Ina Machen

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people with dementia in care homes: a retrospective analysis.

AbstractBackground: Older people in general and care home residents in particular are at high risk of suboptimal or inappropriate prescribing. To date, research into potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has not focused on care home residents and/or has not utilized the recently developed and validated Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of PIP in older people with dementia living in six residential care homes in England, using the STOPP criteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using medication data collected for older people with dementia in six residential care homes in England who participated in the prospective, longitudinal EVIDEM — End of Life (EoL) study. Of the 133 residents recruited to the study, medication administration records were available for and reviewed at two timepoints (approximately 16 weeks apart) for 119 residents and 110 residents, respectively. The prevalence of PIP at these timepoints was determined using 31 of the 65 STOPP criteria applicable when there is no access to residents’ medical records. Results: At the first timepoint, 68 potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were identified. Fifty-five residents (46.2%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s), eleven (9.2%) were prescribed two or more PIMs and two (1.7%) were prescribed three PIMs. Thirteen of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study (41.9%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. >1 month) neuroleptics (antipsychotics) were the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 25; 21.0%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for >3 months, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at maximum therapeutic dosage for >8 weeks, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in patients with dementia and long-term (i.e. >1 month), long-acting benzodiazepines.At the second timepoint, 57 PIMs were identified; 45 residents (40.9%) were prescribed one or more PIM(s) and 10 (9.1%) were prescribed two or more PIMs, but only one resident (0.9%) was prescribed three PIMs. Of the 31 STOPP criteria utilized in this study, ten (32.3%) were used to identify PIP. Long-term (i.e. >1 month) antipsychotics were again the most frequently prescribed PIMs (n = 21; 19.1%), followed by PPIs at maximum therapeutic dosage for >8 weeks, NSAIDS for >3 months and TCAs in patients with dementia.A significant correlation was found at both timepoints between the number of medicines prescribed and occurrence of PIP. Conclusions: This study found that over two-fifths of older people with dementia residing in six residential care homes in England were prescribed at least one PIM at each timepoint. Long-term (i.e. >1 month) antipsychotics, NSAID use for >3 months and PPI use at maximum therapeutic dosage for >8 weeks were the most prevalent PIMs. Regular medication review that targets, but is not limited to, these medications is required to reduce PIP in the residential care home setting. The STOPP criteria represent a useful tool to facilitate such review in this patient population.

Culture, consent, costs and care homes: Enabling older people with dementia to participate in research

Objectives: To describe factors that support and inhibit recruitment and participation of people with dementia living in care homes. Method: This article focuses on the methods used to recruit people with dementia to a longitudinal study that employed a mixed-method design to track events and care that older people with dementia experienced over two years in six care homes. A staged approach to recruitment was adopted involving separate meetings with staff, residents and relatives. Individual consent was secured with residents with dementia who could consent in the moment and for those without capacity, through mail and follow-up telephone contact with consultees. Data were collected on the frequency of meetings, issues raised by staff, consultees and people with dementia as well as the overall time taken to complete recruitment. Results: Over five months, 133 older people with dementia were recruited (62% of sampling frame). The recruitment process was supported or hindered by the number of individuals and organisations that needed to be consulted, the care home culture, staffs understanding of how people with dementia can be involved in research, and how they interpreted their role as mediators, protectors and gatekeepers. Conclusions: Care homes are isolated communities of care. To achieve the research objectives, researchers in the initial stages need to consider the philosophical underpinnings of individual care homes, and the politics of hierarchy both within the care home and between it, and health professionals. There is a need to develop credible infrastructures of support that enable people with dementia to participate in research.

The role of health professionals in promoting the uptake of fall prevention interventions: a qualitative study of older people's views

BACKGROUND uptake of and adherence to fall prevention interventions is often poor and we know little about older peoples perceptions of and beliefs about fall prevention interventions and how these affect uptake. OBJECTIVE to explore older peoples perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to participation in fall prevention interventions in the UK. METHODS we undertook a qualitative study with older people who had taken part in or declined to participate in fall prevention interventions using semi-structured interviews (n = 65), and 17 focus groups (n = 122) with older people (including 32 Asian and 30 Chinese older people). This took place in community settings in four geographical areas of the South of England. The mean age of participants was 75 years (range 60-95). Data analysis used a constant comparative method. RESULTS older people reported that health professionals and their response to reported falls played a major role in referral to and uptake of interventions, both facilitating and hindering uptake. Health professionals frequently failed to refer people to fall prevention interventions following reports of falls and fall-related injuries. CONCLUSIONS consideration should be given to inclusion of opportunistic and routine questioning of older people about recent falls by practitioners in primary care settings. Referrals should be made to appropriate services and interventions for those who have experienced a fall to prevent further injuries or fracture.

Sedative load of medications prescribed for older people with dementia in care homes

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to determine the sedative load and use of sedative and psychotropic medications among older people with dementia living in (residential) care homes.MethodsMedication data were collected at baseline and at two further time-points for eligible residents of six care homes participating in the EVIDEM-End Of Life (EOL) study for whom medication administration records were available. Regular medications were classified using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system and individual sedative loads were calculated using a previously published model.ResultsAt baseline, medication administration records were reviewed for 115 residents; medication records were reviewed for 112 and 105 residents at time-points 2 and 3 respectively. Approximately one-third of residents were not taking any medications with sedative properties at each time-point, while a significant proportion of residents had a low sedative load score of 1 or 2 (54.8%, 59.0% and 57.1% at baseline and time-points 2 and 3 respectively). More than 10% of residents had a high sedative load score (≥ 3) at baseline (12.2%), and this increased to 14.3% at time-points 2 and 3. Approximately two-thirds of residents (66.9%) regularly used one or more psychotropic medication(s). Antidepressants, predominantly selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), were most frequently used, while antipsychotics, hypnotics and anxiolytics were less routinely administered. The prevalence of antipsychotic use among residents was 19.0%, lower than has been previously reported for nursing home residents. Throughout the duration of the study, administration of medications recognised as having prominent sedative adverse effects and/or containing sedative components outweighed the regular use of primary sedatives.ConclusionsSedative load scores were similar throughout the study period for residents with dementia in each of the care homes. Scores were lower than previously reported in studies conducted in long-term care wards which have on-site clinical support. Nevertheless, strategies to optimise drug therapy for care home residents with dementia which rely on clinicians external to the care home for support and medication review are required.

Practice Nurses as Mentors for Student Nurses. An untapped educational Resource

This article describes an evaluation process aimed at exploring the issues related to placing third year undergraduate students with Practice Nurses for their adult branch community placement. The evaluation process was based on an iterative action research cycle, demonstrating a reflective approach to the placement. This evaluation of student nurse placements with Practice Nurses intended to provide a useful contribution to the rather scant literature available on this specific issue in pre-registration nurse education. Specific outcomes for qualitative feedback from both the students and Practice Nurses will be presented and compared to issues highlighted in the literature review. The placement was evaluated highly by both students and Practice Nurses. The students enjoyed a higher than anticipated level of autonomy and were able to achieve all their learning outcomes. The Practice Nurses reported the presence of students had a positive influence on their practice.

Exploring resource use and associated costs in end-of-life care for older people with dementia in residential care homes

The goals of this study are to describe end‐of‐life care costs of older people with dementia (OPWD) residents in care homes (CHs) with no on‐site nursing and evaluate the economic case for an intervention designed to improve end‐of‐life care for OPWD in CHs.

Emergency ambulance service involvement with residential care homes in the support of older people with dementia: an observational study.

BackgroundOlder people resident in care homes have a limited life expectancy and approximately two-thirds have limited mental capacity. Despite initiatives to reduce unplanned hospital admissions for this population, little is known about the involvement of emergency services in supporting residents in these settings.MethodsThis paper reports on a longitudinal study that tracked the involvement of emergency ambulance personnel in the support of older people with dementia, resident in care homes with no on-site nursing providing personal care only. 133 residents with dementia across 6 care homes in the East of England were tracked for a year. The paper examines the frequency and reasons for emergency ambulance call-outs, outcomes and factors associated with emergency ambulance service use.Results56% of residents used ambulance services. Less than half (43%) of all call-outs resulted in an unscheduled admission to hospital. In addition to trauma following a following a fall in the home, results suggest that at least a reasonable proportion of ambulance contacts are for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. An emergency ambulance is not likely to be called for older rather than younger residents or for women more than men. Length of residence does not influence use of emergency ambulance services among older people with dementia. Contact with primary care services and admission route into the care home were both significantly associated with emergency ambulance service use. The odds of using emergency ambulance services for residents admitted from a relative’s home were 90% lower than the odds of using emergency ambulance services for residents admitted from their own home.ConclusionsEmergency service involvement with this vulnerable population merits further examination. Future research on emergency ambulance service use by older people with dementia in care homes, should account for important contextual factors, namely, presence or absence of on-site nursing, GP involvement, and access to residents’ family, alongside resident health characteristics.

Developing a new response to non-urgent emergency calls: evaluation of a nurse and paramedic partnership intervention

Original article can be found at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/login Copyright Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S1463423608000765

Impact on clinical practice of the Joint British Societies' cardiovascular risk assessment tools

Objectives:  The aim of this study was to evaluate the Joint British Societies’ (JBS 2) Factfile, cardiovascular risk assessment paper charts and electronic risk calculator posted to health professionals in general practice.

End of life care for people with dementia: an intervention to promote collaborative working between care home staff and healthcare practitioners

Background In England most care homes have no on-site clinician and rely on primary healthcare for end-of-life (EOL) support. The Evidem EOL study focused on end-of-life care for elders with dementia in care homes. Phase 1 found high levels of uncertainty among care home and primary healthcare staff around anticipating and supporting residents dying with or from dementia. This paper presents the piloting of a modified appreciative inquiry (AI) approach within Evidem EOL Phase 2 to facilitate end-of-life care for people with dementia in care homes. Methods A modified AI approach (a strength-based change management tool) was implemented in three purposively sampled care homes over 6 months (January–July 2011). A self-selected team comprising care home staff, a general practitioner and a district nurse from each care home participated in the modified AI intervention: (3 one-hour AI meetings and on-going researcher support.) Through this intervention the teams developed and implemented context specific, participant driven strategies to support EOL care for people with dementia. Results While evaluation is on-going, preliminary findings from thematic analysis of interviews with participants and collected data on use of emergency/acute services reveal: (1) High acceptance of the intervention, creating rapid engagement between participants who did not have a history of working together (2) Greater understanding and appreciation of respective roles and increased collaboration within the team (3) Improved EOL Care evidenced by increased advanced care planning; reduced number of emergency call outs and hospital admissions; increased staff confidence in talking to residents and family about end-of-life issues and wishes. Discussion Long-term sustainability of the intervention remains to be tested. However preliminary findings suggest modified AI is an effective tool to promote integrated working between care home and health services and to improve EOL care for people with dementia in care homes.