Inge C. Van Gool

POLE Proofreading Mutations Elicit an Antitumor Immune Response in Endometrial Cancer

Purpose: Recent studies have shown that 7% to 12% of endometrial cancers are ultramutated due to somatic mutation in the proofreading exonuclease domain of the DNA replicase POLE. Interestingly, these tumors have an excellent prognosis. In view of the emerging data linking mutation burden, immune response, and clinical outcome in cancer, we investigated whether POLE-mutant endometrial cancers showed evidence of increased immunogenicity. Experimental Design: We examined immune infiltration and activation according to tumor POLE proofreading mutation in a molecularly defined endometrial cancer cohort including 47 POLE-mutant tumors. We sought to confirm our results by analysis of RNAseq data from the TCGA endometrial cancer series and used the same series to examine whether differences in immune infiltration could be explained by an enrichment of immunogenic neoepitopes in POLE-mutant endometrial cancers. Results: Compared with other endometrial cancers, POLE mutants displayed an enhanced cytotoxic T-cell response, evidenced by increased numbers of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and CD8A expression, enrichment for a tumor-infiltrating T-cell gene signature, and strong upregulation of the T-cell cytotoxic differentiation and effector markers T-bet, Eomes, IFNG, PRF, and granzyme B. This was accompanied by upregulation of T-cell exhaustion markers, consistent with chronic antigen exposure. In silico analysis confirmed that POLE-mutant cancers are predicted to display more antigenic neoepitopes than other endometrial cancers, providing a potential explanation for our findings. Conclusions: Ultramutated POLE proofreading-mutant endometrial cancers are characterized by a robust intratumoral T-cell response, which correlates with, and may be caused by an enrichment of antigenic neopeptides. Our study provides a plausible mechanism for the excellent prognosis of these cancers. Clin Cancer Res; 21(14); 3347–55. ©2015 AACR.

Prognostic significance of L1CAM expression and its association with mutant p53 expression in high-risk endometrial cancer

Studies in early-stage, predominantly low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer have demonstrated that L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) overexpression identifies patients at increased risk of recurrence, yet its prognostic significance in high-risk endometrial cancer is unclear. To evaluate this, its frequency, and the relationship of L1CAM with the established endometrial cancer biomarker p53, we analyzed the expression of both markers by immunohistochemistry in a pilot series of 116 endometrial cancers (86 endometrioid, 30 non-endometrioid subtype) with high-risk features (such as high tumor grade and deep myometrial invasion) and correlated results with clinical outcome. We used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) endometrial cancer series to validate our findings. Using the previously reported cutoff of 10% positive staining, 51/116 (44%) tumors were classified as L1CAM-positive, with no significant association between L1CAM positivity and the rate of distant metastasis (P=0.195). However, increasing the threshold for L1CAM positivity to 50% resulted in a reduction of the frequency of L1CAM-positive tumors to 24% (28/116), and a significant association with the rate of distant metastasis (P=0.018). L1CAM expression was strongly associated with mutant p53 in the high-risk and TCGA series (P<0.001), although a substantial fraction (36% of endometrioid, 10% of non-endometrioid morphology) of p53-mutant endometrial cancers displayed <10% L1CAM positivity. Moreover, 30% of p53-wild-type non-endometrioid endometrial cancers demonstrated diffuse L1CAM staining, suggesting p53-independent mechanisms of L1CAM overexpression. In conclusion, the previously proposed threshold for L1CAM positivity of >10% does not predict prognosis in high-risk endometrial cancer, whereas an alternative threshold (>50%) does. L1CAM expression is strongly, but not universally, associated with mutant p53, and may be strong enough for clinical implementation as prognostic marker in combination with p53. The high frequency of L1CAM expression in high-risk endometrial cancers suggests that it may also be a promising therapeutic target in this tumor subset.

Immunological profiling of molecularly classified high-risk endometrial cancers identifies POLE-mutant and microsatellite unstable carcinomas as candidates for checkpoint inhibition

ABSTRACT High-risk endometrial cancer (EC) is an aggressive disease for which new therapeutic options are needed. Aims of this study were to validate the enhanced immune response in highly mutated ECs and to explore immune profiles in other EC subgroups. We evaluated immune infiltration in 116 high-risk ECs from the TransPORTEC consortium, previously classified into four molecular subtypes: (i) ultramutated POLE exonuclease domain-mutant ECs (POLE-mutant); (ii) hypermutated microsatellite unstable (MSI); (iii) p53-mutant; and (iv) no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Within The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) EC cohort, significantly higher numbers of predicted neoantigens were demonstrated in POLE-mutant and MSI tumors compared with NSMP and p53-mutants. This was reflected by enhanced immune expression and infiltration in POLE-mutant and MSI tumors in both the TCGA cohort (mRNA expression) and the TransPORTEC cohort (immunohistochemistry) with high infiltration of CD8+ (90% and 69%), PD-1+ (73% and 69%) and PD-L1+ immune cells (100% and 71%). Notably, a subset of p53-mutant and NSMP cancers was characterized by signs of an antitumor immune response (43% and 31% of tumors with high infiltration of CD8+ cells, respectively), despite a low number of predicted neoantigens. In conclusion, the presence of enhanced immune infiltration, particularly high numbers of PD-1 and PD-L1 positive cells, in highly mutated, neoantigen-rich POLE-mutant and MSI endometrial tumors suggests sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

POLE proofreading mutation, immune response and prognosis in endometrial cancer

ABSTRACT Endometrial cancers (ECs) with POLE proofreading mutations are typified by ultramutation and excellent prognosis. We investigated whether these were related, and found that POLE-mutant ECs display a robust T cell response that corresponds to an enrichment of antigenic tumor neopeptides. Enhanced immunogenicity may explain the favorable outcome of POLE-mutant ECs.

Limited impact of intratumour heterogeneity on molecular risk assignment in endometrial cancer

Introduction Individual prediction of tumour behaviour based on molecular markers may refine adjuvant treatment strategies in endometrial cancer (EC). As these molecular alterations are determined in a small tumour fraction, high intratumour heterogeneity may interfere with correct risk prediction. This study aimed to investigate to which extent intratumour heterogeneity exists for molecular markers and whether it affects the molecular risk assignment in EC. Methods Forty-nine ECs (three tumour blocks/case) were selected with alterations in POLE (n=10), CTNNB1 (n=8), p53 (n=10), mismatch repair (n=11), L1CAM (n=10), and ECs without any of these markers (n=9). Nine ECs carried more than one molecular marker. All 147 blocks were analysed for POLE exonuclease domain and CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations, and for p53, mismatch repair and L1CAM protein expression. All blocks were assigned to a favourable, intermediate or unfavourable risk group, based on a molecular risk assignment. RESULTS Concordance between the three tumour blocks for POLE and CTNNB1 mutational status, and p53, mismatch repair and L1CAM protein expression was found in 100% (48/48), 95.9% (47/49), 93.9% (46/49), 98.0% (48/49), and 91.8% (45/49) of tumours, respectively. These discordances were found in a total of nine cases (18.4%). The intratumour heterogeneity impacted the risk assignment in five cases (10.2%). Conclusion Intratumour heterogeneity of prognostic molecular markers in EC without morphologic heterogeneity is uncommon among three tumour fractions, affecting the molecular risk allocation in a limited number of cases. This low intratumour heterogeneity facilitates the implementation of the molecular risk assignment, advocating its use in clinical decision making.

TGF-β induced CXCL13 in CD8+ T cells is associated with tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer

Coordinated immune responses against human tumors are frequently characterized by tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) which predict improved prognosis. The development of TLS is dependent on the chemokine CXCL13, reported to be secreted by dendritic cells and follicular helper T cells only. We report the unexpected finding that CXCL13 is also secreted by activated CD8+ T cells following stimulation by transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β). Using single cell RNA sequencing we found that expression of CXCL13 in CD8+ T cells was restricted to the intraepithelial CD103+ population. Accordingly, CD8+ T cells activated in the presence of TGF-β simultaneously upregulated CD103 and secreted CXCL13. CXCL13 expression was strongly correlated with neo-antigen burden and cytolytic gene signatures in bulk tumors. In line with this, TLS were abundant in neo-antigen-high, CD103+ T cell-enriched tumors. TGF-β thus appears to play a role in coordinating immune responses against human tumors through CD8-dependent CXCL13-associated formation of TLS.

Somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations are early events in sporadic endometrial and colorectal carcinogenesis, determining driver mutational landscape, clonal neoantigen burden and immune response.

Genomic instability, which is a hallmark of cancer, is generally thought to occur in the middle to late stages of tumourigenesis, following the acquisition of permissive molecular aberrations such as TP53 mutation or whole genome doubling. Tumours with somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations are notable for their extreme genomic instability (their mutation burden is among the highest in human cancer), distinct mutational signature, lymphocytic infiltrate, and excellent prognosis. To what extent these characteristics are determined by the timing of POLE mutations in oncogenesis is unknown. Here, we have shown that pathogenic POLE mutations are detectable in non‐malignant precursors of endometrial and colorectal cancer. Using genome and exome sequencing, we found that multiple driver mutations in POLE‐mutant cancers show the characteristic POLE mutational signature, including those in genes conventionally regarded as initiators of tumourigenesis. In POLE‐mutant cancers, the proportion of monoclonal predicted neoantigens was similar to that in other cancers, but the absolute number was much greater. We also found that the prominent CD8+ T‐cell infiltrate present in POLE‐mutant cancers was evident in their precursor lesions. Collectively, these data indicate that somatic POLE mutations are early, quite possibly initiating, events in the endometrial and colorectal cancers in which they occur. The resulting early onset of genomic instability may account for the striking immune response and excellent prognosis of these tumours, as well as their early presentation.

Blinded histopathological characterisation of POLE exonuclease domain‐mutant endometrial cancers: sheep in wolf's clothing

POLE exonuclease domain mutations identify a subset of endometrial cancer (EC) patients with an excellent prognosis. The use of this biomarker has been suggested to refine adjuvant treatment decisions, but the necessary sequencing is not widely performed and is relatively expensive. Therefore, we aimed to identify histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics to aid in the detection of POLE‐mutant ECs.

Neoepitopes and CD3-Positive and CD8-Positive Cells in Polymerase e–Mutated and Microsatellite-Instable Endometrial Cancers

Neoepitopes and CD3-Positive and CD8-Positive Cells in Polymerase e–Mutated and Microsatellite-Instable Endometrial Cancers To the Editor We read with interest the Brief Report by Howitt and colleagues.1 Over the last few years, we have also studied the interesting subgroup of endometrial cancers (ECs) with mutation in the POLE proofreading exonuclease domain,2,3 and in particular their association with excellent prognosis,3,4 not mentioned by Howitt et al1 in their report. In their study, Howitt et al1 claim that their analysis is the first to demonstrate increased predicted neoepitopes and numbers of CD3-positive and CD8-positive cells in POLE-mutant and microsatellite-unstable (MSI) ECs. However, in a study published earlier this year,5 we showed that both POLE proofreadingmutant and MSI ECs demonstrate significantly greater CD8positive cell infiltration and higher numbers of predicted neoantigens than microsatellite-stable ECs. In this analysis, we also demonstrated that POLE-mutant and, to a lesser extent, MSI ECs display increased expression of genes encoding immune checkpoint molecules, including PDCD1 and PDL1. Furthermore, as our study included a substantially greater number of POLE-mutant tumors than that of Howitt et al1 (47 compared with 3 cases), we were also able to confirm the postulate of Howitt et al that the greater number of neoantigens in POLE-mutant than in MSI ECs is reflected in significantly greater CD8-positive cell infiltration.5 Collectively, the small study by Howitt et al,1 and our earlier, more comprehensive analysis, suggest that both POLE proofreading-mutant and MSI tumors are more immunogenic than other ECs. We therefore agree with Howitt et al1 that these cancers may be excellent candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, as indeed we have previously suggested.5 We also suggest that the striking immune response observed in POLE-proofreading mutant ECs may contribute to their favorable clinical outcome.

Adjuvant Treatment for POLE Proofreading Domain–Mutant Cancers: Sensitivity to Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy, and Nucleoside Analogues

Purpose: Pathogenic POLE proofreading domain mutations are found in many malignancies where they are associated with ultramutation and favorable prognosis. The extent to which this prognosis depends on their sensitivity to adjuvant treatment is unknown, as is the optimal therapy for advanced-staged or recurrent POLE-mutant cancers. Experimental Design: We examined the recurrence-free survival of women with POLE-mutant and POLE–wild-type endometrial cancers (EC) in the observation arm of the randomized PORTEC-1 endometrial cancer trial (N = 245 patients with stage I endometrial cancer for analysis). Sensitivity to radiotherapy and selected chemotherapeutics was compared between Pole-mutant mouse-derived embryonic stem (mES) cells, generated using CRISPR-Cas9 (Pole mutations D275A/E275A, and cancer-associated P286R, S297F, V411L) and isogenic wild-type cell lines. Results: In the observation arm of the PORTEC-1 trial (N = 245), women with POLE-mutant endometrial cancers (N = 16) had an improved recurrence-free survival (10-year recurrence-free survival 100% vs. 80.1% for POLE–wild-type; HR, 0.143; 95% confidence interval, 0.001–0.996; P = 0.049). Pole mutations did not increase sensitivity to radiotherapy nor to chemotherapeutics in mES cells. In contrast, Pole-mutant cells displayed significantly increased sensitivity to cytarabine and fludarabine (IC50 Pole P286R–mutant vs. wild-type: 0.05 vs. 0.17 μmol/L for cytarabine, 4.62 vs. 11.1 μmol/L for fludarabine; P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Conclusions: The favorable prognosis of POLE-mutant cancers cannot be explained by increased sensitivity to currently used adjuvant treatments. These results support studies exploring minimization of adjuvant therapy for early-stage POLE-mutant cancers, including endometrial and colorectal cancers. Conversely, POLE mutations result in hypersensitivity to nucleoside analogues, suggesting the use of these compounds as a potentially effective targeted treatment for advanced-stage POLE-mutant cancers. Clin Cancer Res; 24(13); 3197–203. ©2018 AACR.