Ilaria Conti

Olaratumab and doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone for treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma: an open-label phase 1b and randomised phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Treatment with doxorubicin is a present standard of care for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and median overall survival for those treated is 12-16 months, but few, if any, novel treatments or chemotherapy combinations have been able to improve these poor outcomes. Olaratumab is a human antiplatelet-derived growth factor receptor α monoclonal antibody that has antitumour activity in human sarcoma xenografts. We aimed to assess the efficacy of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in patients with advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. METHODS We did an open-label phase 1b and randomised phase 2 study of doxorubicin plus olaratumab treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma at 16 clinical sites in the USA. For both the phase 1b and phase 2 parts of the study, eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma not previously treated with an anthracycline, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and available tumour tissue to determine PDGFRα expression by immunohistochemistry. In the phase 2 part of the study, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either olaratumab (15 mg/kg) intravenously on day 1 and day 8 plus doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) or doxorubicin alone (75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to eight cycles. Randomisation was dynamic and used the minimisation randomisation technique. The phase 1b primary endpoint was safety and the phase 2 primary endpoint was progression-free survival using a two-sided α level of 0.2 and statistical power of 0.8. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01185964. FINDINGS 15 patients were enrolled and treated with olaratumab plus doxorubicin in the phase 1b study, and 133 patients were randomised (66 to olaratumab plus doxorubicin; 67 to doxorubicin alone) in the phase 2 trial, 129 (97%) of whom received at least one dose of study treatment (64 received olaratumab plus doxorubicin, 65 received doxorubicin). Median progression-free survival in phase 2 was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.1-8.3) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 4.1 months (2.8-5.4) with doxorubicin (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 0.44-1.02, p=0.0615). Median overall survival was 26.5 months (20.9-31.7) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 14.7 months (9.2-17.1) with doxorubicin (stratified HR 0.46, 0.30-0.71, p=0.0003). The objective response rate was 18.2% (9.8-29.6) with olaratumab plus doxorubicin and 11.9% (5.3-22.2) with doxorubicin (p=0.3421). Steady state olaratumab serum concentrations were reached during cycle 3 with mean maximum and trough concentrations ranging from 419 μg/mL (geometric coefficient of variation in percentage [CV%] 26.2) to 487 μg/mL (CV% 33.0) and from 123 μg/mL (CV% 31.2) to 156 μg/mL (CV% 38.0), respectively. Adverse events that were more frequent with olaratumab plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone included neutropenia (37 [58%] vs 23 [35%]), mucositis (34 [53%] vs 23 [35%]), nausea (47 [73%] vs 34 [52%]), vomiting (29 [45%] vs 12 [18%]), and diarrhoea (22 [34%] vs 15 [23%]). Febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was similar in both groups (olaratumab plus doxorubicin: eight [13%] of 64 patients vs doxorubicin: nine [14%] of 65 patients). INTERPRETATION This study of olaratumab with doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma met its predefined primary endpoint for progression-free survival and achieved a highly significant improvement of 11.8 months in median overall survival, suggesting a potential shift in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma. FUNDING Eli Lilly and Company.

Inhibition of RAF Isoforms and Active Dimers by LY3009120 Leads to Anti-tumor Activities in RAS or BRAF Mutant Cancers

LY3009120 is a pan-RAF and RAF dimer inhibitor that inhibits all RAF isoforms and occupies both protomers in RAF dimers. Biochemical and cellular analyses revealed that LY3009120 inhibits ARAF, BRAF, and CRAF isoforms with similar affinity, while vemurafenib or dabrafenib have little or modest CRAF activity compared to their BRAF activities. LY3009120 induces BRAF-CRAF dimerization but inhibits the phosphorylation of downstream MEK and ERK, suggesting that it effectively inhibits the kinase activity of BRAF-CRAF heterodimers. Further analyses demonstrated that LY3009120 also inhibits various forms of RAF dimers including BRAF or CRAF homodimers. Due to these unique properties, LY3009120 demonstrates minimal paradoxical activation, inhibits MEK1/2 phosphorylation, and exhibits anti-tumor activities across multiple models carrying KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutation.

Phase 2 study of tabalumab, a human anti‐B‐cell activating factor antibody, with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma

In this double‐blind, Phase 2 study, 220 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive placebo (N = 72), tabalumab 100 mg (N = 74), or tabalumab 300 mg (N = 74), each in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg and subcutaneous bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 on a 21‐day cycle. No significant intergroup differences were observed among primary (median progression‐free survival [mPFS]) or secondary efficacy outcomes. The mPFS was 6·6, 7·5 and 7·6 months for the tabalumab 100, 300 mg and placebo groups, respectively (tabalumab 100 mg vs. placebo Hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1·13 [0·80–1·59], P = 0·480; tabalumab 300 mg vs. placebo HR [95% CI] = 1·03 [0·72–1·45], P = 0·884). The most commonly‐reported treatment‐emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (37%), fatigue (37%), diarrhoea (35%) and constipation (32%). Across treatments, patients with low baseline BAFF (also termed TNFSF13B) expression (n = 162) had significantly longer mPFS than those with high BAFF expression (n = 55), using the 75th percentile cut‐off point (mPFS [95% CI] = 8·3 [7·0–9·3] months vs. 5·8 [3·7–6·6] months; HR [95% CI] = 1·59 [1·11–2·29], P = 0·015). Although generally well tolerated, PFS was not improved during treatment with tabalumab compared to placebo. A higher dose of 300 mg tabalumab did not improve efficacy compared to the 100 mg dose. Nonetheless, BAFF appears to have some prognostic value in patients with multiple myeloma.

Phase 1 Study of Tabalumab, a Human Anti-B-Cell Activating Factor Antibody, and Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Purpose: Tabalumab, a human mAb that neutralizes B-cell–activating factor (BAFF), demonstrated antitumor activity in xenograft models of multiple myeloma. Here we report on a phase I study of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients in which the primary objective was to identify a tolerable and potentially efficacious dose of tabalumab when combined with bortezomib. Experimental Design: Forty-eight patients were enrolled; 20 to the dose-escalation cohort, and 28 to cohort expansion in which a dose of 100 mg of tabalumab was evaluated. All patients had received either prior bortezomib or an immunomodulatory drug; the median number of prior therapies was 3. Bortezomib was administered intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day schedule. Tabalumab was given every 21 days for 3 cycles, then every 42 days thereafter. Results: The most common grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, pneumonia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Pharmacokinetic data suggested serum exposure increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner up to a dose of 100 mg. Out of 46 evaluable patients, 20 had confirmed responses. The median time to progression (9 patients censored) was 4.8 months, and the median response duration (4 patients censored) was 7.2 months. Conclusions: A dose of 100 mg tabalumab in combination with bortezomib was well tolerated and active and is currently under further investigation. Clin Cancer Res; 22(23); 5688–95. ©2016 AACR.

Can Gemcitabine Instillation Ablate Solitary Low-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer? Results of a Phase II Marker Lesion Study

Purpose: The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate whether low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be ablated with intravesical gemcitabine in a marker lesion study. Patients and Methods: The study had a Simon II-stage design. Thirteen patients were to be recruited for stage I. In the event of ≧4 responses, another 30 patients were to be recruited. Patients were given gemcitabine 2,000 mg intravesically once per week for 6 weeks and the response was assessed with endoscopic, histological, and urine cytological findings. Results: Fourteen patients evaluated for efficacy completed the study; complete responses were achieved by 2 patients (14.3%), both of these patients had lesions of <1 cm. Eleven patients (78.6%) were non-responders and 1 patient (7.1%) had progressive disease. Since the response rate in stage I was below the minimal pre-defined limit, the study was stopped. Conclusions: This study shows that intravesical gemcitabine does not merit further study in this patient population. A tumor size of >1 cm may be a critical factor in accounting for the low response rate.

Dose-escalation study of tabalumab with bortezomib and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma

B‐cell activating factor (BAFF) promotes the survival and adhesion of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Tabalumab (LY2127399) is an anti‐BAFF monoclonal antibody. This phase 1, multicenter, open‐label, nonrandomized, dose‐escalation study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of tabalumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Sixteen patients received intravenous i.v. tabalumab 100 mg (Cohort 1, n = 4) or i.v. tabalumab 300 mg (Cohort 2, n = 12) in combination with oral dexamethasone 20 mg/day and i.v. or s.c. bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2. All patients had treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAE) possibly related to study treatment; the most common TEAE were thrombocytopenia (81.3%), lymphopenia (43.8%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (43.8%). Two (20.0%) dose‐limiting toxicities were observed, both in Cohort 2 (tabalumab 300 mg), which was below the predefined cutoff for tolerability (<33%). The pharmacokinetics of tabalumab were similar when bortezomib was coadministered i.v. versus s.c. The overall response rate was 56.3%, suggesting that the combined treatment was effective. In conclusion, combined treatment with these three agents was well tolerated in this population of Japanese patients with RRMM. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01556438).

Abstract DDT02-02: Identification of LY3009120 as a pan inhibitor of Raf isoforms and dimers with minimal paradoxical activation and activities against BRaf or Ras mutant tumor cells

Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2014; April 5-9, 2014; San Diego, CA Mutations in KRas, NRas, BRaf and NF-1 that activate the Ras and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway are among the most common oncogenic drivers in many cancers, including melanoma, lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer. Two BRaf selective inhibitors, vemurafenib and dabrafenib, have been approved for the treatment of melanoma patients harboring the BRaf V600E/K mutation. However, both compounds have been reported to promote paradoxical MAPK pathway activation in BRaf wild-type cells through induction of active Raf dimers. Therefore, they are believed to be contraindicated for treatment of cancers with BRaf wild type background. In this study, we have identified and characterized a pyrido-pyrimidine derivative inhibitor of all three Raf isoforms. A whole-cell mass spectrum-based analysis revealed that LY3009120 binds to ARaf, BRaf and CRaf isoforms with similar affinity in cells with activating mutations of BRaf or KRas, while vemurafenib or dabrafenib have little or modest CRaf activity. Additionally, LY3009120 induces BRaf-CRaf heterodimerization, but inhibits the phosphorylation of downstream MEK and ERK, indicating that it effectively inhibits the kinase activity of BRaf-CRaf heterodimer. Due to its activity against the three Raf isoforms and dimer, LY3009120 induces minimal paradoxical pathway activation in NRas or KRas mutant cells. These unique pharmacological properties of LY3009120 further distinguish it from selective BRaf inhibitors by its physiologically-relevant activities against tumor cells with NRas or KRas mutations. LY3009120 inhibits MEK phosphorylation and cell proliferation in vitro, and exhibits anti-tumor activity in multiple xenograft models carrying mutations in BRaf, NRas or KRas. LY3009120 is also active against melanoma cells with acquired resistance to vemurafenib or dabrafenib in the setting of MAPK reactivation and cyclin D1 upregulation caused by RTK/Ras activation, BRaf splice variants, or NRas Q61K mutation. Collectively, our findings identify LY3009120 as a potentially best-in-class inhibitor of three Raf isoforms and Raf dimer, with activity against tumor cells with BRaf, NRas or KRas mutations, as well as melanoma cells with acquired resistance to current BRaf therapies. These unique features support investigation of LY3009120 in clinical studies. Citation Format: Sheng-Bin Peng, James Henry, Michael Kaufman, Wei-Ping Lu, Bryan D. Smith, Subha Vogeti, Scott Wise, Youyan Zhang, Robert Van Horn, Xiaoyi Zhang, Tinggui Yin, Vipin Yadav, Lysiane Huber, Lisa Kays, Jennie Walgren, Denis McCann, Phenil Patel, Sean Buchanan, Ilaria Conti, James J. Starling, Daniel L. Flynn. Identification of LY3009120 as a pan inhibitor of Raf isoforms and dimers with minimal paradoxical activation and activities against BRaf or Ras mutant tumor cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr DDT02-02. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-DDT02-02