Ioanna Tsiligianni
University of Crete
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ioanna Tsiligianni.
Primary Care Respiratory Journal | 2011
Ioanna Tsiligianni; Janwillem Kocks; Nikolaos Tzanakis; Nikolaos M. Siafakas; Thys van der Molen
BACKGROUND A major goal in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is to ensure that the burden of the disease for patients with COPD is limited and that patients will have the best possible quality of life. AIMS To explore all the possible factors that could influence disease-specific quality of life and health status in patients with COPD. METHODS A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis were performed to explore the factors that could have a positive or negative effect on quality of life and/or health status in patients with COPD. RESULTS Quality of life and health status are determined by certain factors included gender, disease severity indices, lung function parameters, body mass index, smoking, symptoms, co-morbidity, depression, anxiety, and exacerbations. Factors such as dyspnoea, depression, anxiety and exercise tolerance were found to be more correlated with health status than the widely used spirometric values. Forced expiratory volume in one second had a weak to modest Pearson weighted correlation coefficient which ranged from -0.110 to -0.510 depending on the questionnaire used. CONCLUSIONS The broad range of determining factors suggests that, in order to reach the management goals, health status should be measured in addition to lung function in patients with COPD.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine | 2012
Ioanna Tsiligianni; Thys van der Molen; Despoina Moraitaki; Ilaine Lopez; Janwillem Kocks; Konstantinos Karagiannis; Nikolaos M. Siafakas; Nikolaos Tzanakis
BackgroundHealth status provides valuable information, complementary to spirometry and improvement of health status has become an important treatment goal in COPD management. We compared the usefulness and validity of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), two simple questionnaires, in comparison with the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).MethodsWe administered the CAT, CCQ and SGRQ in patients with COPD stage I-IV during three visits. Spirometry, 6 MWT, MRC scale, BODE index, and patients perspectives on questionnaires were recorded in all visits. Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was used to calculate the Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID) of all questionnaires.ResultsWe enrolled 90 COPD patients. Cronbachs alpha for both CAT and CCQ was high (0.86 and 0.89, respectively). Patients with severe COPD reported worse health status compared to milder subgroups. CAT and CCQ correlated significantly (rho =0.64, p < 0.01) and both with the SGRQ (rho = 0.65; CAT and rho = 0.77; CCQ, p < 0.01). Both questionnaires exhibited a weak correlation with lung function (rho = −0.35;CAT and rho = −0.41; CCQ, p < 0.01). Their reproducibility was high; CAT: ICC = 0.94 (CI 0.92-0.96), total CCQ ICC = 0.95 (0.92-0.96) and SGRQ = 0.97 (CI 0.95-0.98). The MCID calculated using the SEM method showed results similar to previous studies of 3.76 for the CAT, 0.41 for the CCQ and 4.84 for SGRQ. Patients suggested both CAT and CCQ as easier tools than SGRQ in terms of complexity and time considerations. More than half of patients preferred CCQ instead of CAT.ConclusionsThe CAT and CCQ have similar psychometric properties with a slight advantage for CCQ based mainly on patients’ preference and are both valid and reliable questionnaires to assess health status in COPD patients.
The Lancet Global Health | 2015
Frederik van Gemert; Bruce Kirenga; Niels H. Chavannes; Moses R. Kamya; Simon Luzige; Patrick Musinguzi; John Turyagaruka; R. Jones; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Sian Williams; Corina de Jong; Thys van der Molen
BACKGROUND In sub-Saharan Africa, little is known about the damage to respiratory health caused by biomass smoke and tobacco smoke. We assessed the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and related risk factors in a rural region of Uganda. METHODS We did this prospective observational cross-sectional study in rural Masindi, Uganda. We randomly selected people above the age of 30 years from 30 villages. Trained local health-care workers asked validated questionnaires and administered spirometry to participants. We defined COPD as FEV1:FVC less than the lower limit of normal. We calculated prevalence of COPD and tested its association with risk factors. FINDINGS Between April 13, and Aug 14, 2012, we invited 620 people to participate, of whom 588 provided acceptable spirometry and were analysed. Mean age was 45 years (SD 13·7); 297 (51%) were women. 546 (93%) were exposed to biomass smoke. The prevalence of COPD was 16·2% (15·4% in men, 16·8% in women). Prevalence was highest in people aged 30-39 years (17 [38%] of 45 men, 20 [40%] of 50 women). 20 (44%) of 45 men with COPD were current smokers (mean age 40 years, SD 7·5), 11 (24%) were former smokers (mean age 49 years, SD 11·0); four [8%] of 50 women were current smokers (mean age 52 years, SD 18·1), nine (18%) were former smokers (mean age 64 years, SD 16·2). Mean Clinical COPD Questionnaire score was 0·81 (SD 0·78), mean Medical Research Council dyspnoea score was 1·33 (SD 0·65); 28 (30%) of 95 patients had had one or more exacerbations past 12 months. COPD was associated with wheeze (odds ratio 2·17, 95% CI 1·09-4·34; p=0·028) and being a former smoker (1·96, 1·07-3·59; p=0·029). INTERPRETATION In this rural district of Uganda, COPD starts early in life. Major risk factors were biomass smoke for both sexes and tobacco smoke for men. In addition to high smoking prevalence in men, biomass smoke could be a major health threat to men and women in rural areas of Uganda. FUNDING International Primary Care Respiratory Group.
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | 2015
Georgios Hillas; Fotis Perlikos; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Nikolaos Tzanakis
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Age and smoking are common risk factors for COPD and other illnesses, often leading COPD patients to demonstrate multiple coexisting comorbidities. COPD exacerbations and comorbidities contribute to the overall severity in individual patients. Clinical trials investigating the treatment of COPD routinely exclude patients with multiple comorbidities or advanced age. Clinical practice guidelines for a specific disease do not usually address comorbidities in their recommendations. However, the management and the medical intervention in COPD patients with comorbidities need a holistic approach that is not clearly established worldwide. This holistic approach should include the specific burden of each comorbidity in the COPD severity classification scale. Further, the pharmacological and nonpharmacological management should also include optimal interventions and risk factor modifications simultaneously for all diseases. All health care specialists in COPD management need to work together with professionals specialized in the management of the other major chronic diseases in order to provide a multidisciplinary approach to COPD patients with multiple diseases. In this review, we focus on the major comorbidities that affect COPD patients. We present an overview of the problems faced, the reasons and risk factors for the most commonly encountered comorbidities, and the burden on health care costs. We also provide a rationale for approaching the therapeutic options of the COPD patient afflicted by comorbidity.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Annemarije Kruis; Björn Ställberg; R. Jones; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Karin Lisspers; Thys van der Molen; Janwillem Kocks; Niels H. Chavannes
Background Guideline recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on the results of large pharmaceutically-sponsored COPD studies (LPCS). There is a paucity of data on disease characteristics at the primary care level, while the majority of COPD patients are treated in primary care. Objective We aimed to evaluate the external validity of six LPCS (ISOLDE, TRISTAN, TORCH, UPLIFT, ECLIPSE, POET-COPD) on which current guidelines are based, in relation to primary care COPD patients, in order to inform future clinical practice guidelines and trials. Methods Baseline data of seven primary care databases (n = 3508) from Europe were compared to baseline data of the LPCS. In addition, we examined the proportion of primary care patients eligible to participate in the LPCS, based on inclusion criteria. Results Overall, patients included in the LPCS were younger (mean difference (MD)-2.4; p = 0.03), predominantly male (MD 12.4; p = 0.1) with worse lung function (FEV1% MD -16.4; p<0.01) and worse quality of life scores (SGRQ MD 15.8; p = 0.01). There were large differences in GOLD stage distribution compared to primary care patients. Mean exacerbation rates were higher in LPCS, with an overrepresentation of patients with ≥1 and ≥2 exacerbations, although results were not statistically significant. Our findings add to the literature, as we revealed hitherto unknown GOLD I exacerbation characteristics, showing 34% of mild patients had ≥1 exacerbations per year and 12% had ≥2 exacerbations per year. The proportion of primary care patients eligible for inclusion in LPCS ranged from 17% (TRISTAN) to 42% (ECLIPSE, UPLIFT). Conclusion Primary care COPD patients stand out from patients enrolled in LPCS in terms of gender, lung function, quality of life and exacerbations. More research is needed to determine the effect of pharmacological treatment in mild to moderate patients. We encourage future guideline makers to involve primary care populations in their recommendations.
Primary Care Respiratory Journal | 2010
Hilary Pinnock; Mike Thomas; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Karin Lisspers; Anders Østrem; Björn Ställberg; Osman Yusuf; Dermot Ryan; Johan Buffels; Jochen Cals; Niels H. Chavannes; Svein Hoegh Henrichsen; Arnulf Langhammer; Elena Latysheva; Christos Lionis; John Litt; Thys van der Molen; Nicholas Zwar; Sian Williams
AIM Respiratory diseases are a public health issue throughout the world, with high prevalence and morbidity. This Research Needs Statement from the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) aims to highlight unanswered questions on the management of respiratory diseases that are of importance to practising primary care clinicians. METHODS An informal but inclusive consultation process was instigated in 2009. Draft statements in asthma, rhinitis, COPD, tobacco dependence, and respiratory infections were circulated widely to IPCRG members, other recognised experts, and representatives from a range of economic and healthcare backgrounds. An iterative process was used to generate, prioritise and refine research questions in each section. RESULTS Two overarching themes emerged. Firstly, there is a real need for research to be undertaken within primary care, which recruits patients representative of primary care populations, evaluates interventions realistically delivered within primary care, and draws conclusions that will be meaningful to professionals working within primary care. Secondly, international and national guidelines exist, but there is little evidence on the best strategies for implementing recommendations. Disease-specific research questions focus on effective and cost-effective ways to prevent disease, confirm the diagnosis, assess control, manage treatment, and empower selfmanagement. Practical questions about how to deliver this comprehensive agenda in diverse primary care settings are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS We hope that this Research Needs Statement will be used by clinicians and patients campaigning for answers to relevant questions, by researchers seeking funding to provide answers to these questions, and by funding bodies to enable them to prioritise research agendas.
Respiration | 2006
Maria Tsoumakidou; Georgios Chrysofakis; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Georgios Maltezakis; Nikolaos M. Siafakas; Nikolaos Tzanakis
Background:The clinical presentation of hemoptysis often raises a number of diagnostic possibilities. Objectives:This study was designed to evaluate the relative frequency of different causes of hemoptysis and the value of chest radiography, computed tomography (CT) scanning and fiber-optic bronchoscopy in the evaluation of a Greek cohort population. Methods:We prospectively followed a total of 184 consecutive patients (137 males/47 females, 145 smokers/39 nonsmokers) admitted with hemoptysis between January 2001 and December 2003 to the University Hospital of Heraklion. Follow-up data were collected on August 2005. Results:The main causes of hemoptysis were bronchiectasis (26%), chronic bronchitis (23%), acute bronchitis (15%) and lung cancer (13%). Bronchiectasis was significantly more frequent in nonsmokers (p < 0.02). Among nonsmokers, patients with moderate/severe bleeding or a history of tuberculosis were more likely to have bronchiectasis (OR 8.25; 95% CI 1.9–35.9, p = 0.007 and OR 16.5; 95% CI 1.7–159.1, p = 0.007, respectively). Nonsmokers with normal or abnormal X-rays were equally likely to have bronchiectasis (OR 2.5; 95% CI 0.66–9.39, p = 0.2). Lung cancer was only found in smokers. Smokers with normal X-rays were less likely to have lung cancer compared to smokers with abnormal X-ray (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.54–19.34, p = 0.004). There were no smokers with normal CT and lung cancer. Follow-up data were collected in 91% of patients. Lung cancer did not develop in any patient assumed to have hemoptysis of another origin than lung cancer on initial evaluation. Conclusions:Bronchiectasis is the main diagnosis in patients admitted with hemoptysis to a Greek University Hospital and it is more frequent among nonsmokers with moderate/severe bleeding and/or previous tuberculosis infection. Nonsmokers with moderate/severe hemoptysis and/or a history of tuberculosis should be evaluated with high-resolution CT. Smokers with hemoptysis are at increased risk for lung cancer and need to be extensively evaluated with chest CT and bronchoscopy.
Respiratory Research | 2010
Ioanna Tsiligianni; Thys van der Molen
BackgroundPulmonary inflammation, oxidants-antioxidants imbalance, as well as innate and adaptive immunity have been proposed as playing a key role in the development of COPD. The role of vitamins, as assessed either by food frequency questionnaires or measured in serum levels, have been reported to improve pulmonary function, reduce exacerbations and improve symptoms. Vitamin supplements have therefore been proposed to be a potentially useful additive to COPD therapy.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed on the association of vitamins and COPD. The role of vitamin supplements in COPD was then evaluated.ConclusionsThe results of this review showed that various vitamins (vitamin C, D, E, A, beta and alpha carotene) are associated with improvement in features of COPD such as symptoms, exacerbations and pulmonary function. High vitamin intake would probably reduce the annual decline of FEV1. There were no studies that showed benefit from vitamin supplementation in improved symptoms, decreased hospitalization or pulmonary function.
BMC Pulmonary Medicine | 2005
Ioanna Tsiligianni; Katerina M. Antoniou; Despina Kyriakou; Nikolaos Tzanakis; George Chrysofakis; Nikolaos M. Siafakas; Demosthenes Bouros
BackgroundSarcoidosis is thought to be a T-helper type 1 cytokine (Th2 cytokine) mediated disorder. Induced sputum (IS) has been proposed as a useful non-invasive method, mainly for the assessment of the airway diseases. The aim of this study was to explore induced sputum (IS) CD4+Th1 T-lymphocyte subpopulation and to compare them with those of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in patients with sarcoidosis.MethodsWe studied prospectively 21 patients (12 female, 9 male) of median age 46 yr (range, 25–65) with sarcoidosis and 10 normal subjects (5 female, 5 male) of median age 39 yr (range, 26–60). IS was performed with hypertonic saline solution using an ultrasonic nebulizer. BALF was performed within 10 days of IS. After stimulation of sputum lymphocytes with phorbol-myristate-acetate, we used double immunocytochemical methods to identify CD4+ IFN-γ positive and IL-4 positive cells (Th1 and Th2, respectively).ResultsSarcoidosis patients had an increased number of CD4+ -IFN-γ producing cells in IS (p = 0.003) and BALF (p = 0.01) in comparison with normal subjects. No significant differences were detected between CD4+ -IL-4 cells in BALF (p = 0.053, NS) and IS (p = 0.46, NS) between sarcoidosis patients and healthy controls. The ratio of Th1 to Th2 cells in BALF and IS was statistically different in sarcoidosis when compared with normal subjects (p = 0.007 in BALF and IS). A significant correlation was found between CD4+ IFN-γ positive cells in IS and those in BALF in sarcoidosis patients (r = 0.685, p = 0.0006).ConclusionThese data suggests that a Th1-like cytokine pattern can be observed in CD4+ T-lymphocytes in IS in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Further studies are needed to explore the value of IS vs BALF in the follow-up of these patients.
Primary Care Respiratory Journal | 2013
Pedro Azevedo; Jaime Correia-de-Sousa; Jean Bousquet; António Bugalho-Almeida; Stefano Del Giacco; P. Demoly; Tari Haahtela; Tiago Jacinto; Vanessa Garcia-Larsen; Thys van der Molen; Mário Morais-Almeida; Luís Nogueira-Silva; Ana Margarida Pereira; Miguel Román-Rodrígues; Bárbara G Silva; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Hakan Yaman; Barbara P. Yawn; João Fonseca
Asthma frequently occurs in association with allergic rhinitis and a combined management approach has been suggested. The Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) is the first questionnaire to assess control of both diseases concurrently. However, to have an impact on healthcare it needs to be disseminated and adopted. In this paper we discuss the dissemination of CARAT in different countries and its possible applications in primary care. At present, the adaptation of CARAT for use in different languages and cultures is being led by volunteer researchers and clinicians in 15 countries. Website and smartphone applications have been developed, and a free open model of distribution was adopted to contribute to the dissemination of CARAT. Examples of dissemination activities include distribution of leaflets and posters, educational sessions on the use of the questionnaire in the follow-up of patients, development of clinical studies, collaborations with professional organisations and health authorities, and the inclusion of CARAT in clinical guidelines. The adoption of innovations is an important challenge in healthcare today, and research on the degree of success of dissemination strategies using suitable methods and metrics is much needed. We propose that CARAT can be used in a range of settings and circumstances in primary care for clinical, research and audit purposes, within the overall aim of increasing awareness of the level of disease control and strengthening the partnership between patients and doctors in the management of asthma and rhinitis.