Ilpo Rimpiläinen

The Site of Impulse Generation in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Facial Nerve

The facial nerve can be stimulated in its intracranial course through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We studied the site of impulse generation produced by TMS by comparing the latencies of the muscle evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with TMS and intracranial electrical stimulation (IES) of the facial nerve during neurosurgical posterior fossa procedures. In a series of 25 patients, the mean latency of the TMS elicited MEPs, recorded in the orbicularis oris muscle, was 5.0 ms (SD 0.58). Also IES of the distal part of the facial nerve in the internal acoustic meatus showed a mean latency of 5.0 ms (SD 0.68). Proximal IES in the root entry zone of the facial nerve, and intermediate IES between root entry zone and meatus, produced MEPs with significantly longer latencies compared to TMS and distal IES (p < 0.05). The findings suggest that the TMS induced facial nerve activation, leading to a MEP response, takes place within the internal acoustic meatus.

Prognostication of Bell's Palsy Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a method to noninvasive excitation of the facial nerve in its intracranial segment close to the internal acoustic meatus. Thus, the site of facial nerve activation with TMS is proximal to or within the site of the lesion in Bells palsy. To evaluate the prognostic capability of TMS in unilateral Bells palsy we examined 137 patients with this method, and compared the results with electroneuronography (ENoG). Within 0-4 days from the onset of palsy, the patients with elicitable TMS responses recovered better than those in whom TMS responses were not elicitable. If TMS was performed 5-9 days or 10-28 days after the onset of palsy, it did not provide any prognostic information. Based on amplitude side-to-side differences, ENoG did not contribute prognostic information during the first 9 days from the onset of palsy. Later on, 10-28 days after the onset of palsy, ENoG showed an increased capability to discriminate the patients with poor prognosis. Thus, elicitable facial motor response with TMS predicts good prognosis of Bells palsy at an early stage whereas poor response with ENoG predicts less favorable prognosis at a later stage.

The Noise Level in Magnetic Stimulation

The noise generated by stimulating coils may jeopardize the hearing of the patients as well as the hearing of the examiner. To evaluate the potential risk caused by the impulse noise of stimulating coils, we examined the A-weighted peak sound pressure levels from five different types of magnetic stimulator coils. At a distance of 10 cm, with 100% stimulation intensity, the coils with Dantec and Magstim stimulators created maximum peak sound pressure levels of 110 dB. Correspondingly, Cadwell MES-10 created maximum peak sound pressure levels of 132 dB. The decrease in the peak levels followed the distance rule quite closely. At a distance of 40 cm, the decrease in peak level was on average 14 dB (range -1-(+)1 dB). Based on American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) threshold limits of impact noise, the permitted maximum daily number of magnetic stimuli would be 1000 to 10,000. The permitted number of daily stimuli may be difficult to exceed in clinical practice. We consider the risk as small for the patients that are being examined and the operator using magnetic stimulation. The potential risk can be further diminished by even very light weighted hearing protectors providing proper attenuation to the coil impulses.

Magnetic Facial Nerve Stimulation in Normal Subjects: Three Groups of Responses

Magnetic stimulation provides a method to stimulate the facial nerve transcranially. With this method, the stimulation can be directed to the intracranial part of the facial nerve, whereas conventional electric stimuli are delivered to a more peripheral part of the nerve. In 40 healthy subjects, ipsilateral responses with latencies of 4.5 +/- 0.4 ms were recorded on the nasolabial folds. The latencies were 1.1 ms longer than those elicited at the stylomastoid foramen by electric stimulation. Furthermore, a response with a mean latency of 12 ms (range 10-16 ms) appeared in 6 out of 10 healthy subjects and a polyphasic response with a mean latency of 32 ms in 9 out of 10 of these subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation seems to allow the examination of motor conduction through the proximal part of the facial nerve. In addition, the method may give further information concerning the facial activation mechanisms possibly by other central pathways.

Effect of Visual Information on Postural Control in Patients With Schizophrenia

Lateralized motor and attentional abnormalities contribute to schizophrenia, but little is known about possible abnormalities in neural machinery involved in postural control. We examined postural stability of 22 patients with schizophrenia taking medication and 14 healthy control participants using computerized force platform posturography. The shift in the center point of pressure in the condition of eyes open versus eyes closed characterizes the effect of visual information on body posture. Closing the eyes had less of an effect on the center point of velocity (velocity sm/s) in the patients with schizophrenia than in the control group (median change, 36% vs. 70%, p = 0.0006). Change in the body position during eye closure tended to be directed rightwards in the control group but leftwards in the group with schizophrenia (p = 0.025). The results show that visual component had less dominance in the balance control of these patients with schizophrenia. The lateralized effect of visual information on posture was also impaired.

Magnetic Facial Nerve Stimulation in Bell's Palsy

The transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) technique makes it possible to stimulate the intracranial part of the facial nerve. In a total of 51 patients with acute Bells palsy, TMS was performed, and the responses were compared with those elicited by conventional extracranial electric stimulation (EES). Clinical recovery was evaluated at 258-539, mean 410, days from the beginning of the palsy. With both techniques the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) could always be elicited on the healthy side, the mean latency being 4.7 ms with TMS and 3.7 ms with EES. In the acute phase, TMS elicited MEPs on the paralyzed side in 47% of the patients, and EES in 98%. The patients with TMS elicitable MEPs during the first 4 days of the palsy had significantly better recovery than those without response (p less than 0.05). The difference in recovery between patients with or without elicitable TMS responses on days 5-8 and 9-14 was not significant. In EES, the amplitude difference between the two sides within the first 4 days was not significantly (p greater than 0.05) different. On days 9-14 the patients with a less than 80% difference between the two sides recovered significantly (p less than 0.05) better than those with a difference of greater than or equal to 80%, So, TMS may be of help in the early prognosis of Bells palsy.

Recurrent CSPs after Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex in Restless Legs Syndrome

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate the motor control and central silent period (CSP) in restless legs syndrome (RLS). Methods. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was focused on the dominant and nondominant hemispheric areas of motor cortex in six subjects with RLS and six controls. The responses were recorded on the contralateral abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles with intramuscular needle electrodes. Results. No significant differences were found in the motor conduction or central motor conduction time, in the latency, or in the duration of the CSPs between or within the groups, but multiple CSPs were observed in both groups. The number of the CSPs was significantly higher in both ADMs and in the dominant TA (P ≤ 0.01) in the RLS group compared to the controls. Conclusion. Descending motor pathways functioned correctly in both groups. The occurrence of the recurrent CSPs predominantly in the RLS group could be a sign of a change of function in the inhibitory control system. Further research is needed to clarify the role of the intramuscular recording technique and especially the role of the subcortical generators in the feedback regulation of the central nervous system in RLS.

A comparison of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroneuronography as a predictive test in patients with Bell's palsy

The aim of this study was to examine the neuronographic findings of electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve and to compare their ability to predict clinical recovery from idiopathic facial nerve palsy (Bells palsy). Eighty-six patients were examined clinically and neurophysiologically immediately on presentation to Tampere University Hospital. Electroneuronography (ENoG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were performed 1–6 times for each patient. The time interval between each examination varied from 2 to 7 days. Seventy-eight patients were followed for a median period of 13 months after the onset of palsy. Facial nerve function was graded according to the House-Brackmann grading system. Relative amplitude differences of ENoG and TMS during the acute phase were then correlated with clinical outcome. Statistical analysis of the results showed that a TMS response elicitable during the first 5 days of the palsy was correlatable with a good prognosis. ENoG results correlated with clinical outcome at a later time from onset of symptoms. TMS was well tolerated and no adverse effects were seen. These results indicate that TMS is a useful method for the early prediction of outcome in patients with Bells palsy.

Origin of the facial long latency responses elicited by magnetic stimulation

With magnetic stimulation (MS) it is possible to elicit bilateral long latency facial motor responses (LLRs). Due to a relatively wide magnetic field, the site of neural activation may take place in many different structures. The purpose of this study was to determine the site of origin of facial LLRs. The motor long latency responses were recorded bilaterally on the naso-labial folds (NLFs) with reference electrodes on the nose, and on some subjects also with reference electrodes on the chin. The stimulating coil was placed in the right parietal area. LLRs obtained with MS were compared to LLRs elicited electrically at the right stylomastoid foramen, supraorbital foramen, as well as cutaneous sensory area V1 of the trigeminal nerve. In addition, right sided high intensity electrical stimuli, paired magnetic stimulation and electrical stimulation with interstimulus intervals ranging from 0 to 80 msec were also applied for comparison. LLRs recorded with reference to the nose were always elicitable with MS as well as with the other stimulation procedures. The responses elicited with MS did not differ from those elicited electrically at various extracranial stimulation sites. With paired stimuli the second LLRs were inhibited by the preceding stimulation, whether given magnetically or electrically. In subjects with elicitable LLRs with chin references, the responses were always bilateral. Based on the similar characteristics with extracranial electrical stimuli, bilateral distribution of the responses, and inhibition of the second response with paired stimuli, it is concluded that the neural origin of LLRs to MS is in the extracranial trigeminal or facial nerve branches.

Disrupted Central Inhibition after Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex in Schizophrenia with Long-Term Antipsychotic Treatment

Aims. Schizophrenia is a neuropsychiatric disorder associated with mental and motor disturbances. We aimed to investigate motor control, especially central silent period (CSP) in subjects with schizophrenia (n = 11) on long-term antipsychotic treatment compared to healthy controls (n = 9). Methods. Latency and duration of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and CSPs were measured with the help of single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and intramuscular electrodes. After stimulation of the dominant and nondominant motor cortex of abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle areas, respective responses were measured on the contralateral side. Results. MEPs did not differ significantly between the groups. Multiple CSPs were found predominantly in subjects with schizophrenia, which showed a higher number of CSPs in the dominant ADM and the longest summarized duration of CSPs in the nondominant ADM (P < 0.05) compared to controls. Conclusions. There were multiple CSPs predominantly in the upper extremities and in the dominant body side in subjects with schizophrenia. Behind multiple CSPs may lie an impaired regulation of excitatory or inhibitory neurotransmitter systems in central motor pathways. Further research is needed to clarify the role of the intramuscular recording methods and the effect of antipsychotics on the results.