Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Iki Adachi is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Iki Adachi.


British Journal of Cancer | 1996

A late phase II study of RP56976 (docetaxel) in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

Iki Adachi; Toru Watanabe; Shigemitsu Takashima; M. Narabayashi; Horikoshi N; Aoyama H; T. Taguchi

A late phase II clinical trial of RP56976 (docetaxel), derived from Taxus baccata was performed to evaluate anti-tumour activity, time to progression and clinical toxicity in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. The patients, between 15 and 80 years old with performance status (PS) of 0-2, received at least two cycles of docetaxel 60 mg m-2 intravenously at 3-4 week intervals. Of the 81 patients enrolled, the 72 eligible for the study were given a total of 327 cycles, with a median of four cycles each. Five patients obtained a complete response (CR) and 27 a partial response (PR); the response rate (RR) was 44.4% (95% confidence interval 32.7-56.6%). A relatively high RR of 9/28 (32.1%) was observed in patients who had received prior chemotherapy involving anthracyclines. The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3-4 leucocytopenia or neutropenia, found in 78.9% and 85.9% patients respectively. Other severe (grade > 3) toxicities included alopecia (38%), anorexia (18.3%), nausea/vomiting (11.3%), and fatigue (9.9%). Hypersensitivity reactions, oedema and skin toxicity were not severe and were reversible. One therapy-related death occurred 10 days after the initial dose was given. These findings indicate that docetaxel has potent activity against metastatic breast cancer, and that the dose of 60 mg m-2 is safe.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2009

Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemotherapy in Patients with Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Eric Lim; Grace Harris; Amit Patel; Iki Adachi; Lyn Edmonds; Fujian Song

Introduction: A large number of trials have evaluated the efficacy of postoperative chemotherapy on survival after resection for lung cancer, and a smaller number have evaluated preoperative chemotherapy on survival for potentially resectable lung cancer, but no direct comparison has yet been published comparing the two approaches. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials, extracted time-to-event data using Parmar methods (when not reported), used random effects meta-analysis to evaluate overall and disease survival treatment effects and performed indirect comparison meta-analysis to obtain the relative hazards of postoperative to preoperative administration on survival. Results: Data were abstracted from 32 randomized trials involving more than 10,000 participants, with 22 trials administering postoperative and 10 trials administering preoperative chemotherapy. For overall survival, the hazard ratios were 0.80 (0.74–0.87; p < 0.001) and 0.81 (0.68–0.97; p = 0.024) in postoperative chemotherapy group and preoperative chemotherapy group, respectively. Using indirect comparison meta-analysis, the relative hazards of postoperative compared with preoperative administration was 0.99 (0.81–1.21; p = 0.91). For disease-free survival, the hazard ratios were 0.76 (0.67–0.86; p < 0.001) and 0.79 (0.63 to 1.00; P = 0.050) in postoperative chemotherapy group and preoperative chemotherapy group, respectively. Using indirect comparison meta-analysis, the relative hazards of postoperative compared with preoperative administration was 0.96 (0.77–1.20; p = 0.70). Conclusions: In patients with resectable lung cancer, there was no evidence of a difference in overall and disease-free survival between the timing of administration of chemotherapy (postoperative versus preoperative).


American Journal of Transplantation | 2015

Outpatient management of intra-corporeal left ventricular assist device system in children: a multi-center experience.

Martin Schweiger; Christina VanderPluym; A. Jeewa; Charles E. Canter; P. Jansz; Patrick E. Parrino; Oliver Miera; Jan D. Schmitto; Mary Mehegan; Iki Adachi; M. Hübler; Daniel Zimpfer

Little is known about the outcomes of children supported on intracorporeal left ventricular assist device (HVAD), and the feasibility of outpatient management. All centers with pediatric patients discharged from the hospital on the device were identified using company database. A total of 14 centers were contacted, with 9 centers, contributing data retrospectively. From 2011 to 2013, 12 pediatric patients (7 females), mean aged 11.9 ± 2.3 years (range 8–15), mean weight 43 ± 19 kg (range 18–81), mean body surface area 1.3 ± 0.3 m2 (range 0.76–1.96) were identified. Diagnosis included: dilated cardiomyopathy (CMP) (n = 5), noncompaction CMP (n = 4), toxic CMP (n = 2) and viral CMP (n = 1). Indications for support were permanent support (n = 1), bridge to recovery (n = 1) and bridge to transplantation (n = 10). Prior to HVAD implantation, all patients received intravenous inotropes and two patients were on temporary mechanical support. Overall mortality was 0%. Mean duration of inpatient and outpatient support were 56 (range: 19–95 days) and 290 days (range: 42–790), respectively. Mean readmission rate was 0.02 per patient month (2.1 per patient). No adverse events involving emergency department occurred. Eight children resumed local schooling. Home discharge of children supported on HVAD is feasible and safe. School integration can be achieved. There is wide center variability to discharge practice for children.


Congenital Heart Disease | 2013

Mechanical Support as Failure Intervention in Patients with Cavopulmonary Shunts (MFICS): Rationale and Aims of a New Registry of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Single Ventricle Patients

Joseph W. Rossano; Ronald K. Woods; Stuart Berger; J. William Gaynor; Nancy S. Ghanayem; David L.S. Morales; Chitra Ravishankar; Michael E. Mitchell; Tejas K. Shah; Claudius Mahr; James S. Tweddell; Iki Adachi; Steven Zangwill; Peter D. Wearden; T.B. Icenogle; Robert D.B. Jaquiss; Jack Rychik

It is now recognized that a majority of single ventricle patients, those with functionally univentricular hearts, who have survived palliative cavopulmonary connection will experience circulatory failure and end-organ dysfunction due to intrinsic inadequacies of a circulation supported by a single ventricle. Thus, there are an increasing number of patients with functional single ventricles presenting with failing circulations that may benefit from mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The paucity of experience with MCS in this population, even at high volume cardiac centers, contributes to limited available data to guide MCS device selection and management. Thus, a registry of MCS in this population would be beneficial to the field. A conference was convened in January 2012 of pediatric and adult cardiologists, pediatric cardiac intensivists, congenital heart surgeons, and adult cardiothoracic surgeons to discuss the current state of MCS, ventricular assist device, and total artificial heart therapy for patients who have undergone cavopulmonary connection, either superior cavopulmonary connection or total cavopulmonary connection. Specifically, individual experience and challenges with VAD therapy in this population was reviewed and creation of a multiinstitutional registry of MCS/ventricular assist device in this population was proposed. This document reflects the consensus from the meeting and provides a descriptive overview of the registry referred to as Mechanical Support as Failure Intervention in Patients with Cavopulmonary Shunts.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2016

Risk factors for development of endocarditis and reintervention in patients undergoing right ventricle to pulmonary artery valved conduit placement

Carlos M. Mery; Francisco A. Guzmán-Pruneda; Luis E. De León; Wei Zhang; Matthew Terwelp; Claire E. Bocchini; Iki Adachi; Jeffrey S. Heinle; E. Dean McKenzie; Charles D. Fraser

OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence and risk factors for endocarditis and reintervention in patients undergoing placement of right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery valve conduits. METHODS All right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery valved conduits placed between 1995 and 2014 were included. Freedom from endocarditis, reintervention, and replacement were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and parametric survival regression models. RESULTS A total of 586 patients underwent placement of a total of 792 valved conduits, including 289 (36%) pulmonary homografts, 121 (15%) aortic homografts, 245 (31%) bovine jugular grafts, and 137 (17%) porcine heterografts. There were 474 (60%) primary placements and 318 (40%) replacements. The median duration of conduit follow-up was 7 years; 23 conduits developed endocarditis at a median of 5 years after surgery. The use of bovine jugular grafts was the sole significant risk factor associated with endocarditis (hazard ratio, 9.05; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-31.8 compared with homografts). The hazard was greater for bovine jugular grafts compared with the other conduit types and increased with time; however, bovine jugular grafts were associated with a lower risk for reintervention (P < .0001) and replacement (P = .0002). Factors associated with greater risk of both reintervention and replacement were younger age and smaller conduit size. In addition, a diagnosis of truncus arteriosus was associated with a greater risk for replacement (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS Bovine jugular grafts are associated with a significantly greater risk of late endocarditis but with lower reintervention rates compared with other valved conduits. The risk of endocarditis and durability must be balanced during conduit selection. Antibiotic prophylaxis and a high index of suspicion for endocarditis are warranted in patients with bovine jugular grafts.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2014

Aortic Arch Advancement for Aortic Coarctation and Hypoplastic Aortic Arch in Neonates and Infants

Carlos M. Mery; Francisco A. Guzmán-Pruneda; Kathleen E. Carberry; Carmen H. Watrin; Grant R. McChesney; Joyce G. Chan; Iki Adachi; Jeffrey S. Heinle; E. Dean McKenzie; Charles D. Fraser

BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for infants with aortic coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch is controversial. The goal of this study was to report the short-term and mid-term outcomes of aortic arch advancement (AAA) in infants with hypoplastic aortic arch. METHODS All infants who underwent AAA at our institution from 1995 to 2012 were included. AAA consisted of coarctectomy and end-to-side anastomosis of the descending aorta to the distal ascending aorta/proximal arch through a median sternotomy. The cohort was divided into four groups: (1) isolated AAA (n=29, 11%), (2) AAA with closure of ventricular septal defect (n=56, 20%), (3) AAA with other biventricular repairs (n=115, 42%), and (4) AAA as part of single-ventricle palliation (n=75, 27%). RESULTS The cohort included 275 patients: 125 (45%) were female, and the median age was 14 days (interquartile range, 7-34 days). Genetic abnormalities were present in 48 patients (17%). Neurologic adverse events occurred in 3 patients (1%), all in group 4. Left bronchial compression was seen in 2 patients (0.7%); only one required intervention. Vocal cord dysfunction was noted in 36 of 95 patients (38%) on routine laryngoscopy. Only 1 patient had clinical residual dysfunction at the last follow-up visit. Perioperative mortality was 3% (n=8). At a median follow-up time of 6 years, 8 patients (3%) had reinterventions at a median time of 5 months (3-17 months) after repair. CONCLUSIONS AAA is a safe, effective, and durable operation with low rates of adverse events and mid-term reintervention. The advantages include native tissue-to-tissue reconstruction and preserved potential for growth. As such, it is the ideal technique for the management of hypoplastic aortic arch in neonates and infants.


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2012

Is lung transplantation survival better in infants? Analysis of over 80 infants

Muhammad S. Khan; Jeffrey S. Heinle; Andres X. Samayoa; Iki Adachi; M.G. Schecter; George B. Mallory; David L.S. Morales

BACKGROUND There have been >1,600 pediatric lung transplantations (LTx) performed worldwide with a trend toward improved outcomes over the last 25 years. The majority of these LTxs have been in older children and adolescents. Less than 4 infant (defined as ≤ 12 months of age) LTxs per year have been performed over the past 20 years, mostly in the USA. However, infant LTx outcomes have not been well documented in a multi-institutional longitudinal fashion. METHODS The United Network of Organ Sharing database was queried from October 1987 to July 2011. Of the 1,003 pediatric LTxs reported, 84 (8%) were infants. All combined transplantations were excluded. RESULTS Eighty-one infants received 84 LTxs, of which 95% had a bilateral LTx. Median age and weight at LTx was 4 months (range 0 to 11 months) and 5.3 kg (2.7 to 11.8 kg), respectively. Median ischemic time was 5.2 hours (2.0 to 10.8 hours). Overall Kaplan-Meier graft survival was similar for infants compared with other pediatric age group (OPA: >1 to 18 years) LTx recipients (half-life 4.0 years vs 3.4 years, p = 0.7). Conditional 1-year graft survival for infants was significantly higher than OPA (half-life 7.4 years vs 5.0 years, p = 0.024). Early (1987 to 2000, n = 46) and late (2001 to 2011, n = 38) era graft survival was not significantly different. Graft survival in pre-LTx ventilated infants was significantly better than pre-LTx ventilated OPA (half-life 6.1 years vs 0.9 year, p = 0.004) and was not statistically different from pre-LTx infants not on ventilatory support (half-life 6.1 years vs 2.2 years, p = 0.152). Cox regression of 5 variables (weight, donor arterial PO(2), pre-Tx ventilator, organ ischemic time, center experience) showed that survival was associated with increased center experience (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Infants undergoing LTx have outcomes similar to those of all other pediatric LTx patients.


Pediatric Critical Care Medicine | 2013

Anticoagulation for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.

Gail Annich; Iki Adachi

Extracorporeal life support applications have evolved considerably in recent years. However, the blood-biomaterial interface remains incompletely understood, and management of the acute inflammatory response and coagulation pathways continues to be challenging. At present, the gold standard for anticoagulation is unfractionated heparin. Since the inception of extracorporeal life support, the mainstay for anticoagulation monitoring has been activated clotting time. However, alongside the technological evolution in extracorporeal life support, the methods for monitoring heparin have also become more sophisticated, adding additional layers of complexity to creating an ideal safe protocol for anticoagulation during extracorporeal life support. To address this, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization has formed an Anticoagulation Task Force to help direct both a consensus statement and potential guidelines within which the multiple monitoring methods can be customized for extracorporeal life support. One key question that remains in the use of these monitoring methods is whether the objective during extracorporeal life support is to anticoagulate the circuit to prevent thrombus formation within the extracorporeal device or whether it is to systemically anticoagulate the patient. This review details all current monitoring methods and highlights how they can be used during pediatric mechanical circulatory support.


Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual | 2017

Closing in on the PumpKIN Trial of the Jarvik 2015 Ventricular Assist Device

J. Timothy Baldwin; Iki Adachi; John Teal; Christopher A. Almond; Robert D.B. Jaquiss; M. Patricia Massicotte; Kurt Dasse; Flora S. Siami; Victor Zak; Jonathan R. Kaltman; William T. Mahle; Robert Jarvik

The Infant Jarvik ventricular assist device (VAD; Jarvik Heart, Inc., New York, NY) has been developed to support the circulation of infants and children with advanced heart failure. The first version of the device was determined to have elevated hemolysis under certain conditions. The objective of this work was to determine appropriate modifications to the Infant Jarvik VAD that would result in acceptably low hemolysis levels. In vitro hemolysis testing revealed that hemolysis was related to the shape of the pump blade tips and a critical speed over which hemolysis would occur. Various design modifications were tested and a final design was selected that met the hemolysis performance goal. The new version was named the Jarvik 2015 VAD. Chronic in vivo tests, virtual fit studies, and a series of other performance tests were carried out to assess the devices performance characteristics. In vivo test results revealed acceptable hemolysis levels in a series of animals and virtual fit studies showed that the device would fit into children 8 kg and above, but could fit in smaller children as well. Additional FDA-required testing has been completed and all of the data are being submitted to the FDA so that a clinical trial of the Jarvik 2015 VAD can begin. Development of a Jarvik VAD for use in young children has been challenging for various reasons. However, with the hemolysis issue addressed in the Jarvik 2015 VAD, the device is well-poised for the start of the PumpKIN clinical trial in the near future.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2015

Evolution and impact of ventricular assist device program on children awaiting heart transplantation.

Iki Adachi; Muhammad S. Khan; Francisco A. Guzmán-Pruneda; Charles D. Fraser; Carlos M. Mery; Susan W. Denfield; William J. Dreyer; David L.S. Morales; E. Dean McKenzie; Jeffrey S. Heinle

BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate the impact of the evolution of a pediatric mechanical circulatory support (MCS) program on outcomes of children listed for heart transplantation at our institution. METHODS All patients listed for isolated heart transplantation from 1995 to 2013 were included. The use of MCS while on the wait-list was recorded. Wait-list and posttransplant outcomes were compared before and after 2005, which was when we became capable of providing long-term MCS without size limitation. RESULTS In total, 259 patients were listed for transplant and 201 (78%) reached transplant. The use of MCS was significantly increased between the eras (13% and 37%, p = 0.0001). Wait-list mortality was significantly decreased (25% and 11%, p = 0.0006). Among transplant recipients, the proportion of patients who underwent MCS was significantly increased (13% and 37%, p = 0.0002). Of these MCS patients, the use of long-term devices was significantly increased (50% and 98%, p = 0.0004). Median duration of MCS was significantly increased (12 and 78 days, p = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a trend (p = 0.08) toward improved survival after bridge-to-transplant both at 1 year (70% in the early era and 88% in the late era) and at 5 years (60% and 78%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of pediatric heart transplantation have significantly improved over the last 2 decades. We believe such improvement is, at least in part, attributable to maturation of MCS strategy, characterized by avoiding the use of temporary devices such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge-to-transplant and a more aggressive use of long-term devices.

Collaboration


Dive into the Iki Adachi's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles D. Fraser

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey S. Heinle

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aamir Jeewa

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carlos M. Mery

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David L.S. Morales

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hideki Uemura

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Dean McKenzie

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan W. Denfield

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William J. Dreyer

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jack F. Price

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge