Ido Weinberg

Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism and risk of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE Thrombolytic therapy may be beneficial in the treatment of some patients with pulmonary embolism. To date, no analysis has had adequate statistical power to determine whether thrombolytic therapy is associated with improved survival, compared with conventional anticoagulation. OBJECTIVE To determine mortality benefits and bleeding risks associated with thrombolytic therapy compared with anticoagulation in acute pulmonary embolism, including the subset of hemodynamically stable patients with right ventricular dysfunction (intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism). DATA SOURCES PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from inception through April 10, 2014. STUDY SELECTION Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials comparing thrombolytic therapy vs anticoagulant therapy in pulmonary embolism patients. Sixteen trials comprising 2115 individuals were identified. Eight trials comprising 1775 patients specified inclusion of patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently extracted trial-level data including number of patients, patient characteristics, duration of follow-up, and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes were risk of recurrent embolism and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Peto odds ratio (OR) estimates and associated 95% CIs were calculated using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS Use of thrombolytics was associated with lower all-cause mortality (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; 2.17% [23/1061] vs 3.89% [41/1054] with anticoagulants; number needed to treat [NNT] = 59) and greater risks of major bleeding (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.91-3.91; 9.24% [98/1061] vs 3.42% [36/1054]; number needed to harm [NNH] = 18) and ICH (OR, 4.63; 95% CI, 1.78-12.04; 1.46% [15/1024] vs 0.19% [2/1019]; NNH = 78). Major bleeding was not significantly increased in patients 65 years and younger (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.50-3.14). Thrombolysis was associated with a lower risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.74; 1.17% [12/1024] vs 3.04% [31/1019]; NNT = 54). In intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism trials, thrombolysis was associated with lower mortality (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92) and more major bleeding events (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.07-4.92). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with pulmonary embolism, including those who were hemodynamically stable with right ventricular dysfunction, thrombolytic therapy was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality and increased risks of major bleeding and ICH. However, findings may not apply to patients with pulmonary embolism who are hemodynamically stable without right ventricular dysfunction.

The Massachusetts General Hospital Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (MGH PERT): Creation of a Multidisciplinary Program to Improve Care of Patients With Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

Abstract New and innovative tools have emerged for the treatment of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). These novel treatments, when considered alongside existing therapy, such as anticoagulation, systemic intravenous thrombolysis, and open surgical pulmonary embolectomy, have the potential to improve patient outcomes. However, data comparing different treatment modalities are sparse, and guidelines provide only general advice for their use. Treatment decisions rest on clinician expertise and institutional resources. Because various medical and surgical specialties offer different perspectives and expertise, a multidisciplinary approach to patients with massive and submassive PE is required. To address this need, we created a novel multidisciplinary program – the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) – which brings together multiple specialists to rapidly evaluate intermediate- and high-risk patients with PE, formulate a treatment plan, and mobilize the necessary resources to provide the highest level of care. Development of a clinical, educational, and research infrastructure, as well as the creation of a national PERT consortium, will make our experience available to other institutions and serve as a platform for future studies to improve the care of complex patients with massive and submassive PE.

The Systolic Blood Pressure Difference Between Arms and Cardiovascular Disease in the Framingham Heart Study

BACKGROUND An increased interarm systolic blood pressure difference is an easily determined physical examination finding. The relationship between interarm systolic blood pressure difference and risk of future cardiovascular disease is uncertain. We described the prevalence and risk factor correlates of interarm systolic blood pressure difference in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) original and offspring cohorts and examined the association between interarm systolic blood pressure difference and incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. METHODS An increased interarm systolic blood pressure difference was defined as ≥ 10 mm Hg using the average of initial and repeat blood pressure measurements obtained in both arms. Participants were followed through 2010 for incident cardiovascular disease events. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to investigate the effect of interarm systolic blood pressure difference on incident cardiovascular disease. RESULTS We examined 3390 (56.3% female) participants aged 40 years and older, free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, mean age of 61.1 years, who attended a FHS examination between 1991 and 1994 (original cohort) and from 1995 to 1998 (offspring cohort). The mean absolute interarm systolic blood pressure difference was 4.6 mm Hg (range 0-78). Increased interarm systolic blood pressure difference was present in 317 (9.4%) participants. The median follow-up time was 13.3 years, during which time 598 participants (17.6%) experienced a first cardiovascular event, including 83 (26.2%) participants with interarm systolic blood pressure difference ≥ 10 mm Hg. Compared with those with normal interarm systolic blood pressure difference, participants with an elevated interarm systolic blood pressure difference were older (63.0 years vs 60.9 years), had a greater prevalence of diabetes mellitus (13.3% vs 7.5%,), higher systolic blood pressure (136.3 mm Hg vs 129.3 mm Hg), and a higher total cholesterol level (212.1 mg/dL vs 206.5 mg/dL). Interarm systolic blood pressure difference was associated with a significantly increased hazard of incident cardiovascular events in the multivariable adjusted model (hazard ratio 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.75). For each 1-SD-unit increase in absolute interarm systolic blood pressure difference, the hazard ratio for incident cardiovascular events was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.00-1.14) in the fully adjusted model. There was no such association with mortality (hazard ratio 1.02; 95% CI 0.76-1.38). CONCLUSIONS In this community-based cohort, an interarm systolic blood pressure difference is common and associated with a significant increased risk for future cardiovascular events, even when the absolute difference in arm systolic blood pressure is modest. These findings support research to expand clinical use of this simple measurement.

Anti-dsDNA Antibodies in Sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND Sarcoidosis is a chronic multisystem disorder characterized by an exaggerated cellular immune response to antigens with the production of various antibodies including rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibodies (ANA). The prevalence and significance of antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) in sarcoid patients is unknown. The occurrence of anti-dsDNA antibodies is known to be a specific marker of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Sarcoidosis can occur with SLE. It is unclear if anti-dsDNA antibodies in patients with sarcoidosis signify the eventual development of SLE. OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence of anti-dsDNA antibodies in patients with sarcoidosis in a university hospital and their significance in predicting the diagnosis of associated SLE. METHODS In a retrospective study, 34 patient files with diagnosed sarcoidosis in a university hospital during a period of 15 years were reviewed for serological markers, including ANA, anti-dsDNA, and immunoglobulin and C3 levels. The occurrence of SLE in these patients also was evaluated. RESULTS ANA were positive in 10 of 34 of the patients screened. Two patients with sarcoidosis had antibodies to dsDNA. C3 levels in these 34 patients were an average of 87.7 +/- 25.3 mg/100 mL, which is within the normal range. IgG immunoglobulin levels were an average of 2,206 +/- 999 mg/100 mL, which was above normal limits. The 2 patients who were positive for anti-dsDNA had normal C3 levels and SLE did not develop during a follow-up period of 10 to 15 years. CONCLUSIONS Anti-dsDNA antibodies may occur in patients with sarcoidosis, but their presence does not predict the subsequent development of SLE.

Thrombectomy using suction filtration and veno-venous bypass: single center experience with a novel device.

To describe the first single center experience with a novel aspiration thrombectomy device.

Nonatherosclerotic Arterial Disorders of the Lower Extremities

Atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common, estimated to affect 4.3% to 29% of the adult population.1,2 PAD is an important syndrome to identify promptly because it is associated with an increased risk of premature myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality.3 The public has limited appreciation for the disorder and its associated risks, making awareness of this disorder a high priority.4 Conversely, nonatherosclerotic artery diseases of the lower extremities (nonatherosclerotic PAD [NAPADs]) represent a heterogeneous group of uncommon conditions (Figure 1). Given the frequency of symptoms of leg discomfort, these disorders must also be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients who may not have the classic profile of atherosclerosis. Although each condition has distinctive pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, treatment, and prognosis, NAPAD also has unifying characteristics. Furthermore, left undiagnosed or mismanaged, these conditions may result in seriously adverse outcomes that may otherwise have been avoided or minimized. Figure 1. Examples of various types of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease. A , Halo sign caused by artery wall edema, typical of vasculitis. B , Computed tomographic angiography reconstruction of lower extremities revealing diffuse arterial calcification, typical of atherosclerosis. C , Angiography revealing transient occlusion of the popliteal artery on active plantar flexion (right), consistent with popliteal artery entrapment. D , Typical beaded appearance of the medial fibroplasia type of fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) in the right external iliac artery. Note the associated aneurysms of the common iliac arteries, potentially representing aneurysms associated with FMD or combined atherosclerosis and FMD. Patients with symptoms of exertional limb discomfort or physical examination findings suggestive of lower-extremity arterial ischemia may have PAD; however, it is important to differentiate between PAD and NAPAD. Given the uncommon nature of NAPAD, the differential diagnosis is unfamiliar to most clinicians. PAD is the most common arterial cause of …

Blood pressure response to renal artery stenting in 901 patients from five prospective multicenter FDA-approved trials.

Renal artery stent revascularization is commonly used for renovascular hypertension. Clinical predictors associated with blood pressure (BP) improvement after renal artery stent revascularization are not well understood.

Proximal versus distal embolic protection for carotid artery stenting: a national cardiovascular data registry analysis.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the stroke/death rates between proximal embolic protection devices (P-EPDs) and distal filter embolic protection devices (F-EPDs) in elective carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND P-EPDs have theoretical advantages that may make them superior to F-EPDs for stroke prevention during CAS. METHODS We examined 10,246 consecutive elective CAS procedures performed with embolic protection in the NCDR CARE registry between January 2009 and March 2013. We analyzed crude and propensity-matched rates of in-hospital combined death/stroke in patients treated with P-EPDs versus F-EPDs. Secondary analyses included 30-day adverse event rates and stroke rates by the involved cerebrovascular territory. RESULTS P-EPDs were used in 590 of 10,246 cases (5.8%). Patients treated with P-EPDs had higher rates of symptomatic lesion status (46.8% vs. 39.7%, p<0.001), atrial fibrillation/flutter (16.1% vs. 13.0%, p=0.03), and history of a neurological event (51.2% vs. 46.6%, p=0.03). In unadjusted and propensity-matched analyses, differences in in-hospital stroke/death between P-EPD and F-EPD cohorts were nonsignificant (1.5% vs. 2.4%, p=0.16 and 1.6% vs. 2.0%, p=0.56, respectively). For patients with available data (n=7,693, 75.1%), 30-day adverse events rates were similar for P-EPDs and F-EPDs before (2.5% vs. 4.2%, p=0.07) and after (2.7% vs. 4.0%, p=0.22) propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS Use of a P-EPD during CAS was associated with low rates of in-hospital stroke/death similar to those with an F-EPD in the first comparative effectiveness study of the devices. An adequately powered randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes between these devices is unlikely to be feasible.

Exploring the mango-poison ivy connection: the riddle of discriminative plant dermatitis.

A relationship between sensitivity to poison oak or poison ivy and mango dermatitis has been suggested by previous publications. The observation that acute allergic contact dermatitis can arise on first exposure to mango in patients who have been sensitized beforehand by contact with other urushiol‐containing plants has been documented previously. We report 17 American patients employed in mango picking at a summer camp in Israel, who developed a rash of varying severity. All patients were either in contact with poison ivy/oak in the past or lived in areas where these plants are endemic. None recalled previous contact with mango. In contrast, none of their Israeli companions who had never been exposed to poison ivy/oak developed mango dermatitis. These observations suggest that individuals with known history of poison ivy/oak allergy, or those residing in area where these plants are common, may develop allergic contact dermatitis from mango on first exposure. We hypothesize that previous oral exposure to urushiol in the local Israeli population might establish immune tolerance to these plants.

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Usage, Complications, and Retrieval Rate in Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Because cancer patients frequently have contraindications to anticoagulation, inferior vena cava filters are commonly placed. The use, safety, and retrieval of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in cancer patients have not been well studied. METHODS A retrospective review of retrievable inferior vena cava filter use at a tertiary referral hospital was conducted between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011. Indications for inferior vena cava filter placement, anticoagulation practices, complications, filter retrieval, and patient outcomes were analyzed for patients with and without active cancer and for cancer subtypes, including localized and metastatic cases. RESULTS Of 666 patients receiving retrievable inferior vena cava filters during this time period, 247 (37.1%) had active cancer. Of these, 151 (22.7%) had carcinoma, 92 (13.8%) had sarcoma, and 115 (17.3%) had metastatic disease. Overall, follow-up was available for a median of 401.0 (interquartile range: 107.5-786.5) days. Indwelling filter-related complications occurred in 19.8% of patients without cancer and 17.7% with an active cancer (P = .50). Patients with cancer were less likely to have the filter retrieved (28.0% vs 42.0%, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, cancer was not associated with filter-related complications but was associated with a lower rate of filter retrieval. CONCLUSIONS In a modern cohort of patients undergoing retrievable inferior vena cava filter placement, active diagnosis of cancer is not associated with a significant increase in filter-related complications, but is associated with a reduced rate of filter retrieval.