars and striae distensae.

Computerized segmentation and measurement of chronic wound images

An estimated 6.5 million patients in the United States are affected by chronic wounds, with more than US

Evidence-Based Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: The Maxi-Mini Approach

25 billion and countless hours spent annually for all aspects of chronic wound care. There is a need for an intelligent software tool to analyze wound images, characterize wound tissue composition, measure wound size, and monitor changes in wound in between visits. Performed manually, this process is very time-consuming and subject to intra- and inter-reader variability. In this work, our objective is to develop methods to segment, measure and characterize clinically presented chronic wounds from photographic images. The first step of our method is to generate a Red-Yellow-Black-White (RYKW) probability map, which then guides the segmentation process using either optimal thresholding or region growing. The red, yellow and black probability maps are designed to handle the granulation, slough and eschar tissues, respectively; while the white probability map is to detect the white label card for measurement calibration purposes. The innovative aspects of this work include defining a four-dimensional probability map specific to wound characteristics, a computationally efficient method to segment wound images utilizing the probability map, and auto-calibration of wound measurements using the content of the image. These methods were applied to 80 wound images, captured in a clinical setting at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, with the ground truth independently generated by the consensus of at least two clinicians. While the mean inter-reader agreement between the readers varied between 67.4% and 84.3%, the computer achieved an average accuracy of 75.1%.

Analysis of Factors Contributing to Severity of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema

Summary: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction is a high-risk procedure, but it can be performed safely if a systematic approach is followed. In this article, the authors present their evidence-based technique for abdominal wall reconstruction. This approach aims at reducing rates of complications and hernia recurrence, starting with critical patient selection; preoperative patient optimization; adherence to intraoperative principles including preservation of vascular perforators through maintenance of composite tissue with limited undermining; direct supported mesh reinforcement of midline musculofascial reapproximation; use of percutaneous transfascial suture mesh fixation; careful attention to dead space obliteration in any plane; and aggressive soft-tissue resection of marginal, undermined, or tenuous skin and subcutaneous tissue. Postoperative strategies to decrease complications are also used. The authors’ surgical technique is described in detail, and pilot data are presented to support the authors’ approach. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis

BackgroundUpper extremity lymphedema is a well-described complication of breast cancer treatment. Risk factors for lymphedema development include axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), obesity, increasing age, radiation, and postoperative complications. In this study, we seek to evaluate a cohort of patients who have either self-referred or been referred to the Department of Physical Therapy for lymphedema treatment. Our goal is to evaluate specific risk factors associated with the severity of lymphedema in this patient population. MethodsAll patients who presented to the Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, with a chief complaint of upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment were reviewed retrospectively. Upper extremity lymphedema index (UELI) was used as a severity indicator and patient factors including demographics and breast cancer treatments were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. ResultsFifty (4.5%) patients presented for upper extremity lymphedema treatment after breast cancer treatment (total of 1106 patients treated surgically for breast cancer). Greater UELIs were found in patients 50 years and older, those with ALND, radiation, chemotherapy, pathologic stage greater than 3, and an International Society of Lymphology lymphedema stage II (P < 0.05). The multivariate model showed age older than 50 years and pathologic stage greater than 3 were significant predictors of higher UELI (P < 0.05). ConclusionsIn this study, we report that in patients who present for lymphedema treatment, increased UELI is significantly related to ALND, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, age, and pathologic stage. An improved understanding of the patient population referred for lymphedema treatment will allow for the identification of patients who may be candidates for therapeutic intervention.

Evidence-Based Strategies to Reduce Postoperative Complications in Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND Compared to other cosmetic procedures, rhinoplasty has a relatively low patient satisfaction rate, due to the difficulty of the procedure, and potentially unrealistic patient expectations. Understanding the reasons behind patient dissatisfaction is key to improving outcomes. Previous authors have done surgeon-initiated surveys, expert ratings, and morphologic measurements, to measure rhinoplasty success. No study has analyzed online reviews by patients to identify reasons for dissatisfaction with rhinoplasty. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to analyze satisfaction patterns in rhinoplasty using online reviews. METHODS All primary rhinoplasty reviews on RealSelf (Seattle, WA), a social media website for patients undergoing cosmetic surgery, were reviewed. The researchers recorded patient gender, whether they were satisfied, and the reasons for satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Male and female patients were compared, using chi-squared analysis. RESULTS There were 2326 reviews for primary rhinoplasty (2032 females, 294 males). The overall satisfaction rate was 83.6%. Significantly more females than males were satisfied (87.6% vs 56.1%, P < .001). Among males, the most common reasons for dissatisfaction were residual dorsal hump, under-rotated tip, and a nose that was too small. Among females, the most common reasons for dissatisfaction were residual dorsal hump, under-rotated tip, and bulbous tip. Among dissatisfied patients, females were significantly more likely than males to precisely verbalize the morphologic or functional reason for their dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS We found that males had lower satisfaction with rhinoplasty, and were more vague when expressing reasons for dissatisfaction, than females. Social media provides a novel way to understand reasons for patient dissatisfaction after cosmetic surgery.