Iftekhar Kalsekar

Clinical Outcomes in Measurement-based Treatment (Comet): a trial of depression monitoring and feedback to primary care physicians.

Despite the availability of effective treatments for depression, many patients under the care of primary care physicians do not achieve remission. Clinical Outcomes in Measurement‐based Treatment (COMET) was designed to assess whether communicating patient‐reported depression symptom severity to primary care physicians affects patient outcomes at 6 months.

A review of real-world data on the effects of aripiprazole on weight and metabolic outcomes in adults.

Abstract Background: Metabolic abnormalities observed with atypical antipsychotic treatment may be specific to each antipsychotic medication. The association between atypical antipsychotics and risk factors for cardiovascular disease prompted the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to issue a consensus statement that categorized aripiprazole and ziprasidone as atypical antipsychotics with a lower likelihood of metabolic abnormalities. Objective: The aim of the current systematic review was to evaluate real-world studies (i.e. observational/naturalistic and open-label studies) assessing the risk for weight gain, dyslipidemia, glucose abnormalities, and diabetes mellitus in adult patients receiving treatment with atypical antipsychotics, with a specific focus on aripiprazole. Methods: A systematic PubMed search for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 4 October 2011 was performed using the following search terms in the title and abstract: aripiprazole, atypical, glucose, insulin, cholesterol, triglycerides, diabetes, hemoglobin A1c, weight, body mass index, and hyperlipidemia. Results: Twenty-two peer-reviewed articles were found that assessed the metabolic effects associated with aripiprazole treatment, including studies from small observational trials to large databases (n = 15 to n > 1,700,000). Thirteen articles reported observational or naturalistic studies, and nine were open-label trials evaluating weight gain, dyslipidemia, glucose abnormalities, and the risk of developing diabetes in adult patients receiving treatment with aripiprazole. Compared with other atypical antipsychotics, aripiprazole was either less likely to have an impact or had a comparable impact on weight gain and dyslipidemia; the degree of effect appeared to be dependent on study design. In addition, there was less risk of diabetes mellitus with aripiprazole compared with most other atypical antipsychotic agents. Conclusions: Consistent with data from randomized controlled studies, the current review of observational/naturalistic and open-label studies suggests aripiprazole may be associated with a lower risk than other commonly used atypical antipsychotics for metabolic adverse events in adults, consistent with the ADA/APA consensus statement.

Incidence of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Diabetes Mellitus Among Users of Second-Generation Antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE To examine the risk of cardiovascular outcomes and diabetes mellitus in patients prescribed second-generation antipsychotics. METHOD From the MarketScan claims database, nondiabetic adults prescribed aripiprazole between July 2003 and March 2010 were propensity score-matched with patients prescribed olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Patients were followed through the claims for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes indicating myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, coronary bypass/angioplasty procedures, and incident diabetes. Incidence rates of each outcome were calculated and compared between aripiprazole and the other second-generation antipsychotics using Cox models. RESULTS Aripiprazole initiators were matched 1:1 to 9,917 olanzapine, 14,935 quetiapine, 10,192 risperidone, and 5,696 ziprasidone initiators. Increased risk was found with olanzapine for stroke (hazard ratio = 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.95) and any cardiovascular event (1.28; 1.05-1.55); with quetiapine for stroke (1.58; 1.19-2.09), heart failure (1.55; 1.15-2.11), and any cardiovascular event (1.50; 1.25-1.79); and with risperidone for stroke (1.54; 1.12-2.12), heart failure (1.43; 1.02-1.99), and any cardiovascular event (1.49; 1.21-1.83). Ziprasidone showed no significant difference in risk from aripiprazole for any outcome. Incidence of diabetes ranged from 18 to 21 events per 1,000 person-years in each cohort and did not differ significantly between second-generation drugs. CONCLUSIONS This analysis of real-world data found lower risk of some cardiovascular events with aripiprazole than with olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone, but no differences were found with ziprasidone. There were no significant differences in risk of diabetes. Limitations include use of claims data and inability to adequately control for differential prescribing of second-generation antipsychotics to patients at higher risk of diabetes.

Intent-to-Treat Analysis of Health Care Expenditures of Patients Treated With Atypical Antipsychotics as Adjunctive Therapy in Depression

OBJECTIVE To compare health care utilization and expenditures in patients with depression whose initial antidepressant (AD) treatment was augmented with a second-generation antipsychotic. METHODS Claims data from January 1, 2001, through June 30, 2009, were used to select patients aged 18 to 64 years with depression treated with ADs augmented with aripiprazole, olanzapine, or quetiapine. Patients were required to have 6 months of continuous eligibility before the first AD prescription and 6 months after the second-generation antipsychotic augmentation (index) date. Utilization and expenditures were assessed for 6 months after the index date. Multivariate regression was used to estimate adjusted expenditures and risks for hospitalizations and emergency department visits. RESULTS A total of 483 patients treated with aripiprazole, 978 with olanzapine, and 2471 with quetiapine were selected. Mean adjusted expenditures for aripiprazole were significantly lower than those for olanzapine for each service category (all-cause, all-cause medical care, mental health-related, and mental health-related medical care) and were significantly lower than those for quetiapine for each category with the exception of mental health-related. The adjusted risks for hospitalization and emergency department visits were significantly higher for quetiapine than for aripiprazole. CONCLUSIONS Compared with patients treated with ADs and aripiprazole, those treated with ADs and olanzapine or quetiapine had greater utilization and higher expenditures.

Dosing patterns of aripiprazole and quetiapine for adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder (2006–2010)

The aim of this study was to investigate the dosing patterns of adjunctive quetiapine or adjunctive aripiprazole in the treatment of major depressive disorder from 2006 to 2010, and to evaluate the impact of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval on these dosing patterns. Patients included in the study were adults diagnosed with major depressive disorder, and treated with adjunctive aripiprazole or quetiapine between the years 2006 and 2010. The average daily dose and dose distribution were calculated and assessed statistically over the same time period. The mean daily dose for patients treated with adjunctive aripiprazole decreased from 13.5 mg/day in 2006 to 6.9 mg/day in 2010, whereas the mean daily dose for patients treated with quetiapine increased from 129 mg/day in 2006 to 139 mg/day in 2007, decreasing to 123 mg/day in 2010. The proportion of patients receiving FDA-recommended doses increased significantly for aripiprazole (86.3% in 2006 to 94.5% in 2010; P<0.001) and remained relatively stable for quetiapine (21.3% in 2006 to 24.0% in 2010; NS). The majority of patients treated with quetiapine received doses below those recommended by the FDA throughout the study period. Aripiprazole was mostly prescribed at therapeutic doses (pre-FDA and post-FDA approval), although the mean dose decreased significantly over time.

Medical costs and utilization in patients with depression treated with adjunctive atypical antipsychotic therapy

Objective To compare total medical costs and utilization over a 12-month period in commercially insured patients receiving FDA-approved adjunctive atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, olanzapine, or quetiapine) for depression. Methods A retrospective claims analysis was conducted from 2005–2010 using the PharMetrics database. Subjects were adult commercial health-plan members with depression, identified using International Classification of Diseases codes and followed for 12 months after augmentation with an atypical antipsychotic. Outcomes included total medical costs, hospitalization, and ER visits. Generalized linear models and logistic regression were used to compare the total medical costs and the odds of hospitalization and ER visits between the treatment groups after adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Results A total of 9675 patients with depression were included in the analysis, of which 68.4% were female, with a mean age of 45.2 (±12.0) years. Adjusted 12-month total medical costs were higher for olanzapine (

Real-world glycemic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating exenatide once weekly and liraglutide once daily: a retrospective cohort study.

14,275) and quetiapine (

Comparison of health-related quality of life among patients using atypical antipsychotics for treatment of depression: results from the National Health and Wellness Survey

12,998) compared to aripiprazole (

Medical Costs and Hospitalizations Among Patients with Depression Treated with Adjunctive Atypical Antipsychotic Therapy: An Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data

9,801; P < 0.05 for all comparisons with aripiprazole). When divided into inpatient and outpatient costs, olanzapine and quetiapine had significantly higher adjusted inpatient costs compared to aripiprazole (

Prevalence of pre-existing risk factors for adverse events associated with atypical antipsychotics among commercially insured and medicaid insured patients newly initiating atypical antipsychotics.

6,124 and