Ilaria Cuccuru

Maternal triglyceride levels and newborn weight in pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance

Objective  To determine the predictive value of serum triglyceride levels (TG) for neonatal weight in pregnant women with positive diabetic screening but normal glucose tolerance.

C-reactive protein and metabolic syndrome in women with previous gestational diabetes.

This study evaluates the presence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its association with C‐reactive protein (CRP) and other cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, in a sample of women with and without previous Gestational Diabetes (pGDM).

Normal Glucose Tolerance and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus What is in between

OBJECTIVE— The aim of this article was to define the metabolic phenotype of pregnant women with one abnormal value (OAV) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to test whether OAV could be considered metabolically comparable to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or a specific entity between GDM and normal pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— After 100-g 3-h OGTTs, 4,053 pregnant women were classified as having GDM, OAV, or normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Those with OAV were subdivided into three subgroups: fasting hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at fasting during an OGTT), 1-h hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at 1 h during an OGTT [1h-OAV]), or 2- or 3-h hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at 2 or 3 h during an OGTT). As derived from the OGTT, we measured insulin sensitivity (insulin sensitivity index [ISI] Matsuda) and insulin secretion (homeostasis model assessment for the estimation of β-cell secretion [HOMA-B], first- and second-phase insulin secretion). The product of the first-phase index and the ISI was calculated to obtain the insulin secretion–sensitivity index (ISSI). RESULTS— GDM was diagnosed in 17.9% and OAV in 18.7% of pregnant women; women with GDM and OAV were older and had higher BMI and serum triglyceride levels than those with NGT (all P < 0.05). Women with NGT had the highest ISI followed by those with OAV (−21.7%) and GDM (−32.1%). HOMA-B results were comparable with those for OAV and GDM but significantly (P < 0.01) lower than those for NGT; first- and second-phase insulin secretion appeared progressively reduced from that in women with NGT to that in women with OAV and GDM (P < 0.01). ISSI was higher in women with NGT than in women with either OAV (−34%) or GDM (−51.7%) (P < 0.001). Among OAV subgroups, the 1h-OAV subgroup showed the lowest ISSI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS— OAV and GDM are clinically indistinguishable, and both groups are different from women with NGT. Women with GDM and OAV showed impaired insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity, although these defects are more pronounced in women with GDM. Compared with other OAV subgroups, 1h-OAV could be considered a more severe condition.

Maternal Metabolic Control and Perinatal Outcome in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Lispro or Aspart Insulin Comparison with regular insulin

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with increased risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity with macrosomia being the most common neonatal complication (1). The risk of macrosomia and/or disproportionate fetal growth is closely related to 1-h postprandial glucose concentration (2). Therefore, the treatment of GDM should be aimed at normalizing maternal glycemia including the early postprandial response. Insulin therapy is needed whenever strict normoglycemia cannot be achieved by medical nutritional therapy alone (3). Because of their pharmacokinetic properties, short-acting insulin analogs (Insulin Aspart [ASP] and Insulin Lispro [LIS]) could be more effective in pregnancy than human regular insulin (HI) (4). Nevertheless, data …

Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Women With Previous Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

To determine if women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (pGDM), a population at high risk for type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome (1), have signs of subclinical atherosclerosis, we measured carotid intimal-medial thickness (IMT) and multiple cardiovascular risk factors in 28 women with and 24 without pGDM (control group) 2 years after delivery. A 75-g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test was performed for assessment of glucose tolerance, area under the glucose curve (AUCgluc), insulin sensitivity index, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lipid profile, oxidized LDL (oxLDL), C-reactive protein (CRP), adiponectin, and fibrinogen. Family history, anthropometric parameters, and blood pressure were recorded. IMT was measured at four segments of …

Gestational diabetes, inflammation, and late vascular disease.

Physiological changes of pregnancy include insulin resistance and activation of the innate immunity with an inflammatory response. The working hypothesis is that the sub-clinical inflammation associated with excessive adiposity may favor the development of gestational diabetes (GDM) and Type 2 diabetes and other metabolic abnormalities related to cardiovascular disease later in life. In this paper we review the complex interrelationship among inflammatory markers, metabolic syndrome, and endothelium dysfunction in women with GDM and discuss if women with previous GDM (pGDM) could be considered at risk for cardiovascular diseases. MEDLINE was searched for articles relating GDM and the adipokines (tumor necrosis factor-α and adiponectin) as well as the acute-phase inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein that contribute to the development of diabetic pregnancy and vascular complications. However, to date, in pGDM women no prospective study is available, to corroborate the hypothesis that inflammatory pattern could be taken as predictor of cardiovascular disease later in life. Therefore, our paper should provide arguments to perform follow-up programs to prevent cardiovascular events in women with pGDM. Control of body weight, regular physical exercise are indeed powerful intervention tools able at improving insulin sensitivity and reduce sub-clinical inflammation, both involved in the patoghenesis of cardiovascular disease.

Normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus: what is between?

OBJECTIVE— The aim of this article was to define the metabolic phenotype of pregnant women with one abnormal value (OAV) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to test whether OAV could be considered metabolically comparable to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or a specific entity between GDM and normal pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— After 100-g 3-h OGTTs, 4,053 pregnant women were classified as having GDM, OAV, or normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Those with OAV were subdivided into three subgroups: fasting hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at fasting during an OGTT), 1-h hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at 1 h during an OGTT [1h-OAV]), or 2- or 3-h hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at 2 or 3 h during an OGTT). As derived from the OGTT, we measured insulin sensitivity (insulin sensitivity index [ISI] Matsuda) and insulin secretion (homeostasis model assessment for the estimation of β-cell secretion [HOMA-B], first- and second-phase insulin secretion). The product of the first-phase index and the ISI was calculated to obtain the insulin secretion–sensitivity index (ISSI). RESULTS— GDM was diagnosed in 17.9% and OAV in 18.7% of pregnant women; women with GDM and OAV were older and had higher BMI and serum triglyceride levels than those with NGT (all P < 0.05). Women with NGT had the highest ISI followed by those with OAV (−21.7%) and GDM (−32.1%). HOMA-B results were comparable with those for OAV and GDM but significantly (P < 0.01) lower than those for NGT; first- and second-phase insulin secretion appeared progressively reduced from that in women with NGT to that in women with OAV and GDM (P < 0.01). ISSI was higher in women with NGT than in women with either OAV (−34%) or GDM (−51.7%) (P < 0.001). Among OAV subgroups, the 1h-OAV subgroup showed the lowest ISSI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS— OAV and GDM are clinically indistinguishable, and both groups are different from women with NGT. Women with GDM and OAV showed impaired insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity, although these defects are more pronounced in women with GDM. Compared with other OAV subgroups, 1h-OAV could be considered a more severe condition.

Normal Glucose Tolerance and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE— The aim of this article was to define the metabolic phenotype of pregnant women with one abnormal value (OAV) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to test whether OAV could be considered metabolically comparable to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or a specific entity between GDM and normal pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— After 100-g 3-h OGTTs, 4,053 pregnant women were classified as having GDM, OAV, or normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Those with OAV were subdivided into three subgroups: fasting hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at fasting during an OGTT), 1-h hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at 1 h during an OGTT [1h-OAV]), or 2- or 3-h hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at 2 or 3 h during an OGTT). As derived from the OGTT, we measured insulin sensitivity (insulin sensitivity index [ISI] Matsuda) and insulin secretion (homeostasis model assessment for the estimation of β-cell secretion [HOMA-B], first- and second-phase insulin secretion). The product of the first-phase index and the ISI was calculated to obtain the insulin secretion–sensitivity index (ISSI). RESULTS— GDM was diagnosed in 17.9% and OAV in 18.7% of pregnant women; women with GDM and OAV were older and had higher BMI and serum triglyceride levels than those with NGT (all P < 0.05). Women with NGT had the highest ISI followed by those with OAV (−21.7%) and GDM (−32.1%). HOMA-B results were comparable with those for OAV and GDM but significantly (P < 0.01) lower than those for NGT; first- and second-phase insulin secretion appeared progressively reduced from that in women with NGT to that in women with OAV and GDM (P < 0.01). ISSI was higher in women with NGT than in women with either OAV (−34%) or GDM (−51.7%) (P < 0.001). Among OAV subgroups, the 1h-OAV subgroup showed the lowest ISSI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS— OAV and GDM are clinically indistinguishable, and both groups are different from women with NGT. Women with GDM and OAV showed impaired insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity, although these defects are more pronounced in women with GDM. Compared with other OAV subgroups, 1h-OAV could be considered a more severe condition.

Prescribing exercise for prevention and treatment of gestational diabetes: review of suggested recommendations

Abstract Exercise has been proved to be safe during pregnancy and to offer benefits for both mother and fetus; moreover, physical activity may represent a useful tool for gestational diabetes prevention and treatment. Therefore, all women in uncomplicated pregnancy should be encouraged to engage in physical activity as part of a healthy lifestyle. However, exercise in pregnancy needs a careful medical evaluation to exclude medical or obstetric contraindications to exercise, and an appropriate prescription considering frequency, intensity, type and duration of exercise, to carefully balance between potential benefits and potential harmful effects. Moreover, some precautions related to anatomical and functional adaptations observed during pregnancy should be taken into consideration. This review summarized the suggested recommendations for physical activity among pregnant women with focus on gestational diabetes.

NORMAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE AND GESTATIONAL DIABETES: WHAT IS IN BETWEEN?

OBJECTIVE— The aim of this article was to define the metabolic phenotype of pregnant women with one abnormal value (OAV) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to test whether OAV could be considered metabolically comparable to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or a specific entity between GDM and normal pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— After 100-g 3-h OGTTs, 4,053 pregnant women were classified as having GDM, OAV, or normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Those with OAV were subdivided into three subgroups: fasting hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at fasting during an OGTT), 1-h hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at 1 h during an OGTT [1h-OAV]), or 2- or 3-h hyperglycemia (one abnormal value at 2 or 3 h during an OGTT). As derived from the OGTT, we measured insulin sensitivity (insulin sensitivity index [ISI] Matsuda) and insulin secretion (homeostasis model assessment for the estimation of β-cell secretion [HOMA-B], first- and second-phase insulin secretion). The product of the first-phase index and the ISI was calculated to obtain the insulin secretion–sensitivity index (ISSI). RESULTS— GDM was diagnosed in 17.9% and OAV in 18.7% of pregnant women; women with GDM and OAV were older and had higher BMI and serum triglyceride levels than those with NGT (all P < 0.05). Women with NGT had the highest ISI followed by those with OAV (−21.7%) and GDM (−32.1%). HOMA-B results were comparable with those for OAV and GDM but significantly (P < 0.01) lower than those for NGT; first- and second-phase insulin secretion appeared progressively reduced from that in women with NGT to that in women with OAV and GDM (P < 0.01). ISSI was higher in women with NGT than in women with either OAV (−34%) or GDM (−51.7%) (P < 0.001). Among OAV subgroups, the 1h-OAV subgroup showed the lowest ISSI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS— OAV and GDM are clinically indistinguishable, and both groups are different from women with NGT. Women with GDM and OAV showed impaired insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity, although these defects are more pronounced in women with GDM. Compared with other OAV subgroups, 1h-OAV could be considered a more severe condition.