Ingrid Harle
Queen's University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ingrid Harle.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2014
Stephen B. Singh; Ingrid Harle
In the palliative care setting, patients often present with pain crises. However, potential cardiac complications of pain crises are rarely seen or discussed. One potential cardiac complication is Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC). If unrecognized or ignored, TC can cause an acute increase in suffering and mortality in this patient population. This case review examines the events preceding a presentation of TC in a patient with a prolonged pain crisis secondary to an underlying cancer diagnosis, who was admitted to the palliative care service of an acute care hospital. The case report serves to educate palliative medicine and oncology colleagues about this particular cardiac complication of pain crises. A review of the literature did not reveal any prior case reports of cancer-related pain crisis (without associated chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or opioid withdrawal) as a precipitating factor for the development of TC.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2013
Maya L. Roth; Kate St. Cyr; Ingrid Harle; Joel Katz
CONTEXT Previous research suggests that patients receiving palliative care may simultaneously experience poorly managed pain and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related symptoms as a result of their deteriorating health. OBJECTIVES To: 1) examine predictors of PTSD-related symptoms in patients requiring palliative care; 2) assess whether anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, and pain anxiety mediate the relationship between pain interference and PTSD-related symptoms; and 3) evaluate the impact of these variables on pain interference and PTSD-related symptoms. METHODS One hundred patients receiving palliative care at one of two palliative care sites in London, ON, Canada, completed the PTSD Checklist-Civilian version (PCL-C), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), and the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20 (PASS-20). Hierarchical multiple regressions were used to examine HADS-Anxiety, HADS-Depression, PCS and PASS-20 scores as predictors of PCL-C scores; and mediation analyses were used to test the effect of HADS-Anxiety, HADS-Depression, PCS, and PASS-20 on the relationship between BPI-SF interference and PCL-C. Mediators that significantly affected this relationship in the individual mediator models were entered into a multiple mediator model. RESULTS Only pain anxiety and pain catastrophizing emerged as significant mediators of the relationship between pain interference and PTSD-related symptoms. After being entered in a multiple mediator model, pain anxiety emerged as the strongest mediator. CONCLUSION The findings of the present study reveal that pain and PTSD-related symptoms are important concerns in palliative care, and that pain must be addressed to best meet the needs of this population.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine | 2018
Jeff Myers; Roxanne Cosby; Danusia Gzik; Ingrid Harle; Deb Harrold; Nadia Incardona; Tara Walton
Background: Advance care planning and goals of care discussions involve the exploration of what is most important to a person, including their values and beliefs in preparation for health-care decision-making. Advance care planning conversations focus on planning for future health care, ensuring that an incapable person’s wishes are known and can guide the person’s substitute decision maker for future decision-making. Goals of care discussions focus on preparing for current decision-making by ensuring the person’s goals guide this process. Aim: To provide evidence regarding tools and/or practices available for use by health-care providers to effectively facilitate advance care planning conversations and/or goals of care discussions. Data sources: A systematic review was conducted focusing on guidelines, randomized trials, comparative studies, and noncomparative studies. Databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the proceedings of the International Advance Care Planning Conference and the American Society of Clinical Oncology Palliative Care Symposium. Conclusions: Although several studies report positive findings, there is a lack of consistent patient outcome evidence to support any one clinical tool for use in advance care planning or goals of care discussions. Effective advance care planning conversations at both the population and the individual level require provider education and communication skill development, standardized and accessible documentation, quality improvement initiatives, and system-wide coordination to impact the population level. There is a need for research focused on goals of care discussions, to clarify the purpose and expected outcomes of these discussions, and to clearly differentiate goals of care from advance care planning.
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine | 2016
Denis E. O’Donnell; J. Alberto Neder; Ingrid Harle; Onofre Moran-Mendoza
ABSTRACT Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is one of the most common forms of interstitial lung disease, with a median survival time of two to five years. Most patients with IPF experience chronic breathlessness, which is closely linked to poor perceived quality of life and significant restriction of daily activities; therefore, effective management of this distressing symptom is a major goal of patient care. Areas covered: This report summarizes the physiology of IPF during rest and exercise, outlines current concepts of the mechanisms of breathlessness, and provides a physiological rationale for optimal management of individual patients. It also examines the evidence for efficacy of a number of therapeutic interventions currently at our disposal for the management of breathlessness in IPF, which aim to reduce respiratory neural drive, reduce worsening of mechanical load, and alter central perception. Expert commentary: The current evidence supporting general measures in relieving chronic breathlessness is weak; hence, more carefully designed prospective studies are required.
Journal of Oncology Practice | 2018
Safiya Karim; Ingrid Harle; Jennifer O’Donnell; Shirley Li; Christopher M. Booth
PURPOSE Guidelines recommend that oncologists discuss goals of care (GOC) with patients who have advanced cancer and that these patients be referred for early palliative care (PC). An audit of practice between 2010 and 2015 at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario suggested that these rates were suboptimal. We sought to improve the rate of documentation of GOC and referral to PC through the implementation of a quality improvement (QI) initiative. METHODS Patients receiving palliative systemic treatment of lung, pancreatic, colorectal, and breast cancer were identified via electronic pharmacy records and the electronic patient care system. Using the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control QI methodology, we drafted a guideline for GOC documentation and PC referral and designed a standardized documentation system. E-mail reminders were sent to physicians and a QI scorecard was displayed to document overall and individual physician rates of GOC documentation. Data were analyzed monthly and presented on statistical process control P charts. RESULTS Between May 2016 and November 2017, a total of 303 unique patients were identified (52%, 21%, 17%, and 10% with lung, breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer, respectively). GOC documentation increased significantly over the study period (baseline, 0%; passive phase, 3%; active phase, 31%); this increase was likely because of our intervention. PC referral rates also increased over the study period (baseline, 36%; passive phase, 35%; active phase 48%). We did not identify any patient, physician, or disease factors that were associated with GOC discussion or referral to PC. CONCLUSION Our QI initiative was successful in improving rates of GOC documentation in patients with advanced cancer.
Current Oncology | 2017
Ingrid Harle; Safiya Karim; W. Raskin; Wilma M. Hopman; Christopher M. Booth
Background Documentation of advance care planning for patients with terminal cancer is known to be poor. Here, we describe a quality improvement initiative. Methods Patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for metastatic lung, pancreatic, colorectal, and breast cancer during 2010-2015 at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario were identified from electronic pharmacy records. Clinical notes were reviewed to identify documentation of care plans in the event of acute deterioration. After establishing baseline practice, we sought to improve documentation of goals of care and referral rates to palliative care. Using quality improvement methodology, we developed a guideline, a standardized documentation system, and a process to facilitate early referral to palliative care. Results During 2010-2015, 456 patients were included in the baseline cohort: 63% with lung cancer, 16% with colorectal cancer, 13% with pancreatic cancer, and 7% with breast cancer. Care goals in the event of an acute illness were documented by medical oncologists in 6% of cases (26 of 456). Of the 456 patients, 47% (n = 214) were seen by palliative care; care goals were documented by palliative care in 48% of the patients seen (103 of 214). With those baseline data in hand, a local practice guideline and process was developed to facilitate the identification of patients for whom advance care planning and early palliative care referral should be considered. A system was also established so that goals-of-care documentation will be supported with a written framework and broadly accessible in the electronic medical record. Conclusions Low rates of documentation of advance care planning and referral to palliative care persist and have stimulated a local quality improvement initiative.
Clinical Oncology | 2016
W. Raskin; Ingrid Harle; Wilma M. Hopman; Christopher M. Booth
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Ingrid Harle; Christine Knott
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Ingrid Harle; Safiya Karim; Christopher M. Booth
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
William Raskin; Ingrid Harle; Wilma M. Hopman; Christopher M. Booth