Ingunn Holen

Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer

IntroductionBreast cancer remains a significant scientific, clinical and societal challenge. This gap analysis has reviewed and critically assessed enduring issues and new challenges emerging from recent research, and proposes strategies for translating solutions into practice.MethodsMore than 100 internationally recognised specialist breast cancer scientists, clinicians and healthcare professionals collaborated to address nine thematic areas: genetics, epigenetics and epidemiology; molecular pathology and cell biology; hormonal influences and endocrine therapy; imaging, detection and screening; current/novel therapies and biomarkers; drug resistance; metastasis, angiogenesis, circulating tumour cells, cancer ‘stem’ cells; risk and prevention; living with and managing breast cancer and its treatment. The groups developed summary papers through an iterative process which, following further appraisal from experts and patients, were melded into this summary account.ResultsThe 10 major gaps identified were: (1) understanding the functions and contextual interactions of genetic and epigenetic changes in normal breast development and during malignant transformation; (2) how to implement sustainable lifestyle changes (diet, exercise and weight) and chemopreventive strategies; (3) the need for tailored screening approaches including clinically actionable tests; (4) enhancing knowledge of molecular drivers behind breast cancer subtypes, progression and metastasis; (5) understanding the molecular mechanisms of tumour heterogeneity, dormancy, de novo or acquired resistance and how to target key nodes in these dynamic processes; (6) developing validated markers for chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity; (7) understanding the optimal duration, sequencing and rational combinations of treatment for improved personalised therapy; (8) validating multimodality imaging biomarkers for minimally invasive diagnosis and monitoring of responses in primary and metastatic disease; (9) developing interventions and support to improve the survivorship experience; (10) a continuing need for clinical material for translational research derived from normal breast, blood, primary, relapsed, metastatic and drug-resistant cancers with expert bioinformatics support to maximise its utility. The proposed infrastructural enablers include enhanced resources to support clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo tumour models; improved access to appropriate, fully annotated clinical samples; extended biomarker discovery, validation and standardisation; and facilitated cross-discipline working.ConclusionsWith resources to conduct further high-quality targeted research focusing on the gaps identified, increased knowledge translating into improved clinical care should be achievable within five years.

Exploring the anti-tumour activity of bisphosphonates in early breast cancer

Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and are firmly established in the management of breast cancer patients with metastatic skeletal disease. There are extensive data that bisphosphonates, particularly nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid, exhibit anti-tumour activity potentially via both indirect and direct mechanisms in vitro. In vivo studies using animal models of breast cancer induced bone disease have shown that bisphosphonates exert anti-tumour effects via inhibiting osteolysis and reducing skeletal tumour burden. Furthermore, pre-clinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-tumour effects between chemotherapy agents commonly used in breast cancer treatment and nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. This, coupled with emerging evidence from pre-clinical in vivo studies suggesting that bisphosphonates may have additional anti-tumour activity outside of the bone microenvironment, could be of significant importance in the clinical management of breast cancer. The evidence in favour of an anti-tumour effect of bisphosphonates in the clinical setting is inconclusive however, with conflicting evidence from several trials. This review focuses on the anti-tumour activity of bisphosphonates in breast cancer, with particular focus on zoledronic acid. The pre-clinical evidence for anti-tumour activity will be reviewed, followed by the synergistic effects with anti-cancer agents. Finally, the clinical relevance and strategies for the evaluation of anti-tumour activity in breast cancer will be discussed. We are currently exploring the potential synergistic anti-tumour effects of the sequential treatment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by zoledronic acid in a randomised phase II study evaluating biological endpoints including apoptosis, proliferation and angiogenesis in patients with breast cancer.

Antitumor Effects of Doxorubicin Followed by Zoledronic Acid in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND The potent antiresorptive drug zoledronic acid (Zol) enhances the antitumor effects of chemotherapy agents in vitro. We investigated the effects of clinically achievable doses of doxorubicin (Dox) and Zol, given alone, in sequence, and in combination, on the growth of established breast tumors in vivo. METHODS Female MF1 nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 5 x 10(5) human breast cancer MDA-MB-436 cells that stably expressed green fluorescent protein (ie, MDA-G8 cells). Beginning on day 7 after tumor cell injection, the mice were injected weekly for 6 weeks with saline, Dox (2 mg/kg body weight via intravenous injection), Zol (100 microg/kg body weight via intraperitoneal injection), Dox plus Zol, Zol followed 24 hours later by Dox, or Dox followed 24 hours later by Zol (n = 8-9 mice per group). The effects of treatment on tumor growth were determined by measuring tumor volume; on tumor cell apoptosis and proliferation by immunohistochemistry using antibodies for caspase-3 and Ki-67, respectively; and on bone by microcomputed tomography and bone histomorphometry. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS Treatment with Dox or Zol alone or Zol followed 24 hours later by Dox did not statistically significantly decrease final tumor volume compared with saline. Mice treated with Dox plus Zol had statistically significantly smaller final tumor volumes than those treated with Dox alone (mean = 122 mm(3) vs 328 mm(3), difference = 206 mm(3), 95% confidence interval [CI] = 78 to 335 mm(3), P < .001), with Zol alone (122 mm(3) vs 447 mm(3), difference = 325 mm(3), 95% CI = 197 to 454 mm(3), P < .001), or with Zol followed 24 hours later by Dox (122 mm(3) vs 418 mm(3), difference = 296 mm(3), 95% CI = 168 to 426 mm(3), P < .001). Treatment with Dox followed 24 hours later by Zol almost completely abolished tumor growth. Tumors from mice that were treated with Dox followed by Zol had more caspase-3-positive cells than tumors from mice treated with saline (mean number of caspase-3-positive cells per square millimeter: 605.0 vs 82.19, difference = 522.8, 95% CI = 488.2 to 557.4, P < .001), with Zol alone (605.0 vs 98.44, difference = 506.6, 95% CI = 472.0 to 541.2, P < .001), or with Zol followed by Dox (605.0 vs 103.1, difference = 501.9, 95% CI = 467.3 to 536.5, P < .001). The treatment-induced increase in the number of caspase-3-positive cells was mirrored by a decrease in the number of tumor cells positive for the proliferation marker Ki-67. No evidence of bone disease was detected in any of the treatment groups following microcomputed tomography and histological analysis of bone. CONCLUSION Sequential treatment with Dox followed by Zol elicited substantial antitumor effects in subcutaneous breast tumors in vivo, in the absence of bone disease.

Tumour macrophages as potential targets of bisphosphonates

Tumour cells communicate with the cells of their microenvironment via a series of molecular and cellular interactions to aid their progression to a malignant state and ultimately their metastatic spread. Of the cells in the microenvironment with a key role in cancer development, tumour associated macrophages (TAMs) are among the most notable. Tumour cells release a range of chemokines, cytokines and growth factors to attract macrophages, and these in turn release numerous factors (e.g. VEGF, MMP-9 and EGF) that are implicated in invasion-promoting processes such as tumour cell growth, flicking of the angiogenic switch and immunosuppression. TAM density has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in breast cancer, suggesting that these cells may represent a potential therapeutic target. However, there are currently no agents that specifically target TAMs available for clinical use.Bisphosphonates (BPs), such as zoledronic acid, are anti-resorptive agents approved for treatment of skeletal complication associated with metastatic breast cancer and prostate cancer. These agents act on osteoclasts, key cells in the bone microenvironment, to inhibit bone resorption. Over the past 30 years this has led to a great reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with advanced cancer and improved the morbidity associated with cancer-induced bone disease. However, there is now a growing body of evidence, both from in vitro and in vivo models, showing that zoledronic acid can also target tumour cells to increase apoptotic cell death and decrease proliferation, migration and invasion, and that this effect is significantly enhanced in combination with chemotherapy agents. Whether macrophages in the peripheral tumour microenvironment are exposed to sufficient levels of bisphosphonate to be affected is currently unknown. Macrophages belong to the same cell lineage as osteoclasts, the major target of BPs, and are highly phagocytic cells shown to be sensitive to bisphosphonates in model studies; In vitro, zoledronic acid causes increased apoptotic cell death; in vivo the drug has been shown to inhibit the production of pro-angiogenic factor MMP-9, as well as most recent evidence showing it can trigger the reversal of the TAMs phenotype from pro-tumoral M2 to tumoricidal M1. There is thus accumulating evidence supporting the hypothesis that effects on TAMs may contribute to the anti-tumour effect of bisphosphonates. This review will focus in detail on the role of tumour associated macrophages in breast cancer progression, the actions of bisphosphonates on macrophages in vitro and in tumour models in vivo and summarise the evidence supporting the potential for the targeting of tumour macrophages with bisphosphonates.

Zoledronic acid repolarizes tumour-associated macrophages and inhibits mammary carcinogenesis by targeting the mevalonate pathway

It is unknown whether zoledronic acid (ZA) at clinically relevant doses is active against tumours not located in bone. Mice transgenic for the activated ErbB‐2 oncogene were treated with a cumulative number of doses equivalent to that recommended in human beings. A significant increase in tumour‐free and overall survival was observed in mice treated with ZA. At clinically compatible concentrations, ZA modulated the mevalonate pathway and affected protein prenylation in both tumour cells and macrophages. A marked reduction in the number of tumour‐associated macrophages was paralleled by a significant decrease in tumour vascularization. The local production of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin‐10 was drastically down‐regulated in favour of interferon‐γ production. Peritoneal macrophages and tumour‐associated macrophages of ZA‐treated mice recovered a full M1 antitumoral phenotype, as shown by nuclear translocation of nuclear factor kB, inducible nitric oxide synthase expression and nitric oxide production. These data indicate that clinically achievable doses of ZA inhibit spontaneous mammary cancerogenesis by targeting the local microenvironment, as shown by a decreased tumour vascularization, a reduced number of tumour‐associated macrophages and their reverted polarization from M2 to M1 phenotype.

Sequence‐ and schedule‐dependent enhancement of zoledronic acid induced apoptosis by doxorubicin in breast and prostate cancer cells

We investigated whether the combination of zoledronic acid and doxorubicin induced apoptosis of breast and prostate cancer cell lines, and if synergistic interaction was present. We investigated whether the levels of cell death altered depending on the sequence in which the drugs were administered and the possible mechanism of action responsible for the increased cell death following combined treatments. Breast and prostate cancer cells were treated with zoledronic acid alone, doxorubicin alone, or drugs in sequence (doxorubicin before, after, or with zoledronic acid), and the levels of apoptotic death were determined by evaluation of nuclear morphology. We found that clinically relevant concentrations of doxorubicin and zoledronic acid induced sequence‐ and schedule‐dependent apoptosis of breast and prostate cancer cells. For maximal apoptosis, cells had to be pretreated for 24 hr with doxorubicin before immediate treatment with zoledronic acid for 1 hr. This observation is a characteristic feature of cell cycle phase‐specific synergistic effect. Replacing zoledronic acid with the nonnitrogen‐containing bisphosphonate clodronate did not induce increased apoptosis. Induction of apoptosis was mainly via inhibition of the mevalonate (MVA) pathway, as addition of the MVA pathway intermediary geranylgeraniol inhibited the induction of apoptosis by doxorubicin followed by zoledronic acid. In conclusion, combined treatment of breast and prostate cancer cell lines with clinically relevant doses of doxorubicin and zoledronic acid induces apoptosis in a synergistic fashion. These findings may have relevance for the clinical setting, particularly breast cancer patients receiving these drugs in the adjuvant setting.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) produced by bone marrow stromal cells protects breast cancer cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis

Advanced breast cancer is often associated with metastatic bone disease, causing a number of serious complications for the patients such as hypercalceamia, pain, nerve compression and fractures. The formation of bone metastases depends on complex interactions between tumour cells and the cells of the bone microenvironment, but the precise molecular mechanisms involved in the development of tumour-induced bone disease have not been identified. We have investigated the ability of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) isolated from breast cancer patients to generate osteoprotegerin (OPG), a molecule involved both in bone turnover and cell survival. The potential survival effects of OPG are mediated through binding to a member of the TNF super family, TNF-related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL), preventing association between TRAIL and its death-inducing receptors present on a number of tumour cell types. In the present report we show that bone marrow stromal cells isolated from breast cancer patients produce OPG when grown in culture. The levels of OPG present in BMSC conditioned medium is sufficient to protect breast cancer cells from undergoing TRAIL induced apoptosis. Our data suggest that bone-derived OPG may increase survival of breast cancer cells that reach the bone microenvironment as part of the metastatic process.

The anti-tumour activity of bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are stable analogues of pyrophosphate (PPi), an endogenous regulator of bone mineralisation. A number of placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated their positive impact on skeletal-related events (SRE) that occur as a consequence of metastatic or myelomatous bone disease. Based upon their chemical structure bisphosphonates can be classified into nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, (N-bisphosphonates) (for example zoledronate and pamidronate) and non-nitrogen containing (for example, clodronate and etidronate), which more closely resemble PPi. Clinical trials investigating bisphosphonates in the preventative setting have shown bisphosphonates to not only delay occurrence of bone metastases in certain cancers, but in one trial, occurrence of non-osseous lesions was delayed, and survival was prolonged. Other trials however have shown the opposite. Likewise, in animal models of cancer and metastases, conflicting results have been obtained. In vitro work has concentrated on bisphosphonates direct action upon tumour cells and has found a variety of anti-tumour effects such as apoptosis induction, inhibition of cell growth, inhibition of invasive behaviour and inhibition of angiogenic factors. Furthermore it would appear that bisphosphonates have the potential to enhance anti-tumour activity of known cytotoxic drugs. Ongoing research aims to assess this further, in addition to determining more precisely the role of adjuvant bisphosphonates in cancers such as breast and prostate cancer.

Pathophysiological roles of osteoprotegerin (OPG)

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a secreted glycoprotein central to bone turnover via its role as a decoy receptor for the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) and has traditionally been linked to a number of bone-related diseases. However, there is additional evidence that OPG can promote cell survival by inhibiting TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis. As a result, a number of in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies have been performed assessing the role of OPG in tumourigenesis. Similar studies have been performed regarding vascular pathologies, resulting from observations of expression and regulation of OPG in the vasculature. This review aims to provide an update on this area and assess the potential protective or detrimental role of OPG in both vascular pathologies and tumourigenesis.

Role of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in cancer.

OPG (osteoprotegerin), a secreted member of the TNF (tumour necrosis factor) receptor superfamily, has a variety of biological functions which include the regulation of bone turnover. OPG is a potent inhibitor of osteoclastic bone resorption and has been investigated as a potential therapeutic for the treatment of both osteoporosis and tumour-induced bone disease. Indeed, in murine models of cancer-induced bone disease, inhibition of osteoclastic activity by OPG was also associated with a reduction in tumour burden. The discovery that OPG can bind to and inhibit the activity of TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) triggered extensive research into the potential role of OPG in the regulation of tumour cell survival. A number of reports from studies using in vitro models have shown that OPG protects tumour cells from the effects of TRAIL, thereby possibly providing tumour cells that produce OPG with a survival advantage. However, the ability of OPG to act as a tumour cell survival factor remains to be verified using appropriate in vivo systems. A third area of interest has been the use of OPG as a prognostic marker in various cancer types, including myeloma, breast and prostate cancer. This review provides an overview of the role of OPG in cancer, both in cancer-induced bone disease and in tumour growth and survival.