Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Inger Sandanger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Inger Sandanger.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 1998

Concordance between symptom screening and diagnostic procedure : the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview I

Inger Sandanger; Torbjørn Moum; G. Ingebrigtsen; Odd Steffen Dalgard; Tom Sørensen; D. Bruusgaard

Abstract The definition of case is a core issue in psychiatric epidemiology. Psychiatric symptom screening scales have been extensively used in population studies for many decades. Structured diagnostic interviews have become available during recent years to give exact diagnoses through carefully undertaken procedures. The aim of this article was to assess how well the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) predicted cases by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and find the optimal cut-offs on the HSCL-25 for each diagnosis and gender. Characteristics of concordant and discordant cases were explored. In a Norwegian two-stage survey mental health problems were measured by the HSCL-25 and the CIDI. Only 46% of the present CIDI diagnoses were predicted by the HSCL-25. Comorbidity between CIDI diagnoses was found more than four times as often in the concordant cases (cases agreed upon by both instruments) than in the discordant CIDI cases. Concordant cases had more depression and panic/generalized anxiety disorders. Neither the anxiety nor the depression subscales improved the prediction of anxiety or depression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves confirmed that the HSCL-25 gave best information about depression. Except for phobia it predicted best for men. Optimal HSCL-25 cut-off was 1.67 for men and 1.75 for women. Of the discordant HSCL-25 cases, one -third reported no symptoms in the CIDI, one-third reported symptoms in the CIDI anxiety module, and the rest had symptoms spread across the modules. With the exception of depression, the HSCL-25 was insufficient to select individuals for further investigation of diagnosis. The two instruments to a large extent identified different cases. Either the HSCL-25 is a very imperfect indicator of the chosen CIDI diagnoses, or the dimensions of mental illness measured by each of the instruments are different and clearly only partly overlapping.


European Journal of Neurology | 2008

Depression and anxiety amongst multiple sclerosis patients

A. G. Beiske; Elisabeth Svensson; Inger Sandanger; B. Czujko; E. D. Pedersen; Jan Harald Aarseth; Kjell-Morten Myhr

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety amongst multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and the associations with demographic and clinical characteristics. The current treatment for depression and anxiety was also evaluated amongst the MS patients.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 1999

Prevalence, incidence and age at onset of psychiatric disorders in Norway

Inger Sandanger; Jan F. Nygård; G. Ingebrigtsen; Tom Sørensen; Odd Steffen Dalgard

Abstract  Background: Increased demands for psychiatric services and increased rates of sickness absence for depression have raised the question of the occurrence of psychiatric disorders in Norway, and whether there is in fact a rising incidence rate. Methods: Between 1989–1991, 2015 and 617 persons participated in a two-phase population study. Phase I comprised screening by the Hopkins Symptom Check List 25 items (HSCL-25), and phase II a diagnostic interview by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), including report of date (year) of the first occurrence of any symptoms, and any consequent diagnosis: Results: A symptom score of 1.75 or more was found in 19.8% of the women and 9.3% of the men by the HSCL-25. Depression, anxiety or somatoform disorder by CIDI was found in 21.5% of the women and 11.5% of the men. The incidence rate increased significantly from 3.3 to 12.8 per 1000 person years from 1930 to 1991. The incidence rate in the year before the interview was 42.6 per 1000 person years. Age of onset became lower. More women became ill, but the illness seemed to last longer in men. A major problem in comparing results between studies is the different concepts and operationalisations of psychiatric illness, and the varying time periods given for estimates. Conclusion: The findings provide evidence of psychiatric illness being a rising and major health problem, but the role of recall bias must be further investigated.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 1999

The meaning and significance of caseness : the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview II

Inger Sandanger; Torbjørn Moum; G. Ingebrigtsen; Tom Sørensen; Odd Steffen Dalgard; D. Bruusgaard

Abstract In previous analyses of data from the present general population study we found that screening of anxiety and depression symptoms by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) and diagnostic classification by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) identified the same amount of cases, but agreed in only half of them. In this paper we compared and validated the screening cases with the classificatory cases by the use of medication, loss of functioning and help seeking (illness indicators). We thought that the CIDI cases would have more illness indicators, because they reflected diagnoses, “true illness”, in contrast to the HSCL-25, which was a more unspecific measure of distress. The HSCL-25 and the illness indicators data were collected in a stage I random individual population sample above 18 years during 1989–1991 (N = 1879, response rate 74%), the CIDI data were collected in a selected stage II, (N = 606, response rate 77%). The stage II data were weighted to represent the population sample. Screening cases by the HSCL-25 had significantly more illness indicators than diagnostic cases by the CIDI. Cases agreed upon with both instruments had the most illness indicators, cases agreed upon only by the CIDI had the least. Diagnoses give information about help eventually needed, the HSCL-25 distress measure expresses more the urgency with which it is needed. The choice between the HSCL-25 and the CIDI would depend on the aim and the resources of the study. If evaluation of needs is involved, using an instrument picking up both classification and distress would be the best choice. Given our positive experience with interviewing with the CIDI, a CIDI improved to be more sensitive to how much distress a certain diagnosis exerts on the individual would be a good choice.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2000

Sickness absence with psychiatric disorders--an increased risk for marginalisation among men?

Gunnel Hensing; Søren Brage; Jan F. Nygård; Inger Sandanger; Gunnar Tellnes

Abstract  Background: Sickness absence with psychiatric disorders is a major public health problem with serious consequences for the individual, the employer and society. The aim was to assess the occurrence of psychiatric sickness absence with special focus on sex differences. Methods: A nationwide sickness insurance register was used. Population at risk was defined as all individuals entitled to sickness benefits in 1994 (N = 1,978,030). Those who were sick-listed for more than 14 consecutive days with a psychiatric diagnosis (n = 28,799) were selected as cases. Results: Of the population under study, 1.46% had at least one psychiatric sickness absence episode. Women had twice the male cumulative incidence of sickness absence for a psychiatric diagnosis. Cumulative incidence was highest among those aged 45–59 years. Men had more sickness absence days. Depression was the most common diagnosis among both women and men. Conclusion: Increased efforts are needed to recognise, treat and rehabilitate individuals with a lowered work capacity due to sickness absence. The increased risk of long sick-leave spells among men needs further attention.


BMC Public Health | 2007

Changes in body mass index by age, gender, and socio-economic status among a cohort of Norwegian men and women (1990–2001)

Deborah L. Reas; Jan F. Nygård; Elisabeth Svensson; Tom Sørensen; Inger Sandanger

BackgroundConsistent with global trends, the prevalence of obesity is increasing among Norwegian adults. This study aimed to investigate individual trends in BMI (kg/m2) by age, gender, and socio-economic status over an 11-year period.MethodsA cohort of 1169 adults (n = 581 men; n = 588 women) self-reported BMI during a general health interview twice administered in two regions in Norway.ResultsAverage BMI increased significantly from 23.7 (SD = 3.4) to 25.4 (SD = 3.8), with equivalent increases for both genders. Proportion of obesity (BMI ≥ 30) increased from 4% to 11% for women and 5% to 13% for men. Of those already classified as overweight or obese in 1990, 68% had gained additional weight 10 years later, by an average increase of 2.6 BMI units. The greatest amount of weight gain occurred for the youngest adults (aged 20–29 years). Age-adjusted general linear models revealed that in 1990, women with a lower level of education had a significantly greater BMI than more educated women. In both 1990 and 2001, rural men with the highest level of household income had a greater BMI than rural men earning less income. Weight gain occurred across all education and income brackets, with no differential associations between SES strata and changes in BMI for either gender or region.ConclusionResults demonstrated significant yet gender-equivalent increases in BMI over an 11-year period within this cohort of Norwegian adults. Whereas socio-economic status exerted minimal influence on changes in BMI over time, young adulthood appeared to be a critical time period at which accelerated weight gain occurred.


Spine | 2007

Emotional distress as a predictor for low back disability: a prospective 12-year population-based study.

Soren Brage; Inger Sandanger; Jan F. Nygård

Study Design. A population-based, prospective cohort. Objective. To study associations between emotional distress and long-term low back disability in a general population. Summary of Background Data. In primary and hospital care studies, emotional, cognitive, and personality factors have been associated with low back disability, while the association between distress and novel back pain episodes has been uncertain. Methods. A randomly drawn cohort of 1152 occupationally active persons aged 20–55 years was interviewed with a comprehensive psychosocial questionnaire in 1990, and was followed for 12 years in national registers over sickness, rehabilitation, and disability benefits. Data on emotional distress, earlier low back pain (LBP), education, life style, psychosocial, and work-related factors were collected at baseline. Results. Long-term benefits due to low back disability were granted to 131 persons (11.4%) in the follow-up period. In multivariate analysis, earlier LBP, emotional distress, low grade of education, and high physical job stress were associated with low back disability. Persons with both emotional distress and earlier back pain were most at risk for disability (hazard ratio 2.91, 95% confidence interval 1.60–5.29). Persons with emotional distress but no earlier episodes of LBP had no increased risk for low back disability (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.34–1.45). Conclusions. Emotional distress is a predictor for low back disability in persons with earlier LBP, but not in persons without. To prevent low back disability, emotional distress should be considered and treated in persons with LBP.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2004

Is women's mental health more susceptible than men's to the influence of surrounding stress?

Inger Sandanger; Jan F. Nygård; Tom Sørensen; Torbjørn Moum

Abstract.Background:Most epidemiological population studies have demonstrated that women suffer more anxiety and depression than men. A higher level of stress, greater vulnerability to stress, and a non-additive effect of private/domestic and occupational obligations on women have been suggested as an explanation.Objective:The objective of this study was to examine if women’s mental health is more susceptible than men’s to the influence of surrounding stress.Material and method:A cross-sectional, random sample of the population resulted in 651 men and 626 women, all of whom were employed, participating in the study. Participants were interviewed using face-to-face standardized questionnaires.Results:Younger women experienced more stressful relationship events, illness events and network events than men of the same age. Relationship events were more important for men as they grew older, and interacted with other stress to increase anxiety and depression symptoms. Stressful illness events were more strongly related to anxiety/depression symptoms in women over 40 than in men of the same age, and interacted with work stress to increase symptom scores.Conclusion:Stress was more strongly related to symptoms in women, suggesting that they may have a greater susceptibility to surrounding stress, and to somatic illness stress. This might contribute to the sex difference in psychiatric illness.


Scandinavian Journal of Public Health | 2000

Relation between health problems and sickness absence: gender and age differences A comparison of low-back pain, psychiatric disorders, and injuries

Inger Sandanger; Jan F. Nygård; Soren Brage; Gunnar Tellnes

Women have higher long-term sickness absence rates than men, and higher rates of most health problems. The rates vary with type of problem and diagnosis. The objectives were to examine whether equal proportions of women and men had sickness absence when they had a given health problem, and if disparities were diagnosis specific. Prevalence of low-back pain, psychiatric disorders, and injuries was assessed in random samples of two populations in Norway. Prevalence of long-term sickness absence for the same diagnostic categories was estimated for the same time period (1990). For injuries, the prevalence ratios between a health problem and a sickness absence were equal for women and men. For psychiatric health problems, there were 1.7 more women than men behind each sickness absence. Low-back pain showed an intermediate gender ratio of 1.3, indicating that also for this condition women tended to have less sickness absence. Musculoskeletal and psychiatric health problems (fluctuating, chronic) may result in more gender-biased, subjective, and random assessment of work ability than injuries (acute health problem).


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2007

Current somatoform disorders in Norway: prevalence, risk factors and comorbidity with anxiety, depression and musculoskeletal disorders

Kari Ann Leiknes; Arnstein Finset; Torbjørn Moum; Inger Sandanger

BackgroundThe future existence of somatoform disorders (SDs) has recently been debated. The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of current SDs (defined as the presence of multisomatoform disorder [MSD] or somatoform disorders not otherwise specified [SDnos], without psychosocial impairment) and severe current SDs (MSD or SDnos with psychosocial impairment) in Norway. Differences in markers of severe current SDs, anxiety/depression and self-reported musculoskeletal disorders were explored. In addition, psychological distress and utilization of healthcare in subclasses (defined according to comorbidity with anxiety, depression and musculoskeletal disorders) of severe current SDs were examined.MethodsWe interviewed 1,247 respondents using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) in the Oslo–Lofoten general population survey in 2000–2001. Six-month prevalence rates (%) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for current SDs were investigated by gender and age. Risk factors of disorders, psychological distress, healthcare utilization and use of medication were explored using logistic regression analyses.ResultsThe overall prevalence rate for severe current SDs was 10.2%. When psychosocial impairment was excluded as a criterion, the rate increased to 24.6%. Anxiety was strongly correlated with severe current SDs. Comorbidity of severe current SDs with anxiety/depression was 45%, and with musculoskeletal disorders, 43%. Analysis of healthcare utilization and use of medication showed that the presence of a comorbid psychiatric condition was more important than the presence of somatoform disorders alone. Conclusion Somatoform symptoms alone (with no psychiatric comorbidity) should not be considered a psychiatric disorder.

Collaboration


Dive into the Inger Sandanger's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Odd Steffen Dalgard

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ole Klungsøyr

Akershus University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge