Ingo Sasgen
Pennsylvania State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ingo Sasgen.
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems | 2009
Michael Bevis; Eric Kendrick; Robert Smalley; Ian W. D. Dalziel; Dana J. Caccamise; Ingo Sasgen; Michiel M. Helsen; Frederick W. Taylor; Hao Zhou; Abel Brown; David Raleigh; Michael J. Willis; T. J. Wilson; Stephanie Konfal
We present preliminary geodetic estimates for vertical bedrock velocity at twelve survey GPS stations in the West Antarctic GPS Network, an additional survey station in the northern Antarctic Peninsula, and eleven continuous GPS stations distributed across the continent. The spatial pattern of these velocities is not consistent with any postglacial rebound (PGR) model known to us. Four leading PGR models appear to be overpredicting uplift rates in the Transantarctic Mountains and West Antarctica and underpredicting them in the peninsula north of 65°. This discrepancy cannot be explained in terms of an elastic response to modern ice loss (except, perhaps, in part of the peninsula). Therefore, our initial geodetic results suggest that most GRACE ice mass rate estimates, which are critically dependent on a PGR correction, are systematically biased and are overpredicting ice loss for the continent as a whole.
Reports on Progress in Physics | 2014
Bert Wouters; J.A. Bonin; Don P. Chambers; Riccardo E. M. Riva; Ingo Sasgen; John Wahr
Continuous observations of temporal variations in the Earths gravity field have recently become available at an unprecedented resolution of a few hundreds of kilometers. The gravity field is a product of the Earths mass distribution, and these data-provided by the satellites of the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE)-can be used to study the exchange of mass both within the Earth and at its surface. Since the launch of the mission in 2002, GRACE data has evolved from being an experimental measurement needing validation from ground truth, to a respected tool for Earth scientists representing a fixed bound on the total change and is now an important tool to help unravel the complex dynamics of the Earth system and climate change. In this review, we present the mission concept and its theoretical background, discuss the data and give an overview of the major advances GRACE has provided in Earth science, with a focus on hydrology, solid Earth sciences, glaciology and oceanography.
Science Advances | 2016
Shfaqat Abbas Khan; Ingo Sasgen; Michael Bevis; Tonie van Dam; Jonathan L. Bamber; John Wahr; Michael J. Willis; Kurt H. Kjær; Bert Wouters; Veit Helm; Bea M. Csatho; Kevin Fleming; Anders A. Bjørk; Andy Aschwanden; Per Knudsen; Peter Kuipers Munneke
Present destabilization of marine-based sectors in Greenland may increase sea level for centuries to come. Accurate quantification of the millennial-scale mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) and its contribution to global sea-level rise remain challenging because of sparse in situ observations in key regions. Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) is the ongoing response of the solid Earth to ice and ocean load changes occurring since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; ~21 thousand years ago) and may be used to constrain the GrIS deglaciation history. We use data from the Greenland Global Positioning System network to directly measure GIA and estimate basin-wide mass changes since the LGM. Unpredicted, large GIA uplift rates of +12 mm/year are found in southeast Greenland. These rates are due to low upper mantle viscosity in the region, from when Greenland passed over the Iceland hot spot about 40 million years ago. This region of concentrated soft rheology has a profound influence on reconstructing the deglaciation history of Greenland. We reevaluate the evolution of the GrIS since LGM and obtain a loss of 1.5-m sea-level equivalent from the northwest and southeast. These same sectors are dominating modern mass loss. We suggest that the present destabilization of these marine-based sectors may increase sea level for centuries to come. Our new deglaciation history and GIA uplift estimates suggest that studies that use the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment satellite mission to infer present-day changes in the GrIS may have erroneously corrected for GIA and underestimated the mass loss by about 20 gigatons/year.
Journal of Geodesy | 2015
Henryk Dobslaw; Inga Bergmann-Wolf; Robert Dill; Ehsan Forootan; Volker Klemann; Jürgen Kusche; Ingo Sasgen
A new synthetic model of the time-variable global gravity field is now available based on realistic mass variability in atmosphere, oceans, terrestrial water storage, continental ice-sheets, and the solid Earth. The updated ESA Earth System Model is provided in Stokes coefficients up to degree and order 180 with a temporal resolution of 6 h covering the time period 1995–2006, and can be readily applied as a source model in future gravity mission simulation studies. The model contains plausible variability and trends in both low-degree coefficients and the global mean eustatic sea level. It depicts reasonable mass variability all over the globe at a wide range of frequencies including multi-year trends, year-to-year variability, and seasonal variability even at very fine spatial scales, which is important for a realistic representation of spatial aliasing and leakage. In particular on these small spatial scales between 50 and 250 km, the model contains a range of signals that have not been reliably observed yet by satellite gravimetry. In addition, the updated Earth System Model provides substantial high-frequency variability at periods down to a few hours only, thereby allowing to critically test strategies for the minimization of temporal aliasing.
Surveys in Geophysics | 2014
Hannes Konrad; Malte Thoma; Ingo Sasgen; Volker Klemann; Klaus Grosfeld; Dirk Barbi; Zdeněk Martinec
We apply a coupled thermomechanical ice sheet—self-gravitating viscoelastic solid Earth model (SGVEM), allowing for the dynamic exchange of ice thickness and bedrock deformation, in order to investigate the effect of viscoelastic deformation on ice dynamics and vice versa. In a synthetic glaciation scenario, we investigate the interaction between the ice sheet and the solid Earth deformation, the glacial-isostatic adjustment (GIA), accounting for an atmospheric forcing depending on the ice sheet surface altitude. We compare the results from the coupled model to runs with the common elastic lithosphere/relaxing asthenosphere (ELRA) model, where the lithosphere is represented by a thin plate and the mantle relaxes with one characteristic relaxation time, as well as to a rigid Earth without any deformation. We find that the deformational behaviour of the SGVEM on ice dynamics (i.e. stored ice volume, ice thickness and velocity field) is comparable to the ELRA for an optimal choice of the parameters in steady state, but exhibits differences in the transient behaviour. Beyond the ice sheet, in the region of peripheral forebulge, the differences in the transient surface deformation between ELRA and SGVEM are substantial, demonstrating the inadequacy of the ELRA model for interpreting constraints on GIA in the periphery of the ice sheet, such as sea-level indicators and GPS uplift rates.
IEEE Access | 2018
Estel Cardellach; Jens Wickert; Rens Baggen; Javier Benito; Adriano Camps; Nuno Catarino; Bertrand Chapron; Andreas Dielacher; Fran Fabra; Greg Flato; Heinrich Fragner; Carolina Gabarró; Christine Gommenginger; Christian Haas; S. B. Healy; M. Hernández-Pajares; Per Høeg; Adrian Jäggi; Juha Kainulainen; Shfaqat Abbas Khan; Norbert M. K. Lemke; Weiqiang Li; Son V. Nghiem; Nazzareno Pierdicca; Marcos Portabella; Kimmo Rautiainen; A. Rius; Ingo Sasgen; Maximilian Semmling; C. K. Shum
The global navigation satellite system (GNSS) Transpolar Earth Reflectometry exploriNg system (G-TERN) was proposed in response to ESA’s Earth Explorer 9 revised call by a team of 33 multi-disciplinary scientists. The primary objective of the mission is to quantify at high spatio-temporal resolution crucial characteristics, processes and interactions between sea ice, and other Earth system components in order to advance the understanding and prediction of climate change and its impacts on the environment and society. The objective is articulated through three key questions. 1) In a rapidly changing Arctic regime and under the resilient Antarctic sea ice trend, how will highly dynamic forcings and couplings between the various components of the ocean, atmosphere, and cryosphere modify or influence the processes governing the characteristics of the sea ice cover (ice production, growth, deformation, and melt)? 2) What are the impacts of extreme events and feedback mechanisms on sea ice evolution? 3) What are the effects of the cryosphere behaviors, either rapidly changing or resiliently stable, on the global oceanic and atmospheric circulation and mid-latitude extreme events? To contribute answering these questions, G-TERN will measure key parameters of the sea ice, the oceans, and the atmosphere with frequent and dense coverage over polar areas, becoming a “dynamic mapper” of the ice conditions, the ice production, and the loss in multiple time and space scales, and surrounding environment. Over polar areas, the G-TERN will measure sea ice surface elevation (<10 cm precision), roughness, and polarimetry aspects at 30-km resolution and 3-days full coverage. G-TERN will implement the interferometric GNSS reflectometry concept, from a single satellite in near-polar orbit with capability for 12 simultaneous observations. Unlike currently orbiting GNSS reflectometry missions, the G-TERN uses the full GNSS available bandwidth to improve its ranging measurements. The lifetime would be 2025–2030 or optimally 2025–2035, covering key stages of the transition toward a nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in summer. This paper describes the mission objectives, it reviews its measurement techniques, summarizes the suggested implementation, and finally, it estimates the expected performance.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013
Henryk Dobslaw; Frank Flechtner; I. Bergmann‐Wolf; Christoph Dahle; R. Dill; S. Esselborn; Ingo Sasgen; Maik Thomas
The Cryosphere | 2013
Ingo Sasgen; Hannes Konrad; Erik R. Ivins; M. R. van den Broeke; Jonathan L. Bamber; Zdeněk Martinec; Volker Klemann
Studia Geophysica Et Geodaetica | 2006
Ingo Sasgen; Zdenek. Martinec; Kevin Fleming
Journal of Geodynamics | 2012
Ingo Sasgen; Volker Klemann; Zdeněk Martinec