Irene Rubio
University of Valencia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Irene Rubio.
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences | 2016
Deven Patel; Preeti Shah; Aditi P Kotdawala; Javier Herrero; Irene Rubio; Manish Banker
BACKGROUND: Embryonic aneuploidy may result in miscarriage, implantation failure, or birth defects. Thus, it is clinically necessary to avoid the selection of aneuploid embryos during in vitrofertilization treatment. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify the morphokinetic differences by analyzing the development of euploid and aneuploid embryos using a time-lapse technology. We also checked the accuracy of a previously described model for selection of euploid embryos based on morphokinetics in our study population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective study of 29 cycles undergoing preimplantation genetic screening from October 2013 to April 2015 at our center. Of 253 embryos, 167 suitable for biopsy embryos were analyzed for their chromosomal status using array-comparative genome hybridization (CGH). The morphokinetic behavior of these embryos was further analyzed in embryoscope using time-lapse technology. RESULTS: Among the analyzed embryos, 41 had normal and 126 had abnormal chromosome content. No significant difference in morphokinetics was found between euploid and aneuploid embryos. The percentage of embryos with blastulation was similar in the euploid (65.85%, 27/41) and aneuploid (60.31%, 76/126) embryos (P = 0.76). Although hard to define, majority of the chromosomal defects might be due to meiotic errors. On applying embryo selection model from Basile et al., embryos falling within optimal ranges for time to division to 5 cells (t5), time period of the third cell cycle (CC3), and time from 2 cell division to 5 cell division (t5-t2) exhibited greater proportion of normal embryos than those falling outside the optimal ranges (28.6%, 25.9%, and 26.7% vs. 17.5%, 20.8%, and 14.3%). CONCLUSION: Keeping a track of time interval between two stages can help us recognize aneuploid embryos at an earlier stage and prevent their selection of transfer. However, it cannot be used as a substitute for array CGH to select euploid embryos for transfer.
Fertility and Sterility | 2012
Marcos Meseguer; Irene Rubio; María Cruz; Natalia Basile; Julian Marcos; Antonio Requena
Fertility and Sterility | 2012
Irene Rubio; Reidun Kuhlmann; Inge Errebo Agerholm; John Kirk; Javier Herrero; María-José Escribá; José Bellver; Marcos Meseguer
Fertility and Sterility | 2014
Irene Rubio; Arancha Galán; Zaloa Larreategui; Fernando Ayerdi; José Bellver; Javier Herrero; Marcos Meseguer
Fertility and Sterility | 2016
J. Aguilar; Irene Rubio; Elkin Muñoz; A. Pellicer; Marcos Meseguer
Fertility and Sterility | 2014
Sonia Fernandez Perez; Irene Rubio; Belén Aparicio; D. Beltrán; V. García-Láez; Marcos Meseguer
Fertility and Sterility | 2011
J. Herrero; A. Tejera; N. Ramsing; Josep Lluis Romero; Irene Rubio; Marcos Meseguer
Fertility and Sterility | 2013
J. Herrero; Irene Rubio; A. Tejera; C. Vidal; Josep Lluis Romero; Marcos Meseguer
Reproductive Biomedicine Online | 2012
Arantzazu Delgado Mendive; Irene Rubio; Javier Herrero; Marcos Meseguer Escrivá
Fertility and Sterility | 2012
Irene Rubio; Javier Herrero; A. Tejera; C. Vidal; Sonia Fernandez Perez; M.M. Escrivá