Ikunosuke Sakurabayashi

Seven Direct Methods for Measuring HDL and LDL Cholesterol Compared with Ultracentrifugation Reference Measurement Procedures

BACKGROUND Methods from 7 manufacturers and 1 distributor for directly measuring HDL cholesterol (C) and LDL-C were evaluated for imprecision, trueness, total error, and specificity in nonfrozen serum samples. METHODS We performed each direct method according to the manufacturers instructions, using a Roche/Hitachi 917 analyzer, and compared the results with those obtained with reference measurement procedures for HDL-C and LDL-C. Imprecision was estimated for 35 runs performed with frozen pooled serum specimens and triplicate measurements on each individual sample. Sera from 37 individuals without disease and 138 with disease (primarily dyslipidemic and cardiovascular) were measured by each method. Trueness and total error were evaluated from the difference between the direct methods and reference measurement procedures. Specificity was evaluated from the dispersion in differences observed. RESULTS Imprecision data based on 4 frozen serum pools showed total CVs <3.7% for HDL-C and <4.4% for LDL-C. Bias for the nondiseased group ranged from -5.4% to 4.8% for HDL-C and from -6.8% to 1.1% for LDL-C, and for the diseased group from -8.6% to 8.8% for HDL-C and from -11.8% to 4.1% for LDL-C. Total error for the nondiseased group ranged from -13.4% to 13.6% for HDL-C and from -13.3% to 13.5% for LDL-C, and for the diseased group from -19.8% to 36.3% for HDL-C and from -26.6% to 31.9% for LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS Six of 8 HDL-C and 5 of 8 LDL-C direct methods met the National Cholesterol Education Program total error goals for nondiseased individuals. All the methods failed to meet these goals for diseased individuals, however, because of lack of specificity toward abnormal lipoproteins.

Non–HDL Cholesterol Shows Improved Accuracy for Cardiovascular Risk Score Classification Compared to Direct or Calculated LDL Cholesterol in a Dyslipidemic Population

BACKGROUND Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score classification by direct LDL cholesterol (dLDL-C), calculated LDL cholesterol (cLDL-C), and non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) compared to classification by reference measurement procedures (RMPs) performed at the CDC. METHODS We examined 175 individuals, including 138 with CVD or conditions that may affect LDL-C measurement. dLDL-C measurements were performed using Denka, Kyowa, Sekisui, Serotec, Sysmex, UMA, and Wako reagents. cLDL-C was calculated by the Friedewald equation, using each manufacturers direct HDL-C assay measurements, and total cholesterol and triglyceride measurements by Roche and Siemens (Advia) assays, respectively. RESULTS For participants with triglycerides<2.26 mmol/L (<200 mg/dL), the overall misclassification rate for the CVD risk score ranged from 5% to 17% for cLDL-C methods and 8% to 26% for dLDL-C methods when compared to the RMP. Only Wako dLDL-C had fewer misclassifications than its corresponding cLDL-C method (8% vs 17%; P<0.05). Non-HDL-C assays misclassified fewer patients than dLDL-C for 4 of 8 methods (P<0.05). For participants with triglycerides≥2.26 mmol/L (≥200 mg/dL) and<4.52 mmol/L (<400 mg/dL), dLDL-C methods, in general, performed better than cLDL-C methods, and non-HDL-C methods showed better correspondence to the RMP for CVD risk score than either dLDL-C or cLDL-C methods. CONCLUSIONS Except for hypertriglyceridemic individuals, 7 of 8 dLDL-C methods failed to show improved CVD risk score classification over the corresponding cLDL-C methods. Non-HDL-C showed overall the best concordance with the RMP for CVD risk score classification of both normal and hypertriglyceridemic individuals.

New Enzymatic Assay for Glycohemoglobin

BACKGROUND Previous methods to measure glycohemoglobin (GHb) have been time-consuming or imprecise; we therefore developed a new enzymatic assay for GHb. METHODS Blood cells were first hemolyzed, and hemoglobin was digested with protease to yield fructosyl amino acid. Fructosyl amino acid oxidase acts on the fructosyl amino acid and generates hydrogen peroxide, which reacts with chromogens in the presence of peroxidase. Total hemoglobin was measured spectrometrically in the same reaction tube. The results were reported as the ratio of the concentrations of GHb and hemoglobin. RESULTS The measured values were comparable to those determined with a HPLC method and with an immunoassay in blood samples from 2854 patients with diabetes. Regression analysis for the enzymatic assay (y) vs the HPLC method (x) produced the following: r = 0.979; slope, 0.994 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.986-1.001]; y-intercept, 0.04% (95% CI, -0.09% to 0.01%); n = 2854. For the enzymatic assay (y) vs the immunoassay (x), the regression statistics were as follows: r = 0.982; slope, 1.002 (95% CI, 0.995-1.009); y-intercept, 0% (95% CI, -0.05% to 0.05%); n = 2854. CONCLUSIONS The values measured by the new enzymatic assay are sufficiently correlated with those of the conventional HPLC method and immunoassay, but the proposed assay for GHb is rapid and has high precision.

Reference intervals for serum apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, B, C-II, C-III, and E in healthy Japanese determined with a commercial immunoturbidimetric assay and effects of sex, age, smoking, drinking, and Lp(a) level

BACKGROUND Apolipoproteins, which are contained in lipoprotein particles, play important roles in the transport of lipids. METHODS Serum levels of apolipoproteins (apo) A-I, A-II, B, C-II, C-III, and E were determined by immunoturbidimetry in a healthy Japanese study population (1018 men and 1167 women, age 20-69 years) to establish reference intervals. RESULTS Among the 2185 subjects examined, the mean serum value for apoA-I was 1.42 +/- 0.20 g/l, for apoA-II was 0.30 +/- 0.05 g/l, for apoB was 0.87 +/- 0.18 g/l, for apoC-II was 29 +/- 13 mg/l, for apoC-III was 75 +/- 20 mg/l, and for apoE was 36 +/- 9 mg/l. A sex difference was detected in the mean serum concentrations of all six apolipoproteins. Alcohol consumption and cigarette use had a slight effect on serum apolipoprotein concentrations. Age effects were observed among women in apoB, apoC-II, and apoC-III concentrations. Moreover, individuals with elevated serum lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a), >300 mg/l] also displayed increased serum apoB and apoC-II levels and an increased apoB/apoA-I ratio. CONCLUSION The reference intervals for apolipoproteins in Japanese adults that we established, using commercially available reagents for automated analyzers, will be helpful for assessing risk of coronary heart disease and pathological conditions of patients with hyperlipidemia. We recommend use of these reference intervals for the clinical interpretation of serum apolipoprotein concentrations.

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) standardization project for the measurement of lipoprotein(a). Phase 2 : Selection and properties of a proposed secondary reference material for lipoprotein(a)

Abstract The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group for the Standardization of Lipoprotein(a) Assays has initiated a project to select a secondary reference material for lipoprotein( a) that can standardize the measurement of this lipoprotein. Most of the analytical problems with lipoprotein( a) assays are due to apolipoprotein(a) kringle 4 type 2 reactive antibodies and values being expressed in mg/l mass units rather than as nmol/l of apolipoprotein( a) particles. In Phase 2, four manufactured materials were compared for analytical performance, commutability properties and method harmonization in 27 lipoprotein(a) test systems. Results of precision and linearity testing were comparable for all materials whereas testing for the harmonization effect resulted in an among-assay coefficient of variation for corrected lipoprotein(a) values of between 11% and 22%. The material that gave maximum harmonization achieved a variation of < 8% for 18 immunonephelometric and immunoturbidimetric assay systems. It can be hypothesized that this residual variation in part takes into account the inaccuracy of lipoprotein(a) measurement due to apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism. On the basis of acceptable analytical performance, maximal harmonization effect and documented stability, a lyophilized material has been selected as the common calibrator for lipoprotein(a) to be used in a value transfer procedure by diagnostic companies.

Mitogenic Activity of Oxidized Lipoprotein (a) on Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Although oxidized lipoproteins may play an important role in the progression of atherosclerosis, no report has mentioned the significance of oxidized lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Initially, we compared the mitogenic actions of Lp(a) and oxidized Lp(a) on human vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). Lp(a) significantly stimulated the growth of human VSMC in a dose-dependent manner, whereas oxidized Lp(a) showed a stronger stimulatory action on VSMC growth than native Lp(a). Interestingly, antioxidants probucol and fluvastatin inhibited the oxidation of Lp(a). Moreover, the stimulatory effect of oxidized Lp(a) on human VSMC growth was significantly inhibited by probucol. Finally, we elucidated the molecular mechanisms of how Lp(a) stimulated the growth of VSMC. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), as those controlled by kinases, modulate critical cellular functions such as cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis, was transiently phosphorylated by oxidized Lp(a) as well as native Lp(a) from 5 minutes, and the phosphorylation disappeared within 30 minutes. The degree of ERK phosphorylation by oxidized Lp(a) was much higher than that by native Lp(a). Administration of a specific inhibitor of MEK, PD 98059, significantly attenuated VSMC growth induced by native Lp(a) or oxidized Lp(a) in a dose-dependent manner (P <0.01). The current study demonstrated that oxidized Lp(a) is more potent than native Lp(a) in stimulating VSMC growth. Oxidized Lp(a) may play an important role in the pathogenesis of vascular disease.

Evaluation of Four Different Equations for Calculating LDL-C with Eight Different Direct HDL-C Assays

BACKGROUND Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is often calculated (cLDL-C) by the Friedewald equation, which requires high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG). Because there have been considerable changes in the measurement of HDL-C with the introduction of direct assays, several alternative equations have recently been proposed. METHODS We compared 4 equations (Friedewald, Vujovic, Chen, and Anandaraja) for cLDL-C, using 8 different direct HDL-C (dHDL-C) methods. LDL-C values were calculated by the 4 equations and determined by the β quantification reference method procedure in 164 subjects. RESULTS For normotriglyceridemic samples (TG<200mg/dl), between 6.2% and 24.8% of all results exceeded the total error goal of 12% for LDL-C, depending on the dHDL-C assay and cLDL-C equation used. Friedewald equation was found to be the optimum equation for most but not all dHDL-C assays, typically leading to less than 10% misclassification of cardiovascular risk based on LDL-C. Hypertriglyceridemic samples (>200mg/dl) showed a large cardiovascular risk misclassification rate (30%-50%) for all combinations of dHDL-C assays and cLDL-C equations. CONCLUSION The Friedewald equation showed the best performance for estimating LDL-C, but its accuracy varied considerably depending on the specific dHDL-C assay used. None of the cLDL-C equations performed adequately for hypertriglyceridemic samples.

Development of Antibody Against Epitope of Lipoprotein(a) Modified by Oxidation Evaluation of New Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Oxidized Lipoprotein(a)

BackgroundRecently, the biological effects of oxidized lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been reported to be more potent than Lp(a), the arteriosclerosis-relevant lipoprotein. Thus, investigations with oxidized Lp(a) are expected to provide viewpoints different from the conventional ones based on Lp(a). Methods and ResultsAn anti-Lp(a) monoclonal antibody (161E2) was produced against synthetic peptide antigen (Arg-Asn-Pro-Asp-Val-Ala-Pro). This epitope was characterized as having various properties because its external exposure was induced as a result of oxidative modification. Using 161E2 antibody, we developed a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure Lp(a) modified by oxidative stress. The present data demonstrated that oxidized Lp(a) that contains the epitope of 161E2 antibody was present in the serum of humans. Therefore, we used this new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to evaluate the role of oxidized Lp(a) in patients with hypertension, which induces oxidative stress . Interestingly, hypertensive patients with complications showed a significantly higher level of oxidized Lp(a) in serum than did normotensive subjects (P <0.01), whereas there was no significant difference in native Lp(a) between normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Importantly, positive immunostaining with 161E2 monoclonal antibody was found in the human arteriosclerotic tissue. ConclusionsWe developed a new antibody against an epitope in Lp(a) as a result of oxidation treatment but not in native Lp(a). The present data demonstrated in vivo the presence of oxidized Lp(a) in the atherosclerotic tissue and its elevation in hypertensive patients. The presence of oxidized Lp(a) may be important in understanding the role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular disease.

Higher frequency of abnormal serum angiopoietin-like protein 3 than abnormal cholesteryl ester transfer protein in Japanese hyperalphalipoproteinemic subjects.

BACKGROUND Either a decrease of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) or an increase of angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) in plasma has been shown to increase HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. However, as yet, it is not known which protein is more strongly associated with the modulation of HDL in the Japanese hyperalphalipoproteinemic (HALT) subjects. METHODS The serum concentration of ANGPTL3 and CETP, together with total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), adiponectin and ApoE phenotypes were determined in three groups with different HDL-C concentrations: low, <40 mg/dl (n=51); normal, 40-90 mg/dl (n=126) and high, >90 mg/dl (n=89) in the average Japanese population. RESULTS The normal range (mean+/-2SD) of serum ANGPTL3 (218+/-144 ng/ml) and CETP (1.29+/-0.90 microg/ml) were determined in cases with 40-90 mg/dl HDL-C concentration. The frequency of abnormally high ANGPTL3 cases (>362 ng/ml) were found to be significantly greater (44%) compared with those of low CETP cases (<0.39 microg/ml, 4.5%) in HALT cases (>90 mg/dl). ANGPTL3 showed a high correlation with HDL-C (r=0.67, P<0.0001) and adiponectin (r=0.57, P<0.0001), but not with CETP. CONCLUSION In average Japanese population, abnormally higher frequency of increased ANGPTL3 prevail in HALT cases as compared with cases with low CETP. These findings suggest that ANGPTL3, the inhibitor of endothelial lipase, may be more strongly associated with increased HDL-C rather than CETP in plasma. Accordingly, ANGPTL3 seems to be a better target for the modulation of HDL-C.

A new Lp(a) assay that is unaffected by apo(a) size polymorphism

We developed sandwich ELISA methods in which anti-apo(a) kringle 4 type 5 through protease (K4 x 5-Pro) domain monoclonal antibody (clone: 203E2) is employed in each instance as the capture antibody and one of the three species of monoclonal antibody [Mab] (clones: 108B8, 202A9, 2B3) is used as the labeled antibody. Using serum containing apo(a) with 34 repeats of kringle 4 as the calibrator, a commercial kit using anti-Lp(a) polyclonal antibody (Pab) or anti-apo(a) Mab overestimated the Lp(a) concentration in samples containing apo(a) with more than 34 repeats of kringle 4 and underestimated the Lp(a) concentration in samples containing apo(a) with fewer than 34 repeats of kringle 4. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the ratios of commercial kit values to anti-apo(a) K4 x 5-Pro Mab-based method values increased as the size of apo(a) increased. The ratios of apo(a) K5 x Pro Mab-based method values to anti-apo(a) K4 x 5-Pro Mab-based method values, however, remained almost constant regardless of the size polymorphism. Thus, we suggest that apo(a) size heterogeneity can significantly affect Lp(a) measurement in the Lp(a) assay using anti-Lp(a) Pab. The novel Lp(a) assay method, using only anti-apo(a) K4 x 5-Pro Mab, is not subject to this phenomenon.