Ingrid Adamsons

The European glaucoma prevention study design and baseline description of the participants.

OBJECTIVES The European Glaucoma Prevention Study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of reducing intraocular pressure (IOP), with dorzolamide to prevent or delay patients affected by ocular hypertension from developing primary open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN Randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS Patients (age > or =30 years) were enrolled from 18 European centers. The patients fulfilled a series of inclusion criteria including the measurements of IOP (22-29 mmHg), two normal and reliable visual fields (VFs) (on the basis of mean defect and corrected pattern standard deviation/corrected loss of variance of standard 30/II Humphrey or Octopus perimetry), and normal optic disc as determined by the Optic Disc Reading Center (vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratios; asymmetry between the two eyes < or =0.4). INTERVENTION Patients were randomized to the treatment with dorzolamide or a placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES End points are VF and/or optic disc changes. A VF change during the follow-up must be confirmed by two further positive tests. Optic disc change is defined by the agreement of two out of three independent observers evaluating optic disc stereo-slides. RESULTS One thousand seventy-seven subjects were randomized between January 1, 1997 and May 31, 1999. The mean age was 57.03 +/- 10.3 years; 54.41% were women and 99.9% were Caucasian. Mean IOP was 23.6 +/- 1.6 mmHg in both eyes. Mean visual acuity was 0.97 +/- 0.11 in both eyes; mean refraction was 0.23 +/- 1.76 diopters in the right eye and 0.18 +/- 1.79 diopters in the left eye. Previous use of medication for ocular hypertension was reported by 38.4% of the patients, systemic hypertension by 28.1%, cardiovascular diseases by 12.9%, and diabetes mellitus by 4.7%. The qualifying VFs were normal and reliable according to protocol criteria. CONCLUSIONS The mean IOP of the patients enrolled in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study is consistent with the estimated mean IOP (within the range of 22-29 mmHg) found in a large sample of the European population. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study should be able to better address the clinical question of whether pharmacological reduction of IOP (by means of dorzolamide) in ocular hypertension patients at moderate risk for developing primary open-angle glaucoma effectively lowers the incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma.

The dorzolamide/timolol combination versus timolol plus pilocarpine: Patient preference and impact on daily life.

PURPOSE To compare the 2.0% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (COSOPT; Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, NJ) to 0.5% timolol plus 2.0% pilocarpine given concomitantly, and to determine patient preference, tolerability, and impact on daily life in patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS Two multi-center, randomized, cross-over, observer masked studies were conducted, one in the United States (97 patients) and one in Europe (93 patients). The Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for Tolerability questionnaire was used to assess patient preference and perception of side effects and activity limitations resulting from study medications. Intraocular pressure was measured before and 2 hours after the morning dose of study medication (hour 0 and hour 2). RESULTS In both studies, among patients with a preference, the combination was preterred to timolol plus pilocarpine by a ratio of 4 to 1. The most commonly cited reason for this preference was side effects. Patients in both studies also reported that the combination interfered significantly less with daily life in terms of side effects and activity limitations. They also reported missing significantly fewer doses of study medication while taking the combination and being significantly more satisfied with it. The efficacy of these two treatments was not significantly different, based on IOP measurements at hour 0 and 2 hours after administration. Patients reported significantly more adverse events while receiving timolol plus pilocarpine in both studies, and in the U.S. study, significantly more patients discontinued therapy while receiving timolol plus pilocarpine than while receiving the combination. CONCLUSION Compared with timolol plus pilocarpine, patients preferred the combination of 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol, and reported less interference in daily activities, better tolerability, and better compliance with therapy.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% dorzolamide and 0.5% betaxolol in the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure

Abstract A multicenter, parallel-design, randomized, double-masked study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of 2% dorzolamide with those of 0.5% betaxolol in the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). A total of 311 adults with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma were randomly allocated to receive either 2% dorzolamide administered topically TID or 0.5% betaxolol administered topically BID plus placebo administered topically QD for 12 weeks. After the washout of previous ocular hypotensive drugs, patients with IOP ≥23 mm Hg in at least one eye at 10 am or 4 pm on study day 1 were randomly allocated to receive one of the study treatments. Throughout the study, IOP was measured 2 and 8 hours after instillation of study medication for the morning peak effect (hour 2) and afternoon trough effect (hour 8). After 12 weeks of therapy, the mean change in IOP was not significantly different between the dorzolamide and betaxolol treatment groups at hour 8 (−3.6 mm Hg in both groups) or hour 2 (−5.4 vs −5.3 mm Hg, respectively). The differences between treatments (and 95% CIs associated with these differences) in mean IOP changes from baseline were 0.02 mm Hg (−0.870 to 0.901) for hour 8 and −0.14 mm Hg (−0.959 to 0.685) for hour 2. The ocular adverse experience (AE) most frequently reported by patients was ocular burning and/or stinging, and the most frequently reported nonocular AEs were taste perversion, upper respiratory infection, and headache. Only the incidence of taste perversion was significantly different between treatment groups (14.6% for the dorzolamide group and 0.0% for the betaxolol group). Two percent of patients in each treatment group discontinued the study due to AEs. This study confirmed the similar IOP-lowering effect of 2% dorzolamide and 0.5% betaxolol. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, and their safety profiles were similar.

Dorzolamide Versus Pilocarpine as Adjunctive Therapies to Timolol: A Comparison of Patient Preference and Impact on Daily Life

The purpose of this study was to compare 2% dorzolamide three times daily with 2% pilocarpine four times daily to determine patient preference, tolerability, and impact on daily life in patients concurrently receiving 0.5% timolol twice daily for treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Seventy-five patients were enrolled in this 4-week, randomized, two-period, crossover study. The Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for Tolerability questionnaire was used to assess patient preference and perception of side effects and activity limitations resulting from the study medications. IOP measurements were obtained 2 hours after drops were instilled and visual field tests were performed at baseline and at the end of each crossover period. Significantly more patients receiving pilocarpine than dorzolamide reported adverse experiences and discontinued the drug because of these adverse experiences. Similarly, patients reported more interference with their daily life because of side effects and activity limitations when receiving pilocarpine. Vision difficulties, accommodation difficulties, and brow ache were reported more often and were considered more bothersome by patients receiving pilocarpine. Bitter/unusual taste was reported more frequently and was considered more bothersome by patients receiving dorzolamide. Patients also reported missing fewer doses and were more satisfied with their medication when receiving dorzolamide. All of these changes were considered statistically significant. IOP control was not significantly different with either dorzolamide or pilocarpine. However, patients experienced a significant worsening of the mean defect of automated visual field examinations when receiving pilocarpine. At the end of the study, among patients with a preference, dorzolamide was preferred to pilocarpine by a ratio of more than 9:1. Overall, 81.9% of patients preferred dorzolamide. Thus dorzolamide demonstrated better tolerability and less adverse impact on daily life than pilocarpine.

The efficacy and safety of dorzolamide as adjunctive therapy to timolol maleate gellan solution in patients with elevated intraocular pressure

PURPOSE Two parallel, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled studies were conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of 2% dorzolamide hydrochloride as adjunctive therapy to 0.5% timolol maleate ophthalmic gellan (gel-forming) solution in patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) that was inadequately controlled with 0.5% timolol maleate gellan solution alone. METHODS Both studies began with an open-label 2-week run-in period on 0.5% timolol maleate gellan solution once a day. The only variation in method between the two studies was the dosage of 2% dorzolamide. In one study, 202 patients received 0.5% timolol maleate gellan solution once daily plus either 2% dorzolamide or placebo three times daily. In the other study, 181 patients received 0.5% timolol maleate gellan solution once daily plus either 2% dorzolamide or placebo twice daily. RESULTS After 85 days, additional mean percent reductions in IOP from baseline at morning trough for the groups receiving 2% dorzolamide three times daily and placebo three times daily were 12.5% and 8.4%, respectively. Mean percent reductions for the groups receiving 2% dorzolamide twice daily and placebo twice daily were 13.1% and 6.5%, respectively. Burning and/or stinging on instillation were the only adverse experiences that affected significantly more of the patients receiving 2% dorzolamide twice or three times daily than those receiving placebo. CONCLUSION When administered concomitantly with 0.5% timolol maleate gellan solution, 2% dorzolamide three times daily or twice daily produced a statistically significant reduction in IOP at morning trough and peak and was generally well tolerated.

Two-year Safety Study of Dorzolamide as Monotherapy and with Timolol and Pilocarpine

PurposeTo evaluate the safety of open-label 2.0% dorzolamide as monotherapy and when used with timolol and/or pilocarpine for as long as 2 years. MethodsThe safety of dorzolamide was evaluated in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension over a 2-year period. The incidence of the most common drug-related adverse experiences in the first year was compared with that in the second year using McNemars test. The ocular hypotensive effect of dorzolamide as monotherapy and with adjunctive therapy was assessed using percent change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline. ResultsOf the 304 patients enrolled, 164 (53.9%) continued to receive dorzolamide as monotherapy for 2 years and 140 (46.1%) required add-on therapy. Add-on therapy was initiated by month 6 in 112 of these 140 patients (80%). Of the 304 patients, 202 (66.4%) completed 2 years of therapy. Of the patients who received dorzolamide as monotherapy, drug-related adverse events occurred more frequently during the first year (29.7%) than the second year (13.8%), and the most common ocular drug-related adverse events included conjunctivitis, burning/stinging eye, follicular conjunctivitis, and eyelid edema. After 2 years of therapy, the mean percent decrease in peak IOP was 22.8% for patients receiving dorzolamide monotherapy and 31.2% to 36.0% for patients receiving add-on therapy. ConclusionDorzolamide was generally well tolerated for up to 2 years as mono-therapy and when used with timolol and/or pilocarpine. Drug-related adverse events were less frequent during the second year of monotherapy than during the first year. Most patients who required add-on therapy did so within the first 6 months of initiating dorzolamide therapy.