Inaoyom Imong
Max Planck Society
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Inaoyom Imong.
Oryx | 2012
Richard A. Bergl; Ymke Warren; Aaron Nicholas; Andrew Dunn; Inaoyom Imong; Jacqueline Sunderland-Groves; John F. Oates
Habitat loss and fragmentation are among the major threats to wildlife populations in tropical forests. Loss of habitat reduces the carrying capacity of the landscape and fragmentation disrupts biological processes and exposes wildlife populations to the effects of small population size, such as reduction of genetic diversity and increased impact of demographic stochasticity. The Critically Endangered Cross River gorilla Gorilla gorilla diehli is threatened in particular by habitat disturbance because its population is small and it lives in an area where high human population density results in intense exploitation of natural resources. We used remotely-sensed data to assess the extent and distribution of gorilla habitat in the Cross River region and delineated potential dispersal corridors. Our analysis revealed > 8,000 km 2 of tropical forest in the study region, 2,500 km 2 of which is in or adjacent to areas occupied by gorillas. We surveyed 12 areas of forest identified as potential gorilla habitat, 10 of which yielded new records of gorillas. The new records expand the known range of the Cross River gorilla by > 50%, and support genetic analyses that suggest greater connectivity of the population than previously assumed. These findings demonstrate that considerable connected forest habitat remains and that the area could potentially support a much larger gorilla population if anthropogenic pressures such as hunting could be reduced.
Scientific Reports | 2016
Hjalmar S. Kühl; Ammie K. Kalan; Mimi Arandjelovic; Floris Aubert; Lucy D’Auvergne; Annemarie Goedmakers; Sorrel Jones; Laura Kehoe; Sebastien Regnaut; Alexander Tickle; Els Ton; Joost van Schijndel; Ekwoge E. Abwe; Samuel Angedakin; Anthony Agbor; Emmanuel Ayuk Ayimisin; Emma Bailey; Mattia Bessone; Matthieu Bonnet; Gregory Brazolla; Valentine Ebua Buh; Rebecca L. Chancellor; Chloe Cipoletta; Heather Cohen; Katherine Corogenes; Charlotte Coupland; Bryan K. Curran; Tobias Deschner; Karsten Dierks; Paula Dieguez
The study of the archaeological remains of fossil hominins must rely on reconstructions to elucidate the behaviour that may have resulted in particular stone tools and their accumulation. Comparatively, stone tool use among living primates has illuminated behaviours that are also amenable to archaeological examination, permitting direct observations of the behaviour leading to artefacts and their assemblages to be incorporated. Here, we describe newly discovered stone tool-use behaviour and stone accumulation sites in wild chimpanzees reminiscent of human cairns. In addition to data from 17 mid- to long-term chimpanzee research sites, we sampled a further 34 Pan troglodytes communities. We found four populations in West Africa where chimpanzees habitually bang and throw rocks against trees, or toss them into tree cavities, resulting in conspicuous stone accumulations at these sites. This represents the first record of repeated observations of individual chimpanzees exhibiting stone tool use for a purpose other than extractive foraging at what appear to be targeted trees. The ritualized behavioural display and collection of artefacts at particular locations observed in chimpanzee accumulative stone throwing may have implications for the inferences that can be drawn from archaeological stone assemblages and the origins of ritual sites.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Sandra Tranquilli; Michael Abedi-Lartey; Katharine Abernethy; Fidèle Amsini; Augustus Asamoah; Cletus Balangtaa; Stephen M Blake; Estelle Bouanga; Thomas Breuer; Terry M. Brncic; Geneviève Campbell; Rebecca L. Chancellor; Colin A. Chapman; Tim R. B. Davenport; Andrew Dunn; Jef Dupain; Atanga Ekobo; Manasseh Eno-Nku; Gilles Etoga; Takeshi Furuichi; Sylvain Gatti; Andrea Ghiurghi; Chie Hashimoto; John Hart; Josephine Head; Martin Hega; Ilka Herbinger; Thurston C. Hicks; Lars H. Holbech; Bas Huijbregts
Numerous protected areas (PAs) have been created in Africa to safeguard wildlife and other natural resources. However, significant threats from anthropogenic activities and decline of wildlife populations persist, while conservation efforts in most PAs are still minimal. We assessed the impact level of the most common threats to wildlife within PAs in tropical Africa and the relationship of conservation activities with threat impact level. We collated data on 98 PAs with tropical forest cover from 15 countries across West, Central and East Africa. For this, we assembled information about local threats as well as conservation activities from published and unpublished literature, and questionnaires sent to long-term field workers. We constructed general linear models to test the significance of specific conservation activities in relation to the threat impact level. Subsistence and commercial hunting were identified as the most common direct threats to wildlife and found to be most prevalent in West and Central Africa. Agriculture and logging represented the most common indirect threats, and were most prevalent in West Africa. We found that the long-term presence of conservation activities (such as law enforcement, research and tourism) was associated with lower threat impact levels. Our results highlight deficiencies in the management effectiveness of several PAs across tropical Africa, and conclude that PA management should invest more into conservation activities with long-term duration.
American Journal of Primatology | 2014
Inaoyom Imong; Martha M. Robbins; Roger Mundry; Richard A. Bergl; Hjalmar S. Kühl
Connectivity among subpopulations is vital for the persistence of small and fragmented populations. For management interventions to be effective conservation planners have to make the critical distinction between structural connectivity (based on landscape structure) and functional connectivity (which considers both landscape structure and organism‐specific behavioral attributes) which can differ considerably within a given context. We assessed spatial and temporal changes in structural and functional connectivity of the Cross River gorilla Gorilla gorilla diehli (CRG) population in a 12,000 km2 landscape in the Nigeria‐Cameroon border region over a 23‐year period, comparing two periods: 1987–2000 and 2000–2010. Despite substantial forest connections between occupied areas, genetic evidence shows that only limited dispersal occurs among CRG subpopulations. We used remotely sensed land‐cover data and simulated human pressure (using a spatially explicit agent‐based model) to assess human impact on connectivity of the CRG population. We calculated cost‐weighted distances between areas occupied by gorillas as measures of connectivity (structural based on land‐cover only, functional based on both land‐cover and simulated human pressure). Whereas structural connectivity decreased by 5% over the 23‐year period, functional connectivity decreased by 11%, with both decreasing more during the latter compared to the earlier period. Our results highlight the increasing threat of isolation of CRG subpopulations due to human disturbance, and provide insight into how increasing human influence may lead to functional isolation of wildlife populations despite habitat continuity, a pressing and common issue in tropical Africa often not accounted for when deciding management interventions. In addition to quantifying threats to connectivity, our study provides crucial evidence for management authorities to identify actions that are more likely to be effective for conservation of species in human‐dominated landscapes. Our approach can be easily applied to other species, regions, and scales. Am. J. Primatol. 76:978–988, 2014.
Tropical Conservation Science | 2017
Mahmoud I. Mahmoud; Sean Sloan; Mason J. Campbell; Mohammed Alamgir; Inaoyom Imong; Odigha Odigha; Hazel M. Chapman; Andrew Dunn; William F. Laurance
The Cross River State Government in Nigeria is proposing to construct a “Cross River Superhighway” that would bisect critical remaining areas of tropical rainforest in south eastern Nigeria. We offer and evaluate two alternative routes to the superhighway that would be less damaging to forests, protected areas, and biological diversity. The first alternative we identified avoids intact forests entirely while seeking to benefit agriculture and existing settlements. The second alternative also avoids intact forests while incorporating existing paved and unpaved roads to limit construction costs. As currently proposed, the superhighway would be 260 km long, would intersect 115 km of intact forests or protected areas, and would cost an estimated ∼US
Environmental Conservation | 2016
Inaoyom Imong; Hjalmar S. Kühl; Martha M. Robbins; Roger Mundry
2.5 billion to construct. Alternative Routes 1 and 2 are only slightly longer (∼290 and ∼353 km, respectively) and have markedly lower estimated construction costs (∼US
Diversity and Distributions | 2012
Jessica Junker; Stephen Blake; Christophe Boesch; Geneviève Campbell; Louwrens du Toit; Chris S. Duvall; Atanga Ekobo; Gilles Etoga; Anh Galat-Luong; Joel Gamys; Jessica Ganas-Swaray; Sylvain Gatti; Andrea Ghiurghi; Nicolas Granier; John Hart; Josephine Head; Ilka Herbinger; Thurston C. Hicks; Bas Huijbregts; Inaoyom Imong; Noelle Kuempel; Sally A. Lahm; Jeremy A. Lindsell; Fiona Maisels; Matthew R. McLennan; Laura Martinez; Bethan J. Morgan; David Morgan; Felix Mulindahabi; Roger Mundry
0.92 billion). Furthermore, the alternative routes would have negligible impacts on forests and protected areas and would be better aligned to benefit local communities and agriculture. We argue that alternative routings such as those we examined here could markedly reduce the economic and environmental costs, and potentially increase the socioeconomic benefits, for the proposed Cross River Superhighway.
Conservation Letters | 2012
Sandra Tranquilli; Michael Abedi-Lartey; Fidèle Amsini; Luis Arranz; Augustus Asamoah; Ogunjemite Babafemi; Nsengiyunva Barakabuye; Geneviève Campbell; Rebecca L. Chancellor; Tim R. B. Davenport; Andrew Dunn; Jef Dupain; Christina Ellis; Gilles Etoga; Takeshi Furuichi; Sylvain Gatti; Andrea Ghiurghi; Elisabeth Greengrass; Chie Hashimoto; John Hart; Ilka Herbinger; Thurston C. Hicks; Lars H. Holbech; Bas Huijbregts; Inaoyom Imong; Noëlle F. Kümpel; Fiona Maisels; Phil Marshall; Stuart Nixon; Emmanuelle Normand
Choosing appropriate management strategies and effective conservation actions requires information about the future consequences of current conservation actions; however, this crucial information is rarely available to conservation planners. This study applies scenario planning and agent-based modelling (ABM) to assess the potential impact of alternative management strategies on future suitability and functional connectivity of Cross River gorilla (CRG) habitat in the Nigeria–Cameroon border region. The CRG population is small and fragmented, with many subpopulations and migration corridors located outside protected areas. This study used ABM to simulate human land use in the study area over a period of 15 years under different management scenarios and assessed the impact on future suitability and functional connectivity of CRG habitat. The simulations showed that a landscape approach with greater focus on interventions to change human behaviour towards conserving gorillas and sustainable forest use would result in greater improvement in habitat suitability and functional connectivity compared to focusing on improving law enforcement within existing protected areas. However, the best scenarios were when both law enforcement and behaviour change increased. The results highlight the importance of human behaviour change to conservation in human-dominated landscapes and can inform conservation planning and management of other species and in similar landscapes.
Archive | 2007
John F. Oates; Jacqueline Sunderland-Groves; Richard A. Bergl; Andrew Dunn; Aaron Nicholas; Ebai Takang; Fidelis Omeni; Inaoyom Imong; Roger Fotso; Louis Nkembi; Elizabeth A. Williamson
Animal Conservation | 2014
Inaoyom Imong; Martha M. Robbins; Roger Mundry; Richard A. Bergl; Hjalmar S. Kühl