Iciar Alberdi
Center for International Forestry Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Iciar Alberdi.
European Journal of Forest Research | 2016
Miren del Río; Hans Pretzsch; Iciar Alberdi; Kamil Bielak; Felipe Bravo; Andreas Brunner; Sonia Condés; Mark J. Ducey; Teresa Fonseca; Nikolas von Lüpke; Maciej Pach; Sanja Perić; Thomas Perot; Zahera Souidi; Peter Spathelf; Hubert Sterba; Martina Tijardović; Margarida Tomé; Patrick Vallet; Andrés Bravo-Oviedo
The growth and yield of mixed-species stands has become an important topic of research since there are certain advantages of this type of forest as regards functions and services. However, the concepts and methods used to characterize mixed stands need to be understood, as well as harmonized and standardized. In this review we have compiled a set of measures, indices, and methods at stand level to characterize the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed stands, and we discuss the pros and cons of their application in growth and yield studies. Parameters for the characterization of mixed stand structure such as stand density, species composition, horizontal (intermingling) and vertical tree distribution pattern, tree size distribution, and age composition are described, detailing the potential as well as the constraints of these parameters for understanding resource capture, use, and efficiency in mixed stands. Furthermore, a set of stand-level parameters was evaluated to characterize the dynamics of mixed stands, e.g. height growth and space partitioning, self- and alien-thinning, and growth partitioning among trees. The deviations and changes in the behaviour of the analysed parameters in comparison with pure stand conditions due to inter-specific interactions are of particular interest. As regards stand productivity, we reviewed site productivity indices, the growth–density relationship in mixed stands as well as methods to compare productivity in mixed versus monospecific stands. Finally, we discuss the main problems associated with the methodology such as up-scaling from tree to stand level as well as the relevance of standardized measures and methods for improving forest growth and yield research in mixed stands. The main challenges are also outlined, especially the need for qualitatively sound data.
Remote Sensing | 2016
Mathias Neumann; Adam Moreno; Christopher Thurnher; Volker Mues; Sanna Härkönen; Matteo Mura; Olivier Bouriaud; Mait Lang; Giuseppe Cardellini; Alain Thivolle-Cazat; Karol Bronisz; Ján Merganič; Iciar Alberdi; Rasmus Astrup; Frits Mohren; Maosheng Zhao; Hubert Hasenauer
Net primary production (NPP) is an important ecological metric for studying forest ecosystems and their carbon sequestration, for assessing the potential supply of food or timber and quantifying the impacts of climate change on ecosystems. The global MODIS NPP dataset using the MOD17 algorithm provides valuable information for monitoring NPP at 1-km resolution. Since coarse-resolution global climate data are used, the global dataset may contain uncertainties for Europe. We used a 1-km daily gridded European climate data set with the MOD17 algorithm to create the regional NPP dataset MODIS EURO. For evaluation of this new dataset, we compare MODIS EURO with terrestrial driven NPP from analyzing and harmonizing forest inventory data (NFI) from 196,434 plots in 12 European countries as well as the global MODIS NPP dataset for the years 2000 to 2012. Comparing these three NPP datasets, we found that the global MODIS NPP dataset differs from NFI NPP by 26%, while MODIS EURO only differs by 7%. MODIS EURO also agrees with NFI NPP across scales (from continental, regional to country) and gradients (elevation, location, tree age, dominant species, etc.). The agreement is particularly good for elevation, dominant species or tree height. This suggests that using improved climate data allows the MOD17 algorithm to provide realistic NPP estimates for Europe. Local discrepancies between MODIS EURO and NFI NPP can be related to differences in stand density due to forest management and the national carbon estimation methods. With this study, we provide a consistent, temporally continuous and spatially explicit productivity dataset for the years 2000 to 2012 on a 1-km resolution, which can be used to assess climate change impacts on ecosystems or the potential biomass supply of the European forests for an increasing bio-based economy. MODIS EURO data are made freely available at ftp://palantir.boku.ac.at/Public/MODIS_EURO.
Annals of Forest Science | 2016
Susana Barreiro; Mart Jan Schelhaas; Gerald Kändler; Clara Antón-Fernández; Antoine Colin; Jean Daniel Bontemps; Iciar Alberdi; Sonia Condés; Marius Dumitru; Angel Ferezliev; Christoph Fischer; Patrizia Gasparini; Thomas Gschwantner; Georg Kindermann; Bjarki Kjartansson; Pál Kovácsevics; Miloš Kučera; Anders Lundström; Gheorghe Marin; Gintautas Mozgeris; Thomas Nord-Larsen; Tuula Packalen; John Redmond; Sandro Sacchelli; Allan Sims; Arnór Snorrason; Nickola Stoyanov; Esther Thürig; Per Erik Wikberg
Key messageThis analysis of the tools and methods currently in use for reporting woody biomass availability in 21 European countries has shown that most countries use, or are developing, National Forest Inventory-oriented models whereas the others use standwise forest inventory--oriented methods.ContextKnowledge of realistic and sustainable wood availability in Europe is highly relevant to define climate change mitigation strategies at national and European level, to support the development of realistic targets for increased use of renewable energy sources and of industry wood. Future scenarios at European level highlight a deficit of domestic wood supply compared to wood consumption, and some European countries state they are harvesting above the increment.AimsSeveral country-level studies on wood availability have been performed for international reporting. However, it remains essential to improve the knowledge on the projection methods used across Europe to better evaluate forecasts.MethodsAnalysis was based on descriptions supplied by the national correspondentsinvolved in USEWOOD COST Action (FP1001), and further enriched with additionaldata from international reports that allowedcharacterisation of the forests in these countries for the same base year.ResultsMethods currently used for projecting wood availability were described for 21 European countries. Projection systems based on National Forest Inventory (NFI) data prevail over methods based on forest management plans. Only a few countries lack nationwide projection tools, still using tools developed for specific areas.ConclusionsA wide range of NFI-based systems for projecting wood availability exists, being under permanent improvement. The validation of projection forecasts and the inclusion of climate sensitive growth models into these tools are common aims for most countries. Cooperation among countries would result in higher efficiency when developing and improving projection tools and better comparability among them.
Annals of Forest Science | 2016
Claude A. Vidal; Iciar Alberdi; John Redmond; Martin Vestman; Adrian Lanz; Klemens Schadauer
Key messageDespite agreements on definitions, the national data provided for international reporting are lacking comparability. To address this limitation the European National Forest Inventory Network has established criteria to harmonise definitions and to provide tools to transform national data into internationally comparable data.ContextForest reporting presents a series of challenges for countries, owing to diverse processes at international level such as the Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. Further challenges are faced at European level with Forest Europe and policy needs.AimsThe aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the national and international forest reporting processes and of the role of the National Forest Inventories (NFIs) and the long-associated challenges resulting from a lack of comparability in definitions used. In addition, there is a discussion on the role of the European National Forest Inventory Network (ENFIN) as a facilitator for enhancing harmonization and comparability of national data and the ancillary information required to monitor European forestry-related policies.MethodsNFIs take part to international reporting processes as providers of information. They are correspondent to the FRA process, and then they know very well the context of harmonization. Participating in the ENFIN research projects, NFIs, and particularly authors, conducted a screening exercise on harmonization status at European and World level.ResultsThis review article is a synthesis of the main findings of the abovementioned screening exercise. It highlights the main gaps in terms of comparability of result in international reporting. Thanks to ENFIN harmonization research project, it gives same ways of working as a possible benchmark for the rest of the world.ConclusionBased on the international reporting exercises, their interactions, and impacts on new forestry policy requirements, the need for a strengthened harmonization process can clearly be demonstrated. Due to European policy needs, research work within ENFIN has been initiated to develop tools for building comparable results at international level. This work is an important benchmark particularly for countries outside Europe from which to base future harmonization work.
Journal of Mountain Science | 2012
Alicia Ledo; Sonia Condés; Iciar Alberdi
Cloud forests are unusual and fragile habitats, being one of the least studied and least understood ecosystems. The tropical Andean dominion is considered one of the most significant places in the world as regards biological diversity, with a very high level of endemism. The biodiversity was analysed in an isolated remnant area of a tropical montane cloud forest known as the “Bosque de Neblina de Cuyas”, in the North of the Peruvian Andean range. Composition, structure and dead wood were measured or estimated. The values obtained were compared with other cloud forests. The study revealed a high level of forest biodiversity, although the level of biodiversity differs from one area to another: in the inner areas, where human pressure is almost inexistent, the biodiversity values increase. The high species richness and the low dominance among species bear testimony to this montane cloud forest as a real enclave of biodiversity.
Science of The Total Environment | 2017
Laura Hernández; Robert Jandl; Viorel Blujdea; Aleksi Lehtonen; Kaie Kriiska; Iciar Alberdi; Veiko Adermann; Isabel Cañellas; Gheorghe Marin; Daniel Moreno-Fernández; Ivika Ostonen; Mats Varik; Markus Didion
Accurate carbon-balance accounting in forest soils is necessary for the development of climate change policy. However, changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) occur slowly and these changes may not be captured through repeated soil inventories. Simulation models may be used as alternatives to SOC measurement. The Yasso07 model presents a suitable alternative because most of the data required for the application are readily available in countries with common forest surveys. In this study, we test the suitability of Yasso07 for simulating SOC stocks and stock changes in a variety of European forests affected by different climatic, land use and forest management conditions and we address country-specific cases with differing resources and data availability. The simulated SOC stocks differed only slightly from measured data, providing realistic, reasonable mean SOC estimations per region or forest type. The change in the soil carbon pool over time, which is the target parameter for SOC reporting, was generally found to be plausible although not in the case of Mediterranean forest soils. As expected under stable forest management conditions, both land cover and climate play major roles in determining the SOC stock in forest soils. Greater mean SOC stocks were observed in northern latitudes (or at higher altitude) than in southern latitudes (or plains) and conifer forests were found to store a notably higher amount of SOC than broadleaf forests. Furthermore, as regards change in SOC, an inter-annual sink effect was identified for most of the European forest types studied. Our findings corroborate the suitability of Yasso07 to assess the impact of forest management and land use change on the SOC balance of forests soils, as well as to accurately simulate SOC in dead organic matter (DOM) and mineral soil pools separately. The obstacles encountered when applying the Yasso07 model reflect a lack of available input data. Future research should focus on improving our knowledge of C inputs from compartments such as shrubs, herbs, coarse woody debris and fine roots. This should include turnover rates and quality of the litter in all forest compartments from a wider variety of tree species and sites. Despite the limitations identified, the SOC balance estimations provided by the Yasso07 model are sufficiently complete, accurate and transparent to make it suitable for reporting purposes such as those required under the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) and KP (Kyoto Protocol) for a wide range of forest conditions in Europe.
European Journal of Forest Research | 2018
Iciar Alberdi; Sonia Condés; Ronald E. McRoberts; Susanne Winter
Because shrub cover is related to many forest ecosystem functions, it is one of the most relevant variables for describing these communities. Nevertheless, a harmonized indicator of shrub cover for large-scale reporting is lacking. The aims of the study were threefold: to define a shrub indicator that can be used by European countries for harmonized shrub cover estimation using data from their respective national forest inventories (NFIs); to quantify the effects of using different NFI field cover scales; and to establish bridges to facilitate harmonized estimation. Data for shrub species cover from the Third Spanish NFI together with scales for cover assessment from 16 European NFIs were used. The indicator, mean species cover (MSC), was defined for each species and each European forest category. Estimates of MSC calculated using species covers recorded for field plots, with 1% interval widths (MSCobs), were compared with the MSC values that would be obtained for the same data with the different European cover scales (MSCpred). Residuals calculated as differences between MSCobs and MSCpred were analyzed, and a linear mixed model was used as bridging function to adjust predictions and thus further harmonize estimates. Scales with only two or three intervals produced the greatest residuals, while all the other analyzed scales had residuals less than 5%. Most scales, except those most similar to Braun-Blanquet, displayed a tendency to be unreliable for larger covers. The proposed mean species cover indicator provides comparable estimates for shrub communities at large scales. The linear models improved the harmonization of MSC for the scales having two and three intervals.
Archive | 2016
Iciar Alberdi; Thomas Gschwantner; Michal Bosela; John Redmond; Thomas Riedel; Arnór Snorrason; Patrizia Gasparini; Urs-Beat Braendli; Jonas Fridman; Stein Tomter; Gintaras Kulbokas; Adrian Lanz; Claude A. Vidal
The main objective of COST Action Usewood was to improve and harmonise data and information from National Forest Inventories (NFIs) on the potential supply of wood resources at European level considering the actual extent. This will improve the quality of data available to describe wood resources and possible wood uses. Such high quality information could be used for future scenario modelling and help inform political decision making for the renewable energy sector. The harmonisation of NFIs is based on reference definitions. Four different topics in terms of wood supply are covered and described in this chapter: forest available for wood supply, change estimation, stem quality, other wooded land and trees outside forest. These definitions will enable data comparison between countries and consequently, this will imply a transparent, comprehensive and robust information for decision-making.
Archive | 2016
John Redmond; Thomas Gschwantner; Thomas Riedel; Iciar Alberdi; Claude A. Vidal; Michal Bosela; Christoph Fischer; Laura Hernández; Miloš Kučera; Andrius Kuliešis; Stein Tomter; Martin Vestman; Adrian Lanz
The collection of information on the approaches of wood resources assessment was essential to provide background details necessary to meet the objectives of COST Action Usewood. This chapter describes the processes that were used by COST Action Usewood to review the wood resource assessment methods used in NFI’s and gives an insight into the differences and similarities of definitions and methods applied by European NFIs. To address the specific objectives of COST Action Usewood, the activities of WG1 were organised into four sub-groups that would comprehensively describe the assessment of wood resources. The four sub-groups dealt with the topics of; Forest Available for Wood Supply, Stem Quality, Change Estimation and Other Wooded Land and Trees Outside Forest. The information provided through questionnaires and country reports provided the raw materials required to understand the differences between the definitions and components that make up the definitions that are applied nationally by the various NFIs. Results from the four sub-groups are presented outlining the diversity and similarities among the assessment of wood resources between countries.
Archive | 2016
Laura Hernández; Iciar Alberdi; Ronald E. McRoberts; David Morales-Hidalgo; John Redmond; Claude A. Vidal
Since woody biomass is an important renewable energy source and plays a decisive role in mitigating the effects of climate change the issue of the availability of wood is emerging as a relevant post-Kyoto decision. Accordingly, from a national to a global scale, production of better information on the quantities of wood available has turned out to be of importance for assessing sustainable management decisions in forest policy formulations. Additionally, the majority of these agreements require substantial amounts of harmonised, comparable and accurate information from the parties to assess overall progress, compliance with obligations, as well as to determine the next steps of the agreements. This chapter summarises the diversity of sampling methods, definitions and wood resource assessments (focused on forest available for wood supply, stem quality, change estimation and other wooded land and trees outside forest), for twelve NFIs outside Europe (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Ecuador, Japan, New Zealand, Peru, Russia, South Korea and the US) that contributed to this book. Then, the differences and similarities among them and the European countries are discussed. The analyses provide a global overview of the current state of the potential harmonised assessment of wood availability and use.