Ilan Asher

Treatment of lupus patients with a tolerogenic peptide, hCDR1 (Edratide): immunomodulation of gene expression.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by dysregulation of cytokines, apoptosis, and B- and T-cell functions. The tolerogenic peptide, hCDR1 (Edratide), ameliorated the clinical manifestations of murine lupus via down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and apoptosis, up-regulation of the immunosuppressive cytokine TGF-beta, and the induction of regulatory T-cells. In the present study, gene expression was determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 9 lupus patients that were treated for 26 weeks with either hCDR1 (five patients), or placebo (four patients). Disease activity was assessed by SLEDAI-2K and the BILAG scores. Treatment with hCDR1 significantly down-regulated the mRNA expression of the pathogenic cytokines IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and IL-10, of BLyS (B-lymphocyte stimulator) and of the pro-apoptotic molecules caspase-3 and caspase-8. In contrast, the treatment up-regulated in vivo gene expression of both TGF-beta and FoxP3. Furthermore, hCDR1 treatment resulted in a significant decrease in SLEDAI-2K (from 8.0+/-2.45 to 4.4+/-1.67; P=0.02) and BILAG (from 8.2+/-2.7 to 3.6+/-2.9; P=0.03) scores. Thus, the tolerogenic peptide hCDR1, immunomodulates, in vivo, the expression of genes that play a role in SLE, consequently restoring the global immune dysregulation of lupus patients. Hence, hCDR1 has a potential role as a novel disease-specific treatment for lupus patients.

High α-defensin levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Innate immunity plays a role in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Our objective was to determine the levels of defensins, which are antimicrobial and immunomodulatory polypeptides, in SLE. Sera from SLE patients and healthy controls were tested for pro‐inflammatory human β‐defensin 2 (hBD‐2) and for α‐defensin human neutrophil peptide 1 (HNP‐1). hBD‐2 could not be detected by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and its mRNA levels were low in SLE patients and similar to those found in controls. In contrast, the mean α‐defensin level in the sera of all SLE patients (11·07 ± 13·92 ng/μl) was significantly higher than that of controls (0·12 ± 0·07 ng/μl). Moreover, 60% of patients demonstrated very high serum levels (18·5 ± 13·36 ng/μl) and 50% showed elevated gene expression in polymorphonuclear cells. High α‐defensin levels correlated with disease activity, but not with neutrophil count. Thus, activation and degranulation of neutrophils led to α‐defensin secretion in SLE patients. Given the immunomodulatory role of α‐defensins, it is possible that their secretion may activate the adaptive immune system leading to a systemic response.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are widely used, effective, and well-tolerated antihypertensive agents. The mechanisms by which those agents act can cause side effects such as decreased blood pressure, hyperkalemia, and impaired renal function. ACE-I can induce cough in 5%-35% and angioedema in up to 0.7% of treated patients. Because cough and angioedema are considered class adverse effects, switching treatment to other ACE-I agents is not recommended. Angioedema due to ACE-I has a low fatality rate, although deaths have been reported when the angioedema involves the airways. Here, we review the role of bradykinin in the development of angioedema in patients treated with ACE-I, as well as the incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation, and available treatments for ACE-I-induced angioedema. We also discuss the risk for recurrence of angioedema after switching from ACE-I to angiotensin receptor blockers treatment.

The Tolerogenic Peptide, hCDR1, Down-Regulates the Expression of Interferon-α in Murine and Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Background The tolerogenic peptide, hCDR1, ameliorated manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) via the immunomodulation of pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive cytokines and the induction of regulatory T cells. Because type I interferon (IFN-α) has been implicated to play a role in SLE pathogenesis, we investigated the effects of hCDR1 on IFN-α in a murine model of SLE and in human lupus. Methodology/Principal Findings (NZBxNZW)F1 mice with established SLE were treated with hCDR1 (10 weekly injections). Splenocytes were obtained for gene expression studies by real-time RT-PCR. hCDR1 down-regulated significantly IFN-α gene expression (73% inhibition compared to vehicle treated mice, p = 0.002) in association with diminished clinical manifestations. Further, hCDR1 reduced, in vitro, IFN-α gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of 10 lupus patients (74% inhibition compared to medium, p = 0.002) but had no significant effects on the expression levels of IFN-α in PBMC of primary anti-phospholipid syndrome patients or of healthy controls. Lupus patients were treated for 24 weeks with hCDR1 (5) or placebo (4) by weekly subcutaneous injections. Blood samples collected, before and after treatment, were frozen until mRNA isolation. A significant reduction in IFN-α was determined in hCDR1 treated patients (64.4% inhibition compared to pretreatment expression levels, p = 0.015). No inhibition was observed in the placebo treated patients. In agreement, treatment with hCDR1 resulted in a significant decrease of disease activity. IFN-α appears to play a role in the mechanism of action of hCDR1 since recombinant IFN-α diminished the immunomodulating effects of hCDR1 on IL-1β, TGFβ and FoxP3 gene expression. Conclusions/Significance We reported previously that hCDR1 affected various cell types and immune pathways in correlation to disease amelioration. The present studies demonstrate that hCDR1 is also capable of down-regulating significantly (and specifically to lupus) IFN-α gene expression. Thus, hCDR1 has a potential role as a novel, disease specific treatment for lupus.

Inhaled Fluticasone Causes Iatrogenic Cushing’s Syndrome in Patients Treated with Ritonavir

Introduction: Ritonavir, a protease inhibitor (PI), is commonly used in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. It is a potent inhibitor of the hepatic cytochrome P450 superfamily. Therefore, its usage with other PI medications leads to significant increases in the levels of the latter PI, which allows a reduction in pill burden. Intranasal and inhaled corticosteroids are widely used for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Inhaled steroids do not usually lead to systemic adverse events, since their plasma concentrations are quite low due to extensive first-pass metabolism and clearance by CYP3A4. However, the coadministration of Ritonavir with inhaled (or intranasal) corticosteroids may result in an increase in the plasma corticosteroid levels due to the potent CYP3A4 inhibition by Ritonavir. This may cause Cushing’s syndrome (laboratory and clinical) with adrenal suppression. Methods: Plasma cortisol and urinary-free cortisol levels were determined using immunoassays. In the Synacthen test, plasma cortisol levels were measured at time 0 as well as at times 60, 120, and 150 minutes following an intramuscular injection of 0.25 mg Synacthen. Results: We present here three HIV-1 female patients aged 12, 55 and 65 years who developed iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome with adrenal suppression following the coadministration of Ritonavir and inhaled Fluticasone, both at the standard recommended doses. Conclusions: The coadministration of Ritonavir and Fluticasone at the recommended doses caused, in our three patients, iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome with adrenal suppression. We suggest that this adverse event is underdiagnosed and high clinical suspicion is needed for early diagnosis and prenention of Addisonian crises. Thus, Fluticasone treatment should be avoided in patients who are treated with Ritonavir. Alternative therapeutic options for asthma control such as oral Montelukast or bronchodilators alone should be considered.

Syphilis and HIV co-infection in an Israeli HIV clinic: incidence and outcome.

Summary The re-emergence of syphilis among HIV-infected patients has been reported in recent years. We evaluated co-infection among heterosexual immigrants in an Israeli AIDS center. The records of 1060 HIV-infected patients were evaluated for positive syphilis serology between the years 2000 and 2005, and all seropositive patients were further evaluated. We found 150 HIV/syphilis co-infected patients (57% men, 93% of African origin), of who 135 were found to have late latent syphilis. Lumbar puncture (LP) was performed in 51 patients, 16 (31 %) had abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compatible with neurosyphilis. Abnormal CSF correlated with the absence of previous anti-syphilis treatment, but not with CD4 count, viral load or Venereal Disease Research Laboratory titres. Penicillin was recommended to all patients according to their disease stages and 81 patients completed 12 months post-treatment follow-up. Twenty-one of 81 (26%) treatments were successful, 33 (41 %) showed ‘serofast reaction’ and 27 (33%) failed therapy. In conclusion, a high incidence of syphilis with CSF reactivity suggestive of neurosyphilis was observed in heterosexual Ethiopian HIV-infected patients. Thus, repeated serological screening and CSF evaluation seems to be indicated in these patients. Penicillin therapy resulted in ‘serofast reaction’ or treatment failure for most patients. More, intensive treatment might be needed for HIV/syphilis in co-infected patients, especially those with severe immune-deficiency and prolonged syphilis infection.

The management of systemic lupus erythematosus: Facts and controversies

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a multisystem disease of unknown etiology in which dysregulation of the innate and adaptive immune systems has a major effect in the pathogenesis of the disease. The treatment should be tailored for each patient according to how the disease manifests itself. Although there is no cure for systemic lupus erythematosus, the current treatment, using anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, and immunosuppressive agents, is fairly effective, but serious adverse events are possible. New biologic agents that target various components of the immune system recently have been developed for the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Omalizumab for severe chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real-life experiences of 280 patients

Omalizumab for severe chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real-life experiences of 280 patients Zahava Vadasz, MD, PhD, Yuval Tal, MD, Menachem Rotem, MD, Vered Shichter-Confino, MD, Keren Mahlab-Guri, MD, Yael Graif, MD, Aharon Kessel, MD, Nancy Agmon-Levin, MD, Ramit Maoz-Segal, MD, Shmuel Kivity, MD, Shira Benor, MD, Idit Lachover-Roth, MD, Yuri Zeldin, MD, Migel Stein, MD, Ori Toker, MD, Gamal Hassoun, MD, Shira Bezalel-Rosenberg, MD, Elias Toubi, MD, Ilan Asher, MD*, and Zev Sthoeger, MD*; for The Israeli Forum for investigating and treating Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU)

A Population-Structured HIV Epidemic in Israel: Roles of Risk and Ethnicity.

Background HIV in Israel started with a subtype-B epidemic among men who have sex with men, followed in the 1980s and 1990s by introductions of subtype C from Ethiopia (predominantly acquired by heterosexual transmission) and subtype A from the former Soviet Union (FSU, most often acquired by intravenous drug use). The epidemic matured over the last 15 years without additional large influx of exogenous infections. Between 2005 and 2013 the number of infected men who have sex with men (MSM) increased 2.9-fold, compared to 1.6-fold and 1.3-fold for intravenous drug users (IVDU) and Ethiopian-origin residents. Understanding contemporary spread is essential for effective public health planning. Methods We analyzed demographic and virologic data from 1,427 HIV-infected individuals diagnosed with HIV-I during 1998–2012. HIV phylogenies were reconstructed with maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods. Results Subtype-B viruses, but not A or C, demonstrated a striking number of large clusters with common ancestors having posterior probability ≥0.95, including some suggesting presence of transmission networks. Transmitted drug resistance was highest in subtype B (13%). MSM represented a frequent risk factor in cross-ethnic transmission, demonstrated by the presence of Israeli-born with non-B virus infections and FSU immigrants with non-A subtypes. Conclusions Reconstructed phylogenetic trees demonstrated substantial grouping in subtype B, but not in non-MSM subtype-A or in subtype-C, reflecting differences in transmission dynamics linked to HIV transmission categories. Cross-ethnic spread occurred through multiple independent introductions, with MSM playing a prevalent role in the transmission of the virus. Such data provide a baseline to track epidemic trends and will be useful in informing and quantifying efforts to reduce HIV transmission.

Comparable Long-Term Efficacy of Lopinavir/Ritonavir and Similar Drug-Resistance Profiles in Different HIV-1 Subtypes

Background Analysis of potentially different impact of Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) on non-B subtypes is confounded by dissimilarities in the conditions existing in different countries. We retrospectively compared its impact on populations infected with subtypes B and C in Israel, where patients infected with different subtypes receive the same treatment. Methods Clinical and demographic data were reported by physicians. Resistance was tested after treatment failure. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS. Results 607 LPV/r treated patients (365 male) were included. 139 had HIV subtype B, 391 C, and 77 other subtypes. At study end 429 (71%) were receiving LPV/r. No significant differences in PI treatment history and in median viral-load (VL) at treatment initiation and termination existed between subtypes. MSM discontinued LPV/r more often than others even when the virologic outcome was good (p = 0.001). VL was below detection level in 81% of patients for whom LPV/r was first PI and in 67% when it was second (P = 0.001). Median VL decrease from baseline was 1.9±0.1 logs and was not significantly associated with subtype. Median CD4 increase was: 162 and 92cells/µl, respectively, for patients receiving LPV/r as first and second PI (P = 0.001), and 175 and 98, respectively, for subtypes B and C (P<0.001). Only 52 (22%) of 237 patients genotyped while under LPV/r were fully resistant to the drug; 12(5%) were partially resistant. In48%, population sequencing did not reveal resistance to any drug notwithstanding the virologic failure. No difference was found in the rates of resistance development between B and C (p = 0.16). Conclusions Treatment with LPV/r appeared efficient and tolerable in both subtypes, B and C, but CD4 recovery was significantly better in virologically suppressed subtype-B patients. In both subtypes, LPV/r was more beneficial when given as first PI. Mostly, reasons other than resistance development caused discontinuation of treatment.