Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ingeborg M. Bajema is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ingeborg M. Bajema.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2012

Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis

George Bertsias; Maria G. Tektonidou; Zahir Amoura; Martin Aringer; Ingeborg M. Bajema; J.H.M. Berden; John Boletis; Ricard Cervera; Thomas Dörner; Andrea Doria; Franco Ferrario; Jürgen Floege; Frédéric Houssiau; John P. A. Ioannidis; David A. Isenberg; Cees G. M. Kallenberg; Liz Lightstone; Stephen D. Marks; Alberto Martini; Gabriela Moroni; Irmgard Neumann; Manuel Praga; M. Schneider; Argyre Starra; Vladimir Tesar; Carlos Vasconcelos; Ronald F. van Vollenhoven; Helena Zakharova; Marion Haubitz; Caroline Gordon

Objectives To develop recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis (LN). Methods The available evidence was systematically reviewed using the PubMed database. A modified Delphi method was used to compile questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Results Immunosuppressive treatment should be guided by renal biopsy, and aiming for complete renal response (proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h with normal or near-normal renal function). Hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all patients with LN. Because of a more favourable efficacy/toxicity ratio, as initial treatment for patients with class III–IVA or A/C (±V) LN according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003 classification, mycophenolic acid (MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) in combination with glucocorticoids is recommended. In patients with adverse clinical or histological features, CY can be prescribed at higher doses, while azathioprine is an alternative for milder cases. For pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria, MPA in combination with oral glucocorticoids is recommended as initial treatment. In patients improving after initial treatment, subsequent immunosuppression with MPA or azathioprine is recommended for at least 3 years; in such cases, initial treatment with MPA should be followed by MPA. For MPA or CY failures, switching to the other agent, or to rituximab, is the suggested course of action. In anticipation of pregnancy, patients should be switched to appropriate medications without reducing the intensity of treatment. There is no evidence to suggest that management of LN should differ in children versus adults. Conclusions Recommendations for the management of LN were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2010

Pathologic Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy

Thijs W. Cohen Tervaert; Antien L. Mooyaart; Kerstin Amann; Arthur H. Cohen; H. Terence Cook; Cinthia B. Drachenberg; Franco Ferrario; Agnes B. Fogo; Mark Haas; Emile de Heer; Kensuke Joh; Laure Hélène Noël; Jai Radhakrishnan; Surya V. Seshan; Ingeborg M. Bajema; Jan A. Bruijn

Although pathologic classifications exist for several renal diseases, including IgA nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and lupus nephritis, a uniform classification for diabetic nephropathy is lacking. Our aim, commissioned by the Research Committee of the Renal Pathology Society, was to develop a consensus classification combining type1 and type 2 diabetic nephropathies. Such a classification should discriminate lesions by various degrees of severity that would be easy to use internationally in clinical practice. We divide diabetic nephropathy into four hierarchical glomerular lesions with a separate evaluation for degrees of interstitial and vascular involvement. Biopsies diagnosed as diabetic nephropathy are classified as follows: Class I, glomerular basement membrane thickening: isolated glomerular basement membrane thickening and only mild, nonspecific changes by light microscopy that do not meet the criteria of classes II through IV. Class II, mesangial expansion, mild (IIa) or severe (IIb): glomeruli classified as mild or severe mesangial expansion but without nodular sclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson lesions) or global glomerulosclerosis in more than 50% of glomeruli. Class III, nodular sclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson lesions): at least one glomerulus with nodular increase in mesangial matrix (Kimmelstiel-Wilson) without changes described in class IV. Class IV, advanced diabetic glomerulosclerosis: more than 50% global glomerulosclerosis with other clinical or pathologic evidence that sclerosis is attributable to diabetic nephropathy. A good interobserver reproducibility for the four classes of DN was shown (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.84) in a test of this classification.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2010

Histopathologic Classification of ANCA-Associated Glomerulonephritis

Annelies E. Berden; Franco Ferrario; E. Christiaan Hagen; David Jayne; J. Charles Jennette; Kensuke Joh; Irmgard Neumann; Laure Hélène Noël; Charles D. Pusey; Rüdiger Waldherr; Jan A. Bruijn; Ingeborg M. Bajema

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis is the most common cause of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis worldwide, and the renal biopsy is the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis. Although the prognostic value of the renal biopsy in ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis is widely recognized, there is no consensus regarding its pathologic classification. We present here such a pathologic classification developed by an international working group of renal pathologists. Our classification proposes four general categories of lesions: Focal, crescentic, mixed, and sclerotic. To determine whether these lesions have predictive value for renal outcome, we performed a validation study on 100 biopsies from patients with clinically and histologically confirmed ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. Two independent pathologists, blinded to patient data, scored all biopsies according to a standardized protocol. Results show that the proposed classification system is of prognostic value for 1- and 5-year renal outcomes. We believe this pathologic classification will aid in the prognostication of patients at the time of diagnosis and facilitate uniform reporting between centers. This classification at some point might also provide means to guide therapy.


Kidney International | 2013

C3 glomerulopathy: consensus report

Matthew C. Pickering; Vivette D. D'Agati; Carla M. Nester; Richard J.H. Smith; Mark Haas; Gerald B. Appel; Charles E. Alpers; Ingeborg M. Bajema; Camille L. Bedrosian; Michael C. Braun; Mittie K. Doyle; Fadi Fakhouri; Fernando C. Fervenza; Agnes B. Fogo; Véronique Frémeaux-Bacchi; Daniel P. Gale; Elena Goicoechea de Jorge; Gene Griffin; Claire L. Harris; V. Michael Holers; Sally Johnson; Peter Lavin; Nicholas Medjeral-Thomas; B. Paul Morgan; Cynthia C. Nast; Laure Hélène Noël; D. Keith Peters; Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba; Aude Servais; Sanjeev Sethi

C3 glomerulopathy is a recently introduced pathological entity whose original definition was glomerular pathology characterized by C3 accumulation with absent or scanty immunoglobulin deposition. In August 2012, an invited group of experts (comprising the authors of this document) in renal pathology, nephrology, complement biology, and complement therapeutics met to discuss C3 glomerulopathy in the first C3 Glomerulopathy Meeting. The objectives were to reach a consensus on: the definition of C3 glomerulopathy, appropriate complement investigations that should be performed in these patients, and how complement therapeutics should be explored in the condition. This meeting report represents the current consensus view of the group.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2006

Clinical and Histologic Determinants of Renal Outcome in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Prospective Analysis of 100 Patients with Severe Renal Involvement

Robert A.F. de Lind van Wijngaarden; Herbert A. Hauer; Ron Wolterbeek; David Jayne; Gill Gaskin; Niels Rasmussen; Laure-Hélène Noël; Franco Ferrario; Rüdiger Waldherr; E. Christiaan Hagen; Jan A. Bruijn; Ingeborg M. Bajema

This study aimed to identify clinical and histologic prognostic indicators of renal outcome in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and severe renal involvement (serum creatinine >500 micromol/L). One hundred patients who were enrolled in an international, randomized, clinical trial to compare plasma exchange with intravenous methylprednisolone as an additional initial treatment were analyzed prospectively. Diagnostic renal biopsies were performed upon entry into the study. Thirty-nine histologic and nine clinical parameters were determined as candidate predictors of renal outcome. The end points were renal function at the time of diagnosis (GFR0) and 12 mo after diagnosis (GFR12), dialysis at entry and 12 mo after diagnosis, and death. Multivariate analyses were performed. Predictive of GFR0 were age (r = -0.40, P = 0.04), arteriosclerosis (r = -0.53, P = 0.01), segmental crescents (r = 0.35, P = 0.07), and eosinophilic infiltrate (r = -0.41, P = 0.04). Prognostic indicators for GFR12 were age (r = -0.32, P = 0.01), normal glomeruli (r = 0.24, P = 0.04), tubular atrophy (r = -0.28, P = 0.02), intraepithelial infiltrate (r = -0.26, P = 0.03), and GFR0 (r = 0.29, P = 0.01). Fibrous crescents (r = 0.22, P = 0.03) were predictive of dialysis at entry. Normal glomeruli (r = -0.30, P = 0.01) and treatment arm (r = -0.28, P = 0.02) were predictive of dialysis after 12 mo. No parameter predicted death. Both chronic and acute tubulointerstitial lesions predicted GFR12 in severe ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis, whereas plasma exchange was a positive predictor of dialysis independence after 12 mo for the entire patient group. Plasma exchange remained a positive predictor when patients who were dialysis dependent at presentation were analyzed separately (r = -0.36, P = 0.01). Normal glomeruli were a positive predictor of dialysis independence and improved renal function after 12 mo, indicating that the unaffected part of the kidney is vital in determining renal outcome.


Stem Cells Translational Medicine | 2013

Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Allograft Rejection After Renal Transplantation: Results of a Phase I Study

Marlies E.J. Reinders; Johan W. de Fijter; Helene Roelofs; Ingeborg M. Bajema; Dorottya K. de Vries; Alexander F. Schaapherder; Frans H.J. Claas; Paula P.M.C. van Miert; Dave L. Roelen; Cees van Kooten; Willem E. Fibbe; Ton J. Rabelink

Despite excellent short‐term results, long‐term survival of transplanted kidneys has not improved accordingly. Although alloimmune responses and calcineurin inhibitor‐related nephrotoxicity have been identified as main drivers of fibrosis, no effective treatment options have emerged. In this perspective, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are an interesting candidate because of their immunosuppressive and regenerative properties. Of importance, no other clinical studies have investigated their effects in allograft rejection and fibrosis. We performed a safety and feasibility study in kidney allograft recipients to whom two intravenous infusions (1 million cells per kilogram) of autologous bone marrow (BM) MSCs were given, when a protocol renal biopsy at 4 weeks or 6 months showed signs of rejection and/or an increase in interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA). Six patients received MSC infusions. Clinical and immune monitoring was performed up to 24 weeks after MSC infusions. MSCs fulfilled the release criteria, infusions were well‐tolerated, and no treatment‐related serious adverse events were reported. In two recipients with allograft rejection, we had a clinical indication to perform surveillance biopsies and are able to report on the potential effects of MSCs in rejection. Although maintenance immunosuppression remained unaltered, there was a resolution of tubulitis without IF/TA in both patients. Additionally, three patients developed an opportunistic viral infection, and five of the six patients displayed a donor‐specific downregulation of the peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation assay, not reported in patients without MSC treatment. Autologous BM MSC treatment in transplant recipients with subclinical rejection and IF/TA is clinically feasible and safe, and the findings are suggestive of systemic immunosuppression.


Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2004

Anti-C1q autoantibodies deposit in glomeruli but are only pathogenic in combination with glomerular C1q-containing immune complexes

Leendert A. Trouw; Tom W. L. Groeneveld; Marc A. Seelen; Jacques M.G.J. Duijs; Ingeborg M. Bajema; Frans A. Prins; Uday Kishore; David J. Salant; J. Sjef Verbeek; Cees van Kooten; Mohamed R. Daha

Anti-C1q autoantibodies are present in sera of patients with several autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Strikingly, in SLE the presence of anti-C1q is associated with the occurrence of nephritis. We have generated mouse anti-mouse C1q mAbs and used murine models to investigate whether anti-C1q autoantibodies actually contribute to renal pathology in glomerular immune complex disease. Administration of anti-C1q mAb JL-1, which recognizes the collagen-like region of C1q, resulted in glomerular deposition of C1q and anti-C1q autoantibodies and mild granulocyte influx, but no overt renal damage. However, combination of JL-1 with a subnephritogenic dose of C1q-fixing anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibodies enhanced renal damage characterized by persistently increased levels of infiltrating granulocytes, major histological changes, and increased albuminuria. This was not observed when a non-C1q-fixing anti-GBM preparation was used. Experiments with different knockout mice showed that renal damage was dependent not only on glomerular C1q and complement activation but also on Fcgamma receptors. In conclusion, anti-C1q autoantibodies deposit in glomeruli together with C1q but induce overt renal disease only in the context of glomerular immune complex disease. This provides an explanation why anti-C1q antibodies are especially pathogenic in patients with SLE.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2016

EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis

Max Yates; Richard A. Watts; Ingeborg M. Bajema; Maria C. Cid; Bruno Crestani; Thomas Hauser; Bernhard Hellmich; Julia U. Holle; Martin Laudien; Mark A. Little; Raashid Luqmani; Alfred Mahr; Peter A. Merkel; John R. Mills; Janice Mooney; Mårten Segelmark; Vladimir Tesar; Kerstin Westman; Augusto Vaglio; N. Yalçindag; D Jayne; Chetan Mukhtyar

In this article, the 2009 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) have been updated. The 2009 recommendations were on the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis. The 2015 update has been developed by an international task force representing EULAR, the European Renal Association and the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS). The recommendations are based upon evidence from systematic literature reviews, as well as expert opinion where appropriate. The evidence presented was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus-finding and voting process. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were derived and levels of agreement (strengths of recommendations) determined. In addition to the voting by the task force members, the relevance of the recommendations was assessed by an online voting survey among members of EUVAS. Fifteen recommendations were developed, covering general aspects, such as attaining remission and the need for shared decision making between clinicians and patients. More specific items relate to starting immunosuppressive therapy in combination with glucocorticoids to induce remission, followed by a period of remission maintenance; for remission induction in life-threatening or organ-threatening AAV, cyclophosphamide and rituximab are considered to have similar efficacy; plasma exchange which is recommended, where licensed, in the setting of rapidly progressive renal failure or severe diffuse pulmonary haemorrhage. These recommendations are intended for use by healthcare professionals, doctors in specialist training, medical students, pharmaceutical industries and drug regulatory organisations.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2010

EULAR points to consider in the development of classification and diagnostic criteria in systemic vasculitis

Neil Basu; Richard A. Watts; Ingeborg M. Bajema; Bo Baslund; Thorsten A. Bley; Maarten Boers; Paul A. Brogan; Leonard H. Calabrese; Maria C. Cid; Jw Cohen-Tervaert; Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez; Shouichi Fujimoto; K. de Groot; L. Guillevin; Gulen Hatemi; Thomas Hauser; D Jayne; C Jennette; Cornelis Kallenberg; Shigeto Kobayashi; Mark A. Little; Alfred Mahr; John McLaren; Peter A. Merkel; Seza Ozen; Xavier Puéchal; Niels Rasmussen; Alan D. Salama; Carlo Salvarani; C. O. S. Savage

Objectives The systemic vasculitides are multiorgan diseases where early diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve outcomes. Robust nomenclature reduces diagnostic delay. However, key aspects of current nomenclature are widely perceived to be out of date, these include disease definitions, classification and diagnostic criteria. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to identify deficiencies and provide contemporary points to consider for the development of future definitions and criteria in systemic vasculitis. Methods The expert panel identified areas of concern within existing definitions/criteria. Consequently, a systematic literature review was undertaken looking to address these deficiencies and produce ‘points to consider’ in accordance with standardised European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) operating procedures. In the absence of evidence, expert consensus was used. Results There was unanimous consensus for re-evaluating existing definitions and developing new criteria. A total of 17 points to consider were proposed, covering 6 main areas: biopsy, laboratory testing, diagnostic radiology, nosology, definitions and research agenda. Suggestions to improve and expand current definitions were described including the incorporation of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody and aetiological factors, where known. The importance of biopsy in diagnosis and exclusion of mimics was highlighted, while equally emphasising its problems. Thus, the role of alternative diagnostic tools such as MRI, ultrasound and surrogate markers were also discussed. Finally, structures to develop future criteria were considered. Conclusions Limitations in current classification criteria and definitions for vasculitis have been identified and suggestions provided for improvement. Additionally it is proposed that, in combination with the updated evidence, these should form the basis of future attempts to develop and validate revised criteria and definitions of vasculitis.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2008

Banff Schema for Grading Pancreas Allograft Rejection: Working Proposal by a Multi-Disciplinary International Consensus Panel

Cinthia B. Drachenberg; Jon S. Odorico; Anthony J. Demetris; L. Arend; Ingeborg M. Bajema; Jan A. Bruijn; D. Cantarovich; Helen P. Cathro; Jeremy R. Chapman; K. Dimosthenous; B. Fyfe-Kirschner; Lillian W. Gaber; Osama Gaber; J. Goldberg; E. Honsová; Samy S. Iskandar; David K. Klassen; Brian J. Nankivell; John C. Papadimitriou; Lorraine C. Racusen; Parmjeet Randhawa; Finn P. Reinholt; Karine Renaudin; P. Revelo; Phillip Ruiz; Jose Torrealba; E. Vazquez-Martul; L. Voska; Robert J. Stratta; S. T. Bartlett

Accurate diagnosis and grading of rejection and other pathological processes are of paramount importance to guide therapeutic interventions in patients with pancreas allograft dysfunction. A multi‐disciplinary panel of pathologists, surgeons and nephrologists was convened for the purpose of developing a consensus document delineating the histopathological features for diagnosis and grading of rejection in pancreas transplant biopsies. Based on the available published data and the collective experience, criteria for the diagnosis of acute cell‐mediated allograft rejection (ACMR) were established. Three severity grades (I/mild, II/moderate and III/severe) were defined based on lesions known to be more or less responsive to treatment and associated with better‐ or worse‐graft outcomes, respectively. The features of chronic rejection/graft sclerosis were reassessed, and three histological stages were established. Tentative criteria for the diagnosis of antibody‐mediated rejection were also characterized, in anticipation of future studies that ought to provide more information on this process. Criteria for needle core biopsy adequacy and guidelines for pathology reporting were also defined.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ingeborg M. Bajema's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan A. Bruijn

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emile de Heer

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Franco Ferrario

University of Milano-Bicocca

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annelies E. Berden

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ron Wolterbeek

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Jayne

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Christiaan Hagen

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hans J. Baelde

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge