Imir G. Metushi

A fresh look at the mechanism of isoniazid-induced hepatotoxicity.

Isoniazid (INH)‐induced hepatotoxicity remains a significant clinical problem, and the current mechanistic hypothesis is incomplete; it is simply referred to as metabolic idiosyncrasy, 1 which is believed to involve cytotoxicity caused by bioactivation of acetylhydrazine, 2 a metabolite of INH. However, this hypothesis is based on animal studies, involving characteristics that are very different from those that pertain to hepatotoxicity in humans, such as delayed onset. This issue therefore deserves a fresh look.

Direct oxidation and covalent binding of isoniazid to rodent liver and human hepatic microsomes: humans are more like mice than rats.

Isoniazid (INH) is associated with serious liver injury and autoimmunity. Classic studies in rats indicated that a reactive metabolite of acetylhydrazine is responsible for the covalent binding and toxicity of INH. Studies in rabbits suggested that hydrazine might be the toxic species. However, these models involved acute toxicity with high doses of INH, and INH-induced liver injury in humans has very different features than such animal models. In this study, we demonstrated that a reactive metabolite of INH itself can covalently bind in the liver of mice and also to human liver microsomes. Covalent binding also occurred in rats, but it was much less than that in mice. We were able to trap the reactive metabolite of INH with N-α-acetyl-l-lysine in incubations with human liver microsomes. This suggests that the reactive intermediate of INH that leads to covalent binding is a diazohydroxide rather than a radical or carbocation because those reactive metabolites would be too reactive to trap in this way. Treatment of mice or rats with INH for up to 5 weeks did not produce severe liver injury. The alanine transaminase assay (ALT) is inhibited by INH, and other assays such as glutamate and sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) were better biomarkers of INH-induced liver injury. High doses of INH (200 and 400 mg/kg/day) for one week produced steatosis in rats and an increase in SDH, which suggests that it can cause mitochondrial injury. However, steatosis was not observed when INH was given at lower doses for longer periods of time to either mice or rats. We propose that covalent binding of the parent drug can contribute to INH-induced hepatotoxicity and autoimmunity. We also propose that these are immune-mediated reactions, and there are clinical data to support these hypotheses.

Detection of anti‐isoniazid and anti–cytochrome P450 antibodies in patients with isoniazid‐induced liver failure

Isoniazid (INH)‐induced hepatotoxicity remains one of the most common causes of drug‐induced idiosyncratic liver injury and liver failure. This form of liver injury is not believed to be immune‐mediated because it is not usually associated with fever or rash, does not recur more rapidly on rechallenge, and previous studies have failed to identify anti‐INH antibodies (Abs). In this study, we found Abs present in sera of 15 of 19 cases of INH‐induced liver failure. Anti‐INH Abs were present in 8 sera; 11 had anti–cytochrome P450 (CYP)2E1 Abs, 14 had Abs against CYP2E1 modified by INH, 14 had anti‐CYP3A4 antibodies, and 10 had anti‐CYP2C9 Abs. INH was found to form covalent adducts with CYP2E1, CYP3A4, and CYP2C9. None of these Abs were detected in sera from INH‐treated controls without significant liver injury. The presence of a range of antidrug and autoAbs has been observed in other drug‐induced liver injury that is presumed to be immune mediated. Conclusion: These data provide strong evidence that INH induces an immune response that causes INH‐induced liver injury. (Hepatology 2014;59:1084–1093)

Treatment of PD-1−/− mice with amodiaquine and anti-CTLA4 leads to liver injury similar to idiosyncratic liver injury in patients

The mechanism of idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury (IDILI) remains poorly understood, to a large degree because of the lack of a valid animal model. Recently, we reported an animal model in which treatment of female C57BL/6 mice with amodiaquine (AQ) resulted in mild liver injury with a delayed onset and resolution despite continued treatment. Such adaptation is a common outcome in the IDILI caused by drugs that can cause liver failure. We had hypothesized that most IDILI is immune‐mediated and adaptation represents immune tolerance. In this study we found that AQ treatment of Cbl‐b−/− and PD‐1−/− mice, which have impaired immune tolerance, resulted in a slightly greater injury. Cotreatment of C57BL/6 with AQ and anti‐CTLA4 also resulted in a greater increase in ALT than treatment with AQ alone; however, these mice also had an increase in T regulatory (Treg) cells and T helper cells expressing PD‐1 and CTLA4. The increase in these cells implies the induction of immune tolerance, and the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity in these mice returned to normal despite continued treatment. Cotreatment of PD‐1−/− mice with anti‐CTLA4 antibody and AQ resulted in the greatest increase in ALT (200‐300 U/L), and necroinflammatory responses characterized by portal infiltration of lymphocytes with interface hepatitis. The lymphocyte infiltration included T and B cells, and the CD8+ T cells produced perforin and granzyme. In addition, the ALT activity in PD‐1−/− mice cotreated with anti‐CTLA4 antibody and AQ did not return to normal, as it had in other mice. Conclusion: We report here the first animal model of IDILI that is similar to the IDILI that occurs in humans, and it was accomplished by inhibiting immune tolerance. (Hepatology 2015;61:1332–1342)

Development of a novel mouse model of amodiaquine-induced liver injury with a delayed onset.

Abstract Amodiaquine (AQ) treatment is associated with a high incidence of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) and agranulocytosis. Evidence suggests that AQ-induced IDILI is immune mediated. A significant impediment to mechanistic studies of IDILI is the lack of valid animal models. This study reports the first animal model of IDILI with characteristics similar to mild IDILI in humans. Treatment of female C57BL/6 mice with AQ led to liver injury with delayed onset, which resolved despite continued treatment. Covalent binding of AQ was detected in the liver, which was greater in female than in male mice, and higher in the liver than in other organs. Covalent binding in the liver was maximal by Day 3, which did not explain the delayed onset of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. However, coincident with the elevated serum ALT, infiltration of liver and splenic mononuclear cells and activation of CD8 T-cells within the liver were identified. By Week 7, when ALT levels had returned close to normal, down-regulation of several inflammatory cytokines and up-regulation of PD-1 on T-cells suggested induction of immune tolerance. Treatment of Rag1−/− mice with AQ resulted in higher ALT activities than C57BL/6 mice, which suggested that the adaptive immune response was responsible for immune tolerance. In contrast, depletion of NK cells significantly attenuated the increase in ALT, which implied a role for NK cells in mild AQ-induced IDILI. This is the first example of a delayed-onset animal model of IDILI that appears to be immune-mediated.

Isoniazid-induced liver injury and immune response in mice

Abstract Isoniazid (INH) is associated with one of the highest incidences of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver failure of any commonly prescribed drug. The mechanism of this liver injury remains uncertain, and a valid animal model would greatly facilitate mechanistic studies. Most studies of INH-induced liver toxicity have been acute studies performed in rats with high doses of the drug, and this is very different from the idiosyncratic liver injury that occurs in humans. It has previously been demonstrated that covalent binding of INH in the liver of mice is greater than in rats and more like that in humans. Therefore, mice should be a better species in which to develop an animal model of INH-induced liver injury. Treatment of Cbl-b−/− and PD1−/− mice, which have impaired immune tolerance, resulted in greater injury than their C57BL/6 background, but not liver failure. This suggested that the injury was mediated by the adaptive immune system; however, Rag−/− mice, which do not have competent T- and B-cells, sustained more liver injury than C57BL/6 wild-type mice. This suggested that the adaptive immune system also played a protective role. INH treatment also led to a decrease in the inflammatory cytokines IL-1α and IL-12, which suggests that the drug may have immunosuppressive properties. In short, a mouse model was developed of INH-induced liver injury in which the immune system appears to play a both protective and pathogenic role, but this study was unable to develop a model of INH-induced liver failure.

Mild isoniazid-induced liver injury in humans is associated with an increase in Th17 cells and T cells producing IL-10.

Isoniazid (INH) remains a mainstay for the treatment of tuberculosis despite the fact that it can cause liver failure. The mechanism of INH-induced liver injury remains controversial. It had been proposed that the mechanism involves metabolic idiosyncrasy based on the observations that liver injury is not usually associated with fever, rash, or prompt increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) upon rechallenge. In the present study, we found that patients who were treated with INH because of a positive tuberculosis (TB) skin test and developed a small increase in ALT had an increase in Th17 cells as well as T cells that produce interleukin (IL)-10, which suggests stimulation of an adaptive immune response. Th17 cells are considered inflammatory and could be involved in causing the liver injury. IL-10 is considered anti-inflammatory and could be the reason that more serious liver injury did not occur. These changes were not observed in patients who did not have an increase in ALT. These are the first data to show a change in the T cell profile in patients with mild INH-induced liver injury; however, it is difficult to determine whether these changes were the cause or the result of the liver injury. Nevertheless, together with other studies, the data suggest that INH-induced liver injury is immune-mediated, with mild injury resulting in immune tolerance.

Paradoxical Attenuation of Autoimmune Hepatitis by Oral Isoniazid in Wild-Type and N-Acetyltransferase–Deficient Mice

Isoniazid (INH) treatment can cause serious liver injury and autoimmunity. There are now several lines of evidence that INH-induced liver injury is immune mediated, but this type of liver injury has not been reproduced in animals, possibly because immune tolerance is the dominant response of the liver. In this study, we immunized mice with isonicotinic acid (INA)-modified proteins and Freund’s adjuvant, which led to mild experimental autoimmune hepatitis (EAH) with an increase in cells staining positive for F4/80, CD11b, CD8, CD4, CD45R, and KI67. We expected that subsequent treatment of mice with oral INH would lead to more serious immune-mediated liver injury, but paradoxically it markedly attenuated the EAH caused by immunization with INA-modified hepatic proteins. In addition, patients of the slow acetylator phenotype are at increased risk of INH-induced liver injury. Treatment of arylamine N-acetyltransferase-deficient Nat1/2(−/−) mice with INH for up to 5 weeks produced mild increases in glutamate and sorbitol dehydrogenase activities, but not severe liver injury. Female Nat1/2(−/−) mice treated with INH for 1, 3, or 7 days developed steatosis, an increase in Oil Red O staining, and abnormal mitochondrial morphology in the liver. A decrease in M1 and an increase in M2a and M2b macrophages was observed in female Nat1/2(−/−) mice treated with INH for 1, 3, or 7 days; these changes returned to baseline levels by day 35. These data indicate that INH has immunosuppressive effects, even though it is also known to induce autoantibody production and a lupus-like autoimmune syndrome in humans.

Detection of Anti-Isoniazid and Anti-CYP Antibodies in Patients with Isoniazid-Induced Liver Failure

Isoniazid (INH)‐induced hepatotoxicity remains one of the most common causes of drug‐induced idiosyncratic liver injury and liver failure. This form of liver injury is not believed to be immune‐mediated because it is not usually associated with fever or rash, does not recur more rapidly on rechallenge, and previous studies have failed to identify anti‐INH antibodies (Abs). In this study, we found Abs present in sera of 15 of 19 cases of INH‐induced liver failure. Anti‐INH Abs were present in 8 sera; 11 had anti–cytochrome P450 (CYP)2E1 Abs, 14 had Abs against CYP2E1 modified by INH, 14 had anti‐CYP3A4 antibodies, and 10 had anti‐CYP2C9 Abs. INH was found to form covalent adducts with CYP2E1, CYP3A4, and CYP2C9. None of these Abs were detected in sera from INH‐treated controls without significant liver injury. The presence of a range of antidrug and autoAbs has been observed in other drug‐induced liver injury that is presumed to be immune mediated. Conclusion: These data provide strong evidence that INH induces an immune response that causes INH‐induced liver injury. (Hepatology 2014;59:1084–1093)

Protein Targets of Isoniazid-Reactive Metabolites in Mouse Liver in Vivo.

Isoniazid (INH) has been a first-line drug for the treatment of tuberculosis for more than 40 years. INH is well-tolerated by most patients, but some patients develop hepatitis that can be severe in rare cases or after overdose. The mechanisms underlying the hepatotoxicity of INH are not known, but covalent binding of reactive metabolites is known to occur in animals and is suspected in human cases. A major unresolved question is the identity of the liver proteins that are modified by INH metabolites. Treating mice with INH leads to accumulation of isonicotinoyl-lysine residues on numerous proteins in the hepatic S9 fraction. Analysis of this fraction by SDS-PAGE followed by tryptic digestion of bands and LC-MS/MS revealed a single adducted peptide derived from d-dopachrome decarboxylase. When a tryptic digest of whole S9 was applied to anti-INH antibody immobilized on beads, only 12 peptides were retained, 5 of which clearly contained isonicotinoyl-lysine adducts and could be confidently assigned to 5 liver proteins. In another experiment, undigested S9 fractions from INA-treated and untreated (UT) mice were adsorbed in parallel on anti-INA beads and the retained proteins were digested and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The INA-S9 digest showed 1 adducted peptide that was associated with a unique protein whose identity was corroborated by numerous nonadducted peptides in the digest and 13 other proteins identified only by multiple nonadducted peptides. None of these 14 proteins was associated with any peptides present in the UT-S9 fraction. Overall, we identified 7 mouse liver proteins that became adducted by INH metabolites in vivo. Of these 7 INH target proteins, only 2 have been previously reported as targets of any reactive metabolite in vivo.