Ingvild Mikkola

Regulatory gene expression boundaries demarcate sites of neuronal differentiation in the embryonic zebrafish forebrain

During development of the zebrafish forebrain, a simple scaffold of axon pathways is pioneered by a small number of neurons. We show that boundaries of expression domains of members of the eph, forkhead, pax, and wnt gene families correlate with the positions at which these neurons differentiate and extend axons. Analysis of genetically or experimentally altered forebrains indicates that if a boundary is maintained, there is appropriate neural differentiation with respect to the boundary. Conversely, in the absence of a boundary, there is concomitant disruption of neural patterning. We also show that a strip of cells within the dorsal diencephalon shares features with ventral midline cells. This strip of cells fails to develop in mutant fish in which specification of the ventral CNS is disrupted, suggesting that its development may be regulated by the same inductive pathways that pattern the ventral midline.

Zebrafish contains two Pax6 genes involved in eye development

The Pax6 genes of both vertebrates and invertebrates are expressed in the developing eye and in the central nervous system. These genes encode transcription factors with two DNA-binding domains, an N-terminal paired domain and a homeodomain separated by a flexible linker region. Ectopic eye structures are obtained upon targeted expression of Drosophila, squid, ascidian or mouse Pax6 genes in various imaginal disc primordia of Drosophila. We have previously cloned a Pax6 cDNA from zebrafish. Here we report the cloning of a novel Pax6 homolog from zebrafish denoted Pax6.2. The coding sequences of the two genes show 82% identity whereas the deduced amino acid sequences are 95% identical with complete conservation of the paired- and homeodomains. The embryonic expression patterns of Pax6.1 and Pax6.2 reveal both overlapping and discrete expression domains suggesting a division of labor between these two very similar gene products during development of brain and eye structures. Both Pax6.1 and Pax6.2 can act as transcriptional activators with Pax6.2 being more efficient than Pax6.1. Both Pax6.1 and Pax6.2 are able to induce ectopic eyes in Drosophila, while Pax2 is not, suggesting that eye induction is not a general feature of Pax family genes but a distinct characteristic of Pax6 and its direct homologs. Attempts to detect Pax6. 2 homologs in chick, mice or humans proved unsuccessful suggesting that this gene either was lost during evolution of higher vertebrates or, more likely, arose as part of a larger scale duplication of chromosome segments occurring in the zebrafish lineage.

Phosphorylation of the Transactivation Domain of Pax6 by Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase and p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase

The transcription factor Pax6 is required for normal development of the central nervous system, the eyes, nose, and pancreas. Here we show that the transactivation domain (TAD) of zebrafish Pax6 is phosphorylated in vitro by the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK) and p38 kinase but not by Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). Three of four putative proline-dependent kinase phosphorylation sites are phosphorylated in vitro. Of these sites, the serine 413 (Ser413) is evolutionary conserved from sea urchin to man. Ser413 is also phosphorylatedin vivo upon activation of ERK or p38 kinase. Substitution of Ser413 with alanine strongly decreased the transactivation potential of the Pax6 TAD whereas substitution with glutamate increased the transactivation. Reporter gene assays with wild-type and mutant Pax6 revealed that transactivation by the full-length Pax6 protein from paired domain-binding sites was strongly enhanced (16-fold) following co-transfection with activated p38 kinase. This enhancement was largely dependent on the Ser413 site. ERK activation, however, produced a 3-fold increase in transactivation which was partly independent of the Ser413 site. These findings provide a starting point for further studies aimed at elucidating a post-translational regulation of Pax6 following activation of MAPK signaling pathways.

A novel Bcr-Abl splice isoform is associated with the L248V mutation in CML patients with acquired resistance to imatinib

A novel Bcr-Abl splice isoform is associated with the L248V mutation in CML patients with acquired resistance to imatinib

A co-operative evaluation of different methods of detecting BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia on second-line dasatinib or nilotinib therapy after failure of imatinib

Various techniques have been employed to detect BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are resistant to imatinib. The findings of this study suggest that denaturing high performance liquid chromatography combined with direct sequencing is a reliable screening technique for the detection of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. Background Various techniques have been employed to detect BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are resistant to imatinib. This has led to different reported frequencies of mutations and the finding of a heterogeneous pattern of individual mutations. Design and Methods We compared direct sequencing alone and in combination with denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and two high-sensitivity allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction approaches for analysis of BCR-ABL mutations in 200 blinded cDNA samples prior to and during second-line dasatinib or nilotinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in whom imatinib treatment had failed. Results One hundred and fourteen mutations were detected by both direct sequencing alone or in combination with high performance liquid chromatography and 13 mutations were additionally detected by the combined technique. Eighty of 83 mutations (96%) within a selected panel of 11 key mutations were confirmed by both allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction techniques and 62 mutations were identified in addition to those detected by combined liquid chromatography and direct sequencing, indicating the presence and a high prevalence of low-level mutations in this cohort of patients. Furthermore, 125 mutations were detected by only one allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction technique. Pre-existing mutations were traceable 4.5 months longer and emerging clones were detectable 3.0 months earlier by allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction than by direct sequencing together with liquid chromatography. Conclusions Our results suggest that denaturing high performance liquid chromatography combined with direct sequencing is a reliable screening technique for the detection of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. Allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction further increases the number of detected mutations and indicates a high prevalence of mutations at a low level. The clinical impact of such low-level mutations remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction allows detection of defined mutations at a lower level than does denaturing high performance liquid chromatography combined with direct sequencing and may, therefore, provide clinical benefit by permitting early reconsideration of therapeutic strategies.

The third helix of the homeodomain of paired class homeodomain proteins acts as a recognition helix both for DNA and protein interactions

The transcription factor Pax6 is essential for the development of the eyes and the central nervous system of vertebrates and invertebrates. Pax6 contains two DNA-binding domains; an N-terminal paired domain and a centrally located homeodomain. We have previously shown that the vertebrate paired-less isoform of Pax6 (Pax6ΔPD), and several other homeodomain proteins, interact with the full-length isoform of Pax6 enhancing Pax6-mediated transactivation from paired domain-DNA binding sites. By mutation analyses and molecular modeling we now demonstrate that, surprisingly, the recognition helix for specific DNA binding of the homeodomains of Pax6 and Chx10 interacts with the C-terminal RED subdomain of the paired domain of Pax6. Basic residues in the recognition helix and the N-terminal arm of the homeodomain form an interaction surface that binds to an acidic patch involving residues in helices 1 and 2 of the RED subdomain. We used fluorescence resonance energy transfer assays to demonstrate such interactions between Pax6 molecules in the nuclei of living cells. Interestingly, two mutations in the homeodomain recognition helix, R57A and R58A, reduced protein–protein interactions, but not DNA binding of Pax6ΔPD. These findings suggest a critical role for the recognition helix and N-terminal arm of the paired class homeodomain in protein–protein interactions.

Dynamics of the emergence of dasatinib and nilotinib resistance in imatinib-resistant CML patients.

Dynamics of the emergence of dasatinib and nilotinib resistance in imatinib-resistant CML patients

3T3 Cell Lines Stably Expressing Pax6 or Pax6(5a) – A New Tool Used for Identification of Common and Isoform Specific Target Genes

Pax6 and Pax6(5a) are two isoforms of the evolutionary conserved Pax6 gene often co-expressed in specific stochiometric relationship in the brain and the eye during development. The Pax6(5a) protein differs from Pax6 by having a 14 amino acid insert in the paired domain, causing the two proteins to have different DNA binding specificities. Difference in functions during development is proven by the fact that mutations in the 14 amino acid insertion for Pax6(5a) give a slightly different eye phenotype than the one described for Pax6. Whereas quite many Pax6 target genes have been published during the last years, few Pax6(5a) specific target genes have been reported on. However, target genes identified by Pax6 knockout studies can probably be Pax6(5a) targets as well, since this isoform also will be affected by the knockout. In order to identify new Pax6 target genes, and to try to distinguish between genes regulated by Pax6 and Pax6(5a), we generated FlpIn-3T3 cell lines stably expressing Pax6 or Pax6(5a). RNA was harvested from these cell lines and used in gene expression microarrays where we identified a number of genes differentially regulated by Pax6 and Pax6(5a). A majority of these were associated with the extracellular region. By qPCR we verified that Ncam1, Ngef, Sphk1, Dkk3 and Crtap are Pax6(5a) specific target genes, while Tgfbi, Vegfa, EphB2, Klk8 and Edn1 were confirmed as Pax6 specific target genes. Nbl1, Ngfb and seven genes encoding different glycosyl transferases appeared to be regulated by both. Direct binding to the promoters of Crtap, Ctgf, Edn1, Dkk3, Pdgfb and Ngef was verified by ChIP. Furthermore, a change in morphology of the stably transfected Pax6 and Pax6(5a) cells was observed, and the Pax6 expressing cells were shown to have increased proliferation and migration capacities.

Detection of Drug-Resistant Clones in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients during Dasatinib and Nilotinib Treatment

BACKGROUND Imatinib effectively inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity conferred by the BCR-ABL gene [fusion gene of BCR (breakpoint cluster region) and ABL1 (c-abl oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase)] and thereby appreciably improves outcomes for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). A small percentage of patients relapse because of the proliferation of escape clones; such relapses can be treated with second-generation drugs. Early detection and monitoring of resistant clones may provide clinical benefit. We describe the development and testing of a new approach for quantitative monitoring of CML resistance. METHODS We designed mutation-specific assays that use hydrolysis probes and an array of allele-specific primers containing nucleotides mismatched at various positions. All assays were tested with plasmids containing corresponding mutant or wild-type sequences, allowing identification of optimal assays for specific and effective amplification of the target template. Clinical samples were then used to compare the results of selected assays with those of standard genotyping. RESULTS We used a modified amplification refractory mutational system approach and testing with plasmid constructs to design assays that allowed highly selective detection of resistance for all target mutations. By taking advantage of single-step performance and high PCR efficiency, we were able to quantitatively track the absolute amount of resistance conferred by a specific mutation over 4 orders of magnitude. Moreover, we designed an integrated test for dasatinib resistance that uses multiple primers simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS These single-step, closed-tube assays specifically target mutations associated with resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib. Compared with standard genotyping, such biased genotyping improves the detection of resistance or alternative features via quantitative analysis of the absolute amount of resistance.

Pax6 Regulates the Expression of Dkk3 in Murine and Human Cell Lines, and Altered Responses to Wnt Signaling Are Shown in FlpIn-3T3 Cells Stably Expressing Either the Pax6 or the Pax6(5a) Isoform

Pax6 is a transcription factor important for early embryo development. It is expressed in several cancer cell lines and tumors. In glioblastoma, PAX6 has been shown to function as a tumor suppressor. Dickkopf 3 (Dkk3) is well established as a tumor suppressor in several tumor types, but not much is known about the regulation of its expression. We have previously found that Pax6 and Pax6(5a) increase the expression of the Dkk3 gene in two stably transfected mouse fibroblast cell lines. In this study the molecular mechanism behind this regulation is looked at. Western blot and reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) confirmed higher level of Dkk3 expression in both Pax6 and Pax6(5a) expressing cell lines compared to the control cell line. By the use of bioinformatics and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) we have mapped a functional Pax6 binding site in the mouse Dkk3 promoter. The minimal Dkk3 promoter fragment required for transcriptional activation by Pax6 and Pax6(5a) was a 200 bp region just upstream of the transcriptional start site. Mutation of the evolutionary conserved binding site in this region abrogated transcriptional activation and binding of Pax6/Pax6(5a) to the mouse Dkk3 promoter. Since the identified Pax6 binding site in this promoter is conserved, RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to look for regulation of Dkk3/REIC expression in human cell lines. Six of eight cell lines tested showed changes in Dkk3/REIC expression after PAX6 siRNA knockdown. Interestingly, we observed that the Pax6/Pax6(5a) expressing mouse fibroblast cell lines were less responsive to canonical Wnt pathway stimulation than the control cell line when TOP/FOP activity and the levels of active β-catenin and GSK3-β Ser9 phosphorylation were measured after LiCl stimulation.