Ihab Mahmoud

Interferon Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: Study of Tolerance, Efficacy and Post-Transplantation Course

Background: The potential benefit of pre-transplant treatment of chronic hepatitis C on long-term evolution after renal transplantation is not clear. Methods: Fifty successive renal transplant candidates had their sera positive for HCV RNA and a biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis. Out of these, 18 patients received a standard course of interferon-α2b (IFN; 3 MU three times weekly after hemodialysis sessions for 6 months). Results: IFN was discontinued in 2 patients (11%) due to persistent leukopenia. HCV RNA turned negative in 10 patients of the treatment group and in none of the control group. Two patients of the IFN group had a virological relapse post-transplantation. Post-transplant follow-up periods were 41.5 ± 15 and 50 ± 16 months for the treated and control groups respectively. Transaminases remained normal in all patients of the IFN group after transplantation. In contrast, biochemical evidence of acute and chronic hepatitis was observed in 5 (p = 0.03) and 13 (p = 0.002) patients, respectively, of the control group. Logistic regression analysis identified non-receiving IFN before transplantation as a risk factor for post-transplant hepatic dysfunction (odds ratio = 11.7, p = 0.003) and for chronic allograft nephropathy (odds ratio = 11.6, p = 0.02). Conclusions: IFN-treated patients had a significantly better post-transplant hepatic function and significantly lower rates of chronic allograft nephropathy.

A Prospective Study of Hepatitis C Viremia in Renal Allograft Recipients

In an attempt to study the impact of HCV viremia on renal transplant clinical course and outcome, we prospectively followed 133 HBsAg-negative end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, in whom HCV-RNA-PCR results were available, from the pre- to post-transplant period. Eighty (60%) ESRD patients tested PCR-positive, of these, 12 (15%) were anti-HCV negative by second generation ELISA. The viremic patients had a longer time on dialysis (p < 0.001), received more blood units (p < 0.001) and had a higher frequency of pre-transplantation liver disease (p < 0.001). Further, 41% of PCR-positive patients gave a history of antischistosomal treatment compared with 23% of PCR-negative ones (p = 0.048). Recipients with and without HCV viremia were followed for a mean of 31.8 ± 5.8 (range 6–42) months and 29.8 ± 9 (range 6–41) months respectively, p = 0.14. While the prevalence of HCV viremia increased from 60 to 64% at the last follow-up, the anti-HCV seroprevalence decreased from 63 to 61%. PCR-positive patients had higher rates of both acute (p = 0.005) and chronic (p < 0.001) liver disease after transplantation compared with PCR-negative patients. However, none of our HCV RNA positive recipients developed a fulminant liver disease or hepatic failure until the last follow-up. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified pre-transplant liver disease (Odds ratio = 2.4; p = 0.07) and a cumulative corticosteroid dose in excess of 15 g at the last follow-up (Odds ratio = 3; p = 0.03) as independent predictors of post-transplant hepatic dysfunction in PCR-positive patients. Azathioprine was discontinued due to hepatic dysfunction in a significantly (p = 0.005) higher proportion of viremic patients compared with the non-viremic ones. There were no significant differences between PCR-positive and -negative patients in terms of frequencies and individual causes of graft and patient losses. Our results demonstrate that HCV infection is extremely prevalent in Egyptian hemodialysis patients and is responsible for most hepatic dysfunctions after transplantation. Although HCV viremia did not negatively affect graft or patient outcome until 31 months post-transplantation, the authors would recommend that a viremic patient should have a liver biopsy before transplantation and be immunosuppressed with caution post-transplantation. A longer follow-up may be required to exclude increased rates of HCV-induced hepatic mortalities.

Role of combined L-arginine and prostaglandin E1 in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Background:L-Arginine (L-arg) and Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) have been used effectively as single agents to ameliorate renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that combined treatment with L-arg and PGE1 would be more effective. Materials and Methods: The left renal artery of male Sprague-Dawley rats was clamped for 45 min and the right kidney was removed. Fifty six rats were randomly allocated into 5 groups each consisted of 12 rats except sham group (n = 8). (1) sham, underwent right nephrectomy only; (2) control, untreated ischemic rats; (3) L-arg group, L-arg-treated ischemic rats; (4) PGE1 group, PGE1-treated ischemic rats; (5) L-arg+PGE1 group, ischemic rats treated with both L-arg and PGE1. Renal function and histology were assessed on days 2 and 7 postoperatively. Results: All rats, except control ones, showed a significant improvement of renal function towards normal on postoperative day 7. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were significantly better in L-arg+PGE1 group compared to all other groups on day 7. With the exception of sham-operated and L-arg+PGE1-treated animals, all other groups showed significant increases in fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) in response to renal ischemia-reperfusion. The severest tubular damage was determined in the kidneys of control rats. Rats treated with L-arg+PGE1 had the least severe tubular damage. Conclusion: The administration of either L-arg or PGE1 attenuates both functional and structural consequences of renal warm ischemia. A near total protection might be achieved when both agents are administered concomitantly.

Effect of Concomitant Administration of Cyclosporine and Ketoconazole in Children with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Background: Focal segmental glomerulonephritis (FSGS) is now the most common primary glomerulonephritis that leads to end-stage renal disease in both adults and children. Cyclosporine (CsA) is a well-known and effective immunosuppressive agent that has become a cornerstone of immunotherapy in solid organ transplantation and it has been used in the treatment of FSGS for over 15 years. The deliberate use of ketoconazole (keto) to reduce the need for CsA is not new, but it is particularly relevant because of the high cost of CsA. Many studies have documented this benefit in renal and cardiac transplants, but this co-administration has not been reported in children with nephrotic syndrome (NS). Methods: This study included 116 children (below 18 years of age) with primary FSGS who were steroid resistant or dependent and received CsA therapy. Among them, 88 received daily keto therapy (keto group) in a dose of 50 mg with concomitant decrease of CsA dose by one third, while 28 patients received CsA alone (non-keto group). Mean (±SD) age was 6.17 ± 4.68 years and male to female ratio was 1.9:1. The great majority of the study population received the drugs for 1–2 years. The characteristics of both groups were comparable. Results: Co-administration of keto significantly reduced mean doses of CsA by 46% at 1 year with overall net cost savings of 36%. It also significantly improved the response to CsA therapy and decreased the frequency of renal impairment. No significant side effects for keto were observed. Conclusion: Co-administration of keto and CsA in idiopathic FSGS children is safe. This combination not only reduces the costs but also may improve the response to CsA and stabilize the renal function.

Co-Administration of Cyclosporine and Ketoconazole in Children with Minimal Change Nephrotic Syndrome

Background/Aims: The use of cyclosporine A (CsA) in the treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome was firstly reported in 1986. On the other hand, many studies have documented the benefit of ketoconazole (keto) administration in renal and cardiac transplant adults treated with CsA, but this co-administration has not been reported in children with minimal change disease (MCD). Thus, deliberate use of keto to reduce the need for cyclosporine is not new, but it is particularly relevant because of the high cost of cyclosporine. Methods: This study included 46 children with MCD who were steroid resistant or dependent and received CsA. Among them, 31 received daily keto therapy (keto group) in a dose of 50 mg with concomitant decrease of the CsA dose by one third while 15 patients received CsA alone (non-keto group). Results: The mean (±SD) duration of CsA treatment was 25.7 ± 13.7 months. The characteristics of both groups were comparable. Co-administration of keto significantly improved the response to CsA therapy (from 60 to 94%) and decreased the frequency of renal impairment (from 27 to 3%). Hepatic function remained within the normal range in both groups. Co-administration of keto significantly reduced mean doses of CsA with overall net cost savings of about 34%. Conclusion: From this study, we may conclude that co-administration of low dose ketoconazole to cyclosporine in children with idiopathic MCD is safe. This combination significantly reduces CsA cost and, moreover, keto may improve the response to cyclosporine and may have a favorable effect on the kidney function.