Imran Zahid

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or transsternal thymectomy in the treatment of myasthenia gravis?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was how video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) compares to median sternotomy in the surgical management of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG)? Overall 74 papers were found using the reported search, of which 15 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results are tabulated. We conclude that VATS produces equivalent postoperative mortality and complete stable remission (CSR) rates, with superior results in terms of hospital stay, operative blood loss and patient satisfaction at the expense of a doubling of operative time. Six studies comparing VATS and transsternal sternotomy in non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (NTMG) patients found VATS to have lower operative blood loss (73.8±70.7 vs. 155.3±91.7 ml; P<0.05), reduced total hospital stay (5.6±2.2 vs. 8.1±3.0 days; P=0.008), whilst maintaining equivalent remission rates (33 vs. 44.7%; P=0.16) and mass of thymic tissue resection (37 vs. 34 g; P>0.05). One study comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy to transsternal thymectomy in only thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis (T-MG) patients found equivalent CSR (11.3 vs. 8.7%, P=0.1090) at six-year follow-up. Thymoma recurrence rate (9.64%) was not significantly different (P=0.1523) between the two groups. Eight studies comparing VATS and transsternal approach in mixed T-MG and NTMG patients found a lower hospital stay (1.9±2.6 vs. 4.6±4.2 days, P<0.001), reduced need for postoperative medication (76.5 vs. 35.7%, P=0.022), lower intensive care unit stay (1.5 vs. 3.2 days, P=0.018), greater symptom improvement (100 vs. 77.9%, P=0.019) and better cosmetic satisfaction (100 vs. 83, P=0.042) with VATS. In concordance with NTMG and T-MG alone patient groups, VATS and transsternal methods had equivalent complication rates (23 vs. 19%, P=0.765) with no mortalities in either group. Even though VATS has a longer operative time (268±51 vs. 177±92 min, P<0.05), its improved cosmesis, reduced need for postoperative medication and equivalent disease resolution outcomes make it a preferable surgical option to the transsternal approach.

Does positron emission tomography offer prognostic information in malignant pleural mesothelioma

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether positron emission tomography is useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Altogether 136 papers were found using the reported search, of which 15 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) accurately differentiates benign from malignant pleural disease, helps detect recurrence and provides prognostic information in terms of staging, survival and mortality. Eleven studies evaluated the role of FDG-PET in the diagnosis and prognosis of MPM. Malignant disease had a higher standardised uptake value (SUV) (6.5 ± 3.4 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6; P < 0.001) than benign pleural disease. Shorter median survival (9.7 vs. 21 months; P = 0.02) was associated with high SUV (>10) than low SUV (<10). PET accurately upstaged 13% and downstaged 27% of cases initially staged with computed tomography (CT). In patients undergoing chemotherapy, higher total glycolytic volume led to a lower median survival (4.9 vs. 11.5 months; P = 0.09), while a decline in FDG uptake was associated with a longer time to tumour progression (14 vs. 7 months; P = 0.02). Four studies observed the role of FDG-PET-CT in the diagnosis and prognosis of MPM. SUV was found to be higher in MPM compared to benign pleural disease (6.5 vs. 0.8; P < 0.001). A higher SUV(max) was observed in primary pleural lesions of metastatic (7.1 vs. 4.7; P = 0.003) compared to non-metastatic disease. Patients who underwent surgery had equivalent survival to those excluded based on scan results (20 vs. 12 months; P = 0.3813). One study compared the utility of PET and PET-CT in the diagnosis and prognosis of mesothelioma. PET-CT was found to be more accurate than PET in terms of staging (P < 0.05) disease. Overall, PET accurately diagnoses MPM, predicts survival and disease recurrence. It can guide further management by predicting the response to chemotherapy and excluding surgery in patients with extrathoracic disease. Combined PET-CT has additional benefits in accurately staging disease.

What is the best treatment for malignant pleural effusions

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether chemical pleurodesis is superior to catheter drainage or pleuroperitoneal shunts (PPS) in the management of patients with pleural effusions. Overall 161 papers were found using the reported search, of which 14 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results are tabulated. We conclude that chemical pleurodesis is superior to chronic catheter drainage and PPS in terms survival length and mortality rates but in patients with trapped lung syndrome chronic intrapleural catheter placement is indicated. Six studies reported patient outcomes after treatment with chemical pleurodesis. They report high success rates (89.4%) and low mortality rates (2%) without any need to convert to open thoracotomy. Mean hospital stay of 2.33 days, complication rates of 16.5% and mean survival length of 23.8 ± 16.3 months were observed. Five studies managed malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) using chronic indwelling catheters. They reported mean survival length of 126 days. Symptomatic relief was achieved in 94.2% of patients. There was a significant reduction in the Medical Research Council dyspnoea score (3.0-1.9, P < 0.001) and despite complication rates of 22%, comparable mortality rates (7.5%) were observed. Even in patients with trapped lung syndrome, mean survival length was 125 days with symptomatic improvement being achieved in 90.9% of patients. Three studies treated MPEs using PPSs. Mean hospital stay was 6.2 days (range 2-26) with a mean survival length of 11 months. Pleurodesis success rates varied from 57.1% to 95% with a complication rate of 14.8%. PPSs were shown to produce lower success rates (57.1% vs. 92.3%), shorter survival lengths (4.3 ± 1.9 vs. 6.7 ± 2.1 months) and higher complication rates (14.3% vs. 2.8%) than talc pleurodesis. Overall, chemical pleurodesis is the optimal treatment option for MPE with use of chronic intrapleural catheters reserved in cases where talc pleurodesis is not possible.

Is pleurectomy and decortication superior to palliative care in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) is superior to palliative care in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Overall 80 papers were found using the reported search, of which 11 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results are tabulated. We conclude that P/D may lead to superior survival rates but at the expense of higher morbidity rates to palliative treatment. Six studies reported patient outcomes after use of radical P/D to treat patients with MPM. Radical P/D leads to a higher median survival than supportive care (14.5 vs. 4.5 months) and non-radical decortication (15.3 vs. 7.1 months, P < 0.000). However, radical P/D had a complication rate of 30%, hospital stay of 12 days with an operative mortality rate of 9.1%. One-year survival rate was 65% but this fell to 0-24% at three years. Three studies highlighted the use of palliative chemotherapy to manage patients with MPM. Median survival (14 vs. 10 months) was higher in patients who received chemotherapy early compared to those on a delayed protocol. Early chemotherapy had a longer time to disease progression (25 vs. 11 weeks, P = 0.1) and greater one-year survival (66% vs. 36%) than the delayed group. Active symptom control (ASC) alone had lower symptom control rates than the combination of ASC plus MVP (mitomycin+vinblastine+cisplatin) (7% vs. 11%, P = 0.0017) and ASC plus vinorelbine (4% vs. 7%, P = 0.047). Three studies reported results of palliative surgery in patients with known MPM. Median survival period was 213 days with a 30-day mortality rate of 7.8%. Survival rates reduced from 70.6% at three months to 25.5% at one-year post-surgery. Prolonged air-leak and postoperative empyema complicated 9.8% and 4% of patients, respectively. P/D is a morbid operation that is associated with significant perioperative mortality and complication rates. Although a number of retrospective studies have shown a small benefit in survival with P/D, the heavily documented similarity in patient outcomes between P/D and extrapleural pneumonectomy along with the results of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery trial, should induce the surgical community to consider the use of P/D only in patients with malignant mesothelioma enrolled in prospective trials.

Extrapleural pneumonectomy or supportive care: treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is superior to supportive care in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Overall, 110 papers were found using the reported search, of which 14 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results are tabulated. We conclude that EPP confers no advantage to chemotherapy and palliative treatment in terms of survival and symptom improvement. Ten studies evaluated the role of EPP in the management of MPM. The median survival was 13 months and perioperative and 30-day mortality rates were 5.7% and 9.1%, respectively. There was a high morbidity rate of 37% including atrial fibrillation, empyema and supraventricular arrhythmias. Disease recurred in 73% of patients at a median time of 10 months. Median hospital stay was 13 days and intensive care unit stay was 1.5 days. At three months postsurgery, improvement in symptoms was achieved in 68% of patients. Significant advantages were observed in patients with epithelial MPM (19 vs. 8 months, P<0.01) compared to non-epithelial MPM and with N2 disease (19 vs. 10 months) compared to N1 or N0 disease, respectively. Two studies reported outcomes after chemotherapy in patients with MPM. The median survival was 13 months and symptoms improved in 50% of patients. Response rate of 21% was achieved and the median time to disease progression was 7.2 months. Postoperative haematological toxicity was common and included neutropenia (25%), anaemia (5%) and thrombocytopenia (7.4%). Two studies analysed palliative treatment in mesothelioma and reported a median survival of seven months and improvement in symptoms in 25% of patients at one-year post-treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.8% and complications included prolonged air leak (9.8%) and empyema (4%). Median hospital stay was seven days. Overall, EPP shows no benefit in terms of survival or symptom improvement which is compounded by its high operative mortality and recurrence rate.

Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and open surgery in the management of primary empyema.

Purpose of reviewThoracic empyema is the accumulation of frank pus within the pleural cavity. Its cause is often multifactorial and may include direct contiguous spread of infection, penetrating chest trauma or an iatrogenic cause secondary to surgical instrumentation of the pleural space. Current management of empyema is based on local empirical practice as there is no consensus on an optimal regimen. Over the past decade, surgical management of empyema has attracted great interest, leading to specific recommendations. Recent findingsVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has revolutionized surgical management of patients with empyema. Thoracoscopic management of empyema includes VATS debridement and decortication. VATS debridement has been employed by many centres as the primary treatment option for early-stage empyema. However, this is still contentious as some surgeons continue to advocate initial trials of chest tube drainage and antibiotic-mediated pleural space obliteration prior to any form of surgery. A more aggressive approach is to move directly to VATS decortication, which has shown great promise in the management of chronic empyema. More complex, mulitloculated empyemas would previously have been managed solely by complex open surgical procedures such as open window thoracostomy or thoracomyoplasty. However, recent studies have shown VATS decortication to produce equivalent resolution rates to the higher morbidity open approaches. SummaryA summary of the most recent opinions and results in the thoracoscopic and open surgical management of thoracic empyema is outlined. Early VATS debridement effectively manages simple parapneumonic effusions. VATS decortication has equivalent efficacy to open decortication at managing both chronic and early-stage empyemas.

Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery the best treatment for paediatric pleural empyema?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is the best treatment for paediatric pleural empyema. Altogether 274 papers were found using the reported search, of which 15 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that early VATS (or thoracotomy if VATS not possible) leads to shorter hospitalisation. The duration of chest tube placement and antibiotic use is variable and does not correlate with treatment method. Patients who underwent primary operative therapy had a lower aggregate in-hospital mortality rate (0% vs. 3.3%), re-intervention rate (2.5% vs. 23.5%), length of stay (10.8 days vs. 20.0 days), duration of tube thoracostomy (4.4 days vs. 10.6 days), and duration of antibiotic therapy (12.8 days vs. 21.3 days), compared with patients who underwent non-operative therapy. Similar complication rates were observed for the two groups (5% vs. 5.6%). Moreover, median hospital charges for VATS were

Is lung volume reduction surgery effective in the treatment of advanced emphysema

36,320 [interquartile range (IQR),

What is the best way to diagnose and stage malignant pleural mesothelioma

24,814-

What is the best treatment of postpneumonectomy empyema

62,269]. The median pharmacy and radiological imaging charges were