Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ignacio Varela is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ignacio Varela.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.

Marco Gerlinger; Andrew Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Grönroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q. McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R. Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron Charles Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P. Andrew Futreal; Charles Swanton

BACKGROUND Intratumor heterogeneity may foster tumor evolution and adaptation and hinder personalized-medicine strategies that depend on results from single tumor-biopsy samples. METHODS To examine intratumor heterogeneity, we performed exome sequencing, chromosome aberration analysis, and ploidy profiling on multiple spatially separated samples obtained from primary renal carcinomas and associated metastatic sites. We characterized the consequences of intratumor heterogeneity using immunohistochemical analysis, mutation functional analysis, and profiling of messenger RNA expression. RESULTS Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed branched evolutionary tumor growth, with 63 to 69% of all somatic mutations not detectable across every tumor region. Intratumor heterogeneity was observed for a mutation within an autoinhibitory domain of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase, correlating with S6 and 4EBP phosphorylation in vivo and constitutive activation of mTOR kinase activity in vitro. Mutational intratumor heterogeneity was seen for multiple tumor-suppressor genes converging on loss of function; SETD2, PTEN, and KDM5C underwent multiple distinct and spatially separated inactivating mutations within a single tumor, suggesting convergent phenotypic evolution. Gene-expression signatures of good and poor prognosis were detected in different regions of the same tumor. Allelic composition and ploidy profiling analysis revealed extensive intratumor heterogeneity, with 26 of 30 tumor samples from four tumors harboring divergent allelic-imbalance profiles and with ploidy heterogeneity in two of four tumors. CONCLUSIONS Intratumor heterogeneity can lead to underestimation of the tumor genomics landscape portrayed from single tumor-biopsy samples and may present major challenges to personalized-medicine and biomarker development. Intratumor heterogeneity, associated with heterogeneous protein function, may foster tumor adaptation and therapeutic failure through Darwinian selection. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others.).


Cell | 2011

Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development

Philip Stephens; Christopher Greenman; Beiyuan Fu; Fengtang Yang; Graham R. Bignell; Laura Mudie; Erin Pleasance; King Wai Lau; David Beare; Lucy Stebbings; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J. McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon Teague; Michael A. Quail; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Nigel P. Carter; Laura A. Morsberger; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; George A. Follows; Anthony R. Green; Adrienne M. Flanagan; Michael R. Stratton

Summary Cancer is driven by somatically acquired point mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, conventionally thought to accumulate gradually over time. Using next-generation sequencing, we characterize a phenomenon, which we term chromothripsis, whereby tens to hundreds of genomic rearrangements occur in a one-off cellular crisis. Rearrangements involving one or a few chromosomes crisscross back and forth across involved regions, generating frequent oscillations between two copy number states. These genomic hallmarks are highly improbable if rearrangements accumulate over time and instead imply that nearly all occur during a single cellular catastrophe. The stamp of chromothripsis can be seen in at least 2%–3% of all cancers, across many subtypes, and is present in ∼25% of bone cancers. We find that one, or indeed more than one, cancer-causing lesion can emerge out of the genomic crisis. This phenomenon has important implications for the origins of genomic remodeling and temporal emergence of cancer. PaperClip


Nature | 2010

A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome

Erin Pleasance; R. Keira Cheetham; Philip Stephens; David J. McBride; Sean Humphray; Christopher Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Meng-Lay Lin; Gonzalo R. Ordóñez; Graham R. Bignell; Kai Ye; Julie A Alipaz; Markus J. Bauer; David Beare; Adam Butler; Richard J. Carter; Lina Chen; Anthony J. Cox; Sarah Edkins; Paula Kokko-Gonzales; Niall Anthony Gormley; Russell Grocock; Christian D. Haudenschild; Matthew M. Hims; Terena James; Mingming Jia; Zoya Kingsbury; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies

All cancers carry somatic mutations. A subset of these somatic alterations, termed driver mutations, confer selective growth advantage and are implicated in cancer development, whereas the remainder are passengers. Here we have sequenced the genomes of a malignant melanoma and a lymphoblastoid cell line from the same person, providing the first comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from an individual cancer. The catalogue provides remarkable insights into the forces that have shaped this cancer genome. The dominant mutational signature reflects DNA damage due to ultraviolet light exposure, a known risk factor for malignant melanoma, whereas the uneven distribution of mutations across the genome, with a lower prevalence in gene footprints, indicates that DNA repair has been preferentially deployed towards transcribed regions. The results illustrate the power of a cancer genome sequence to reveal traces of the DNA damage, repair, mutation and selection processes that were operative years before the cancer became symptomatic.


Nature | 2012

The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer

Philip Stephens; Patrick Tarpey; Helen Davies; Peter Van Loo; Christopher Greenman; David C. Wedge; Serena Nik-Zainal; Sancha Martin; Ignacio Varela; Graham R. Bignell; Lucy R. Yates; Elli Papaemmanuil; David Beare; Adam Butler; Angela Cheverton; John Gamble; Jonathan Hinton; Mingming Jia; Alagu Jayakumar; David Jones; Calli Latimer; King Wai Lau; Stuart McLaren; David J. McBride; Andrew Menzies; Laura Mudie; Keiran Raine; Roland Rad; Michael Spencer Chapman; Jon W. Teague

All cancers carry somatic mutations in their genomes. A subset, known as driver mutations, confer clonal selective advantage on cancer cells and are causally implicated in oncogenesis, and the remainder are passenger mutations. The driver mutations and mutational processes operative in breast cancer have not yet been comprehensively explored. Here we examine the genomes of 100 tumours for somatic copy number changes and mutations in the coding exons of protein-coding genes. The number of somatic mutations varied markedly between individual tumours. We found strong correlations between mutation number, age at which cancer was diagnosed and cancer histological grade, and observed multiple mutational signatures, including one present in about ten per cent of tumours characterized by numerous mutations of cytosine at TpC dinucleotides. Driver mutations were identified in several new cancer genes including AKT2, ARID1B, CASP8, CDKN1B, MAP3K1, MAP3K13, NCOR1, SMARCD1 and TBX3. Among the 100 tumours, we found driver mutations in at least 40 cancer genes and 73 different combinations of mutated cancer genes. The results highlight the substantial genetic diversity underlying this common disease.


Nature | 2010

The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer

Peter J. Campbell; Shinichi Yachida; Laura Mudie; Philip Stephens; Erin Pleasance; Lucy Stebbings; Laura A. Morsberger; Calli Latimer; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J. McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon Teague; Constance A. Griffin; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Michael A. Quail; Michael R. Stratton; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; P. Andrew Futreal

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy with a five-year mortality of 97–98%, usually due to widespread metastatic disease. Previous studies indicate that this disease has a complex genomic landscape, with frequent copy number changes and point mutations, but genomic rearrangements have not been characterized in detail. Despite the clinical importance of metastasis, there remain fundamental questions about the clonal structures of metastatic tumours, including phylogenetic relationships among metastases, the scale of ongoing parallel evolution in metastatic and primary sites, and how the tumour disseminates. Here we harness advances in DNA sequencing to annotate genomic rearrangements in 13 patients with pancreatic cancer and explore clonal relationships among metastases. We find that pancreatic cancer acquires rearrangements indicative of telomere dysfunction and abnormal cell-cycle control, namely dysregulated G1-to-S-phase transition with intact G2–M checkpoint. These initiate amplification of cancer genes and occur predominantly in early cancer development rather than the later stages of the disease. Genomic instability frequently persists after cancer dissemination, resulting in ongoing, parallel and even convergent evolution among different metastases. We find evidence that there is genetic heterogeneity among metastasis-initiating cells, that seeding metastasis may require driver mutations beyond those required for primary tumours, and that phylogenetic trees across metastases show organ-specific branches. These data attest to the richness of genetic variation in cancer, brought about by the tandem forces of genomic instability and evolutionary selection.


Cell | 2012

Mutational processes molding the genomes of 21 breast cancers.

Serena Nik-Zainal; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; David C. Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Christopher Greenman; Keiran Raine; David Jones; Jonathan Hinton; John D Marshall; Lucy Stebbings; Andrew Menzies; Sancha Martin; Kenric Leung; Lina Chen; Catherine Leroy; Manasa Ramakrishna; Richard Rance; King Wai Lau; Laura Mudie; Ignacio Varela; David J. McBride; Graham R. Bignell; Susanna L. Cooke; Adam Shlien; John Gamble; Ian Whitmore; Mark Maddison; Patrick Tarpey; Helen Davies; Elli Papaemmanuil

Summary All cancers carry somatic mutations. The patterns of mutation in cancer genomes reflect the DNA damage and repair processes to which cancer cells and their precursors have been exposed. To explore these mechanisms further, we generated catalogs of somatic mutation from 21 breast cancers and applied mathematical methods to extract mutational signatures of the underlying processes. Multiple distinct single- and double-nucleotide substitution signatures were discernible. Cancers with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations exhibited a characteristic combination of substitution mutation signatures and a distinctive profile of deletions. Complex relationships between somatic mutation prevalence and transcription were detected. A remarkable phenomenon of localized hypermutation, termed “kataegis,” was observed. Regions of kataegis differed between cancers but usually colocalized with somatic rearrangements. Base substitutions in these regions were almost exclusively of cytosine at TpC dinucleotides. The mechanisms underlying most of these mutational signatures are unknown. However, a role for the APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases is proposed. PaperClip


Nature | 2010

A small-cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco exposure

Erin Pleasance; Philip Stephens; Sarah O’Meara; David J. McBride; Alison Meynert; David Jones; Meng-Lay Lin; David Beare; King Wai Lau; Christopher Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Helen Davies; Gonzalo R. Ordóñez; Laura Mudie; Calli Latimer; Sarah Edkins; Lucy Stebbings; Lina Chen; Mingming Jia; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon Teague; Jonathon Mangion; Yongming A. Sun; Stephen F. McLaughlin; Heather E. Peckham; Eric F. Tsung

Cancer is driven by mutation. Worldwide, tobacco smoking is the principal lifestyle exposure that causes cancer, exerting carcinogenicity through >60 chemicals that bind and mutate DNA. Using massively parallel sequencing technology, we sequenced a small-cell lung cancer cell line, NCI-H209, to explore the mutational burden associated with tobacco smoking. A total of 22,910 somatic substitutions were identified, including 134 in coding exons. Multiple mutation signatures testify to the cocktail of carcinogens in tobacco smoke and their proclivities for particular bases and surrounding sequence context. Effects of transcription-coupled repair and a second, more general, expression-linked repair pathway were evident. We identified a tandem duplication that duplicates exons 3–8 of CHD7 in frame, and another two lines carrying PVT1–CHD7 fusion genes, indicating that CHD7 may be recurrently rearranged in this disease. These findings illustrate the potential for next-generation sequencing to provide unprecedented insights into mutational processes, cellular repair pathways and gene networks associated with cancer.SUMMARY Cancer is driven by mutation. Worldwide, tobacco smoking is the major lifestyle exposure that causes cancer, exerting carcinogenicity through >60 chemicals that bind and mutate DNA. Using massively parallel sequencing technology, we sequenced a small cell lung cancer cell line, NCI-H209, to explore the mutational burden associated with tobacco smoking. 22,910 somatic substitutions were identified, including 132 in coding exons. Multiple mutation signatures testify to the cocktail of carcinogens in tobacco smoke and their proclivities for particular bases and surrounding sequence context. Effects of transcription-coupled repair and a second, more general expression-linked repair pathway were evident. We identified a tandem duplication that duplicates exons 3-8 of CHD7 in-frame, and another two lines carrying PVT1-CHD7 fusion genes, suggesting that CHD7 may be recurrently rearranged in this disease. These findings illustrate the potential for next-generation sequencing to provide unprecedented insights into mutational processes, cellular repair pathways and gene networks associated with cancer.


Nature | 2011

Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of the SWI/SNF complex gene PBRM1 in renal carcinoma

Ignacio Varela; Patrick Tarpey; Keiran Raine; Dachuan Huang; Choon Kiat Ong; Philip Stephens; Helen Davies; David Jones; Meng-Lay Lin; Jon Teague; Graham R. Bignell; Adam Butler; Juok Cho; Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Danushka Galappaththige; Christopher Greenman; Claire Hardy; Mingming Jia; Calli Latimer; King Wai Lau; John Marshall; Stuart McLaren; Andrew Menzies; Laura Mudie; Lucy Stebbings; David A. Largaespada; Lodewyk F. A. Wessels; Stéphane Richard; Richard J. Kahnoski; John Anema

The genetics of renal cancer is dominated by inactivation of the VHL tumour suppressor gene in clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the commonest histological subtype. A recent large-scale screen of ∼3,500 genes by PCR-based exon re-sequencing identified several new cancer genes in ccRCC including UTX (also known as KDM6A), JARID1C (also known as KDM5C) and SETD2 (ref. 2). These genes encode enzymes that demethylate (UTX, JARID1C) or methylate (SETD2) key lysine residues of histone H3. Modification of the methylation state of these lysine residues of histone H3 regulates chromatin structure and is implicated in transcriptional control. However, together these mutations are present in fewer than 15% of ccRCC, suggesting the existence of additional, currently unidentified cancer genes. Here, we have sequenced the protein coding exome in a series of primary ccRCC and report the identification of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex gene PBRM1 (ref. 4) as a second major ccRCC cancer gene, with truncating mutations in 41% (92/227) of cases. These data further elucidate the somatic genetic architecture of ccRCC and emphasize the marked contribution of aberrant chromatin biology.


Cell | 2012

The Life History of 21 Breast Cancers

Serena Nik-Zainal; Peter Van Loo; David C. Wedge; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Christopher Greenman; King Wai Lau; Keiran Raine; David Jones; John Marshall; Manasa Ramakrishna; Adam Shlien; Susanna L. Cooke; Jonathan Hinton; Andrew Menzies; Lucy Stebbings; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Richard Rance; Laura Mudie; Stephen Gamble; Philip Stephens; Stuart McLaren; Patrick Tarpey; Elli Papaemmanuil; Helen Davies; Ignacio Varela; David J. McBride; Graham R. Bignell; Kenric Leung; Adam Butler

Summary Cancer evolves dynamically as clonal expansions supersede one another driven by shifting selective pressures, mutational processes, and disrupted cancer genes. These processes mark the genome, such that a cancers life history is encrypted in the somatic mutations present. We developed algorithms to decipher this narrative and applied them to 21 breast cancers. Mutational processes evolve across a cancers lifespan, with many emerging late but contributing extensive genetic variation. Subclonal diversification is prominent, and most mutations are found in just a fraction of tumor cells. Every tumor has a dominant subclonal lineage, representing more than 50% of tumor cells. Minimal expansion of these subclones occurs until many hundreds to thousands of mutations have accumulated, implying the existence of long-lived, quiescent cell lineages capable of substantial proliferation upon acquisition of enabling genomic changes. Expansion of the dominant subclone to an appreciable mass may therefore represent the final rate-limiting step in a breast cancers development, triggering diagnosis. PaperClip


Nature | 2009

Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes.

Philip Stephens; David J. McBride; Meng-Lay Lin; Ignacio Varela; Erin Pleasance; Jared T. Simpson; Lucy Stebbings; Catherine Leroy; Sarah Edkins; Laura Mudie; Christopher Greenman; Mingming Jia; Calli Latimer; Jon Teague; King Wai Lau; John Burton; Michael A. Quail; Harold Swerdlow; Carol Churcher; Rachael Natrajan; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; John W.M. Martens; Daniel P. Silver; Anita Langerød; Hege G. Russnes; John A. Foekens; Jorge S. Reis-Filho; Laura J. van 't Veer; Andrea L. Richardson; Anne Lise Børresen-Dale

Multiple somatic rearrangements are often found in cancer genomes; however, the underlying processes of rearrangement and their contribution to cancer development are poorly characterized. Here we use a paired-end sequencing strategy to identify somatic rearrangements in breast cancer genomes. There are more rearrangements in some breast cancers than previously appreciated. Rearrangements are more frequent over gene footprints and most are intrachromosomal. Multiple rearrangement architectures are present, but tandem duplications are particularly common in some cancers, perhaps reflecting a specific defect in DNA maintenance. Short overlapping sequences at most rearrangement junctions indicate that these have been mediated by non-homologous end-joining DNA repair, although varying sequence patterns indicate that multiple processes of this type are operative. Several expressed in-frame fusion genes were identified but none was recurrent. The study provides a new perspective on cancer genomes, highlighting the diversity of somatic rearrangements and their potential contribution to cancer development.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ignacio Varela's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura Mudie

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam Butler

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George S. Vassiliou

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mingming Jia

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Jones

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lucy Stebbings

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Menzies

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David J. McBride

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge