Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ingrid Callies is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ingrid Callies.


Presse Medicale | 2004

La personne de confiance, nouvel outil de la relation médecin patient

Cécile Manaouil; Grégoire Moutel; Ingrid Callies; Nathalie Duchange; Marie Graser; Olivier Jarde; Christian Hervé

THE NOTION OF A PERSON OF TRUST: Introduced by the law dated March 4th 2002, the person of trust is there to accompany the patient in all his/her measures of care; this person is also conceived as an helper in medical decisions or when the patient participates in biomedical research protocols. DESIGNATION MODALITIES: Any adult, unprotected patient can designate a person of trust, whose intervention is not only limited to hospitalisation (the nursing staff are obliged to propose such a person), but can also intervene during care at home or at the doctors. The designation is made in writing and can be revoked at any time. The person of trust can be a relative, a friend or even the treating physician. A SPECIFIC ROLE: The person of trust can be of help in medical measures in routine medicine when the patients needs to be accompanied, and in the case of diagnosis or serious prognosis, and when the patient is incapable of expressing him/herself.


Éthique & Santé | 2005

La personne de confiance : émergence, évolution et enjeux éthiques

C. Manaouil; Grégoire Moutel; Ingrid Callies; Nathalie Duchange; O. Jardé; Christian Hervé

La loi francaise du 4 mars 2002 a instaure la possibilite pour toute personne majeure de designer une personne de confiance. Celle-ci peut accompagner le patient dans ses demarches de soins et devenir en cas de besoin, un intermediaire privilegie pour representer l’avis du patient et a ce titre, elle peut etre consultee sans toutefois aller jusqu’a se substituer au consentement du patient.


Droit, Déontologie & Soin | 2004

Enjeux éthiques des collections d’échantillons humains dans le cadre de la recherche

Ingrid Callies; Sandrine de Montgolfier; Grégoire Moutel; Christian Hervé

Resume Le projet de loi relatif a la bioethique propose une modification en profondeur de la creation et de l’utilisation des collections d’echantillons biologiques humains a visee de recherche. La definition proposee etendrait l’actuelle definition, limitee au cadre genetique, a toutes les fins scientifiques en general. Par ailleurs, cette question renvoie a celle de l’atteinte au corps humain qui doit etre justifiee afin de permettre le recueil des echantillons qui suit differents regimes. Une fois les prelevements realises, se pose la question de l’utilisation des elements et produits obtenus dans le cadre de la constitution d’une collection. La protection des personnes a l’origine des echantillons doit etre au cœur de ce processus, ce qui a amene le legislateur a proposer l’elargissement des missions des comites consultatifs de protection des personnes dans la recherche biomedicale. Les differentes procedures qui seraient applicables sont parfois complexes et il est possible que les praticiens eprouvent parfois des difficultes a identifier celle applicable au cas de figure les concernant. Nous avons etabli des tableaux leur permettant de s’orienter avec plus de facilite.


Therapie | 2017

French Jardé’s law and European regulation on drug trials: Harmonization and implementation of new rules

Dominique Deplanque; Sophie Sénéchal-Cohen; François Lemaire; Pierre-Henri Bertoye; Serge Bureau; Ingrid Callies; Olivier Chassany; Denis Comet; Claude Dubray; Luc Duchossoy; Aurélie Guérin; Véronique Lamarque-Garnier; Anne Raison; Philippe Rush; Tabassome Simon

Jardés law, concerning research studies in humans, was enacted in March 2012 but did not come into force until November 2016. This delay is largely explained by the adoption of a European regulation on clinical trials on medicinal products that will probably not be applicable until October 2018. In addition to covering the respective areas of the French and European legislation, the round table provided an opportunity to discuss the principal measures that will apply to future research, particularly those concerning the operational procedures of the ethics committees and the national committee for research in humans, as well as measures relating to the management of serious adverse effects, more specifically in phase I studies in subjects not presenting with any disorder. This round table also enabled the formulation of recommendations to better anticipate the practical difficulties that the regulatory changes might engender. Finally, we highlight the numerous challenges in terms of training that these important regulatory changes impose and the absolute necessity to best adapt the restrictions to those that are planned in numerous other European countries so that France remains competitive in terms of clinical research and so that French patients may continue to benefit rapidly from the most innovative treatments.


European Journal of Human Genetics | 2005

Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: standpoints of professionals and patients

Grégoire Moutel; Nathalie Duchange; François Raffi; Lama Sharara; Ioannis Theodorou; Violaine Noël; Sandrine de Montgolfier; Ingrid Callies; F. Bricaire; Christian Hervé; Catherine Leport


Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2004

Decisions concerning potentially life-sustaining treatments in paediatric nephrology: a multicentre study in French-speaking countries

Isabelle Fauriel; Grégoire Moutel; Marie-Laure Moutard; Luc Montuclard; Nathalie Duchange; Ingrid Callies; Irène Francois; Pierre Cochat; Christian Hervé


European Journal of Medical Genetics | 2006

Evaluation of biobank constitution and use: multicentre analysis in France and propositions for formalising the activities of research ethics committees.

Sandrine de Montgolfier; Grégoire Moutel; Nathalie Duchange; Ingrid Callies; Lama Sharara; Catherine Beaumont; Josué Feingold; Christian Hervé


Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology | 2004

Improving protection for research subjects in France: analysis of regional ethics committees.

Isabelle Fauriel; Grégoire Moutel; Nathalie Duchange; Ingrid Callies; Irène Francois; Claude Huriet; Christian Hervé


Presse Medicale | 2003

Communication of the results to those participating in biomedical research. New obligations and interrogations in France

Ingrid Callies; Grégoire Moutel; Nathalie Duchange; Lama Sharara; Christian Hervé


Therapie | 2005

Etude sur 10 ans de 622 avis non favorables rendus par 19 comités consultatifs de protection des personnes se prêtant à la recherche biomédicale (CCPPRB)

Isabelle Fauriel; Grégoire Moutel; Ingrid Callies; Christian Hervé

Collaboration


Dive into the Ingrid Callies's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grégoire Moutel

Paris Descartes University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nathalie Duchange

Paris Descartes University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christian Hervé

French Institute of Health and Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pierre-Henri Bertoye

Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge