Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ides Boone is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ides Boone.


Risk Analysis | 2009

NUSAP Method for Evaluating the Data Quality in a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Model for Salmonella in the Pork Production Chain

Ides Boone; Yves Van der Stede; Kaatje Bollaerts; David Vose; Dominiek Maes; Jeroen Dewulf; Winy Messens; Georges Daube; Marc Aerts; Koen Mintiens

The numeral unit spread assessment pedigree (NUSAP) system was implemented to evaluate the quality of input parameters in a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) model for Salmonella spp. in minced pork meat. The input parameters were grouped according to four successive exposure pathways: (1) primary production (2) transport, holding, and slaughterhouse, (3) postprocessing, distribution, and storage, and (4) preparation and consumption. An inventory of 101 potential input parameters was used for building the QMRA model. The characteristics of each parameter were defined using a standardized procedure to assess (1) the source of information, (2) the sampling methodology and sample size, and (3) the distributional properties of the estimate. Each parameter was scored by a panel of experts using a pedigree matrix containing four criteria (proxy, empirical basis, method, and validation) to assess the quality, and this was graphically represented by means of kite diagrams. The parameters obtained significantly lower scores for the validation criterion as compared with the other criteria. Overall strengths of parameters related to the primary production module were significantly stronger compared to the other modules (the transport, holding, and slaughterhouse module, the processing, distribution, and storage module, and the preparation and consumption module). The pedigree assessment contributed to select 20 parameters, which were subsequently introduced in the QMRA model. The NUSAP methodology and kite diagrams are objective tools to discuss and visualize the quality of the parameters in a structured way. These two tools can be used in the selection procedure of input parameters for a QMRA, and can lead to a more transparent quality assurance in the QMRA.


Journal of Risk Research | 2010

NUSAP: a method to evaluate the quality of assumptions in quantitative microbial risk assessment

Ides Boone; Yves Van der Stede; Jeroen Dewulf; Winy Messens; Marc Aerts; Georges Daube; Koen Mintiens

The Numeral Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) system was implemented to evaluate assumptions in a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) model for Salmonella spp. in minced pork meat. This QMRA model allows the testing of mitigation strategies for the reduction of human salmonellosis and aims to serve as a basis for science‐based policy making. The NUSAP method was used to assess the subjective component of assumptions in the QMRA model by a set of four pedigree criteria: ‘the influence of situational limitations’, ‘plausibility’, ‘choice space’ and ‘the agreement among peers’. After identifying 13 key assumptions relevant for the QMRA model, a workshop was organized to assess the importance of these assumptions on the output of the QMRA. The quality of the assumptions was visualized using diagnostic and kite diagrams. The diagnostic diagram pinpointed assumptions with a high degree of subjectivity and a high ‘expected influence on the model results’ score. Examples of those assumptions that should be dealt with care are the assumptions regarding the concentration of Salmonella on the pig carcass at the beginning of the slaughter process and the assumptions related to the Salmonella prevalence in the slaughter process. The kite diagrams allowed a clear overview of the pedigree scores for each assumption as well as a representation of expert (dis)agreement. The evaluation of the assumptions using the NUSAP system enhanced the debate on the uncertainty and its communication in the results of a QMRA model. It highlighted the model’s strong and weak points and was helpful for redesigning critical modules. Since the evaluation of assumptions allows a more critical approach of the QMRA process, it is useful for policy makers as it aims to increase the transparency and acceptance of management decisions based on a QMRA model.


International Conference on the Epidemiology and Control of Biological, Chemical and Physical Hazards in Pigs and Pork | 2007

Identification of Salmonella high risk pig farms in belgium suing semi-parametric quantile regression

Kaatje Bollaerts; Marc Aerts; Stefaan Ribbens; Y. van der Stede; Ides Boone; Koen Mintiens

Since consumption of pork contaminated with Salmonella is an important source of human Salmonellosis in Belgium, policy makers implement the identification of the 10% most Salmonella problematic pig herds. These herds are then encouraged to take control measures to reduce the Salmonella infection burden. To identify high risk herds, serological data were collected, reported as Sample to Positive ratios (SP-ratios). Objectives of the current study are to identify the 10% highest risk herds and to investigate risk factors associated with high Sa/monel/a prevalence. We propose to identify risk herds using semiparametric quantile regression. The risk factor analysis is conducted using Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Finally, practical rules to identify risk farms are deduced.


Journal of The Royal Statistical Society Series A-statistics in Society | 2008

Identification of Salmonella high risk pig‐herds in Belgium by using semiparametric quantile regression

Kaatje Bollaerts; Marc Aerts; Stefaan Ribbens; Yves Van der Stede; Ides Boone; Koen Mintiens


Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 2009

Expert judgement in a risk assessment model for Salmonella spp. in pork: the performance of different weighting schemes.

Ides Boone; Yves Van der Stede; Kaatje Bollaerts; Winny Messens; David Vose; Georges Daube; Marc Aerts; Koen Mintiens


Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift | 2010

Quantitative microbial risk assessment: methods and quality assurance

Ides Boone; Y. Van der Stede; Marc Aerts; Koen Mintiens; Georges Daube


Archive | 2008

Development of a modular quantitative microbial risk assessment to evaluate zoonotic risks in Belgium: Salmonellosis through consumption of pork as an example

Kaatje Bollaerts; Winy Messens; Laurent Delhalle; Marc Aerts; Jeroen Dewulf; E. Debusser; Ides Boone; K. Grijspeerdt


Proceedings 7the International Symposium Safepork | 2007

Identification of Salmonella high risk pig farms in Belgium using semi-parametric quantile regression

Kaatje Bollaerts; Marc Aerts; Stefaan Ribbens; Y Van Der Stede; Ides Boone; Koen Mintiens


International Conference on the Epidemiology and Control of Biological, Chemical and Physical Hazards in Pigs and Pork | 2007

Quantitative risk assessment of human salmonellosis through consumption of pork in Belgium: a modular risk model

K. Grijspeerdt; Winy Messens; Kaatje Bollaerts; P. van Dessel; Laurent Delhalle; Dominiek Maes; Ides Boone; Koen Mintiens


Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine. Proceedings of a meeting held at Liverpool, UK, on the 26th-28th March 2008. | 2008

A structured expert judgement study on Salmonella spp. in pork: analyses of different weighting schemes.

Ides Boone; Y. van der Stede; Kaatje Bollaerts; Winy Messens; K. Grijspeerdt; Georges Daube; Koen Mintiens; E. J. Peeler; L. Alban; A. Russell

Collaboration


Dive into the Ides Boone's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Winy Messens

European Food Safety Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Vose

Food and Drug Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge