Idan Goren
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Idan Goren.
Gut | 2018
Renaud Gaujoux; Elina Starosvetsky; Naama Maimon; Francesco Vallania; Haggai Bar-Yoseph; Sigal Pressman; Roni Weisshof; Idan Goren; Keren Rabinowitz; Matti Waterman; Henit Yanai; Iris Dotan; Edmond Sabo; Yehuda Chowers; Purvesh Khatri; Shai S. Shen-Orr
Objective Although anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) therapies represent a major breakthrough in IBD therapy, their cost–benefit ratio is hampered by an overall 30% non-response rate, adverse side effects and high costs. Thus, finding predictive biomarkers of non-response prior to commencing anti-TNFα therapy is of high value. Design We analysed publicly available whole-genome expression profiles of colon biopsies obtained from multiple cohorts of patients with IBD using a combined computational deconvolution—meta-analysis paradigm which allows to estimate immune cell contribution to the measured expression and capture differential regulatory programmes otherwise masked due to variation in cellular composition. Insights from this in silico approach were experimentally validated in biopsies and blood samples of three independent test cohorts. Results We found the proportion of plasma cells as a robust pretreatment biomarker of non-response to therapy, which we validated in two independent cohorts of immune-stained colon biopsies, where a plasma cellular score from inflamed biopsies was predictive of non-response with an area under the curve (AUC) of 82%. Meta-analysis of the cell proportion-adjusted gene expression data suggested that an increase in inflammatory macrophages in anti-TNFα non-responding individuals is associated with the upregulation of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1) and chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2)-chemokine ligand 7 (CCL7) –axes. Blood gene expression analysis of an independent cohort, identified TREM-1 downregulation in non-responders at baseline, which was predictive of response with an AUC of 94%. Conclusions Our study proposes two clinically feasible assays, one in biopsy and one in blood, for predicting non-response to anti-TNFα therapy prior to initiation of treatment. Moreover, it suggests that mechanism-driven novel drugs for non-responders should be developed.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2015
Idan Goren; Lior Yahav; Hagit Tulchinsky; Iris Dotan
Background:The serologic status of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who develop postoperative pouchitis was compared with that of patients with Crohns disease (CD) and unoperated patients with UC. Methods:Pouch patients were stratified into normal pouch, acute/recurrent acute pouchitis, and chronic pouchitis/Crohns-like disease of the pouch groups. Antibodies against glycans associated with CD (anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae, anti-laminaribioside, anti-chitobioside, and anti-mannobioside carbohydrate antibodies [ASCA, ALCA, ACCA, and AMCA, respectively]) were detected and correlated with type of inflammatory bowel disease and pouch behavior. Results:A total of 501 patients with inflammatory bowel diseases were recruited: 250 (50%) CD, 124 (24.7%) unoperated UC, and 127 (25.3%) UC-pouch. At least 1 positive antibody was detected in 77.6% CD, 52.0% UC-pouch and 33.1% unoperated UC (P < 0.0001 for all). ACCA and AMCA prevalence in CD, UC-pouch and unoperated patients with UC were 33.2%, 24.4%, and 16.9% (P = 0.003 for all) and 35.2%, 26.8%, and 7.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001 for all). ALCA and ASCA were more prevalent in patients with CD than unoperated UC and UC-pouch patients. A longer interval since pouch surgery was associated with inflammatory pouch behavior: 12.45, 11.39, and 8.5 years for acute/recurrent acute pouchitis, chronic pouchitis/Crohns-like disease of the pouch, and normal pouch, respectively, P = 0.01 for all. Conclusions:The prevalence of the CD-associated anti-glycan antibodies ACCA and AMCA is significantly increased in UC-pouch patients, suggesting that pouch surgery may trigger differential immune responses to glycans. The finding that the serology of UC-pouch patients shares similarities with that of patients with CD supports the notion that those 2 inflammatory bowel diseases share a common pathogenic pathway.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2018
Shay Ben-Shachar; Yael Finezilber; Hofit Elad; Keren Rabinowitz; Idan Goren; Ofer Isakov; Henit Yanai; Iris Dotan
Background We evaluated the impact of variations in ATG16L1 and NOD2 and genes on serologic responses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods We recruited 308 IBD patients: 130 with Crohns disease (CD), 67 with ulcerative colitis (UC), 111 with UC and an ileal pouch (UC-pouch), and 74 healthy controls. NOD2 variants (1007fs, G908R, R702W) and the ATG16L1 A300T variant were analyzed. The antiglycan antibodies anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA), antilaminaribioside (ALCA), antichitobioside (ACCA), and antimannobioside carbohydrate (AMCA) were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Antichitobioside was positive in 28% of patients with CD carrying the ATG16L1 A300T variant (either heterozygote or homozygote) compared with only 3% in those without the variant (P < 0.001). Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae was positive in 86% of patients with CD carrying the NOD2 1007fs variant compared with 36% in those without the variant (P < 0.001). UC-pouch patients with the NOD2 1007fs variant had elevated ASCA and ALCA levels compared with those without the variant (50% vs 7%, P = 0.004, and 50% vs 8%, P = 0.006, respectively). Importantly, ATG16L1 A300T and NOD2 variants were not associated with serologic responses in healthy controls and unoperated UC patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that these genetic variants are the main factors associated with specific antiglycan antibody levels in CD and pouch patients. Conclusions Genetic variants may have disease-specific phenotypic (serotypic) effects. This implies that genetic risk factors may also be disease modifiers.
Gastroenterology | 2014
Idan Goren; Lior Yahav; Hagit Tulchinsky; Iris Dotan
characteristic (ROC) curves. The strength of relationship was evaluated according to conventional thresholds whereby 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 indicate small, moderate, and large degrees of responsiveness, respectively.1 Results: Among 121 patients, 29 were clinically unchanged and 92 were changed (Table 1). Between weeks 0 and 6 or 10, the effect sizes and Guyatts responsiveness statistics (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) based on mean scores for the MMCS, MBS, and UCEIS were 0.49 (0.28, 0.71), 0.49 (0.28, 0.71), and 0.58 (0.36, 0.81) and 0.32 (0.11, 0.53), 0.33 (0.12, 0.54), and 0.47 (0.25, 0.69), respectively. The corresponding estimates (95% CI) for the areas under the ROC curves were 0.66 (0.55, 0.78), 0.65 (0.54, 0.77), and 0.68 (0.58, 0.79) The ROC curves are displayed in Figure 1. Conclusion: Although the UCEIS had greater numerical values, the MMCS, MBS, and UCEIS displayed similar, small-to-moderate, responsiveness for the assessment of UC disease activity. These results have important implications for sample size in early drug development. References 1. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):459-68. Table 1. Score changes between 0 and 6/10weeks in clinically changed and unchanged groups
Gastroenterology | 2018
Henit Yanai; Idan Goren; Leah Reshef; Lihi Godny; Karin Yadgar; Keren Zonenesain; Iris Dotan
Gastroenterology | 2018
Henit Yanai; Idan Goren; Lihi Godny; Shay Ben-Shachar; Nitsan Maharshak; Yulia Ron; Karin Yadgar; Keren Zonenesain; Tomer Ziv-Baran; Iris Dotan
Gastroenterology | 2018
Lihi Godny; Tamar Pfeffer-Gik; Idan Goren; Hagit Tulchinsky; Iris Dotan
Gastroenterology | 2018
Lihi Godny; Leah Reshef; Tamar Pfeffer-Gik; Idan Goren; Karin Yadgar; Keren Zonenesain; Revital Barkan; Henit Yanai; Uri Gophna; Hagit Tulchinsky; Iris Dotan
Gastroenterology | 2017
Idan Goren; Lihi Godny; Nitsan Maharshak; Hagit Tulchinsky; Iris Dotan
Gastroenterology | 2016
Idan Goren; Lior Yahav; Hagit Tulchinsky; Iris Dotan