Inko Nimmrich
Epigenomics AG
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Inko Nimmrich.
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry | 2003
Huidong Shi; Sabine Maier; Inko Nimmrich; Pearlly S. Yan; Charles W. Caldwell; Alexander Olek; Tim Hui Ming Huang
Gene silencing via promoter CpG island hypermethylation offers tumor cells growth advantages. This epigenetic event is pharmacologically reversible, and uncovering a unique set of methylation‐silenced genes in tumor cells can bring a new avenue to cancer treatment. However, high‐throughput tools capable of surveying the methylation status of multiple gene promoters are needed for this discovery process. Herein we describe an oligonucleotide‐based microarray technique that is both versatile and sensitive in revealing hypermethylation in defined regions of the genome. DNA samples are bisulfite‐treated and PCR‐amplified to distinguish CpG dinucleotides that are methylated from those that are not. Fluorescently labeled PCR products are hybridized to arrayed oligonucleotides that can discriminate between methylated and unmethylated alleles in regions of interest. Using this technique, two clinical subtypes of non‐Hodgkins lymphomas, mantle cell lymphoma, and grades I/II follicular lymphoma, were further separated based on the differential methylation profiles of several gene promoters. Work is underway in our laboratory to extend the interrogation power of this microarray system in multiple candidate genes. This novel tool, therefore, holds promise to monitor the outcome of various epigenetic therapies on cancer patients.
Cancer Research | 2005
John W.M. Martens; Inko Nimmrich; Thomas Koenig; Maxime P. Look; Nadia Harbeck; Fabian Model; Antje Kluth; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Henk Portengen; Marion E. Meijer-van Gelder; Christian Piepenbrock; Alexander Olek; Heinz Höfler; Marion Kiechle; J.G.M. Klijn; Manfred Schmitt; Sabine Maier; John A. Foekens
To understand the biological basis of resistance to endocrine therapy is of utmost importance in patients with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Not only will this allow us prediction of therapy success, it may also lead to novel therapies for patients resistant to current endocrine therapy. DNA methylation in the promoter regions of genes is a prominent epigenetic gene silencing mechanism that contributes to breast cancer biology. In the current study, we investigated whether promoter DNA methylation could be associated with resistance to endocrine therapy in patients with recurrent breast cancer. Using a microarray-based technology, the promoter DNA methylation status of 117 candidate genes was studied in a cohort of 200 steroid hormone receptor-positive tumors of patients who received the antiestrogen tamoxifen as first-line treatment for recurrent breast cancer. Of the genes analyzed, the promoter DNA methylation status of 10 genes was significantly associated with clinical outcome of tamoxifen therapy. The association of the promoter hypermethylation of the strongest marker, phosphoserine aminotransferase (PSAT1) with favorable clinical outcome was confirmed by an independent quantitative DNA methylation detection method. Furthermore, the extent of DNA methylation of PSAT1 was inversely associated with its expression at the mRNA level. Finally, also at the mRNA level, PSAT1 was a predictor of tamoxifen therapy response. Concluding, our work indicates that promoter hypermethylation and mRNA expression of PSAT1 are indicators of response to tamoxifen-based endocrine therapy in steroid hormone receptor-positive patients with recurrent breast cancer.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008
Nadia Harbeck; Inko Nimmrich; Arndt Hartmann; Jeffrey S. Ross; Tanja Cufer; Robert Grützmann; Glen Kristiansen; Angelo Paradiso; Oliver Hartmann; Astrid Margossian; John W.M. Martens; Ina Schwope; Antje Lukas; Volkmar Müller; Karin Milde-Langosch; Jörg Nährig; John A. Foekens; Sabine Maier; Manfred Schmitt; Ralf Lesche
PURPOSE We recently reported DNA methylation of the paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene to be strongly correlated with increased risk of recurrence in node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients using fresh frozen specimens. Aims of the present study were to establish determination of PITX2 methylation for routine analysis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer tissue and to test PITX2 DNA methylation as a biomarker for outcome prediction in an independent patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology was validated for FFPE tissue by comparing methylation measurements in FFPE specimens with those in fresh frozen specimens from the same tumor. The impact of PITX2 methylation on time to distant metastasis was then evaluated in FFPE specimens from hormone receptor-positive, node-negative breast cancer patients (n = 399, adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy). RESULTS Reproducibility of the PCR assay in replicate measurements (r(s) > or = 0.95; n = 150) and concordant measurements between fresh frozen and FFPE tissues (r(s) = 0.81; n = 89) were demonstrated. In a multivariate model, PITX2 methylation added significant information (hazard ratio = 2.35; 95% CI, 1.20 to 4.60) to established prognostic factors (tumor size, grade, and age). CONCLUSION PITX2 methylation can be reliably assessed by real-time PCR technology in FFPE tissue. Together with our earlier studies, we have accumulated substantial evidence that PITX2 methylation analysis holds promise as a practical assay for routine clinical use to predict outcome in node-negative, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer, which might allow, based on future validation studies, the identification of low-risk patients who may be treated by tamoxifen alone.
Annals of Hematology | 2005
Christian W. Scholz; Inko Nimmrich; Matthias Burger; Evelyne Becker; Bernd Dörken; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Sabine Maier
Patterns of DNA methylation are substantially altered in malignancies compared to normal tissue, with both genome-wide hypomethylation and regional increase of cytosine methylation at dinucleotides of cytosine and guanine, i.e., CpG dinucleotides. While genome-wide hypomethylation renders chromosomes instable, hypermethylation of CpGs in promoter regions is generally associated with transcriptional silencing, e.g., of tumor suppressor genes. To investigate whether disease-specific methylation profiles exist for different entities of acute leukemia, a microarray-based DNA methylation analysis simultaneously assessing 249 CpG dinucleotides originating from 57 genes was employed. Hereby, samples from precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) could be distinguished from cases of acute myeloid leukemia by virtue of N33, EGR4, CDC2, CCND2, or MOS hypermethylation in ALL.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2005
Juyuan Guo; Matthias Burger; Inko Nimmrich; Sabine Maier; Evelyne Becker; Buelent Genc; Dieter Duff; Farahnaz Rahmatpanah; Rebecca Chitma-Matsiga; Huidong Shi; Kurt Berlin; Tim H M Huang; Charles W. Caldwell
Improved care of patients with small B-cell lymphomas (SBCLs) is likely to result from the ongoing discovery of molecular markers that better define these malignant neoplasms. We identified multiple gene loci whose DNA methylation patterns differed between 3 types of SBCL: B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and grades I and II follicular lymphoma. This analysis was performed using an oligonucleotide microarray that allowed determination of the DNA methylation status of 156 loci in 38 genes. Combined bisulfite restriction analysis and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction were used to validate the differential methylation of 6 of these genes. By using non-Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines as models, these genes were examined further for methylation and gene expression relationships. This study illustrates nonrandom epigenetic alterations in SBCLs that seem to preferentially involve lymphomas of germinal center derivation.
Personalized Medicine | 2005
Sabine Maier; Ralf Lesche; Inko Nimmrich; Florian Eckhardt; Christina Dahlstroem; Achim Plum
Over the last few decades, a wealth of treatment options have become available for breast cancer. To specifically direct those therapies to patients with the highest need who will receive the greatest benefit, biomarkers are urgently needed. Two specific needs seem to be most pressing: first is the need for prognostic markers, which would determine which group of patients may recover without adjuvant chemotherapy. Second, predictive markers for specific treatments, such as different endocrine treatments, chemotherapies or targeted drugs, are expected to play a major role in the near future. Ideally, such markers should be strong single markers, or low-complexity marker panels containing only a few markers, to allow for easier assay development and improved reproducibility. The possibility to measure the marker(s) in formalin-fixed specimens would greatly facilitate integration into routine clinical practice. A common and early event in breast cancer is aberrant DNA methylation within gene regulatory regions, affecting a variety of genes with different functions. Data from recently published studies indicate that altered DNA methylation carries prognostic as well as predictive information in breast cancer. Together with the technical advantages of a DNA-based marker, DNA methylation may well constitute the ideal biomarker to further individualize breast cancer treatment. Here the recent literature is reviewed and the most interesting markers, which have the potential to significantly change breast cancer treatment and, therefore, warrant further systematic clinical validation, are highlighted.
European Journal of Cancer | 2007
Sabine Maier; Inko Nimmrich; Thomas Koenig; Serenella Eppenberger-Castori; Inga Bohlmann; Angelo Paradiso; Frédérique Spyratos; Christoph Thomssen; Volkmar Mueller; Jörg Nährig; Francesco Schittulli; Ronald E. Kates; Ralf Lesche; Ina Schwope; Antje Kluth; Almuth Marx; John W.M. Martens; John A. Foekens; Manfred Schmitt; Nadia Harbeck
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2008
Inko Nimmrich; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Marion E. Meijer-van Gelder; Ina Schwope; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Nadia Harbeck; Thomas Koenig; Oliver Hartmann; Antje Kluth; Dimo Dietrich; Viktor Magdolen; Henk Portengen; Maxime P. Look; J.G.M. Klijn; Ralf Lesche; Manfred Schmitt; Sabine Maier; John A. Foekens; John W.M. Martens
International Journal of Oncology | 2005
John K. Field; Triantafillos Liloglou; S. Warrak; Matthias Burger; E. Becker; K. Berlin; Inko Nimmrich; Sabine Maier
Clinical Cancer Research | 2003
Hongyu Yang; Chuan-Mu Chen; Pearlly S. Yan; Tim Hui Ming Huang; Huidong Shi; Mattias Burger; Inko Nimmrich; Sabine Maier; Kurt Berlin; Charles W. Caldwell